Download HIST 2311 Topic Seven: Roman Empire On the morning of March 15

HIST 2311 Topic Seven: Roman Empire
On the morning of March 15, 44 B.C., JULIUS CAESAR was assassinated by several members
of the Roman Senate. This was just one month after he had declared himself dictator of the
Roman world. In the wake of his death, three men moved forward to form a new triumvirate
which would punish Caesar's assassins and then divide up the Roman world. The members
of this triumvirate consisted of Marc Antony (consul), Lepidus (high official), and Octavian
(the grandnephew of Caesar). Up to the year 37 B.C., there was relative peace in the Roman
world. Brutus and Cassius were defeated in the Battle of Philippi (42 B.C.) and Cicero,
perhaps the greatest thinker in the Roman world, had his hands and head cut off and placed
in public display in the Forum. These three men headed a republican faction against Caesar
for the simple reason that Caesar had claimed absolute power for himself. But in 37 B.C.,
stability appeared to disintegrate. Antony had married Octavian's sister but had also formed
some sort of marriage contract with Cleopatra. In 31 B.C., Antony and Cleopatra's navy was
beaten by Octavian's forces at Actium. Antony fled to Alexandria where Octavian eventually
followed. Antony committed suicide while Cleopatra took the asp.
In the wake of this decisive battle, the Battle of Actium, Octavian emerged as the sole
master of the Roman world and would rule the Roman Empire for 45 years, until his death in
A.D.14. Although his rise to power was always suspect, he succeeded in overhauling and
reforming almost every Roman institution. He also helped to establish the Roman Empire on
a much more rational basis. His reforms carried the Roman Empire for almost 200 years, and
this, the most creative period of the Roman Empire, is often called the Age of Augustus.
On January 13, 27 B.C., Octavian appeared before the Roman
Senate and laid down his supreme powers. It was at this time that
Octavian took the name of Augustus Caesar (Imperator Caesar Divi
Filius Augustus). The Senate had been purged of its dubious
members and reduced from about 1000 members to 800. The
majority of these men were solid supporters of Augustus (indeed,
they were handpicked by Augustus). Augustus proclaimed that he
had restored the Republic. The Senate voted to allow Augustus to
govern in for ten years which he gladly accepted. Despite all the
pomp and circumstance which accompanied this, the plain fact was
that he was now left with total control of the armed forces of the
Roman State. The Senate took an oath of allegiance to Augustus as emperor (imperator). In
23 B.C., Augustus was granted the authority of tribune (tribunicia potestas) for life. This
enabled him to have ultimate veto power and also to deal directly with the people.
The reforms of Augustus as well as his long life contributed to the idea that he was
something more than human -- he was certainly a hero, the Romans thought, perhaps even a
god. His reforms of the system of Roman government were important. He compromised
between inherited traditions and a changed economic, political and social reality. In other
words, he effectively mixed both the old and the new, a typically Roman idea. His system of
reforms save the Empire, but in the long run spelled the death of representative institutions.
Augustus never did away with these institutions, he merely united them under one person -himself. He was consul, tribune, chief priest of the civic religion and the public censor. He
ruled by personal prestige: he was princeps (first citizen among equals) and pater patriae
(father of the country). He was the supreme ruler, the king, the emperor and his authority
(auctoritas) was absolute.
He immediately faced four distinct problems. (1) He had to secure the northern frontiers
against attack. Civil wars had involved the army and had led to a weakening of the frontiers
of the border. (2) The army had grown too large and unmanageable: the army formed a
state within a state. (3) The urban population and small farmers had to be helped. (4) His
new government had to promote confidence among the senatorial class which was
necessary for efficient rule.
His reform of the administration of the provinces hit all these problems at once. First, the
frontiers were consolidated. His policy was to extend the northern frontier (the Rhine and
Danube Rivers) no further and to bolster what remained. Augustus reduced the size of the
army and the remainder were stationed in the provinces. He provided a cash payment to
those soldiers who had served for more than twenty years, thus securing their loyalty to the
Roman state and not to their generals. The army was removed from Rome where they were
tempted to meddle in civic affairs. He also created the Praetorian Guard, an elite corps of
9000 men charged with defending him. Stationed at Rome, the members of the Guard were
from Italy only, and received higher pay than soldiers in the Roman legions. The Guard
served as the personal bodyguard to Augustus but a few decades after the death of
Augustus, they often played a decisive role in the "selection" of new emperors. In the home
provinces near Rome, Augustus entrusted the senatorial class. He made the senatorial
aristocracy feel as if they still had power. They were, of course, losing it quickly. The reforms
of Augustus stabilized the economy and made the Mediterranean basin nearly self-sufficient.
But there were flaws which soon became apparent. Economically, the system was based on
a network of mutually interdependent areas. If one fell, it could hurt the whole Empire. The
system of slave labor was also showing signs of deterioration. Slaves had no desire to work.
Furthermore, the number of slaves had been reduced since many slave families had won
their freedom by manumission. As a result, manpower was drained off the farms.
In general, the Augustan system worked fairly well, in fact, it lasted more than 200 years. It
provided a material and political base of cultural achievement that rivaled the Greeks under
Pericles. This is the age of the Pax Romana, the Roman Peace. But the Augustan reforms
were not limited to political, economic and social issues alone. They also envisioned a
fundamental change in Roman culture itself. Augustus tried to turn Rome into a world
capital and taught the Romans to identify their destiny with the destiny of all mankind. They
were the chosen people who would bring peace and stability to a violent and changing
world.
A Digression: Of Greeks and Romans
With their tunnel vision in place, the Greeks had thought of the world of the city-state. The
Romans came to think of the entire world as a city in which everyman might enjoy privileges
of citizenship. Unlike the Greeks, the Romans never thought that the good life was possible
only within the life of the polis. For Rome, one's virtue could be cultivated anywhere and at
anytime. In other words, the Romans did not see their public and private roles as necessarily
conflicting with one another. The height of one's wisdom was to know one's duty and then
to do it, and not to pursue self-interest. In other words, the Romans were natural Stoics.
It has been said that Roman culture was only a translation of Greek cultural values in terms
of the needs of the Roman Empire. Such a statement denies the genius of Rome and also
accepts the greatness of Greek cultural values. This leaves us with a question: "how was it
that the Romans succeeded in envisioning a world civilization?" True, the Romans did find
much in Greek culture that fit their own preconceived notions of the world process. But
Greek culture was obsessed with the problem of individual self-cultivation. The Greeks did
not really describe anything which went beyond the polis. Roman civilization on the other
hand was based on man's ability to provide the good life for himself and others. The Romans
looked forward to a world composed of the most diverse elements and people. The Empire
would be synonymous with the world.
In general, the Romans were optimistic about life whereas the Greeks were not. The Greeks
saw chaos in the world. The Romans experienced that same chaos but held out for the
possibility of bringing order out of that chaos. Roman culture was based on optimism and
faith in man's ability to cope with the existence of chaos. This is a very positive and
optimistic idea. It exudes the confidence and courage to face the unknown. The Romans
managed to translate their thought into actions. The proof is, quite simply, the Roman
Empire itself. The Greeks were perhaps too intellectual. They were more concerned with
extolling the virtues of the citizens of the polis. They were perhaps narrow minded since
they did not see their world as a totality, as did the Romans. I suppose we could say that the
Romans had a heightened awareness of human history whereas the Greeks only conceived
of a Greek history.
After Augustus
When Augustus died in A.D.14, a crisis of leadership of the Empire developed. This crisis
arose basically because the senatorial class were unsure of their political power. Indeed,
they could control administration of the State, but true power lay in the hands of Augustus
alone. After the death of Augustus, Tiberius (42 B.C.-A.D. 37; emperor, A.D. 14-37), the
stepson of Augustus, became the leader of the state. A rather dark, vengeful, complex man
and a soldier by training, Tiberius was suspicious of the Senate who were equally befuddled
by his behavior. The reign of Tiberius eventually became a tyranny -- in the wake of his
paranoia, dozens of members of the Senate and equestrians were denounced and killed. The
reign of Tiberius ended the illusion that the Republic had been restored and revealed some
of the future of the Principiate.
Imperial power fell to the megalomaniac, Gaius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (12-41;
emperor, 37-41) the third child of Augustus' adopted grandson, Germanicus, and Augustus'
granddaughter, Agrippina. Gaius accompanied his parents on military campaigns and was
shown to the troops wearing a miniature soldier's outfit, including a sandal called caliga,
hence the nickname, Caligula. According to the will of Tiberius, Caligula and his cousin
Tiberius Gemellus were joint heirs. Caligula ordered Gemellus killed and with the support of
the Praetorian Prefect, he declared Tiberius will void on the grounds of insanity. Caligula
than accepted the powers of the Principiate. His popularity was great but within four years
he was assassinated by discontented members of his bodyguard.
Ancient and modern sources would agree -- Caligula was insane. The stories of Caligula's
insanity are well known: his excessive cruelty, incestuous relationships with his sisters (he
deified Drusilla), laughable military campaigns (picking up sea shells as the "spoils of war")
and the plan to make his horse a consul. Of course, we could easily argue that Caligula was
merely pushing the limits of the imperial cult, something already established by Augustus.
Following the murder of Caligula, Claudius (10 BC-A.D. 54; emperor, 41-54) emerged as ruler.
According to one story, the Praetorian Guard found Claudius hiding behind a curtain after
Caligula's brutal murder. They picked him up and declared him their emperor. He was the
son of Drusus Claudius Nero, the son of Augustus's wife Livia, and Antonia, the daughter of
Marc Antony. Claudius was plagued from the start because of his many defects: he drooled,
stuttered, limped and was constantly ill. The historian Suetonius wrote in his Twelve Caesars,
that "Claudius' mother, Antonia, often called him 'a monster: a man whom nature had not
finished but had merely begun'." Claudius was secluded from public view throughout his
childhood and youth.
At the death of Caligula there was talk among the Senate of restoring the Republic. Of
course, various Senators proposed that they be chosen as princeps. In the end, it was the
Praetorian Guard who had made the decision and Claudius, the army's choice, became
Rome's fourth emperor. This is important since it shows how the Romans had not
established a line of succession. Caligula had been murdered by his body guard and Claudius
became princeps only through the support of the army.
Claudius' ambitious wife, Agrippina, seeing that the time was ripe to dispose of Claudius, had
him poisoned with a treated mushroom. Claudius was dying but needed to be poisoned
again. With Claudius finally out of the way, the princeps fell to his adopted son, Lucius
Domitus Ahenobarbus, known as Nero Claudius Caesar, or Nero (37-68; emperor, 54-68).
Since Nero was an adolescent, the early part of his reign was characterized by direction from
Agrippina and the Roman philosopher and statesman Seneca (the Younger). Nero eventually
married Poppaea in 62. In the same year Nero passed a series of treason laws directed at
anyone he perceived to be a threat. In 64, a great fire destroyed much of Rome -- the legend
is that Nero had to destroy Rome in order to rebuild it.
Nero had many enemies and there was more than one assassination plot against him. A
number of the conspirators were forced to commit suicide, including Lucan, Petronious and
Seneca. Continued unrest within the Senate and the provinces gave his enemies the chance
to depose him but in early June 68, Nero committed suicide. He was the last of the JulioClaudians.
Control of the Roman Empire between Augustus and Nero was based on military tyranny. In
68, Rome had four emperors, three who died early, leaving the title of princeps to Titus
Flavius Vespasianus or Vespasian (9-79; emperor, 69-79). Vespasian restored the peace and
brought stability to the Empire following the rule of Nero. He also established the Flavian
dynasty as the legitimate successor to the throne. As an emperor Vespasian was sound in his
financial dealings and restored the city and government of Rome following a series of civil
wars early in his reign. Unlike the four previous emperors, Vespasian died peacefully in his
sleep. His administration of the Roman Empire anticipated the period of the "Five Good
Emperors."
Despite the general fear that he would become the next Nero, it was Titus Flavius
Vespasianus, or Titus (30-81; emperor, 79-81), the eldest son of Vespasian and brother of
Domitian, who became emperor. Titus played an important role in the assault of Jerusalem
(70), an assault which showed him to be a capable, but not an innovative military leader.
Tales of Titus' violence as a praetorian prefect and his sexual debauchery preceded his
office. Despite his reputation, Titus was a capable ruler. Huge amounts of money poured
into Rome to finance an extensive building program. The Flavian Amphitheater, or Coliseum,
was built during his reign. In A.D. 79, Vesuvius erupted, destroying Pompeii and
Herculaneum, and killing almost 4000. Titus spent huge sums of money to relieve the
hardships of the people affected. Known for his generosity, Titus died in 81, after only
twenty-six months in office.
Titus was succeeded by his younger brother, Titus Flavius Domitianus, or Domitian (51-96;
emperor, 81-96). Titus and Domitian were not close (they were separated in age by 21 years)
and so while Titus was dying, Domitian left for the praetorian camp where he was hailed as
emperor. As emperor, Domitian produced a financially sound administration. After a series
of catastrophes in Rome (the great fires of 64 and 80, and the civil wars of 68-69), Domitian
erected, restored or completed more than fifty public buildings. In 85, Domitian made
himself censor perpetuus, censor for life, and thus took charge of the conduct and morals of
Rome. He was not much of a military figure and his campaigns were minor at best. It was
instead his domestic policies that earned him some respects in the early years of his rule. It is
odd that while Domitian was severe in his attempt to curb moral and political corruption,
should turn out to be a murderer himself. The catalog of his crimes is long and he inflicted
death on young and old alike. He called himself "Lord God" and spoke of himself as divine.
There were numerous conspirators and in 96 he was murdered in a palace coup. The people
did not mourn the loss of Domitian. That same day Domitian was succeeded by Nerva.
It was Edward Gibbon who called the period 96-180 the era of the "Five Good Emperors." It
was during the reign of Marcus Cocceius Nerva, or Nerva (30-98; emperor, 96-98), that the
practice of an emperor adopting an heir rather than selecting a blood relative first began. He
took an oath before the Senate that he would stop executing its members and also released
those who had been imprisoned by Domitian. Although keen on maintaining a balanced
budget, Nerva also built granaries, repaired the Coliseum and continued the Flavian program
of road building and repair. Under pressure from the Praetorian Guard, Nerva announced
the adoption of Trajan as his successor. In 98, Nerva suffered a stroke and died.
Marcus Ulpius Traianius, or Trajan (53-117; emperor, 98-117), was born near Seville in Spain.
Having won distinction in the Parthian and German campaigns, he was made praetor and
consul (91), was adopted by Nerva (97) as his successor and became sole ruler of Rome in
98. His long and fierce campaign against the Dacians brought the Dacian province into the
Roman sphere. Although he spent most of his time away from Rome, back at the capital he
used a network of informers bound to protect his policies and his person. His internal
administration was sound and he also kept up a policy of public works across the Empire.
Perhaps the most ambitious military man since Julius Caesar, Trajan suffered a stroke and
died in 117. The day after his death, Hadrian was announced as Trajan's successor.
Publius Aeliues Hadrienus, or Hadrian (76-138; emperor, 117-138) was born in Rome but
possibly in Italica, near Seville. In his youth, he was called "The Greekling," owing to his
fondness for Hellenic culture. Hadrian was a military man and like many other young
Romans, joined the army when he was a teenager. Rising through the ranks, he eventually
became a well-respected general. Hadrian was also known for building a wall to defend
Roman Britain from the Scottish Picts to the North. He reorganized the army, ruled justly
and was a lover of the arts. In 138, Hadrian adopted as heir a Senator, T. Aurelius Fulvus
Boionius Arrius Antoninus, who was to be known as the Emperor Antoninus Pius. Ill and
depressed, Hadrian then retired from public life and died after taking poison.
The long reign of Antoninus Pious (86-161; emperor, 138-161) has been described as the calm
before the storm, a storm that would plague the reign of his successor, Marcus Aurelius.
Antoninus' economic policy was conservative and yet supported a program of public works.
He also promised to complete the work begun under Hadrian. He was a man of simple,
benevolent and temperate character and tried to fulfill his role as pater patriae. The
persecution of Christians was partly stayed by his mild measures, and Justin Martyr's
Apologia was received by him with favor. The epithet Pious was conferred upon him for his
defense of Hadrian's memory. By his much-loved yet worthless wife Faustina he had four
children, one of whom married Marcus Aurelius, his adopted son and successor.
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (121-180; emperor, 161-180), the last of the Five Good Emperors,
was one of the noblest figures of the ancient world. From 140, when he was made consul, to
the death of Pious in 161, he discharged his public duties with the utmost fidelity. At the
same time he devoted himself to the study of law and philosophy, especially Stoicism. The
generally peaceful Marcus Aurelius was throughout his reign destined to suffer from
constant wars and although in Asia, in Britain and on the Rhine the barbarians were held in
check, a permanent peace was never secured. Rome was suffering from pestilence and
earthquakes when the imperial colleagues led the Roman armies against the barbarians
along the Danube. He was summoned to the East by a rebellion of the governor, Avidius
Cassius who died at the hands of an assassin before Aurelius had arrived. Meanwhile, his
wife Faustina died in an obscure village at the foot of Mount Taurus. On his way back to
Rome, Aurelius visited Lower Egypt and Greece. At Athens he founded chairs in philosophy
in each of the four main branches -- Platonic, Stoic, Peripatetic and Epicurean. By the end of
176 he reached Italy, and the following year Germany, where new disturbances had broken
out. Victory again followed him but at last, his health gave way and he died at either Vienna
or at Sirmium in Pannonia in 180.
A philosopher as well as emperor and general, Aurelius wrote the
MEDITATIONS, a work which reveals the loneliness of his soul. However,
as a Stoic thinker of the highest caliber, he also shows us that he did not
allow himself to be saddened by his experience of life. His death was a
national calamity and he became almost an object of worship to the
citizens of the empire -- it is said that after his death Aurelius appeared in
dreams as did the saints of the Christian era. Aurelius twice persecuted
the Christians -- he undoubtedly believed Christian fanaticism and
superstition were dangerous to philosophy, society and the empire.
Under the Five Good Emperors the frontiers of the Empire were consolidated to the north
and to the east. The bureaucracy was opened up to all social classes, trade and agriculture
flourished, and there was much public building. Although things did seem to be getting
better, there were problems on the horizon. Barbarian pressures were mounting. There was
a considerable decline in the slave population and the army was no longer large enough to
maintain the frontier. As a result, Marcus Aurelius, the last of the Five Great Emperors, spent
most of his time defending the frontier and as a result, spent very little time in Rome.
Following his death in 180, the imperial office passed to his nineteen year old son and
another madman, Marcus Aurelius Commodus Antoninus (161-192, emperor, 180-192).
Commodus represented a throwback to Nero and Caligula. He began to dress like the god
Hercules, wearing lion skins and carrying a club. He took part in gladiatorial contests and
also fought wild beasts in the amphitheater. He also declared that his own age be
henceforth called the "Golden Age." Commodus was finally strangled in his bath by
Narcissus, an athlete, thus bringing an end to the Antonine dynasty. It was Publius Helvius
Pertinax (126-193; emperor, 192-193), whose brief reign of only three months, followed that
of Commodus. He was a well-educated man and taught grammar for awhile before he
entered a military career. The Praetorian Guard planned a coup but Pertinax learned of the
plot and stopped it. Military discipline continued to break down. Pertinax confronted his
troops and was killed.
The reign of Commodus had been anything but settled so the Roman Empire was fortunate
that the imperial office fell to Lucius Septimius Severus (145-211; emperor, 193-211). Although
he held a positive reputation, his control of the empire was joined by bloodshed. He rejected
the Senate and based his power on the army alone. Henceforth, soldiers' pay was increased,
they could marry while in service and they had greater opportunities for promotion. His first
act was to disband the Praetorian Guard -- he then selected a larger Praetorian Guard drawn
from the provinces. He bought off the people with grain doles and circuses in the Coliseum.
At his death in 211, Severus had created a larger and more expensive army, something that
foreshadowed the highly bureaucratic government of the later Empire.
The rest of the 3rd century could be written off as the history of a political mess. No good
leader could be found to fill the Roman office of emperor. Between 211 and 300, there were
more than seventy emperors who vied for control of the Imperial office. Meanwhile, the
frontiers disintegrated, the barbarian tribes began to move into the territory of the Empire
itself, cities were sacked or declared their independence from Rome, slaves rebelled on the
greatest states, and civic responsibility disappeared. Order was eventually restored but this
order was not consistent with the ideas of the Republic nor was a consistent with the aims
of Augustus Caesar. The Pax Romana was clearly at an end.
The reforms of Diocletian (c.236-305; emperor, 284-305), who brought to an end the period
of "Military Anarchy" (235-284) and Constantine the Great (c.272-337; emperor, 324-337),
who made Christianity the favored religion of the empire, completed the process of
transformation that the 3rd century made necessary to sustain the Empire. What began as
an attempt to bring peace and prosperity ended as a program to insure the very survival of
the Roman Empire. Diocletian tried to bring some kind of emperor-worship to Rome but by
this time the Empire could see the end. The citizens were now called upon to sacrifice
everything -- wealth, property, lives -- for the preservation of the Roman State. And
Diocletian demanded that he be called Dominus noster (Lord and Master), rather than
princeps or imperator. More and more barbarian tribes settled in the Empire and were
invited to do so as long as they paid taxes and supplied soldiers to the army. By 300, more
than seventy-five percent of the army was composed of German soldiers. The army itself
was barbarized and turned into an instrument of sheer oppression. In such a situation it
soon became apparent that the Germans distrusted the Romans and the Romans hated the
Germans in acts of blatant racism.
The Roman Empire became divided geographically and socially between East and West.
Those Romans that did not join with the barbarians, showed their alienation from Rome by
adopting a world-view opposed to everything that was Roman: Christianity. By the year 300,
Christianity had become the largest single religion in the Roman world. It was openly hostile
to Greek humanism as much as it was to Roman institutions.
It was therefore a master stroke, on the part of Constantine the Great to make Christianity
the favored religion within the Roman world in the 330s. Christianity taught that the
principal virtue was charity and service to the religious community. It also made the quest
for salvation a communal quest, and therefore excluded no one. Furthermore, Christianity
offered its benefits to all -- it could appeal to everyone. And of course, Christianity possessed
a well-organized administrative body, the clergy. It was the clergy who carried out
democratic elections and represented a chain of authority from priest to bishop. Christianity
could have been a state within a state but it did not aspire to political power. What
Constantine did was to weld the exceptionally stable religious community onto the Roman
state and then use it to develop a new conception of imperial office. But this was no mere
exploitation of the clergy or Christianity. Constantine's adoption of Christianity signaled the
bankruptcy of classical humanism as a political creed, that secular characteristic of the
Roman Republic and the Augustan Age. Christianity, therefore, signaled the abandonment
of the religion of culture for what I would like to suggest became a new culture of religion.
Steven Kreis