Download From 2003-2008, there were 387 reported cases of avian flu

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Eradication of infectious diseases wikipedia , lookup

Middle East respiratory syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Epidemiology of HIV/AIDS wikipedia , lookup

Swine influenza wikipedia , lookup

Influenza wikipedia , lookup

Influenza A virus wikipedia , lookup

Influenza pandemic wikipedia , lookup

Syndemic wikipedia , lookup

Pandemic wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Rutgers Model United Nations 2008
Delegation: France
Committee: World Health Organization
Topic: Pandemic Preparedness
Delegate: Aaron Himelman and Ishan Thakore
EAST BRUNSWICK HIGH SCHOOL
2
From 2003-2008, there were 387 reported cases of avian flu worldwide, with
scores more awaiting transfer from poultry and livestock (“Cumulative Number” 1).
However, avian flu is only one of sixteen recognized pandemics by the Epidemic and
Pandemic Alert and Response (EPR) branch of the World Health Organization (WHO),
with each occurring in more frequent numbers (“WHO Global Influenza Preparedness
Plan” 5). In today's modern age, pandemics spread faster to more diverse populations, via
air travel and increased mass transit. Pandemics like Ebola, a virus, have devastated
African nations like the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with every 2 out of 3 cases
resulting in deaths, and no confirmation of the actual source. (“Ebola Outbreak
Chronology” 1). France is deeply concerned with the pandemic issue, and is committed
to encouraging further preparedness. In order to combat such a global issue, France
wishes to take an international framework approach, with global standards that can meet
individual state needs.
A pandemic develops when a nation is unable to contain a disease or illness
before it spreads to a wide area, like with avian flu in Southeast Asia (“Alert and
Response Operations” 1). Pandemics also spread rapidly; the SARS epidemic spread to
forty countries within ten days, and had a mortality rate of up to 18.2% (Apostolopoulos
174). With the BBC estimating 150 million deaths from an influenza outbreak, other
epidemics have the possibility of worldwide devastation (Garoon 1). Factors such as
political indifference, inadequate health infrastructure and limited resources all contribute
to pandemics, explaining the resurgence of diseases like polio and plague in Sudan and
Asia (Apostolopoulos 169). Moreover, fear caused by infectious contaminations can
“underscore the crucial role of rapidly mobilized health information systems”
3
(Apostolopoulos 169), preventing the WHO or other national health groups from acting.
For instance, China prohibited the WHO from entering the country during the initial
outbreak of SARS, and even prevented access to patients when the WHO did inspect the
region (Apostolopoulos 170). Furthermore, prioritizing vaccinations or medication in
developing countries contributes to the spread of disease, as not enough of the population
is vaccinated. For example, 69.9% of Africans infected with HIV do not receive proper
drugs or treatment, continuing the spread of the HIV virus (Hunter 45). In terms of
developed nations, pandemics have the capability to ravage economies and businesses, by
infecting workers and even preventing tourism. SARS infected 438 people in Canada,
killing 43, and costing the economy $419 million, according to the Tourism Commission
(Osterholm 2). Even international flights between Hong Kong and the United States
dipped 69%, resulting in millions of lost profit (Osterholm 2). All of these events
occurred only within a relatively short time frame, highlighting the impact a yearlong
epidemic would have (2). Other epidemics have had similar effects in Africa, such as
HIV/AIDS. 1.5 million died in 2007 from the virus in Africa alone (“Worldwide HIV”
1), causing food output to decrease by almost twenty percent in Zimbabwe, as well as
worker layoffs (“The Impact” 1). The WHO is imperative to curbing this global issue,
before it reaches catastrophic levels.
As an active participant of health development, France is well experienced on the
issue of pandemic preparedness. France currently has a three part plan designed to
“protect the French mainland and overseas population as well as protect citizens abroad”
(“National Plan” 4). Using the basic outline from the WHO Influenza Pandemic Report
of 2005, France details what should be done in each of the six phases outlined in the
4
WHO report (“National Plan”4). These six phases are a part of the WHO’s system of
identifying the level of an influenza pandemic, with level six entailing a worldwide
pandemic (“WHO Global Influenza Preparedness Plan” 6). One of the most important
strategies in France’s plan is delaying the peak of pandemic activity, allowing for enough
vaccines and anti-viral drugs to be produced in order to minimize the deadly effects
(“National Plan” 4). France also hopes to stretch the peak of pandemic contamination out
so that enough resources, such as hospital care, are never overburdened for the public use
(“National Plan”5). Moreover, France has begun to develop pre-pandemic vaccines
against the growing threat of avian flu, although pandemic vaccines can only be
efficiently created when the strength of the actual outbreak is known (“National Plan”11).
In preparation against the avian flu, France has conducted mock drills to train its public
officials how to act (Sector 1). During a recent 2006 drill, the drug company SanofiPasteur was also on standby, ready to produce the Tamiflu vaccine (Sector 2). France’s
current policies have been successful so far, with no significant epidemic cases since
2006, according to the WHO (“EPR:France” 1). Furthermore, France continues to
cooperate fully with the WHO, with 31 collaborating centers designed to assist the WHO
(“EPR:France” 1). After reinforcing partnerships with CIRAD, Institut Pasteur, and the
IRD, France has committed a total of €39.5 to this cause (Chippaux 1). France also
continually strengthens the activities of these independent scientific organizations in its
developing African and Asian allies, donating a total of €12.5 million to the Pasteur
Institutes in these continents (Chippaux 1).
In order to become effectively prepared when a pandemic of great
magnitude occurs, France believes that the cooperation of the international community is
5
needed, yielding when necessary to the authority of the WHO. Currently only thirty-six
UN member states have developed pandemic preparedness plans (Garoon 1). However,
France believes that each individual nation must develop a concrete national action plan
to prevent a breakout and effectively react to one based on its own specific needs. These
plans, with actions relating to the six pandemic stages, should be held up to the
requirements of the WHO Influenza Pandemic Report of 2005, and should be completed
by the year 2012.
In specifically dealing with the issue of prioritizing vaccinations in the case of a
pandemic, France believes that those most at risk of developing complications are in need
of the first vaccinations. According to the Institut Pasteur, two main objectives are to
“combat morbidity” and to “fight mortality,” (Chippaux 1) meaning that measures must
first be taken to limit the spread of the illness, while those most likely to die have the
ethical right to be vaccinated first (Chippaux 1). As a result, priority is encouraged to be
given to those most in need of a vaccination. These include medical and public health
workers that are dealing with the pandemic, in addition to those aged sixty-five and over,
pregnant women, and infants aged six to twenty-three months (“HHS Pandemic Influenza
Plan” 62).
France would look to both stall the spread of the pandemic and lengthen out its
peak, creating a circumstance in which not everyone is in need of supplies at the same
time. By noting this, France recognizes that the vaccines must be first sent into the area of
the pandemic outbreak, donating the majority of its resources into ‘the hot zone’ to
ensure that the pandemic does not reach its own borders. However, France recognizes
that not every nation is economically equipped to handle a pandemic, and thus
6
recommends that 0.7% of the country’s GDP be donated to the WHO’s efforts in case of
a pandemic. The fact of the matter is that viruses and bacteria recognize no political
boundaries, and that the rich cannot avoid from the problem, as clearly evidenced in
history through the Black Plague. Even before a pandemic breaks out, however, each
nation must be prepared to react and must allow for transparency.
Moreover, newer pandemics like avian flu and SARS demand the need for more
stringent sanitary and import regulations. As a precaution, chickens and livestock grown
in Southeast Asia should pass more stringent tests by customs officials in those countries.
Also, the WHO recommends that countries perform mock drills involving the distribution
of Tamiflu, personal protective gear and vaccinations in the case of an outbreak. Such a
drill, like the one conducted in France, was also effectively performed as Panstop 2007 in
the South Pacific (“Rapid Containment…” 1).
Furthermore, pandemic treatment and handling in the case of an outbreak should
be eventually handled by the WHO, serving as an unbiased third-party to help resolve the
issue. Being an international organization, the WHO can pool together resources from
member nations to help treat a region, rather than that one country attempting to solve the
crisis individually. Such an issue occurred in China during the SARS pandemic, in which
WHO intervention “might have been able to prevent its spread to the rest of the world,"
according to Executive Director of Communicable Diseases, David L. Heymann (Bork
1). Such international cooperation is needed to forgo a crisis, allowing a more
experienced organization to handle the situation.
The issue of pandemic preparedness has become a major global concern,
prompting the need for international cooperation. Regardless of political ties or
7
geographical boundaries, a pandemic can strike at any time, resulting in casualties and
devastating effects. However, with the proper planning and the assistance of the WHO, a
global crisis can be quickly and effectively handled, or safely averted. France is fully
committed to working with other nations to solve this most pressing issue.
8
Works Consulted
Apostolopoulos, Yorghos, ed. Population Mobility and Infectious Disease. New York:
Springer, 2007.
Bork, Ellen. “China's SARS Problem, and Ours.” The Daily Standard. 4 March 2004.
Online. Internet. <http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles20
/000/000/002/504jlpnl.asp> October 28 2008.
Chippaux, A. “Populations of persons who must be vaccinated with priority.” Institut
Pasteur. 1998. Online. Internet. <
http://www.springerlink.com/content/urgk28n145321708/fulltext.pdf?page=1> 28
October 2008.
"Cumulative Number of Avian Influenza Reported to WHO." WHO. 10 September
2008.<http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/countrycases_table_2008_09_10/
en/index.html> 18 October 2005.
"Ebola Haemorhaggic Fever." WHO. 2008.
<http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/index.html> 18 October 2005.
"Ebola Outbreak Chronology." WHO. 2008.
<http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/index1.html> 18 October 2005.
"EPR: France." World Health Organization. 2008.
<http://www.who.int/csr/don/archive/country/ fra/en/> 18 October 2008.
Garoon, Joshua, and Duggan, Patrick. "Discourses of Disease, Discourses of Disadvantage:
A Critical Analysis of National Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Plans." Science Direct.
24 July 2008. <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VBF4T2GWKK-1&_user=526750&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort
=d&view=c&_version=1&
urlVersion=0&_userid=526750&md5=4729495c0d28c6646442b8977c9ffaac> 18 Oct.
2008.
"Global HIV/AIDS Estimates, End 0f 2007." Avert. July 2008.
<http://www.avert.org/worldstats.htm> 18 Oct. 2008.
Hunter, Susan S. Black Death: AIDS in Africa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
Kalichman, Seth C., ed. Positive Prevention. New York: Plenum Publishers, 2005.
Kioko, Urbauns M., and Enos H.N. Njeru. Funding the Fight Against HIV/AIDS. Nairobi,
Kenya: Institute of Policy Analysis and Research, 2004.
9
"National Plan for the Prevention and Control." General Secretariat for National Defence.
Online.
Internet.http://www.who.int/csr/disease/nfluenza/plan_national_version_anglaise.pdf 17
October 2008.
Odundo, Paul, and Wasunna Owino. HIV/AIDS Scourge in Nyanza Province. Nairobi,
Kenya: Institute of Policy Analysis and Research, 2004.
Offit, Paul A. Vaccinated. New York: Harper Collins, 2007.
Onyango, Christoper H., and Enos H.N. Njeru. Combatting HIV/AIDS in Kenya. Nairobi,
Kenya: Institute of Policy Analysis and Research, 2004.
Osterholm, Michael T. “Preparing for the next pandemic.”Foreign Affairs. August 2005.
Online. Internet. <http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20050701faessay84402-p10/michael-tosterholm/preparing-for-the-next-pandemic.html> 20 October 2008.
“Rapid-containment exercise will test plans to avert an influenza pandemic.” WHO Regional
Office for the West Pacific. 28 March 2007. Online. Internet.
<http://www.wpro.who.int/media_centre/press_releases/pr_20070328_Panstop.htm> 20
October 2008.
Rice, Allan, ed. A History of Aids: Social Work in Hospitals: A Daring Response to an
Epidemic. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press, 2003.
Sector, Charlotte. "Mock Bird Flu Drill Tests French Town's Preparedness, and Gets a Good
Grade." ABC News. 24 Feb. 2006.
<http://abcnews.go.com/International/AvianFlu/story?id=1658123&page=1> 18 October
2008.
"Ten Things You Need To Know About Pandemic Influenza." World Health Organization.
Online. Internet. <http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/pandemic10things/en/> 17
October 2008
"The Impact of HIV/AIDS in Africa." Avert. Online. Internet. October 2008.
<http://www.avert.org/aidsimpact.htm> 18 October 2008.
“What is a Pandemic?" Web MD. 2005. Online. Internet. <http://www.webmd.com/coldand-flu/features/what-is-pandemic?page=2> 18 October 2008.
WHO/CDS/2005.28 "WHO Outbreak Communication Guidelines." World Health
Organization. November 2005.
WHO/CDS/CSR/GIP/2005.5 "WHO global influenza preparedness plan". World Health
Organization. November 2005.
10
WHO/CDS/CSR/EPH/2002.16. "Preparedness for the Deliberate Use of Biological Agents."
World Health Organization. May 2002.
WHO/CDS/CSR/GAR/2002.4. "Global Crises, Global Solution." World Health
Organization. October 2002.
WHO/CDS/EPR/2007.6. "Infection Prevention and Control of Epidemic and Pandemic
Prone Acute Respiratory Diseases in Health Care." World Health Organization. June
2007.
WHO/CDS/EPR/GIP/2006.5 "WHO Influenza Pandemic Task Force: Report of the First
Meeting" World Health Organization. 26 September 2006.
WHO/CDS/EPR/GIP/2007.2 "Ethical Considerations in Developing a Public Health
Response to Pandemic Influenza." World Health Organization. October 2007.
WHO/CDS/EPR/LYO/2006.4 "Strengthening National Capacities for Epidemic
Preparedness and Response." World Health Organization. May 2006.
WHO/IVB/06.13 "Global Pandemic Influenza Action Plan to Increase Vaccine Supply."
World Health Organization. September 2006.