Download Method sheet lines magnetism

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Geomagnetic storm wikipedia , lookup

Electromotive force wikipedia , lookup

Magnetometer wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup

Friction-plate electromagnetic couplings wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical descriptions of the electromagnetic field wikipedia , lookup

Earth's magnetic field wikipedia , lookup

Magnetotactic bacteria wikipedia , lookup

Giant magnetoresistance wikipedia , lookup

Magnetotellurics wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnetic field wikipedia , lookup

Electrical resistance and conductance wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Compass wikipedia , lookup

Magnetochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Ferrofluid wikipedia , lookup

Magnet wikipedia , lookup

Magnetohydrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Force between magnets wikipedia , lookup

Magnetoreception wikipedia , lookup

History of electromagnetic theory wikipedia , lookup

Multiferroics wikipedia , lookup

Magnetism wikipedia , lookup

Superconducting magnet wikipedia , lookup

Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup

Skin effect wikipedia , lookup

History of electrochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnet wikipedia , lookup

History of geomagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Method sheet lines magnetism\ oersterd experiment.
Experimenters imagined that, if an electric current flowed along a straight wire, then the magnetic field it produced would be in the same direction.
So they placed their compass needles at right angles to the wire, thinking they would be deflected by the current so that they became parallel to
the wire. They saw no effect because, as Oersted was to show, the magnetic field produced is at right angles to the wire. So preconceptions
prevented earlier experimenters from seeing the effect. (Note that the available equipment –voltaic piles, typically – would only produce a small
current, so the effect would in any case have been very weak.)
Experiment: Set a compass pointing north-south; place a wire above it, lying east-west. Connect to a 1.5 V cell. There should be no effect.
Preconceptions (existing ideas) may make it difficult to make progress.
Oersted’s thinking
Oersted imagined an electric current ‘struggling’ through a wire. As it flowed, this ‘conflict’ gave rise to heat and light, which radiated away from
the wire. Might it not also result in a magnetic field, radiating away?
One idea leads to another, which can then be tested.
Question: How would you draw magnetic field lines to represent Oersted’s idea?
Answer: Radiating out from the wire.
Question: How should a compass needle behave, if this idea is correct?
Answer: It might be expected to point radially to the wire. Try it, and the magnet does not do this. So magnetic field lines do not radiate out from
a current-carrying wire.
Oersted’s experiment
Oersted was giving a public demonstration of the connection between electricity, heat and light. He connected a voltaic pile to a platinum wire and
showed that it became hot and glowed.
As he lectured, his idea about a connection between electricity and magnetism resurfaced in his mind. He had a compass to hand (for other
experiments he intended to demonstrate), so he decided to test his idea there and then.
Experiment: Set up the previous experiment, but with the wire lying north-south above the compass, parallel to the compass needle. Switch on –
the needle rotates to lie east-west.
Oersted reversed the current; the needle moved the other way.
The effect observed by Oersted and his audience was small; no-one was very impressed. Oersted was aware that other scientists had been
distracted by similar elusive phenomena, and it was three months before he spent any more time on his discovery.
Scientists are often working at the limits of sensitivity of their instruments. A technique may have to be refined greatly before a phenomenon can
be observed reliably.
What Oersted did next
Oersted showed that the magnetic field around a current-carrying wire was circular; i.e. the lines of force are circles, centred on the wire.
Experiment: Magnetic field due to an electric current in a wire
He went on to show that a thicker wire produced a greater effect. He also showed that materials placed between wire and compass had no effect.
Question: Why?
Answer: Thicker wire has less resistance, so greater current. Non-magnetic materials have no effect on a magnetic field.
In July 1820, he sent a 4-page paper outlining his results, in Latin, to several scientific journals.
Scientists are expected to share their findings as soon as possible, by publication in journals. In 1820, Latin was a common (shared) language
which allowed scientists of different nationalities to understand each other’s work.
Ampere read Oersted’s report, and in the space of a week had repeated the observations and developed a mathematical theory describing how
the magnetic field depends on the strength of the current and the distance from the wire.
In principle, scientific results are checked by other scientists who repeat the experiments, to see if they get the same results.
Oersted had observed and described an experimental phenomenon. Ampere took it further by writing a mathematical equation to account for it.
Question: Oersted had shown that an electric current has a magnetic field around it. What practical applications were developed from this idea?
Answer: Electromagnets, motors, dynamos, transformers, etc.
More about Oersted
Oersted founded the Danish Society for the Dissemination of Natural Science, a society aimed at presenting scientific ideas to the general public.
Oersted also played a key role in the founding of the Technical University of Denmark, with the intention of improving the scientific basis of
engineering.
Many scientists seek to share their work with a wider audience. They may also seek to share the technological benefits of their discoveries. He
described 1820, the year of his great discovery, as the happiest year of his life.
Scientists can get great pleasure from their work.
In 1802, an Italian lawyer called Gian Domenico Romagnosi published an account of an observation similar to Oersted’s. However, his article
appeared in a newspaper and it wasn’t taken up by the scientific community. Romagnosi doesn’t appear to have followed up his preliminary
findings.
There are many examples of ‘prior claims’ in the history of science. In practice, the acknowledgement usually goes to the person who publishes a
careful, detailed and repeatable account of their observations, at a time when other scientists are ready for the idea, and in a place it will be read
and taken seriously.
STEP 1- Fix thick insulated wire onto the wooden stand with tape as shown in the picture.
STEP 2- place the magnets beside the insulated copper wire a shown in the picture.
STEP 3- Cut the connecting wire into two pieces and bare its ends.
STEP 4- Connect the connecting wire to the thick insulated copper wire and battery cell. What do
you observe ?? how the needles change direction.
Once you exchange the points of connecting wire from cathode to anode of battery cell what does
happen??
*we do not provide scissors with this kit.