* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Evaluation of `Oh What A Lovely War`
Theatre of France wikipedia , lookup
Stage lighting wikipedia , lookup
English Renaissance theatre wikipedia , lookup
Improvisational theatre wikipedia , lookup
Antitheatricality wikipedia , lookup
Theatre of the Oppressed wikipedia , lookup
Augustan drama wikipedia , lookup
Medieval theatre wikipedia , lookup
Evaluation of ‘Oh What A Lovely War’ The author Joan Littlewood wanted to bring the British population’s attention to the denial of the tragic deaths of the soldiers in the First World War and the power of the propaganda. This was shown beautifully in the production at the Tobacco factory on the November 19th, performed by the Bristol Old Vic Theatre School. The performance of the play ‘Oh What a Lovely War’ at the Tobacco factory was very different to what I expected. My initial thoughts of the play when we had a pre-performance workshop was that it was a comedy with timeless jokes throughout, and that even the more serious parts were supposed to be funny. However I was pleasantly surprised when the war scenes were performed with such melancholy that it brought the whole meaning of the play forward. The contrast between the pantomime and the deaths of the soldiers out at the trenches really engaged the audience with the play’s meaning and the author’s intentions. The production was performed in a converted tobacco factory that is now a very successful theatre. The stage was a thrust stage with audience at three sides. The connexion between the actors and the audience is very important in Littlewood’s plays; the stage played a large role in enhancing this relationship. Throughout most of the performance there were lights on the audience so the actors could see the audience and interact with us more. There were also copies of the original propaganda posters hanging on the walls around the audience. The posters made me feel a part of the performance and involved with the action. The use of space was very effective. The stage was set out like a traditional 1914’s stage with coloured lights hanging between two columns. However in parts of the performance one forgot it was a play on a stage but a form of entertainment. Three of the entrances and exits came through the audience’s space, also enhancing the relationship between the actors and the audience. The entrances on the actual stage were not on the side but at the back, so the actors came through the back with the more dramatic entrances and exits. A lot of the characters are based on stereotypes, this adds to the panto feel of the play because the characters are exaggerated. The costumes were also stereotypical to the character. The Russian generals all had Shapkas and were played by quite tall and broad men. However the French generals had little moustaches and were played very flamboyantly. The women dressed like show girls from the First World War, to show the period that the play is set in. When a scene was set in Britain, the costumes were colourful, however when there was a scene in the trenches, the costumes were dark, uniform colours. There was also a contrast with the lighting. When there was a trench scene, the lighting would be dappled and low, so the actors’ faces couldn’t be seen properly. There were spotlights of greens, blues and white that overlapped each other. In the ‘home ground’ scenes the lighting was a warm wash so there wasn’t that same feeling of mystery. A lot of songs were composed in the First World War to raise hopes and to keep the morale of the public going. So the songs, that frequently appeared, enabled the audience to feel the underlying desperation and true sadness the characters are feeling in this war. The idea that the propaganda covered up the truth and masked what was really going on came through from the stereotypical characters and costume. The make-up was also overdone to emphasize this point. The live music performances just added to the atmosphere in a way that pre-recorded songs wouldn’t. Only the sound effects had been programmed. The acting was very energetic and engaging. There wasn’t a big cast so many of the actors played two or more of the characters, However it wasn’t confusing because each character had a different way of moving and use of voice. A lot of the time the actors used accents to convey where the character lived. In the scene where the soldiers are being taught how to load a gun, the actor who plays the major does an exaggerated walk and kept on looking at the audience with a piercing eye. The characters were like moving caricatures. There was a lot of dancing as well as singing, this also added to the style of the piece. Overall I think it was a fun and energetic play to watch. The contrast and tension that was created throughout the play was very good. However I didn’t understand a lot of the jokes, partly because they were jokes about people I had never heard of. So maybe it would have been helpful if I had done some research beforehand on the First World War. I went away thinking about all the men that had died in the First World War, and how their deaths had been played down, just to boost moral. Facts were shouted out in intervals throughout the play that just seem to hit me round the face. Before I had watched this play I thought the First World was boring and didn’t understand why it was such a big deal. However I feel the play had enlightened me about the subject and I am very grateful for that. by Lola Russell