* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Independent species in independent niches behave neutrally: a
Survey
Document related concepts
Introduced species wikipedia , lookup
Source–sink dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Fauna of Africa wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup
Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup
Unified neutral theory of biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Oikos 120: 964–965, 2011 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19880.x © 2011 The Author. Oikos © 2011 Nordic Society Oikos Subject Editor: Stefano Allesina. Accepted 6 April 2011 Independent species in independent niches behave neutrally: a response Ryan A. Chisholm and S. W. Pacala R. A. Chisholm ([email protected]), Smithsonian Tropical Res. Inst., MRC0580/12, Unit 9100, Box 0948, DPO AA 34002/9998, USA. – S. W. Pacala, Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. In a recent paper (Chisholm and Pacala 2010), we analyzed a hybrid niche-neutral model with strong niche structure: the landscape is divided into several discrete niches; each species is assigned a single niche preference; species in their preferred niche competitively exclude those from other niches; and species with the same preferred niche behave neutrally with respect to one another (i.e. neutral zero-sum dynamics occur within a niche). The model is spatially implicit and consists of a local community that is semi-isolated from a much larger metacommunity. We proved analytically that, in the limit of high diversity, the species abundance distribution resulting from this model looks neutral. This result suggests that neutral drift is the mechanism responsible for generating statistical patterns of species abundances in ecosystems even when a degree of niche structure is present. Haegeman and Etienne (2011) analyzed a similar model to ours but without the zero-sum constraint. They observed that in their model species in different niches are independent of one other and therefore behave neutrally. Haegeman and Etienne make two main claims based on their analysis. The first is that the results of our model (Chisholm and Pacala 2010) are also attributable to the independence of species in different niches. The second is that simple niche models such as these cannot be used to draw conclusions about the prevalence of niche or neutral processes in ecological systems. We address these two claims in turn. With regards to the first claim, it is certainly true that in the model of Haegeman and Etienne (2011), species in different niches are completely independent and therefore behave neutrally. However, the difference between their model and ours, as noted already, is that we impose a zerosum constraint whereas they do not. As a consequence, we observe niche-structured patterns at low diversity and neutral patterns at high diversity, whereas they always observe neutral patterns. The reason for our observation of niche-structured patterns is that the species in different niches in our model are fundamentally not independent, but instead competitively exclude one another from their 964 respective niches and thereby constrain one another’s abundances. The model of Haegeman and Etienne (2011) does shed light, mathematically, on why we obtain our asymptotic result in the limit of high diversity. But the absence of the zero-sum constraint makes their model less biologically realistic (in a tropical forest tree community, there is a strong zero-sum constraint because individuals are effectively competing for space), prevents nonneutral patterns from emerging at any level of diversity, and therefore prevents one from exploring any transition from niche-structured to neutral pattern (Chisholm and Pacala 2011). The second claim that Haegeman and Etienne (2011) make is that simple niche models such as these cannot be used to draw conclusions about the prevalence of niche or neutral processes in ecological systems. The point of our paper was not to draw conclusions about the prevalence of niche structure. We know from empirical evidence that niche structure is prevalent in different ecosystems across the planet. We stated explicitly in our paper that observations of neutral species abundance distributions ‘cannot be used to infer an absence of niche structure’, at least in highdiversity systems (Chisholm and Pacala 2010). The point of our paper was to investigate the robustness of the neutral species abundance distribution to niche structure. For the case of strong non-overlapping niche structure, we provided a rigorous proof of previous conjectures that neutral and niche models generate similar patterns of diversity. Of course, our model represents a simplified view of reality and Haegeman and Etienne’s (2011) model is even more simplified. An important extension of our model can be understood by imagining a continuum of niche strength, with different models sitting at different points on the continuum. Niche strength can be measured as the extent to which individuals in their preferred niche exclude individuals from other niches. The neutral model sits at one extreme end of this continuum, where niche strength is zero (no competitive exclusion). Our model was specifically designed to be at the opposite end of this continuum, where niche strength is infinite (complete competitive exclusion from non-preferred niches). We have proven that species abundance distributions at both ends of this continuum look neutral (Chisholm and Pacala 2010), and simulations suggest that species abundance distributions at intermediate points of the continuum also look neutral (Purves and Pacala 2005). Thus, we conjecture that neutral drift is the predominant mechanism responsible for observed patterns of species abundance distributions in high diversity systems at all points along the continuum. However, in the absence of an analytical proof it does, of course, remain conceivable that some other mechanism intervenes at intermediate levels of niche strength. We agree with Haegeman and Etienne that the analysis of more realistic models such as these, while challenging, is a priority for future research. References Chisholm, R. A. and Pacala, S. W. 2010. Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent species abundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities. – Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107: 15821–15825. Chisholm, R. A. and Pacala, S. W. 2011. Theory predicts a rapid transition from niche-structured to neutral biodiversity patterns across a speciation-rate gradient. – Theor. Ecol. 4: 195–200. Haegeman, B. and Etienne, R. S. 2011. Independent species in independent niches behave neutrally. – Oikos 120: 961–963. Purves, D. W. and Pacala, S. W. 2005. Ecological drift in nichestructured communities: neutral pattern does not imply neutral process. – In: Burslem, D. et al. (eds), Biotic interactions in the tropics: their role in the maintenance of species diversity. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 107–138. 965