* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download TALK - ECM-UB
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Perturbation theory wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Asymptotic safety in quantum gravity wikipedia , lookup
Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Higgs mechanism wikipedia , lookup
Two-body Dirac equations wikipedia , lookup
Noether's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Topological quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Scale invariance wikipedia , lookup
AdS/CFT correspondence wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Leading order gravitational backreactions in de Sitter spacetime Bojan Losic Theoretical Physics Institute University of Alberta IRGAC 2006, Barcelona July 14, 2006 Outline • • • • • • Probing backreactions in a simple arena Perturbation ansatz Linearization instability Quantum anomalies De Sitter group invariance of fluctuations Conclusions July 14, 2006 Based on gr-qc/0604122 (B.L. and W.G. Unruh) de Sitter spacetime perturbations •Trivial (constant) scalar field with constant potential •Perturbation ansatz: ↔ de Sitter Spacetime Leading order is second order Overbar denotes `background` Background metric (closed) slicing • Similarly perturb the scalar field Constant July 14, 2006 Quantum perturbation Higher order equations •Stress energy is quadratic in field → leading contribution in de Sitter spacetime at second order •Defining the monomials (assuming Leibniz rule) Background covariant derivative we may write the leading order stress-energy as Background D’Alembertian •Leading order Einstein equations are of the form July 14, 2006 Linearization instability I • Vary the Bianchi identity around the de Sitter background Lambda constant, so drops out of variation to obtain • Now vary the Bianchi identity times a Killing vector of the de Sitter background: ∫ ∫ De Sitter Killing vector Integrate both sides and use Gauss’ theorem July 14, 2006 Zero if Killing eqn. holds Variation of Christoffel symbols Linearization stability II • The integral is independent of hypersurface and variation of metric. Thus get • However we want the fluctuations to obey the Einstein equations • Thus we get an integral constraint on the scalar field fluctuations: Linearization stability (LS) condition July 14, 2006 What are the consequences of this constraint? Anomalies in the LS conditions • Hollands, Wald, and others have worked out a notion of local and covariant nonlinear (interacting) quantum fields in curved space-time • One can redefine products of fields consistent with locality and covariance in their sense: Curvature scalar, [length]-2 Recall Curvature scalar, [length]-4 • We show that the anomalies present in the LS conditions for de Sitter are of the form Normal Killing ~ 0 July 14, 2006 A number Normal component of Killing vector component is odd over space Volume measure of hypersurface LS conditions and SO(4,1) symmetry • It turns out that the LS conditions form a Lie algebra LS condition holds Structure constants No quantum anomalies in commutator • But it also turns out that the Killing vectors form the same algebra The same structure constants • The LS conditions demand that all physical states are SO(4,1) invariant July 14, 2006 Problems with de Sitter invariant states • Allen showed no SO(4,1) invariant states for massless scalar field: Massless scalar field action with zero mode • How are dynamics possible with such symmetric states? • How do we understand the flat (Minkowski) limit? July 14, 2006 Conclusion • Linearization insatbilities in de Sitter spacetime imply nontrivial constraints on the quantum states of a scalar field in de Sitter spacetime. •It turns out that the quantum states of a scalar field in de Sitter spacetime must, if consistently coupled to gravity to leading order, be de Sitter invariant (and not covariant!). July 14, 2006 July 14, 2006 July 14, 2006 July 14, 2006 July 14, 2006 July 14, 2006