Download Contesting Sociology as a Science

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Traian Herseni wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Contesting Sociology
as a Science
Interpretivism



Interpretivists argue that
society cannot be studied
in the same way as objects
in natural science
Drawing from Weber’s
concept of VERSTEHEN or
empathetic understanding,
Sociologists should place
themselves in the position
of others
In this way they can
understand social
behaviour from the
viewpoint of the individual.
Subjectivity




One of the difficulties with
this approach is that
verstehen explanations are
subjective.
Different researchers may
interpret the same event in
different ways.
Some sociologists would
claim that the only way to
study aspects of society is
to immerse oneself into it
The objectivity of natural
science then appears
irrelevant to developing
understanding
Thomas Khun – the structure of
scientific revolutions



Khun’s work on the
development of natural
science has been related to
the development of social
science
Khun states that science does
not change gradually but goes
through scientific revolutions
where a “paradigm shift”
takes place.
A paradigm is a way of
viewing the world through the
theories and methodology of
science in a particular period
of time
Paradigm shifts






A scientific revolution occurs when a contradiction
in the old paradigm becomes apparent
One way of thinking is swept away by another
E.g. the discovery by Copernicus that the Earth
revolves around the Sun – not the other way
round
“Normal” science then returns until the next
scientific revolution
Some sociologists would use Khun’s idea, arguing
that it justifies Sociology as a science
If normal science is dependent on paradigm shifts
then sociology may be more like normal science.
The Social context of science




Khun’s work suggests that
it may not be possible to
achieve an objective truth
As paradigms shift, the
truth shifts.
This position has been
developed to argue that
science is not necessarily
the objective pursuit of
knowledge
Science studied within a
social context, may lead to
harm
The Realist view




Scientific enquiry demands the investigation of
observable phenomena
Realists would argue that explanations in natural
science and social science must involve an
understanding of underlying and unobservable
processes
Science must go under the surface and beyond
the obvious
Much of sociology aims to uncover underlying
structures and mechanisms in society such as
patriarchy or labelling in order to understand
society and human behaviour
Summary






There are those who say that Sociology is like the natural
sciences (POSITIVISTS)
There are those who say it could be a science (POPPER)
Those who say it cannot be a science (INTERPRETIVISTS)
And those who analyse the nature of science and compare
it to Sociology (KHUN & REALISTS)
If science is the use of systematic methods of empirical
research and the logical assessment of theories, then
Sociology is scientific
However, Sociology cannot be neutral, because it influences
the very behaviour it attempts to explain