Download Mechanisms of Aspartimide Formation: The Effects of Protecting

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Biochemistry wikipedia, lookup

Nucleic acid analogue wikipedia, lookup

Proteolysis wikipedia, lookup

Fatty acid metabolism wikipedia, lookup

Genetic code wikipedia, lookup

Amino acid synthesis wikipedia, lookup

Fatty acid synthesis wikipedia, lookup

Metalloprotein wikipedia, lookup

Peptide synthesis wikipedia, lookup

Metabolism wikipedia, lookup

Biosynthesis wikipedia, lookup

Oligonucleotide synthesis wikipedia, lookup

Citric acid cycle wikipedia, lookup

Hepoxilin wikipedia, lookup

Butyric acid wikipedia, lookup

Specialized pro-resolving mediators wikipedia, lookup

15-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid wikipedia, lookup

Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides wikipedia, lookup

Transcript
the rate of byproduct formation increases more sharply with the increased acid concentration, indicating
an AAcl mechanism. More importantly, the acylium ion intermediate of the
glutamyl residue has been identified in
this and other studies.
In analogy to the glutamic acid-rate
profile, the aspartimide formation in
low HF concentrations is expected to
be AAc2. As the acid concentration increases, the rate of byproduct formation changes at HF >75%. However, it
is not clear whether there is a change of
mechanism from AAc2 to AAC 1. Contrary to the case with glutamic acid, the
corresponding aspartyl acylium ion has
never been identified. Further, data obtained from other studies do not support the existence of an acylium ion intermediate ( 40). For example, Olah
(29) found that: ( l) a- or P-amino
acids, including aspartic acid, did not
give acylium ions in much stronger
acids than HF; for example, super acids
at 45° C. Under the same conditions yamino acids, such as glutamic acid, exhibited acylium ion production. 2)
Aspartimide formation is sequence dependent, while side reactions of
glutamyl peptides do not appear to be
sequence dependent. (3) Side reactions
of glutamyl peptides occur at slower
rates than the cyclization to aspartimide. These data argue against
acylium ion formation from aspartic
acid. The difference may be caused
by the greater charge separation of
the aspartyl acylium ion (+NH3CH(COOH)CH2CO+) as compared to
the
glutamyl
acylium
ion
(+NH3CH(COOH)CH2CH2CO+) (29,
30). Since our model tetrapeptide contains both the a- and P-amino acid
linkage of aspartyl sequence, we conclude that acylium ion formation is not
likely to occur. To clarify the situation,
we reacted the [3-aspartyl peptide (4)
under conditions similar to other model
tetrapeptides (Table 5). It was anticipated that in HF, aspartimide could
only be formed by an AAc2 mechanism, in which either the a-benzyl ester
or the protonated a-benzyl ester a-carboxyl group was protonated. The formation of an acylium ion has not been
observed with a-carboxylic acids or
esters. Indeed, aspartimide was obtained from 14. These results, together
with literature data, appear to diminish
the likelihood of the AAc l mechanism
for aspartimide formation in strong
acid. An alternative explanation is
needed for the rate change of aspartimide formation in concentrated HF
solutions. A plausible explanation is
that aspartimide formation remains
AAc2 under these conditions, and the
rate change reflects the stability of the
dication 23 in the rate-determining step
Figure 12). Further, there is an increased tendency towards protonation
of the side chain carboxyl as the acidity
increases. Finally, it is clear from our
results that 0-protonation of the AspGly amide bond predominates over Nprotonation. Attack on the amide
nitrogen is only possible with the
former.
Our results support the conclusion
the cyclohexyl ester is a suitable
protecting group for the synthesis of
0
II
~-C-OR
I
·-(Glu)-NH-CH-C-NH-CHz-C-(Tiir)-·
It
0
II
0
22
'Vu
0
II
cu-e
I
z
\
··-NH-CH-~-N--···
0
24
"'"'
Figure 12. Proposed AAc2 mechanism for aspartimide formation in strong acids.
Vol. 1. No. 1 (1988)
peptidcs containing aspartic acid. It
minimizes both base and acid catalyzed
aspartimide formation by either the
BAc2 or AAc2 mechanisms. From the
results of this work, the mechanism of
this side reaction is better understood
and can be better controlled. Furthermore. this study has provided insight
into the role of protecting groups in
aspartimide formation. It suggests a
protecting group strategy for peptide
synthesis which will minimize the formation of aspartimide.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by
PHS grant DKOI260 and CA36544.
We thank Ms. Dolores Wilson and
Mrs. Rita Taylor for expert secretarial
work.
We dedicate this paper to Professor
H. Yajima on the occasion of his retirement from Kyoto University.
REFERENCES
I.Baba, T., H. Sugiyama and S. Seto. 1973.
Rearrangement of a- to (}-aspartyl peptide
with anhydrous hydrogen fluoride. Chern.
Phann. Bull. (Tokyo)21:207-209.
2.Battersby, A. and J.C. Robinson. 1955.
Studies on specific fission of peptide links.
Part I. The rearrangement of aspartyl and
glutamyl peptides. J. Am. Chern. Soc. 77:259269.
3.Benoiton, L. 1962. Synthesis of isoasparagine
from ~-benzyl aspartate. Can J. Chern. 40:
570-571.
4.Berhard, S.A, A. Berger, H.H. Carter, E.
Katchalski, M. Sela andY. Shalitin. 1962.
Co-operative effects of functional groups in
peptides.l. Aspartyl-serine derivatives. J. Am.
Chern. Soc. 84:2421-2434.
5.Blaha, K. and J, Rudinger. 1965. Rates offission of some substituted benzyloxycarbonylglycines and two heterocyclic analogues
with HBr in acetic acid. Coli. Czech. Chern.
Comm. 30:585-598.
6.Biake, J. 1979. Use of cydopentyl ester protection for aspartic acid to reduce base catalyzed
succinimide formation in solid-phase peptide
synthesis. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 13:418425.
7.Bodanszky, M. and J.H. Kwei. 1978. Side
reactions in peptide synthesis. Int. J. Pept.
Protein Res./2:69-74.
8.Bodanszky, M. and S. Natarajan. 1975. Side
reaction in peptide synthesis. II. Formation of
succinimide derivatives from aspartyl residues. J. Org. Chern. 40:2495-2499.
9.Bodanszky, M., J.C. Tolle, S.S. Deshmane
and A. Bodanszky. 1978. Side reactions in
peptide synthesis. VI. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res.
12:57-68.
lO.Engelhard, M. and R.B. Merrifield. 1978.
Tyrosine protecting groups: Minimization of