* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download View Finals - National Agri
Product planning wikipedia , lookup
Food marketing wikipedia , lookup
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
Affiliate marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing research wikipedia , lookup
Sports marketing wikipedia , lookup
Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup
Multi-level marketing wikipedia , lookup
Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup
Target market wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup
Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup
Young Marketers Compete in National Competition A team of students from [university name] has (won, finished in [place]) at this year’s national marketing competition hosted by the National Agri-Marketing Association (NAMA). The competition was held April 13 – 14 in Kansas City, Missouri. “Every team participating in the marketing competition does an excellent job of developing a thorough marketing plan, a process that takes most teams the majority of the academic year to complete,” said Randy Happel, NAMA Careers Committee Chair. “Those teams that advanced to the finals truly did exceptional work on their projects. Each year I am amazed by the talent of these teams. They’re truly an awesome group that we hope will continue in Ag marketing as they begin their professional careers.” The [university] team had XX students involved with this year’s project to market [project description]. The team spent the last several months conducting market research, writing the marketing plan and developing a presentation. The top six marketing teams this year were: Finalists (in alpha order), California Polytechnic State University – San Luis Obispo, Illinois State University and the North Dakota State University. Third place, Kansas State University; Second place, University of Saskatchewan; and First Place, University of Wisconsin – Madison. Students decide on a project and develop a plan to successfully bring the product or service to the marketplace. In developing their marketing plan, students follow the same practices and principles used by today’s marketing professionals. Teams submit a written plan summary prior to the competition and then make a formal presentation of their marketing plan to a panel of judges at the competition. The judges’ panel consists of marketing and agribusiness professionals. Overall, 30 student NAMA chapters participated in the marketing competition. The competition is part of the National Agri-Marketing Association’s annual conference and trade show. Over 400 student members attended the conference. “The marketing competition is a great learning tool for these students and provides them with some really good practical experience,” said Happel. “Our congratulations to [university name] for their exceptional work and success at the competition this year.” ###