Download View Finals - National Agri

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Product planning wikipedia , lookup

Food marketing wikipedia , lookup

Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup

Affiliate marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup

Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup

Target audience wikipedia , lookup

Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup

Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing research wikipedia , lookup

Sports marketing wikipedia , lookup

Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup

Multi-level marketing wikipedia , lookup

Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup

Target market wikipedia , lookup

Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup

Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup

Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup

Marketing wikipedia , lookup

Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup

Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup

Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup

Green marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup

Street marketing wikipedia , lookup

Global marketing wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Young Marketers Compete in National Competition
A team of students from [university name] has (won, finished in [place]) at this year’s national
marketing competition hosted by the National Agri-Marketing Association (NAMA). The
competition was held April 13 – 14 in Kansas City, Missouri.
“Every team participating in the marketing competition does an excellent job of developing a
thorough marketing plan, a process that takes most teams the majority of the academic year to
complete,” said Randy Happel, NAMA Careers Committee Chair. “Those teams that advanced to
the finals truly did exceptional work on their projects. Each year I am amazed by the talent of these
teams. They’re truly an awesome group that we hope will continue in Ag marketing as they begin
their professional careers.”
The [university] team had XX students involved with this year’s project to market [project
description]. The team spent the last several months conducting market research, writing the
marketing plan and developing a presentation.
The top six marketing teams this year were: Finalists (in alpha order), California Polytechnic State
University – San Luis Obispo, Illinois State University and the North Dakota State University.
Third place, Kansas State University; Second place, University of Saskatchewan; and First Place,
University of Wisconsin – Madison.
Students decide on a project and develop a plan to successfully bring the product or service to the
marketplace. In developing their marketing plan, students follow the same practices and principles
used by today’s marketing professionals. Teams submit a written plan summary prior to the
competition and then make a formal presentation of their marketing plan to a panel of judges at the
competition. The judges’ panel consists of marketing and agribusiness professionals.
Overall, 30 student NAMA chapters participated in the marketing competition. The competition is
part of the National Agri-Marketing Association’s annual conference and trade show. Over 400
student members attended the conference.
“The marketing competition is a great learning tool for these students and provides them with
some really good practical experience,” said Happel. “Our congratulations to [university name]
for their exceptional work and success at the competition this year.”
###