* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download DÆ Upgrade - FSU High Energy Physics
Survey
Document related concepts
Electrostatics wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Electric charge wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
History of optics wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear physics wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental interaction wikipedia , lookup
Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Central Scintillator Forward Scintillator + New Electronics, Trig, DAQ New Solenoid, Tracking System Si, SciFi,Preshowers Shielding Forward Mini-drift chambers D Upgrade Luminosity and cross section Luminosity is a measure of the beam intensity (particles per area per second) ( L~1031/cm2/s ) “integrated luminosity” is a measure of the amount of data collected (e.g. ~100 pb-1) cross section s is measure of effective interaction area, proportional to the probability that a given process will occur. 1 barn = 10-24 cm2 1 pb = 10-12 b = 10-36 cm2 = 10- 40 m2 interaction rate: dn / dt L s n s Ldt Standard Model A theoretical model of interactions of elementary particles Symmetry: – SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) “Matter particles” – quarks up, down, charm,strange, top bottom – leptons electron, muon, tau, neutrinos “Force particles” – Gauge Bosons (electromagnetic force) W, Z (weak, elctromagnetic) g gluons (strong force) Higgs boson – spontaneous symmetry breaking of SU(2) – mass Standard Model Brief History of the Standard Model Late 1920’s - early 1930’s: Dirac, Heisenberg, Pauli, & others extend Maxwell’s theory of EM to include Special Relativity & QM (QED) - but it only works to lowest order! 1933: Fermi introduces 1st theory of weak interactions, analogous to QED, to explain b decay. 1935: Yukawa predicts the pion as carrier of a new, strong force to explain recently observed hadronic resonances. 1937: muon is observed in cosmic rays – first mistaken for Yukawa’s particle 1938: heavy W as mediator of weak interactions? (Klein) 1947: pion is observed in cosmic rays 1949: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga introduce renormalization into QED - most accurate theory to date! 1954: Yang and Mills develop Gauge Theories 1950’s - early 1960’s: more than 100 hadronic “resonances” have been observed ! 1962 two neutrinos! 1964: Gell-Mann & Zweig propose a scheme whereby resonances are interpreted as composites of 3 “quarks”. (up, down, strange) Brief History of the Standard Model (continued) 1970: Glashow, Iliopoulos, Maiani: 4th quark (charm) explains suppression of K decay into 1964-1967:spontaneous symmetry breaking (Higgs, Kibble) 1967: Weinberg & Salam propose a unified Gauge Theory of electroweak interactions, introducing the W,Z as force carriers and the Higgs field to provide the symmetry breaking mechanism. 1967: deep inelastic scattering shows “Bjorken scaling” 1969: “parton” picture (Feynman, Bjorken) 1971-1972: Gauge theories are renormalizable (t’Hooft, Veltman, Lee, Zinn-Justin..) 1972: high pt pions observed at the CERN ISR 1973: Gell-Mann & Fritzsch propose that quarks are held together by a Gauge-Field whose quanta, gluons, mediate the strong force Quantum Chromodynamics 1973: “neutral currents” observed (Gargamelle bubble chamber at CERN) Brief History of the Standard Model (continued) 1975: J/ interpreted as cc bound state (“charmonium”) 1974: J/ discovered at BNL/SLAC; 1976: t lepton discovered at SLAC 1977: discovered at Fermilab in 1977, interpreted as bb bound state (“bottomonium”) 3rd generation 1979: gluon “observed” at DESY 1982: direct evidence for jets in hadron hadron interactions at CERN (pp collider) 1983: W, Z observed at CERN (pp- collider built for that purpose) 1995: top quark found at Fermilab (D0, CDF) 1999: indications for “neutrino oscillations” (SuperKamiokande experiment) 2000: direct evidence for tau neutrino (t) at Fermilab (DONUT experiment) 2003: Higgs particle observed at Fermilab (?????) Cathode ray history 1855 German inventor Heinrich Geissler develops mercury pump - produces first good vacuum tubes, these tubes, as modified by Sir William Crookes, become the first to produce cathode rays, leading eventually to the discovery of the electron (and a bit farther down the road to television). 1858 Julius Plücker shows that cathode rays bend under the influence of a magnet suggesting that they are connected in some way; this leads in 1897 to discovery that cathode rays are composed of electrons. 1865 H. Sprengel improves the Geissler vacuum pump. Plücker uses Geissler tubes to show that at lower pressure, the Faraday dark space grows larger. He also finds that there is an extended glow on the walls of the tube and that this glow is affected by an external magnetic field. 1869 J.W. Hittorf finds that a solid body put in front of the cathode cuts off the glow from the walls of the tube. 1871 C.F. Varley is first to publish suggestion that cathode rays are composed of particles. Crookes proposes that they are molecules that have picked up a negative charge from the cathode and are repelled by it. 1874 George Johnstone Stoney estimates the charge of the then unknown electron to be about 10-20 coulomb, close to the modern value of 1.6021892 x 10-19 coulomb. (He used the Faraday constant (total electric charge per mole of univalent atoms) divided by Avogadro's Number. James Clerk Maxwell had recognized this method soon after Faraday had published, but he did not accept the idea that electricity is composed of particles.) Stoney also proposes the name "electrine" for the unit of charge on a hydrogen ion. In 1891, he changes the name to "electron." 1876 Eugen Goldstein shows that the radiation in a vacuum tube produced when an electric current is forced through the tube starts at the cathode; Goldstein introduces the term cathode ray to describe the 1883 Heinrich Hertz shows that cathode rays are not deflected by electrically charged metal plates, which would seem to indicate (incorrectly) that cathode rays cannot be charged particles. 1886 Eugen Goldstein observes that a cathoderay tube produces, in addition to the cathode ray, radiation that travels in the opposite direction - away from the anode; these rays are called canal rays because of holes (canals) bored in the cathode; later these will be found to be ions that have had electrons stripped in producing the cathode ray. 1890 Arthur Schuster calculates the ratio of charge to mass of the particles making up cathode rays (today known as electrons) by measuring the magnetic deflection of cathode rays. Joseph John (J.J.) Thomson first becomes interested in the discharge of electricity through a gas a low pressure, that is to say, cathode rays. 1892 Heinrich Hertz who has concluded (incorrectly) that cathode rays must be some form of wave, shows that the rays can penetrate thin foils of metal, which he takes to support the wave hypothesis. Philipp von Lenard develops a cathode-ray tube with a thin aluminum window that permits the rays to escape, allowing the rays to be studied in the open air. 1894 J.J. Thomson announces that he has found that the velocity of cathode rays is much lower than that of light. He obtained the value of 1.9 x 107 cm/sec, as compared to the value 3.0 x 1010 cm/sec for light. This was in response to the prediction by Lenard that cathode rays would move with the velocity of light. However, by 1897, he distrusts this measurement. Special Note: At this time there was great rivalry between German and British researchers. As concerning the nature of the cathode ray, the Germans tended to the explanation that cathode rays were a wave (like In fact, J.J. Thomson will be awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1906 for proving the electron is a particle and his son, George Paget Thomson, will be awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1937 for showing that the electron is a wave. 1895 Jean-Baptiste Perrin shows that cathode rays deposit a negative electric charge where they impact, refuting Hertz's concept of cathode rays as waves and showing they are particles. 1896 Pieter P. Zeeman discovers that spectral lines of gases placed in a magnetic field are split, a phenomenon call the Zeeman effect; Hendrik Antoon Lorentz explains this effect by assuming that light is produced by the motion of charged particles in the atom. Lorentz uses Zeeman's observations of the behavior of light in magnetic field to calculate the charge to mass ratio of the electron in an atom, a year before electrons are discovered and 15 years before it is known that electron are constituents 1869: Johann Hittorf (1824-1914) (Münster) – determined that discharge in a vacuum tube was accomplished by the emission of rays ( named “glow rays” by him, later termed “cathode rays”) capable of casting a shadow of an opaque body on the wall of the tube. – rays seemed to travel in straight lines and produce a fluorescent glow where they passed through the glass. – Rays deflected by magnetic field 1870’s: William Crookes (1832-1919) (London): – detailed investigation of discharges; – Confirms Hittorf’s findings about deflection in magnetic field – Concludes that rays consist of particles carrying negative charge 1886 - 1887: Heinrich Hertz (1857-1894) (Karlsruhe) – Built apparatus to generate and detect electromagnetic waves predicted by Maxwell’s theory High voltage induction coil to cause spark discharge between two pieces of brass; once spark forms conducting path between two brass conductors charge oscillated back and forth, emitting e.m. radiation Circular copper wire with spark gap used as receiver; presence of oscillating charge in receiver signaled by spark across the spark gap – Experiment successful – – detected radiation up to 50 ft away – Established that radiation had properties reminiscent of light: was reflected and refracted as expected, could be polarized, speed = speed of light 1887: Heinrich Hertz: – Unexpected new observation: when receiver spark gap is shielded from light of transmitter spark, the maximum spark-length became smaller – Further investigation showed: Glass effectively shielded the spark Quartz did not Use of quartz prism to break up light into wavelength components find that wavelength which makes little spark more powerful was in the UV Hertz’ conclusion: “I confine myself at present to communicating the results obtained, without attempting any theory respecting the manner in which the observed phenomena are brought about” 1888: Wilhelm Hallwachs (1859-1922) (Dresden) – Performs experiment to elucidate effect observed by Hertz: Clean circular plate of Zn mounted on insulating stand; plate connected by wire to gold leaf electroscope Electroscope charged with negative charge – stays charged for a while; but if Zn plate illuminated with UV light, electroscope loses charge quickly Electroscope charged with positive charge: UV light has no influence on speed of charge leakage. – But still no explanation – Calls effect “lichtelektrische Entladung” (lightelectric discharge) 1894: Hertz and Philipp Lenard (1862-1947): – Further investigations of cathode rays using discharge tubes: Cathode rays penetrate through thin Al window ate end of tube, Cause fluorescence over distance of few centimeters in air Deflected by magnetic field No deflection by electric fields (later explained due to insufficiently good vacuum) 1895: Wilhelm Röntgen (1845-1923) (Würzburg) – Uses discharge tubes designed by Hittorf and Lenard (but improved pump) to verify Hertz’ and Lenard’s experiments – Discovers X-rays -- forget about cathode rays! Röntgen and X-rays: Hand of Anna Röntgen From Life magazine,6 April 1896 1895: Jean Perrin (1870-1942) (Paris): – Modifies cathode ray tube – adds “Faraday cup” which is connected to electrometer – Shows that cathode rays carry negative charge 1896: Hendrik A Lorentz (1853-1928) (Leiden) – Formulates atomistic interpretation of Maxwell’s equations in terms of electrically charged particles (called “ions” by him) – “Lorentz force” = force exerted by magnetic field on moving charged particles 1896: Pieter A. Zeeman (1865-1943) (Amsterdam) – Observes broadening of Na D line in magnetic field – measures broadening vs field strength 1896: Explanation of this effect by Lorentz: based on light emitted by “ions” orbiting within Na atom Calculates expected broadening f (e/m)B By comparing with measured line broadening, obtains estimate of e/m of “ions” in Na atom: e/m 107 emu/g 1011 C/kg (cf modern value of 1.76x10 C11/kg) 1897: three experiments measuring e/m, all with improved vacuum: – Emil Wiechert (1861-1928) (Königsberg) Measures e/m – value similar to that obtained by Lorentz Assuming value for charge = that of H ion, concludes that “charge carrying entity is about 2000 times smaller than H atom” Cathode rays part of atom? Study was his PhD thesis, published in obscure journal – largely ignored – Walther Kaufmann (1871-1947) (Berlin) Obtains similar value for e/m, points out discrepancy, but 1897: Joseph John Thomson (1856-1940) (Cambridge) – Improves on tube built by Perrin with Faraday cup to verify Perrin’s result of negative charge – Conclude that cathode rays are negatively charged “corpuscles” – Then designs other tube with electric deflection plates inside tube, for e/m measurement – Result for e/m in agreement with that obtained by Lorentz, Wiechert, Kaufmann, Wien – Bold conclusion: “we have in the cathode rays matter in a new state, a state in which the subdivision of matter is carried very much further than in the ordinary gaseous state: a state in which all matter... is of one and the same kind; this matter being the substance from which all the chemical elements are built up.“ 1899: J.J. Thomson: studies of photoelectric effect: – Modifies cathode ray tube: make metal surface to be exposed to light the cathode in a cathode ray tube – Finds that particles emitted due to light are the same as cathode rays (same e/m) 1902: Philipp Lenard – Studies of photoelectric effect Measured variation of energy of emitted photoelectrons with light intensity Use retarding potential to measure energy of ejected electrons: photo-current stops when retarding potential reaches Vstop Surprises: – Vstop does not depend on light intensity – energy of electrons does depend on color (frequency) of light 1905: Albert Einstein (1879-1955) (Bern) – Gives explanation of observation relating to photoelectric effect: Assume that incoming radiation consists of “light quanta” of energy hf (h = Planck’s constant, f=frequency) electrons will leave surface of metal with energy E = hf – W W = “work function” = energy necessary to get electron out of the metal When cranking up retarding voltage until current stops, the highest energy electrons must have had energy eVstop on leaving the cathode Therefore eVstop = hf – W Minimum light frequency for a given metal, that for which quantum of energy is equal to work function 1906 – 1916 Robert Millikan (1868-1963) (Chicago) – Did not accept Einstein’s explanation – Tried to disprove it by precise measurements – Result: confirmation of Einstein’s theory, measurement of h with 0.5% precision 1923: Arthur Compton (1892-1962)(St.Louis): – Observes scattering of X-rays on electrons Neutrino Particle detectors, cont’d Scintillator: – energy liberated in de-excitation and capture of ionization electrons emitted as light ``scintillation light'’ – light channeled to photomultiplier in light guide (e.g. optical fibers); – scintillating materials: certain crystals (e.g. NaI), transparent plastics with doping (fluors and wavelength shifters) proportional tube: – metallic tube with thin wire in center, filled with gas, HV between wall (-, “cathode”) and central wire (+,”anode”); strong electric field near wire; – charged particle in gas ionization electrons liberated; – electrons accelerated in electric field can liberate other electrons by ionization which in turn are accelerated and ionize “avalanche of electrons” moves to wire current pulse; current pulse amplified electronic signal: – gas is usually noble gas (e.g. argon), with some additives e.g. carbon dioxide, methane, isobutane,..) as “quenchers”; Particle detectors, cont’d multi wire proportional chamber: – contains many parallel anode wires between two cathode planes (array of prop.tubes with separating walls taken out) – operation similar to proportional tube; – cathodes can be metal strips or wires get additional position information from cathode signals. drift chamber: – field shaping wires and electrodes on wall to create very uniform electric field, and divide chamber volume into “drift cells”, each containing one anode wire; – within drift cell, electrons liberated by passage of particle move to anode wire, with avalanche multiplication near anode wire; – arrival time of pulse gives information about distance of particle from anode wire; ratio of pulses at two ends of anode wire gives position along anode wire; Particle detectors, cont’d Cherenkov detector: – measure Cherenkov light (amount and/or angle) emitted by particle going through counter volume filled with transparent gas liquid, aerogel, or solid get information about speed of particle. calorimeter: – “destructive” method of measuring a particle's energy: put enough material into particle's way to force formation of electromagnetic or hadronic shower (depending on kind of particle) – eventually particle loses all of its energy in calorimeter; – energy deposit gives measure of original particle energy. Note: many of the detectors and techniques developed for particle and nuclear physics are now being used in medicine, mostly diagnosis, but also for therapy. Particle detectors, cont’d Scintillator: – energy liberated in de-excitation and capture of ionization electrons emitted as light – “scintillation light'’ – light channeled to photomultiplier in light guide (e.g. optical fibers); – scintillating materials: certain crystals (e.g. NaI), transparent plastics with doping (fluors and wavelength shifters) proportional tube: – metallic tube with thin wire in center, filled with gas, HV between wall (-, “cathode”) and central wire (+,”anode”); strong electric field near wire; – charged particle in gas ionization electrons liberated; – electrons accelerated in electric field can liberate other electrons by ionization which in turn are accelerated and ionize “avalanche of electrons” moves to wire current pulse; current pulse amplified electronic signal: – gas is usually noble gas (e.g. argon), with some additives e.g. carbon dioxide, methane, isobutane,..) as “quenchers”; Particle detectors, cont’d multi wire proportional chamber: – contains many parallel anode wires between two cathode planes (array of prop.tubes with separating walls taken out) – operation similar to proportional tube; – cathodes can be metal strips or wires get additional position information from cathode signals. drift chamber: – field shaping wires and electrodes on wall to create very uniform electric field, and divide chamber volume into “drift cells”, each containing one anode wire; – within drift cell, electrons liberated by passage of particle move to anode wire, with avalanche multiplication near anode wire; – arrival time of pulse gives information about distance of particle from anode wire; ratio of pulses at two ends of anode wire gives position along anode wire; Particle detectors, cont’d Cherenkov detector: – measure Cherenkov light (amount and/or angle) emitted by particle going through counter volume filled with transparent gas liquid, aerogel, or solid get information about speed of particle. calorimeter: – “destructive” method of measuring a particle's energy: put enough material into particle's way to force formation of electromagnetic or hadronic shower (depending on kind of particle) – eventually particle loses all of its energy in calorimeter; – energy deposit gives measure of original particle energy. Note: many of the detectors and techniques developed for particle and nuclear physics are now being used in medicine, mostly diagnosis, but also for therapy.