* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Naturalness, Hierarchy and Physics Beyond the Standard Model
Quantum chaos wikipedia , lookup
Dark matter wikipedia , lookup
Quantum vacuum thruster wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear structure wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum gravity wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup
Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup
An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything wikipedia , lookup
ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup
Theory of everything wikipedia , lookup
Large Hadron Collider wikipedia , lookup
Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Higgs boson wikipedia , lookup
Supersymmetry wikipedia , lookup
Technicolor (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Event symmetry wikipedia , lookup
Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup
Grand Unified Theory wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Search for the Higgs boson wikipedia , lookup
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Seesaw for the Higgs boson Xavier Calmet Université Libre de Bruxelles Outline • Review the motivations for physics beyond the standard model. • What do we know for sure? • Some minimal modifications of the Standard Model can address these issues • Modification of short distance physics • Modification in the Higgs sector • A gateway to new physics • Conclusions Motivations for new physics Guiding principles for physics beyond the SM • Guiding principles for model building have changed. • Till ‘03 or so hierarchy and naturalness were the main problems to address: why is the weak scale so small compared to the Planck scale and why is the Higgs boson’s mass stable under radiative corrections? • Indeed if quantum field theories are only an “effective tool” (Wilsonian approach) one has to explain small numbers! Guiding principles for physics beyond the SM after 2003 • Post landscape era: fine-tuning is allowed ( or required: anthropic or statistical arguments). • More important we have experimental evidence that the hierarchy and naturalness problems are not necessarily valid guidance principles: • Hints from the cosmological constant: not zero and small: unnatural (but observed!!). Effective theories argument would imply new physics at 0.001 eV! No sign of it! • Next surprise: light Higgs and no SUSY (or little Higgs)? • Personal point of view: within the framework of a renormalizable quantum field theory, fine-tuning or hierarchy problems make no sense: a parameter is measured at some scale and one can compute its running. • So what is the meaning of small or big? It’s an experimental question. • There may be an esthetic reason against the Higgs: only fundamental scalar? • But main issue is the negative squared mass: it’s never free to break a symmetry. • We can hope that the LHC will reveal the mechanism that triggers the Higgs mechanism. What do we know for sure? • Two experimental facts: • There is dark matter. What do we know for sure? • • • • Two experimental facts: There is dark matter. Most probably dark energy exits as well. Mathematical consistency of the standard model implies that effectively there is a scalar degree of freedom in the standard model (or S matrix is nonperturbative) • Unification of gravity and quantum mechanics implies a minimal length in nature (see last year talk). New picture of the Universe SM Extended Higgs sector Minimal length From astro-ph/0609541 (J. R. Primack) How to implement these facts in the Standard Model? • Minimal length: modify spacetime at short distance: one option is a noncommutative spacetime. • What are the physical consequences? New insight for the cosmological constant. • What about the electroweak symmetry breaking: extend the Higgs sector. • Quite natural to expect that dark matter couples to the Higgs boson, if not it will be very difficult to ever produce it in a collider. Gravity on noncommutative spaces • Hypothesis: is a constant of nature and it has the same value in every coordinate frame. • Well if that is the situation, what are the coordinate transformations allowed by the NC algebra: • Let us consider the transformations: and study the NC algebra: • It is invariant iff • The solutions are: • They form a subgroup of 4-vol. preserving coord. transf. • If there is an expansion in the action must take the form: • When we vary the action with respect to the metric, we have to impose the unimodular condition. The eqs of motion are: • Using the Bianchi Identities and the conservation of the energy-momentum tensor, we find: • This differential equation can be easily integrated: • Plugging this back in the equations of motion, one obtains • Remarkable: on a canonical NC spacetime: the cosmological constant is an integration constant uncorrelated to parameters of the action! Get ready for a bit of speculation! • If one quantized unimodular gravity action, one finds an uncertainty relation for the cosmological constant and the volume: • Now on a NC spacetime, the volume is “quantized”, the number of fundamental cells is expected to fluctuate • The volume of spacetime then fluctuates with the number of cell • In other words and one thus finds: • Or assuming that the scale for NC is the Planck scale: which is of the right order of magnitude!!! (critical assumption: natural value for is 0, plausible by Baum and Hawking.) Back to the SM of particle physics • Let me assume that somehow gravity is taken care of at the quantum level by e.g. spacetime noncommutativity or nonperturbative effects: • There is a good chance that Nature is indeed described by renormalizable quantum field theories. • The remaining issue of the SM is to understand why the Higgs mechanism takes place. Seesaw Higgs Mechanism Seesaw for Higgs • Let me consider a generic 2 Higgs doublets model • Diagonalization of the mass matrix: • Is there a negative root? • Decoupling case: Breaks SU(2) x U(1) Decouples Fine-tuning of the Yukawa couplings Degenerate case: • Scalar potential: • Yukawa sector: • Let me diagonalize the mass matrix: • Let me assume that the action is invariant under ha hb • This implies a Z 2 symmetry for h and H. • In a compact notation: • Mass spectrum Phenomenology • Higgs production at LHC • Dark matter candidate! A gateway to a hidden sector • Higgs sector is fascinating: Higgs mass term is the only super-renormalizable term in the SM: door to a hidden sector. • New option to break the EW: e.g. hidden technicolor sector • Connection to extra-dimension (J. van der Bij recent works) A simple model • Couple a new sector in minimal way • This operator can impact Veltman’s relation • It improves naturalness of the SM • Consider e.g. SM replica model • Different options! • Implies interesting new phenomenology e.g.: and dark matter candidates New Guiding principles and Grand Unification • SO(10) is viable, again due to fine tuning in Higgs sector Conclusions • There are two missing blocks in High Energy Physics. • Dark energy might just be a cosmological constant which is connected to a minimal length. On a noncommutative spacetime its value is arbitrary. • Further hand waving arguments could explain its value. • Electroweak symmetry sector is the only SM one which has not be tested yet. • Possible connection to hidden sectors/dark matter: LHC will produce DM in most of the scenarios. • Were the guiding principles right? • We will have answers soon!