Download Solutions to homework 1

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup

Large numbers wikipedia , lookup

Abuse of notation wikipedia , lookup

Arithmetic wikipedia , lookup

Sequence wikipedia , lookup

P-adic number wikipedia , lookup

Addition wikipedia , lookup

Birthday problem wikipedia , lookup

Collatz conjecture wikipedia , lookup

Proofs of Fermat's little theorem wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
MATH 5705: HOMEWORK 1 SOLUTIONS
Chapter 2
Problem 22. If there are no ties, the result amounts to a permutation of the
runners, of which there are 4! = 24.
If exactly two runners tie there are 42 = 6 choices of who tied. There are then
3! = 6 orders in which the three groups (two individuals plus one pair) could finish.
This contributes (6)(6) = 36 possibilities by the multiplication principle.
If there is a three way tie, there are 4 choices for the person who did not tie and
2 possible orders (either the triple finished tied for first or tied for second). This is
(4)(2) = 8 more possibilities.
If there are two different two-ways ties, there are 42 = 6 choices for the pair that
finish tied for first.
Lastly, a 4-way tie represents one more possibility. In total, there are
24 + 36 + 8 + 6 + 1 = 75
possible outcomes.
Problem 28. (a) To get to work by walking only 17 blocks, he must go East
or North each time, and there must be exactly 9 East blocks and 8 North blocks
followed. The only choice is in which order to do these. The number of possibilities
is
17
= 24310
9
as he must choose at which times from 1 to 17 he will take the 9 East blocks.
(b) Call the starting point the origin (0, 0) and the ending point (9, 8). The block
in question is the one from (4, 3) to (5, 3). A path from (0, 0) to (9, 8) including this
block can be broken into three parts which can be chosen independently
(1) a length 7 path from (0, 0) to (4, 3)
(2) the block from (4, 3) to (5, 3)
(3) a length 9 path from (5, 3) to (9, 8)
There
is no flexibility for the second part. By considerations as in part (a), there are
7
choices for the first part and 94 choices for the second. As such, there are
4
7 9
= 4410
4 4
paths that include the block in question. The number of paths that avoid it, then is
24310 − 4410 = 19900.
= 38760 ways to choose 6 of the 20 sticks.
Problem 39. (a) There are 20
6
1
2
MATH 5705: HOMEWORK 1 SOLUTIONS
(b) Number the sticks from 1 to 20, and let {i1 , . . . i6 } be such a selection with
i1 < i2 < . . . < i6 . Define j1 , j2 , . . . , j6 by
j1
j2
j3
j4
j5
j6
= i1
= i2 − 1
= i3 − 2
= i4 − 3
= i5 − 4
= i6 − 5
The effect of this is each pair of consecutive j ′ s is 1 closer together than the corresponding i’s (e.g. j4 − j3 = (i4 − i3 ) − 1). Since each pair of i′ s is at least 2
apart, the j ′ s are distinct and also in increasing order. Lastly j1 = i1 ≥ 1 and
j6 = i6 − 5 ≤ 20 − 5 = 15. So we have 1 ≤ j1 < j2 < . . . < j6 ≤ 15. Moreover, any
sequence of j ′ s with these properties arises from a unique choice of the i′ s, namely
i1
i2
i3
i4
i5
i6
= j1
= j2 + 1
= j3 + 2
= j4 + 3
= j5 + 4
= j6 + 5
So if suffices to count the number of possible
j ′ s, that is, the number of 6 element
15
subsets of {1, 2, . . . 15}. The answer is 6 = 5005.
(c) Let {i1 , . . . i6 } be such a selection with i1 < i2 < . . . < i6 . Define j1 , j2 , . . . , j6
by
j1
j2
j3
j4
j5
j6
= i1
= i2 − 2
= i3 − 4
= i4 − 6
= i5 − 8
= i6 − 10
Similar to the proof in part (b), this defines a bijection between the collection in
question and the set of 6 element
subsets {j1 < j2 < . . . < j6 } of {1, 2, . . . , 20 − 10}.
=
210.
The number of such is 10
6
Problem 46. (a) Number the people from 1 to 2n. There are 2n − 1 possible
matches for person 1. Of the 2n − 2 remaining people, consider the lowest numbered
person. There are then 2n − 3 possible matches for him. Continue in this manner.
Whenever 2k people remain, there are always 2k − 1 ways to choose the partner
for the lowest numbered such person regardless of what pairings have already been
made. By the multiplication principle there are (2n − 1)(2n − 3) · · · (5)(3)(1) possible
ways to pair everyone up.
MATH 5705: HOMEWORK 1 SOLUTIONS
3
(b) There are 2n + 1 ways to choose the person not talking to anyone. Once this
is done, 2n people remain who can be paired up in the manner described in part (a).
As such there are
(2n + 1)(2n − 1)(2n − 3)(2n − 5) · · · (3)(1)
ways to pair up all but one of the people.
Problem 54. For each i = 1, 2, . . . , n, exactly one of the three following possibilities occurs:
(1) i ∈ A and i ∈ B
(2) i ∈
/ A and i ∈ B
(3) i is in neither A nor B
Ordinarily there would be a fourth option, namely i ∈ A and i ∈
/ B. However, this
would contradict the assumption of the problem A ⊆ B.
Suppose we independently decide which of the three should happen for each i from
1 to n. This can be done in 3n different ways. The claim is that any such choices are
possible and uniquely determine both A and B. Indeed, A must consist of exactly
those i for which option 1 occurs. Similarly, B must consist of precisely those i for
which either option 1 or 2 occurs. Any i ∈ A will have come from case 1 meaning
that i ∈ B, so A ⊆ B as required. As such the number of pairs A, B with the desired
properties is indeed 3n .
Problem 60. I assume we are choosing an order (e.g. 3 bagels of type 1, 0
bagels of type 2, . . . ) at random from the set of legal orders, rather than choosing
each bagel randomly one at a time. A legal order consists of nonnegative integers
m1 , m2 , . . . , m6 with m1 + m2 + . . . + m6 = 15, where mi represents the number of
bagels of the ith type. We have seen that the total number of such is
20
15 + 6 − 1
= 15504
=
5
6−1
If an order contains at least one bagel of each kind, then the flexibility is in deciding
what the other 15−6 = 9 bagels are. Put another way, we need to choose nonnegative
integers m1 − 1, m2 − 1, . . . , m6 − 1 with sum 9. The number of ways to do this is
14
9+6−1
= 2002.
=
5
6−1
There are 2002 outcomes with at least one bagel of each type out of 15504 total
outcomes, so the probability of at least one bagel of each type is
2002 ∼
= 0.129
15504
Suppose that Sesame bagels are type 1. Then to get at least 3 sesame bagels we
need a solution to m1 +m2 +. . .+m6 = 15 with m1 ≥ 3 and mi ≥ 0 for i = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
Equivalently, we need a 6-tuple of nonnegative integers m1 − 3, m2 , m3 , . . . , m6 with
sum 15 − 3 = 12. The number of such is
12 + 6 − 1
17
=
= 6188.
6−1
5
4
MATH 5705: HOMEWORK 1 SOLUTIONS
So, the probability that there are at least 3 sesame bagels is
91 ∼
6188
=
= .399.
15504
228
Problem 64. (a) The total nunber of outcomes equals the total number of nstrings over the n-element set {1, 2, . . . , n}. This number is nn by the multiplication
principle.
Suppose now that such a sequence contains exactly n − 2 distinct integers. Put
another way, there are only 2 terms of the sequence that are repeats of earlier terms.
If these 2 terms are the same as each other, then that integer appears 3 times and
(n − 2) − 1 = n − 3 other integers appear once each. If these 2 terms are distinct,
then those two integers each appear twice, and the other (n − 2) − 2 = n − 4 integers
all appear once. These two cases do not overlap, so count them each separately and
add.
First, suppose that one integer appears three times. A sequence of this sort can
be selected by making the following independent choices:
n
possibilities)
(1) Choose the n − 2 integers that appear at least once ( n−2
(2) Choose the one of those integers that appears 3 times (n − 2 possibilities)
(3) Choose which three
of the n locations in the sequence will contain the ren
peated number ( 3 possibilities)
(4) Choose a full permuation of the remaining n − 3 integers to indicate in what
order they fill the remaining spaces ((n − 3)! possilities)
By the multiplication principle, there are
n(n − 1)
n(n − 1)(n − 2)
n(n − 1)(n − 2)
(n − 2)
(n − 3)! =
n!
2!
3!
12
such sequences.
Now suppose two integers each appear twice. To obtain such a sequence:
n
possibilities)
(1) Choose the n − 2 integers that appear at least once ( n−2
n−2
(2) Choose the two of those numbers that appear twice ( 2 possibilities)
(3) Choose the two places for the lower of those numbers ( n2 possibilities)
(4) Choose among the remaining places two for the larger of those numbers ( n−2
2
possibilities)
(5) Choose a full permutation of the remaining n − 4 integers to indicate in what
order they fill the remaining spaces ((n − 4)! possibilities)
The number of ways to do all this is
n(n − 1) (n − 2)(n − 3) n(n − 1) (n − 2)(n − 3)
n(n − 1)(n − 2)(n − 3)
(n− 4)! =
n!.
2!
2!
2!
2!
16
MATH 5705: HOMEWORK 1 SOLUTIONS
5
The total number of sequences with exactly n − 2 different integers is
n(n − 1)(n − 2)(n − 3)
n(n − 1)(n − 2)
n! +
n!
12
16
n(n − 1)(n − 2)
1 n−3
=
n!
+
4
3
4
3n − 5
n(n − 1)(n − 2)
n!
=
4
12
n(n − 1)(n − 2)(3n − 5)
=
n!
48
The probability that a given sequence has exactly n − 2 different integers is obtained
by dividing by nn .
n(n − 1)(n − 2)(3n − 5)n!
48nn