* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Luteinizing Hormone and Prolactin
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Mohan & Sultana ISSN 0976-2272 J. B io s c i. Re s ., 2010. Vol. 1(4):279-284 Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Luteinizing Hormone and Prolactin Levels in Infertile Women in North Chennai, Tamilnadu K. MOHAN AND MAZHER SULTANA PG & Research Department of Advanced Zoology & Biotechnology, Presidency College, Chennai-5. Abstract The aim of the study was to determine the studies follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone and prolactin levels in infertile women in north chennai, Tamilnadu, India. The present investigation was carried out at JPM Diagnostic Centre in Chennai, Tamil Nadu the data were collected from 70 women patients and grouped them into infertility (n = 30) and control (n = 40). The patients referred by a Gynecologist for infertility investigation. The details pertaining to the patients regarding age, height, weight, no of years after marriage is furnished. The blood was collected during mid cycle 14 – 16 day on a fasting by venipuncture. The blood was allowed to clot, the serum was decanted and used for analysis. FSH, LH and Prolactin were estimated by Immuno enzymatic assay by Elisa Reader. FSH hormonal levels of the infertile women when compared to control groups statistically significant were found to be lower level of serum FSH mean±SD 3.46±0.73 (P<0.001) in the infertile group. serum LH concentration was lower in the infertile group than in the control group. The LH mean±SD 2.97±0.64 (P<0.001), serum Prolactin concentration was increased in infertile group compared with control group. The serum Prolactin mean±SD 55.80±23.44 (P<0.001). Regression analysis revealed obese to be strongly associated with infertility observed. BMI mean ± SD 29.05±1.80 (P<0.001). The level of FSH on 3rd of the cycle is with in the normal range. However they are on the lower side. This reflect a decrease in the ovarian reserve.The decrease level of LH in the midcycle clearly indicates that there is a possibility of anovulation, which results in infertility. The elevated prolactin values in some of the infertile women clearly shows that there is a mechanism operating at the anterior pituitary level which shows an abnormal distribution of FSH and LH which may further explain the abnormal /delay ovum maturation. The present study indicates obese associated with infertility. Key words: Infertility, hormones, obese, ovulation, hyperprolactinemia *For correspondence: [email protected]/ [email protected] Abbreviation FSH-follicle stimulating hormone ; LH-luetinizing hormone; PRL- prolactin Introduction Infertility is generally defined as one year of unprotected intercourse without conception. Approximately 85-90% of healthy young couples conceive within one year. Infertility affects 10 -15 % of couples, is an important part of investigation and helps the couple to have children (Mosher, et al., 1991). Many people may be infertile JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES RESEARCH 1(4):279-284 279 during their reproductive years. They may be unaware of this infertility. Many parameters are outlined for the cause of infertility like age, lifestyle and physical problems etc. Greater focus on education and careers among women has triggered other trend in modern society, less frequent, early and late marriages and more frequent divorce are among the most striking cases of delayed childbirth. Expanding contraceptive options and access to family planning and legalized abortion services have markedly contributed to the declined birthrate (Norton, et al., 1992). The infertility problems are more common phenomenon among the women now a days and has increased over past 30 years (Stephen and Chendon, 2000). An ongoing epidemic of sexually transmitted infection, associated with increased risk of subsequent infertility of chlamydial infection and 650,000 gonorrhea infections was recorded in the US each year (Cates, et al., 1999). The major causes of infertility includes ovulatory dysfunction (15%), tubal and peritoneal pathology(30-40%), and male fact(30-40%) and uterine pathology. To some extent the prevalence of each varies with age. Ovulatory dysfunction is more common in younger than old couples, tubal and peritoneal factors have a similar prevalence (Miller, et al., 1999). Life style choice and environmental factors can influence fertility and deserve consideration.(Stillman, et al., 1986, Hnghes and Prennan 1996 and Angoo et al., 1998 and Hakim, et al, 1998). Other potentially harmful occupational environmental exposure, pesticides, chlorinated hydrocarbon fumicides have been associated with the increased link of spontaneous miscarriage in women (Hruska, et al., 2000). The female infertility evaluation revealed the medical history like, Mohan & Sultana tobacco, alcohol, other drugs, birth defects, thyroid disorder, galactorrhoea, and physical examination (weight body mass index, breast secretion, thyroid enlargement, vaginal abnormality etc., (ASRM,2000). An elevation in prolactin (hyperprolactinemia) levels may also indicate the presence of a pituitary tumor. In addition, some drugs can elevate levels of prolactin, effects the ovulation, and inhibition of hormones. Overall, disorders of ovulation account for approximately 15% of the problems identified in infertile couples. The female infertility are caused by ovulation disorders. Deficiencies in luetinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and elevated prolatin level even slight irregularities in the hormone system can affect ovulation. The infertility causes due to insufficiency or imbalance hormones. Ovarian cyst may indicate advanced endometriosis; it may cause rigid webs of scar tissue between uterus, ovary, and fallopian tubes. This may prevent the transfer of the egg to the fallopian tube. The ovaries are enlarged by many cysts beneath by ovarian capsule. Small follicles that start to grow but can’t mature to ovulation remain with in the ovary. The lack of ovulation may lead to mild enlargements of ovaries especially in obese patient. Fertility can be negatively affected by obesity. In women, early onset of obesity favours the development of menses irregularities, Obesity in women can also increase risk of miscarriages and impair the outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies and pregnancy, when the body mass index exceeds 30 kg/m2. The main factors implicated in the association may be insulin excess and insulin resistance. These adverse effects of obesity are specifically evident in polycystic ovary syndrome. Body mass index (obese) affects reproduction by causing menstrual disturbance and JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES RESEARCH 1(4):279-284 280 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Infertile I BM t ei gh W H ei gh t Control Ag e anovulation. The obesity influences the reproductive cycle by impaired estrogen metabolism Norman. et al., The present investigation evaluates the hormonal profile of infertile women. The aim of the present study was to estimate the mean value of FSH, LH, and Prolactin levels of in infertile women as compared to the control group in the North Chennai area of Tamilnadu. Materials and Methods The present investigation was carried out at JPM Diagnostic Centre in Chennai, Tamil Nadu the data were collected from 70 women patients as referred by a Gynecologist for infertility investigation. The details pertaining to the patients regarding age, height, weight, no of years after marriage is furnished. The group of infertile women consisted of patient with regular menstrual cycle lasting between 2830 days and with ovulation between the 12th and 16th day of the cycle, the clinical examination revealed that the women has normal uterus, ovary and fallopian tube and the semen analysis of their husband was also normal. An th ro p o m e tric m e as u re m e n ts The physical examination of body weight was calculated by taking weight in kilogram(kg) (Verma et al., 1982) and height was measured in centimeters (Frisancho et al., 1984). The Body Mass index was calculated from the formula; BMI = weight in kilograms / (height in meters)2 Patients were taken as obese if their body mass index was 29.9 (Olefsky et al., 1992). B io c h e m ic al p aram e te rs The blood was collected during mid cycle 14 – 16 day on a fasting by venipuncture. The blood was allowed to clot, the serum was decanted and used for analysis. Haemolysis sera was discarded and a fresh specimen was obtained. The serum was stored at –20 oC and assay were completed within three days.FSH, LH and Prolactin were estimated by Immuno Mohan & Sultana enzymatic assay by Elisa Reader. The kits were obtained from Fortrees Diagnostic Limited, United Kingdom, Northern Ireland.(Odell et al., 1981), (Saxema et al., 1968) Statis tic al An aly s is Statistical analysis was done by descriptive statistics, independent groups ttest between means, two sample t-test between percent, chi-square test, compared means by ANOVA. All analysis were done using the windows based Statpac Statistical package version 3.0. Results Table 1 gives the detailed anthropometric parameters viz., age in years, weight in kilograms (kgs), height in centimeters(cms), body mass index(BMI) of infertile groups and control groups. Infertile groups statistically increased the age mean ± SD 28.401.57 (P<0.001), weight mean ± SD 66.833.53 (P<0.001), body mass index mean ± SD 29.05-1.80 (P<0.001). Figure 1 : Anthropometric parameters of the subjects Table 2 showed the hormonal characteristics of the infertile groups when compared to control groups statistically significant increase in the level of serum FSH concentration was lower in the infertile group than in the control group. The FSH mean±SD 3.46±0.73 (P<0.001), serum LH concentration was lower in the infertile group than in the control group. LH JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES RESEARCH 1(4):279-284 281 mean±SD 2.97±0.64 (p<0.001), and serum PRL concentration was higher in the infertile group than in the control group, PRL mean±SD 55.80±23.44 (P<0.001). Figure 2: FSH, LH, PRL levels in infertile and control group. 60 50 40 ng/m l 30 iInfertility 20 Control 10 0 FSH LH PRL Discussion The level of FSH on 3rd day of the cycle is within the normal range. But they are on the lower side such a decrease in the ovarian reserve causes infertility. The level of FSH falls within the lower (2.064.28mIU/ml) limit of normal range (6.024.0mIU/ml). Among them 30 (42.9%) patients are at lower side of the normal range. The LH results of 30 patients (42.9%) were below normal (5.024.0mIU/ml). The decreased level of LH in the midcycle clearly indicates possibility of anovualation, causing infertility. The serum Prolactin concentration was increased (22.08 – 95.05 ng/ml) for 30(42.9%) patients. This present studies indicated hyperprolactinemia as the cause for infertility in female. The incidence of hyperprolactinemia has reported to 42% by Avasthi kukum (2006), 25% by Mishra et al., (2006 ), however in the present study the incidence was 42.9%. Early studies indicated hyperprolactinemia as the cause for infertility in female. hyperprolactinemia was recorded in 12% of the total women but 18% was reported by Awathi kumkum, et al.,(2006) among infertile women. The incidence of hyperprolactinemia in women Mohan & Sultana was found to be 62.16% (Rajan, et al., 1990) and 90%(Avasthi kumkum, et al., 2002). The levels of FSH, LH and Prolactin gonodotropic hormones in infertile women were evaluated by many researchers. According to Moltz, et al., (1991) higher level of FSH, LH in infertile women with a proper menstrual cycle is rarely found. However lower concentration of those hormones observed only in 8% of cases. Moltz et al, (1991) also states that 65.5% of infertile women with proper twophase menstrual cycles suffered from luteal phase defects but in 28.7% of cases lower values of FSH and LH were noticed. Kohler (Givens et al,1986)states that women with higher values of prolactin and luteal phase defects have lower levels of FSH, and LH during their menstrual cycle. Both luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) are required for follicle development and oestrogen production. Due to elevated of prolactin the follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone are decreased and causes infertility. The obesity influences the reproductive cycle by impaired estrogen metabolism causing menstrual disturbance and anovulation. The present study clearly indicates all the obese patients increased in serum prolactin level and decreased FSH, LH levels. Conclusion The present study on FSH,LH and Prolactin levels in infertile women evaluates the hormonal profile of infertile women with anovulatory menstrual cycle. The hormone studied were pituitary derived FSH, LH and PRL. The examination involved a group of 70 women. The level of FSH on 3rd of the cycle is with in the normal range. However they are on the lower side. This reflect a decrease in the ovarian reserve. The decrease level of LH in the midcycle clearly indicates that there is a possibility of anovulation, which JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES RESEARCH 1(4):279-284 282 results in infertility. The elevated prolactin values in some of the infertile women clearly shows that there is a mechanism operating at the anterior pituitary level which shows an abnormal distribution of FSH and LH which may further explain the abnormal /delay ovum maturation. Both luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) are required for follicle development and oestrogen production. Due to elevated of prolactin the follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone are decreased and causes infertility. The present study indicates obese associated with infertility. The study clearly indicates to understand the hormonal levels in infertile women. which caused the change in the levels of FSH, LH and prolactin for a better management. Acknowledgement We are grateful to the Director, Mrs.D.Joyce Marlin, JPM Diagnostic Centre, Chennai.for the opportunity and the help rendered to carry out the investigation in her Medical Laboratory. References Avasthi Kumkum, 2006 Hyperpro lactinema In Infertile Women The Journal Of Obstertrics And Gynecology Of India Vol. 56, 68-71 Cates W,1999 Sexually Transmitted Diseases In The United State.Journal Of Sexually Transmitted Diseases 26:S2. Givens JR, Kohler PO, John Wiley & Sons 1986.Ovarian Disorders,Clinical Endocrinology, New York, 303 – 312. Hughes EG, Brennan BG 1996 Does cigarette smoking impair natural Fertil Steril 66, 679–689. Hakim, R.B., Gray, R.H. and Zacur, H. 1998 Alcohol and caffeine consumption and decreased fertility in Fertil. Steril., 1999, 71, 974 Hruska KS, Furth PA, Seifer DB, Sharara FI, Flaws JA. 2000 Environmental Mohan & Sultana factors in infertility. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43:821–829 Mosher WD, Pratt WF. 1991 Fecundity And Infertility In The United States Journal Of Fertility And Sterility 56;192 Miller L 1992 Marriage, Divorce, And Remarriage In The 1990’s Bureau Of The Census Washington D.C, Vi 21. Moltz L, Leidenberger F, Weise C, 1991 Rational Hormone Diagnosis In Normocyclic Functional Sterility Journal Of Infertility 51(9);756-68. Mishra R, Baveja R, Gupta V, 2002 Prolactin Level In Infertility With Menstrual Irregularities. The Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology In India 52;40-3. Marshall JR, 1974 Ovulation Disorder Journal Of Endocrinology 27;298 Norman R.J , Clark A.M Reproduction, Fertility and Development 10(1) 55 - 63 Odell, W.D, Parlow, A.F, 1981 Estimation of FSH Test Assay Journal Of Clinical Investigation 47, 2551. Rajan R.1990 Prolctin Metbolism In Infertility.The Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology In Indian 40:243-7. Scott R., Toner, J., Muasher S, 1989 Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Levels On Cycle Day 3.Journal Of Fertilility & Sterility ,51,651-654. Saxema,B.B, Demura, H.M, 1968 Determination Of FSH Journal Of Clinical Endocrinal Metabolism, 28,591. Stephen EH, Chandra A. Use of infertility services in the United States: 1995. Fam Plann Perspect (2000) 32:132 Stillman, 1986 infertility, in Human Reproduction, 6: 242-244 Verma BL, Kumar A, Srivastava RN.1982 Measurement of body build based on weight/height, an index for adults in an Indian population. Ind J Pub Health ; 26. Frisancho AR. 1984 New standards of weight and body composition by frame size and height for assessment of JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES RESEARCH 1(4):279-284 283 nutritional status in adults and elderly. Amm J Clin Nutr; 40 : 808. Olefsky JM. 1991 Obesity In: Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 12th Ed. McGraw Hill ook Company , New York,; 411. Mohan & Sultana Olefsky JM. 1992, Diabetes mellitus, In cecil textbook of Medicine 18th Ed. Wynagaarden and Smith Jr. Eds; WB Saunders Int ED.; 1291. Table 1: Anthropometric parameters of the subjects. Parameter Age Height Weight BMI Control group n = 40 26.73±1.68 153.35±3.08 48.85±2.65 20.79±1.34 Infertile group n = 30 28.40±1.57 151.73±2.88 66.83±3.53 29.05±1.80 t-value p-value 4.232 2.239 24.357 22.023 0.0001** 0.0285* 0.0000** 0.0000** t-value p-value 14.410 19.672 11.759 0.0000* 0.0000* 0.0000* Values are mean SD (Standard Deviation), * P<0.05, ** P<0.001 Table 2: The hormonal variables of the study groups Parameter FSH LH PRL Control group n = 40 7.53±1.41 17.82±4.09 11.47±4.03 Infertile group n = 30 3.46±0.73 2.97±0.64 55.80±23.44 Values are mean SD (Standard Deviation), * P<0.001 JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES RESEARCH 1(4):279-284 284