Download print pdf 3.3 Mo, 17 p.

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Infinitesimal wikipedia , lookup

Large numbers wikipedia , lookup

List of important publications in mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup

Recurrence relation wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup

Real number wikipedia , lookup

Collatz conjecture wikipedia , lookup

Addition wikipedia , lookup

Proofs of Fermat's little theorem wikipedia , lookup

Number theory wikipedia , lookup

Partial differential equation wikipedia , lookup

Elementary mathematics wikipedia , lookup

System of polynomial equations wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Abstract
Updated 2016
On the Marko↵ Equation
x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 3xyz
It is easy to check that the equation x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 3xyz,
where the three unknowns x, y , z are positive integers, has
infinitely many solutions. There is a simple algorithm which
produces all of them. However, this does not answer to all
questions on this equation : in particular, Frobenius asked
whether it is true that for each integer z > 0, there is at most
one pair (x, y ) such that x < y < z and (x, y , z) is a solution.
This question is an active research topic nowadays.
Michel Waldschmidt
Institut de Mathématiques de Jussieu (Paris VI)
http://www.math.jussieu.fr/⇠miw/
1 / 87
Abstract (continued)
2 / 87
The sequence of Marko↵ numbers
A Marko↵ number is a
positive integer z such that
there exist two positive
integers x and y satisfying
Marko↵’s equation occurred initially in the study of minima of
quadratic forms at the end of the XIX–th century and the
beginning of the XX–th century. It was investigated by many a
mathematician, including Lagrange, Hermite, Korkine,
Zolotarev, Marko↵, Frobenius, Hurwitz, Cassels. The solutions
are related with the Lagrange-Marko↵ spectrum, which
consists of those quadratic numbers which are badly
approximable by rational numbers. It occurs also in other parts
of mathematics, in particular free groups, Fuchsian groups and
hyperbolic Riemann surfaces (Ford, Lehner, Cohn, Rankin,
Conway, Coxeter, Hirzebruch and Zagier. . .).
We discuss some aspects of this topic without trying to
cover all of them.
Andrei Andreyevich Marko↵
(1856–1922)
x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 3xyz.
For instance 1 is a Marko↵
number, since
(x, y , z) = (1, 1, 1) is a
solution.
Photos :
http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/
3 / 87
4 / 87
The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences
Integer points on a surface
1, 2, 5, 13, 29, 34, 89, 169, 194, 233, 433, 610, 985, 1325, 1597, 2897,
4181, 5741, 6466, 7561, 9077, 10946, 14701, 28657, 33461, 37666,
43261, 51641, 62210, 75025, 96557, 135137, 195025, 196418, 294685, . . .
The sequence of Marko↵
numbers is available on the
web
The On-Line Encyclopedia
of Integer Sequences
Neil J. A. Sloane
Given a Marko↵ number z, there exist infinitely many pairs of
positive integers x and y satisfying
x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 3xyz.
This is a cubic equation in the 3 variables (x, y , z), of which
we know a solution (1, 1, 1).
There is an algorithm producing all integer solutions.
http://oeis.org/A002559
5 / 87
Marko↵’s cubic variety
6 / 87
Algorithm producing all solutions
Let (m, m1 , m2 ) be a solution of Marko↵’s equation :
The surface defined by
Marko↵’s equation
A.A. Marko↵ (1856–1922)
m2 + m12 + m22 = 3mm1 m2 .
Fix two coordinates of this solution, say m1 and m2 . We get a
quadratic equation in the third coordinate m, of which we
know a solution, hence, the equation
x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 3xyz.
is an algebraic variety with
many automorphisms :
permutations of the variables,
changes of signs and
(x, y , z) 7! (3yz
x 2 + m12 + m22 = 3xm1 m2 .
has two solutions, x = m and, say, x = m0 , with
m + m0 = 3m1 m2 and mm0 = m12 + m22 . This is the cord and
tangente process.
x, y , z).
Hence, another solution is (m0 , m1 , m2 ) with m0 = 3m1 m2
7 / 87
m.
8 / 87
Three solutions derived from one
New solutions
We shall see that any solution di↵erent from (1, 1, 1) and from
(2, 1, 1) yields three new di↵erent solutions – and we shall see
also that, in each other solution, the three numbers m, m1 and
m2 are pairwise distinct.
Starting with one solution (m, m1 , m2 ), we derive three new
solutions :
(m0 , m1 , m2 ),
(m, m10 , m2 ),
(m, m1 , m20 ).
Two solutions are called neighbors if they share two
components.
If the solution we start with is (1, 1, 1), we produce only one
new solution, (2, 1, 1) (up to permutation).
For instance
• (1, 1, 1) has a single neighbor, namely (2, 1, 1),
• (2, 1, 1) has two neighbors : (1, 1, 1) et (5, 2, 1),
• any other solution has exactly three neighbors.
If we start from (2, 1, 1), we produce only two new solutions,
(1, 1, 1) and (5, 2, 1) (up to permutation).
A new solution means distinct from the one we start with.
9 / 87
Marko↵’s tree
10 / 87
This algorithm yields all the solutions
Assume we start with (m, m1 , m2 ) satisfying m > m1 > m2 .
We shall check
m20 > m10 > m > m0 .
Conversely, starting from any solution other than (1, 1, 1), the
algorithm produces a smaller solution.
Hence, by induction, we get a sequence of smaller and smaller
solutions, until we reach (1, 1, 1).
We order the solution according to the largest coordinate.
Then two of the neighbors of (m, m1 , m2 ) are larger than the
initial solution, the third one is smaller.
Therefore the solution we started from was in Marko↵’s tree.
Hence, if we start from (1, 1, 1), we produce infinitely many
solutions, which we organize in a tree : this is Marko↵’s tree.
11 / 87
12 / 87
First branches of Marko↵’s tree
Marko↵’s tree starting from (2, 5, 29)
FIGURE
2
Markoff triples ( p , q, r ) with max( p , q )
13 / 87
14 / 87
Conversely,
given fractions
a Markoff and
triplethe
( p , Marko↵
q, r ) with tree
r > 1, one checks easily th
Continued
3pq - r < r; and from t h s it follows by induction that all Markoff triples occu
and occur only once, on this tree (for a fuller discussion of t h s and other propertie
of the Markoff tree, see [2]).
E. Bombieri,
To prove the theorem we must analyze the asymptotic behavior of the Marko
Continued
fractions
and the(1) we find that 3r2 2 3pqr or r 2 pq; if p is larg
tree. From
the Markoff
equation
Marko↵
tree, for all but a small portion of the tree, contributing O(log x )
(which will
happen
Expo.this
Math.
25 (2007),
M(x)), then
implies
that r is much larger than q and hence (1) gives r 2 < 3pqr
r 2 o(r2)
r 3pq. Multiplying both sides of this equation by 3 and takin
no. 3,or187–213.
logarithms gives
Marko↵’s tree up to 100 000
DON ZAGIER
Don Zagier,
On the number of Marko↵
numbers below a given bound.
Mathematics of Computation,
39 160 (1982), 709–723.
+
-
log(3p)
FIGURE
2
Markoff triples ( p , q, r ) with max( p , q )
100000
+ log(3q) = log(3r) + o(1)
( p large)
100000
Conversely, given a Markoff triple ( p , q, r ) with r > 1, one checks easily that
3pq - r < r; and from t h s it follows by induction that all Markoff triples occur,
and occur only once, on this tree (for a fuller discussion of t h s and other properties
of the Markoff tree, see [2]).
To prove the theorem we must analyze the asymptotic behavior of the Markoff
tree. From the Markoff equation (1) we find that 3r2 2 3pqr or r 2 pq; if p is large
15 / 87
16 / 87
Marko↵’s tree
Letter from Masanobu Kaneko to Yuri Manin
26/06/2008
17 / 87
a2 + b 2 + c 2 = 3abc
X2
18 / 87
The Fibonacci sequence and the Marko↵ equation
The smallest Marko↵ number is 1. When we impose z = 1 in
the Marko↵ equation x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 3xyz, we obtain the
equation
x 2 + y 2 + 1 = 3xy .
3abX + a2 + b 2 =
(X c)(X 3ab + c)
Going along the Marko↵’s tree starting from (1, 1, 1), we
obtain the subsequence of Marko↵ numbers
1, 2, 5, 13, 34, 89, 233, 610, 1597, 4181, 10946, 28657, . . .
which is the sequence of Fibonacci numbers with odd indices
F1 = 1, F3 = 2, F5 = 5, F7 = 13, F9 = 34, F11 = 89, . . .
19 / 87
20 / 87
Leonardo Pisano (Fibonacci)
The Fibonacci sequence
(Fn )n 0 :
Encyclopedia of integer sequences (again)
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597,
2584, 4181, 6765, 10946, 17711, 28657, 46368, 75025, 121393, 196418,
317811, 514229, 832040, 1346269, 2178309, 3524578, 5702887, 9227465, . . .
Leonardo Pisano (Fibonacci)
(1170–1250)
The Fibonacci sequence is
available online
The On-Line Encyclopedia
of Integer Sequences
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21,
34, 55, 89, 144, 233 . . .
is defined by
Neil J. A. Sloane
F0 = 0, F1 = 1,
Fn = F n
1
+ Fn
(n
2
2).
http://oeis.org/A000045
21 / 87
Fibonacci numbers with odd indices
Order of the new solutions
Let (m, m1 , m2 ) be a solution of Marko↵’s equation
Fibonacci numbers with odd indices are Marko↵’s numbers :
Fm+3 Fm
1
2
Fm+1
= ( 1)m
for m
m2 + m12 + m22 = 3mm1 m2 .
1
and
Fm+3 + Fm
1
= 3Fm+1
for m
22 / 87
Denote by m0 the other root of the quadratic polynomial
1.
X2
3m1 m2 X + m12 + m22 .
Set y = Fm+1 , x = Fm 1 , x 0 = Fm+3 , so that, for even m,
x + x 0 = 3y ,
Hence,
xx 0 = y 2 + 1
X2
and
X2
3yX + y 2 + 1 = (X
x)(X
x 0 ).
3m1 m2 X + m12 + m22 = (X
m)(X
m0 )
and
m + m0 = 3m1 m2 ,
23 / 87
mm0 = m12 + m22 .
24 / 87
m1 6= m2
Two larger, one smaller
Assume m1 > m2 .
Question : Do we have m0 > m1 or else m0 < m1 ?
Let us check that if m1 = m2 , then m1 = m2 = 1 :
this holds only for the two exceptional solutions (1, 1, 1),
(2, 1, 1).
Consider the number a = (m1
Assume m1 = m2 . We have
m2 + 2m12 = 3mm12
m)(m1
m0 ).
Since m + m0 = 3m1 m2 , and mm0 = m12 + m22 , we have
hence m2 = (3m
2)m12 .
a= m12
m1 (m + m0 ) + mm0
= 2m12 + m22
Therefore m1 divides m. Let m = km1 . We have
k 2 = 3km1 2, hence k divise 2.
For k = 1 we get m = m1 = 1.
For k = 2 we get m1 = 1, m = 2.
= (2m12
3m12 m2
2m12 m2 ) + (m22
m12 m2 ).
However 2m12 < 2m12 m2 and m22 < m12 m2 , hence a < 0.
Consider now a solution distinct from (1, 1, 1) or (2, 1, 1) :
hence m1 6= m2 .
This means that m1 is in the interval defined by m and m0 .
25 / 87
Order of the solutions
26 / 87
Prime factors
Remark. Let m be a Marko↵ number with
m2 + m12 + m22 = 3mm1 m2 .
If m > m1 , we have m1 > m0 and the new solution
(m0 , m1 , m2 ) is smaller than the initial solution (m, m1 , m2 ).
If m < m1 , we have m1 < m0 and the new solution
(m0 , m1 , m2 ) is larger than the initial solution (m, m1 , m2 ).
The same proof shows that the gcd of m, m1 and m2 is 1 :
indeed, if p divides m1 , m2 and m, then p divides the new
solutions which are produced by the preceding process – going
down in the tree shows that p would divide 1.
The odd prime factors of m are all congruent to 1 modulo 4
(since they divide a sum of two relatively prime squares).
If m is even, then the numbers
m
,
2
3m 2
,
4
3m + 2
,
8
are odd integers.
27 / 87
28 / 87
Marko↵’s Conjecture
Frobenius’s work
The previous algorithm produces the sequence of Marko↵
numbers. Each Marko↵ number occurs infinitely often in the
tree as one of the components of the solution.
Marko↵’s Conjecture does not
occur in Marko↵’s 1879 and
1880 papers but in
Frobenius’s one in 1913.
Ferdinand Georg Frobenius
(1849–1917)
According to the definition, for a Marko↵ number m > 2,
there exist a pair (m1 , m2 ) of positive integers with
m > m1 > m2 such that m2 + m12 + m22 = 3mm1 m2 .
Question : Given m, is such a pair (m1 , m2 ) unique ?
The answer is yes, as long as m  10105 .
29 / 87
Special cases
30 / 87
Powers of a prime number
The Conjecture has been
proved for certain classes of
Marko↵ numbers m like
pn ± 2
pn ,
3
for p prime.
A. Baragar (1996),
P. Schmutz (1996),
J.O. Button (1998),
M.L. Lang, S.P. Tan (2005),
Ying Zhang (2007).
Arthur Baragar
Anitha Srinivasan, 2007
A really simple proof of the
Marko↵ conjecture for prime
powers
Number Theory Web
Created and maintained by
Keith Matthews, Brisbane, Australia
www.numbertheory.org/pdfs/simpleproof.pdf
http://www.nevada.edu/ baragar/
31 / 87
32 / 87
Marko↵ Equation and Nilpotent Matrices
arXiv :0709.1499
Marko↵ Equation and Nilpotent Matrices
arXiv :0709.1499 [math.NT]
From : Norbert Riedel
Submission history
[v1] Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22 :11 :39 GMT (11kb)
[v2] Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18 :45 :29 GMT (11kb)
[v3] Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17 :43 :40 GMT (15kb)
[v4] Tue, 5 Aug 2008 21 :24 :23 GMT (15kb)
[v5] Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14 :08 :48 GMT (15kb)
[v6] Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18 :49 :17 GMT (15kb)
[v7] Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12 :36 :56 GMT (0kb,I)
Comments : Most of the (correct) portion of this paper has
been incorporated into the paper ”On the Marko↵ equation”
(arXiv :1208.4032)
Norbert Riedel
http://fr.arxiv.org/abs/0709.1499
A triple (a, b, c) of positive integers is called a
Marko↵ triple i↵ it satisfies the diophantine equation
a2 + b 2 + c 2 = abc. Recasting the Marko↵ tree,
whose vertices are Marko↵ triples, in the framework
of integral upper triangular 3 ⇥ 3 matrices, it will be
shown that the largest member of such a triple
determines the other two uniquely. This answers a
question which has been open for almost 100 years.
33 / 87
On the Marko↵ Equation arXiv :1208.4032
34 / 87
Serge Perrine
http://www.tessier-ashpool.fr/html/marko↵.html
[v1] Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15 :05 :47 GMT (51kb)
[v2] Mon, 1 Apr 2013 10 :21 :39 GMT (52kb)
[v3] Wed, 15 May 2013 17 :39 :35 GMT (52kb)
[v4] Mon, 8 Jul 2013 17 :35 :21 GMT (53kb)
[v5] Sun, 13 Oct 2013 21 :23 :28 GMT (50kb)
[v6] Sun, 20 Oct 2013 13 :37 :31 GMT (50kb)
[v7] Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19 :11 :53 GMT (53kb)
[v8] Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14 :59 :52 GMT (53kb)
[v9] Mon, 15 Dec 2014 18 :50 :40 GMT (58kb)
[v10] Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20 :16 :28 GMT (59kb)
[v11] Sat, 5 Sep 2015 12 :30 :49 GMT (59kb)
La théorie de Marko↵
et ses développements
Tessier et Ashpool, 2002.
35 / 87
36 / 87
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00406601
Why the coefficient 3 ?
Let n be a positive integer.
If the equation x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = nxyz has a solution in positive
integers, then
either n = 3 and x, y , z are relatively prime,
or n = 1 and the gcd of the numbers x, y , z is 3.
Norbert Riedel
[v1] Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22 :11 :39 GMT (11kb)
[v2] Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18 :45 :29 GMT (11kb)
[v3] Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17 :43 :40 GMT (15kb)
[v4] Tue, 5 Aug 2008 21 :24 :23 GMT (15kb)
[v5] Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14 :08 :48 GMT (15kb)
[v6] Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18 :49 :17 GMT (15kb)
Comments by Serge Perrine (23/07/2009)
On the version 2 on Novembre 7, 2007, 32 p.
On the version 3 on April 25, 2008, 57 p.
On the version 4 on March 10, 2009, 103 p.
On the versions 5 and 6 on July 29, 2009, 145 p.
Friedrich Hirzebruch & Don Zagier,
The Atiyah–Singer Theorem and elementary number theory,
Publish or Perish (1974)
37 / 87
38 / 87
Equations x 2 + ay 2 + bz 2 = (1 + a + b)xyz
Marko↵ type equations
If we insist that (1, 1, 1) is a solution, then up to permutations
there are only two more Diophantine equations of the type
Bijection between the solutions for n = 1 and those for n = 3 :
• if x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 3xyz, then (3x, 3y , 3z) is solution of
X 2 + Y 2 + Z 2 = XYZ , since
(3x)2 + (3y )2 + (3z)2 = (3x)(3y )(3z).
x 2 + ay 2 + bz 2 = (1 + a + b)xyz
having infinitely many integer solutions, namely those with
(a, b) = (1, 2) and (2, 3) :
• if X 2 + Y 2 + Z 2 = XYZ , then X , Y , Z are multiples of 3
and (X /3)2 + (Y /3)2 + (Z /3)2 = 3(X /3)(Y /3)(Z /3).
x 2 + y 2 + 2z 2 = 4xyz
The squares modulo 3 are 0 and 1. If X , Y and Z are not
multiples of 3, then X 2 + Y 2 + Z 2 is a multiple of 3.
and x 2 + 2y 2 + 3z 2 = 6xyz
• x 2 + y 2 + z 2 : tessalation of the plane by equilateral triangles
• x 2 + y 2 + 2z 2 = 4xyz : tessalation of the plane by isoceles
rectangle triangles
• x 2 + 2y 2 + 3z 2 = 6xyz : tessalation ?
If one or two (not three) integers among X , Y , Z are
multiples of 3, then X 2 + Y 2 + Z 2 is not a multiple of 3.
39 / 87
40 / 87
Hurwitz’s equation x12 + x22 + · · · + xn2 = kx1 · · · xn
Hurwitz’s equation (1907)
For each n
equation
2 the set Kn of positive integers k for which the
x12 + x22 + · · · + xn2 = kx1 · · · xn
When there is a solution in positive integers, there are infinitely
many solutions, which can be organized in finitely many trees.
has a solution in positive integers is finite.
The largest value of k in Kn is n — with the solution
(1, 1, . . . , 1).
A. Baragar proved that there exists such equations which
require an arbitrarily large number of trees :
J. Number Theory (1994), 49 No 1, 27-44.
Examples :
K3 = {1, 3},
K4 = {1, 4},
K7 = {1, 2, 3, 5, 7}.
The analog for the rank of elliptic curves over the rational
number field is yet a conjecture.
41 / 87
42 / 87
Growth of Marko↵’s sequence
1978 : order of magnitude of
m, m1 and m2 for
m2 + m12 + m22 = 3mm1 m2
with m1 < m2 < m,
Euclidean tree
Start with (0, 1, 1). From a triple (a, b, c) satisfying a + b = c
and a  b  c, one produces two larger such triples
(a, c, a + c) and (b, c, b + c) and a smaller one (a, b a, b)
or (b a, a, b).
Harvey Cohn
(0, 1, 1)
|
(1, 1, 2)
|
(1, 2, 3)
|
log(3m1 ) + log(3m2 ) = log(3m) + o(1).
To identify primitive words in
a free group with two
generators, H. Cohn used
Marko↵ forms.
|
|
(1, 3, 4)
|
x 7! log(3x) : (m1 , m2 , m) 7! (a, b, c) with a + b ⇠ c.
..
.
43 / 87
|
(2, 3, 5)
|
|
(1, 4, 5)
(3, 4, 7)
(2, 5, 7)
|
|
|
.. ..
. .
.. ..
. .
|
|
(3, 5, 8)
.. ..
. .
|
..
.
44 / 87
Marko↵ and Euclidean trees
Growth of Marko↵’s sequence
Don Zagier (1982) :
estimating
theOFnumber
MATHEMATICS
COMPUTATIONof the
VOLUME 39, NUMBER 160
OCTOBER 1982, PAGES 709-723
Marko↵ triples bounded by x :
c(log x)2 + O log
x(log
log x)2 ,of Markoff Numbers
On
the Number
Below a Given Bound
c = 0.180 717 0 . . .
By Don Zagier
Abstract.:According
to a famous
theoremnumber
of Markoff, the
Conjecture
the n-th
Marko↵
mnindefinite
is quadratic forms with
exceptionally large minima (greater than f of the square root of the discriminant) are in 1 : 1
correspondence withpthe solutions of the Diophantine equation p2 q 2 r 2 = 3pqr. By
n
relating Markoff's algorithm
for finding solutions of this equation to a problem of countn points in triangles, it is shown that the number of solutions less than x
ing lattice
equals C l o g 2 3 x O(log x loglog2 x ) with an explicitly computable constant C =
0.1807170471 1507. . . . Numerical data up to
is presented which suggests that the true
error term is considerably
2 smaller.
+ +
m ⇠A
Tom Cusik & Mary Flahive,
The Marko↵ and Lagrange spectra,
Math. Surveys and Monographs 30, AMS (1989).
+
with A = 10.510 150 4 · · ·
Remark : c = 1/(log A) .
1. By a Markoff triple we mean a solution ( p , q, r ) of the Markoff equation
45 / 87
Marko↵ and Diophantine approximation
46 / 87
(1)
P2+q2+r2=3pqr
( p , q , r ~ Z , l ~ p ~ q ~ r ) ;
a Markoff number is a member of such a triple. These numbers, of which the first few
are
1, 2 , 5 , 13,29, 34, 89, 169, 194,233,433,610,985,. . . ,
Connection
with Hurwitz’s Theorem
play a role in a famous theorem of Markoff [lo] (see also Frobenius [6], Cassels 121):
the GL2(Z)-equivalence classes of real indefinite binary quadratic forms Q of
J.W.S. Cassels,
An introduction to
Diophantine approximation,
Cambridge Univ. Press (1957)
discriminant 1 for whlch the invariant
Don Zagier,
On the number of Marko↵ numbers below a given bound.
Mathematics
of Computation, 39 160 (1982), 709–723.
is greater than 3 are in one-to-one correspondence with the Markoff triples,
John William Scott Cassels
the
invariant p(Q) for the form corresponding to ( p , q, r ) being (9 - 4r-2)-'/2. Thus
the part of the Markoff spectrum (the set of all p(Q)) lying above 3 is described
exactly by the Markoff numbers. An equivalent theorem is that, under the action of
SL2(Z) on R U {a)given by x * (ax b)/(cx
d), the SL2(Z)-equivalence
classes of real numbers x for which the approximation measure
+
+
is > are in 1 : 1 correspondence with the Markoff triples, the spectrum being the
same as above (e.g. p(x) = 5-'I2 for x equivalent to the golden ratio and p(x) G 8-'12
for all other x). Thus the Markoff numbers are important both in the theory of
quadratic forms and in the theory of Diophantine approximation. They have also
arisen in connection with problems in several other branches of mathematics, e.g. the
M.W., Open Diophantine Problems,
Moscow
Mathematical
4198N1. 1, 2004, 245–305.
Received
July 15, 198 1; revisedJournal
December 16,
1980 Muthemutics Suhject Classification. Primary 10BIO; Secondary 10A21, 10C25, 10525, 10F99.
01982 American Mathematical Society
48 / 87
0025-571 8/82/ooOO-0259/$03.75
47 / 87
709
Historical origin : rational approximation
Hurwitz’s Theorem (1891) :
For any real irrational number
x, there exist infinitely many
rational numbers p/q such
that
x
Lagrange’s constant
p
For x 2 R \ Q denote by (x) 2 [ 5, +1] the least upper
bound of the numbers > 0 such that there exist infinitely
many p/q 2 Q satisfying
Adolf Hurwitz
(1859–1919)
x
p
1
p
·
q
5q 2
p
1
 2·
q
q
This means
1
= lim inf q min |qx
q!1
p2Z
(x)
Golden ratio
p
= (1 + 5)/2 =
1.618 033 9 . . .
Hurwitz’s result is optimal.
Hurwitz p
: (x)
( ) = 5.
p
p| .
5 = 2.236 067 9 · · · for any x and
49 / 87
Badly approximable numbers
Badly approximable numbers
An irrational real number x is badly approximable by rational
numbers if its Lagrange’s constant is finite. This means that
there exists > 0 such that, for any p/q 2 Q,
x
p
q
50 / 87
Any quadratic irrational real number has a finite Lagrange’s
constant (= is badly approximable).
It is not known whether there exist real algebraic numbers of
degree 3 which are badly approximable.
1
·
q2
It is not known whether there exist real algebraic numbers of
degree 3 which are not badly approximable . . .
For instance Liouville’s numbers have an infinite Lagrange’s
constant.
A real number is badly approximable if and only if the sequence
(an )n 0 of partial quotients in its continued fraction expansion
One conjectures that any irrational real number which is not
quadratic and which is badly approximable is transcendental.
This means that one conjectures that no real algebraic number
of degree 3 is badly approximable.
x = [a0 , a1 , a2 , . . . , an , . . . ]
is bounded.
51 / 87
52 / 87
Lebesgue measure
Properties of the Lagrange’s constant
We have
The set of badly approximable
real numbers has zero
measure for Lebesgue’s
measure.
Henri Léon Lebesgue
(1875–1941)
(x + 1) = (x) :
x +1
and
( x) = (x) :
x
p
= x
q
p+q
q
p
p
= x+ ,
q
q
Also (1/x) = (x) :
p2
1
x
q
p
= q2
· x
p
qx
p
.
q
53 / 87
54 / 87
✓
The modular group
The multiplicative group
generated by the three
matrices
✓
◆
✓
◆
✓
◆
1 1
1 0
0 1
,
,
0 1
0
1
1 0
◆
ax + b
a b
x=
c d
cx + d
✓
◆
1 1
x =x +1
0 1
(x + 1) = (x)
✓
1
0
◆
0
x=
1
x
( x) = (x)
✓
◆
1
0 1
x=
1 0
x
(1/x) = (x)
is the group GL2 (Z) of 2 ⇥ 2
matrices
✓
◆
a b
with coefficients in Z
c d
and determinant ±1.
Consequence : Let x 2 R \ Q and let a, b, c, d be rational
integers satisfying ad bc = ±1. Set
J-P. Serre – Cours d’arithmétique, Coll. SUP, Presses
Universitaires de France, Paris, 1970.
Then (x) = (y ).
y=
55 / 87
ax + b
·
cx + d
56 / 87
Hurwitz’s work (continued)
p
The inequality (x)
5 for
all real irrational x is optimal
for the Golden ratio and for
all the noble irrational
numbers whose continued
fraction expansion ends with
an infinite sequence of 1’s –
these numbers are roots of
the quadratic polynomials
having discriminant 5 :
Noble numbers
Adolf Hurwitz, 1891
A noble number, whose continued fraction expansion ends
with an infinite sequence of 1’s, is a number related to the
Golden ratio by a homography of determinant ±1 :
✓
◆
a +b
a b
with
2 GL2 (Z).
c d
c +d
= [1, 1, 1, . . . ] = [1].
57 / 87
The first elements of the spectrum
Lagrange Spectrum
For all the real numbers which are not noble numbers, a
stronger inequality than Hurwitz’s inequality
p
(x)
5 = 2, 236 067 977 . . .
The constant
p
5 is best possible in Hurwitz’s Theorem.
If ↵ is notpGL(2, Z) equivalent
to the Golden ratio, the
p
constant 5 improves to 8.
is valid, namely
(x)
58 / 87
p
2 2 = 2, 828 427 125 . . .
If we also
p exclude the numberspwhich are GL(2, Z) equivalent
to 1 + 2, then we can take 221/5 as the constant.
This is optimal for
p
2 = 1.414 213 562 373 095 048 801 688 724 209 698 078 . . .
The sequence
p
p
p
5 = 2.236 . . . , 8 = 2.828 . . . , 221/5 = 2.973 . . .
whose continued fraction expansion is
continues as follows.
[1; 2, 2, . . . , 2, . . . ] = [1; 2].
59 / 87
60 / 87
Lagrange Spectrum
Lagrange Spectrum
There is an infinite increasing sequence of real numbers (Li )i
with limit 3, and an associated sequence of quadratic
irrationalities (✓i )i 1 , such that for any i 1, if ↵ is not
GL(2, Z) equivalent to any of ✓1 , . . . , ✓i 1 , then there is
infinitely many rational numbers that satisfy
↵
Denoting by m1 , m2 , . . . the sequence of Marko↵ numbers, one
has
q
Li = 9 (4/mi2 )
1
and
✓i =
3mi + 2ki +
2mi
p
9mi2
4
,
where ki is an integer satisfying ai ki ⌘ bi (mod mi ) and
(ai , bi , mi ) is a solution of Marko↵’s equation with
mi max{ai , bi }.
p
1
,
<
q
Li q 2
and this is best possible when ↵ is GL(2, Z) equivalent to ✓i .
Here one assumes Marko↵’s Conjecture to get unicity of
(ai , bi ).
61 / 87
First values
q
Li = 9
Minima of quadratic forms
(4/mi2 ),
✓i =
Fi (X , Y ) = mi X 2 + (2ki
i
1
2
3
mi
1
2
5
ki
1
1
2
62 / 87
Li
p
p5
p 8
221/5
3mi + 2ki +
2mi
3mi )XY +
ki2
✓pi
(1 + p5)/2
1 +p 2
( 11 + 221)/10
p
9mi2
Let f (X , Y ) = aX 2 + bXY + cY 2 be a quadratic form with
real coefficients. Denote by (f ) its discriminant b 2 4ac.
4
Consider the minimum m(f ) of |f (x, y )| on Z2 \ {(0, 0)}.
Assume (f ) 6= 0 and set
p
C (f ) = m(f )/ | (f )|.
3ki mi + 1 2
Y .
mi
Fi
X
XY Y 2
2(X 2 2XY Y 2 )
5X 2 + 11XY 5Y 2
2
63 / 87
Let ↵ and ↵0 be the roots of f (X , 1) :
f (X , Y ) = a(X
⇢
1
0
{↵, ↵ } =
2a
↵Y )(X
b±
p
↵0 Y ),
(f )
.
64 / 87
Example with
<0
Definite quadratic forms (
The form
If the discriminant is negative, J.L. Lagrange and Ch.pHermite
(letter to Jacobi, August 6, 1845) proved C (f )  1/ 3 with
2
2
equality for
p f (X , Y ) = X + XY + Y . For each
% 2 (0, 1/ 3], there exists such a form f with C (f ) = %.
f (X , Y ) = X 2 + XY + Y 2
has discriminant
(f ) =
For
m(f )
1
C (f ) = p
=p ·
3
| (f )|
3 and minimum m(f ) = 1, hence
Joseph-Louis
Lagrange
(1736–1813)
< 0, the form
r
Charles Hermite
(1822–1901)
Carl Gustav Jacob
Jacobi
(1804–1851)
| | 2
(X + XY + Y 2 )
3
p
and minimum | |/3. Again
f (X , Y ) =
has discriminant
< 0)
1
C (f ) = p ·
3
65 / 87
Example with
>0
Indefinite quadratic forms (
The form
f (X , Y ) = X 2
Assume
Y2
XY
has discriminant
(f ) = 5 and minimum m(f ) = 1, hence
For
m(f )
1
C (f ) = p
=p ·
5
(f )
f (X , Y ) =
r
5
(X 2
and minimum
p
XY
Y 2)
/5. Again
1
C (f ) = p ·
5
67 / 87
> 0)
>0
A. Korkine and E.I.. Zolotarev
p
proved in 1873 C (f )  1/ 5
with equality for
f0 (X , Y ) = X 2 XY Y 2 .
For all forms which are not
equivalent to f0 under
GL(2, Z), p
they prove
C (f )  1/ 8.
p
1/ 5 = 0.447 213 595 . . .
p
1/ 8 = 0.353 553 391 . . .
> 0, the form
has discriminant
66 / 87
Egor Ivanovich Zolotarev
(1847–1878)
68 / 87
Indefinite quadratic forms (
The works by Korkine and
Zolotarev inspired Marko↵
who pursued the study of this
question.
He produced infinitely many
values C (fi ),
pi = 0, 1, . . .,
between 1/ 5 and 1/3, with
the same property as f0 .
These values form a sequence
which converges to 1/3. He
constructed them by means of
the tree of solutions of the
Marko↵ equation.
> 0).
Indefinite quadratic forms (
> 0)
Assume f ((X , Y ) = aX 2 + bXY + cY 2 2 R[X , Y ] with a > 0
has discriminant > 0.
A. Marko↵, 1879 and 1880.
If |f (x, y )| is small with y 6= 0, then x/y is close to a root of
f (X , 1), say ↵.
Then
and ↵
↵0 =
p
|x
↵0 y | ⇠ |y | · |↵
↵0 |
/a.
Hence
|f (x, y )| = |a(x
↵y )(x
↵0 y )| ⇠ y 2
69 / 87
Lagrange spectrum and Marko↵ spectrum
p
↵
x
.
y
70 / 87
Chronologie
Marko↵ spectrum = set of values taken by
J. Liouville, 1844
J-L. Lagrange et Ch. Hermite, 1845
A. Korkine et E.I. Zolotarev, 1873
A. Marko↵, 1879
F. Frobenius, 1915
L. Ford, 1917, 1938
R. Remak, 1924
J.W.S. Cassels, 1949
J. Lehner, 1952, 1964
H. Cohn, 1954, 1980
R.A. Rankin, 1957
A. Schmidt, 1976
S. Perrine, 2002
p
1
=
(f )/m(f )
C (f )
when f runs over the set of quadratic forms ax 2 + bxy + cy 2
with real coefficients of discriminant (f ) = b 2 4ac > 0
and m(f ) = inf (x,y )2Z2 \{0} |f (x, y )|.
Lagrange spectrum = set of values taken by Lagrange’s
constant.
(x) = 1/ lim inf q(min |qx
q!1
p2Z
p|)
when x runs over the set of real numbers.
The Marko↵ spectrum contains the p
Lagrange spectrum.
The intersection with the intervall [ 5, 3[ is the same for both
of them, and is a discrete sequence.
71 / 87
72 / 87
Fraction continue et géométrie hyperbolique
The Geometry of Marko↵ Numbers
Caroline Series,
The Geometry of Marko↵
Numbers,
The Mathematical
Intelligencer 7 N.3 (1985),
20–29.
Référence : Caroline Series
73 / 87
Fuchsian groups and hyperbolic Riemann surfaces
Marko↵’s tree can be seen as
the dual of the triangulation
of the hyperbolic upper half
plane by the images of the
fundamental domain of the
modular invariant under the
action of the modular group.
Lazarus Immanuel Fuchs
(1833–1902)
74 / 87
Triangulation of polygons, metric properties of
polytopes
Harold Scott
MacDonald
Coxeter
(1907–2003)
75 / 87
Robert Alexander
Rankin
(1915–2001)
John Horton
Conway
76 / 87
Fricke groups
The subgroup
Free groups.
Fricke proved that if A and B are two generators of , then
their traces satisfy
of SL2 (Z) generated by the two matrices
✓
◆
✓
◆
1 1
2 1
and
1 2
1 1
(trA)2 + (trB)2 + (trAB)2 = (trA)(trB)(trAB)
Harvey Cohn showed that
p quadratic forms with a Marko↵
constant C (f ) 2]1/3, 1/ 5] are equivalent to
is the free group with two generators.
cx 2 + (d
The Riemann surface quotient of the Poincaré upper half
plane by is a punctured torus. The minimal lengths of the
closed geodesics are related to the C (f ), for f indefinite
quadratic form.
where
is a generator of .
✓
a)xy
a b
c d
by 2
◆
77 / 87
Fundamental domain of a punctured disc
78 / 87
A simple curve on a punctured disc
79 / 87
80 / 87
Ford circles
Farey sequence of order 5
The Ford circle associated to
the irreducible fraction p/q is
tangent to the real axis at the
point p/q and has radius
1/2q 2 .
Ford circles associated to two
consecutive elements in a
Farey sequence are tangent.
Lester Randolph Ford
(1886–1967)
Amer. Math. Monthly (1938).
0 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 3 4 1
, , , , , , , , , ,
1 5 4 3 5 2 5 3 4 5 1
81 / 87
Complex continued fraction
82 / 87
Laurent’s phenomenon
Connection with Laurent polynomials.
James Propp, The combinatorics of frieze patterns and
Marko↵ numbers, http://fr.arxiv.org/abs/math/0511633
The third generation of Asmus Schmidt’s complex continued
fraction method.
If f , g , h are Laurent polynomials in two variables x and y ,
i.e., polynomials in x, x 1 , y , y 1 , in general
h f (x, y ), g (x, y )
is not a Laurent polynomial :
x2 + 1
1
=x+ ,
x
x
✓
◆2
1
x+
+1
x 4 + 3x 2 + 1
x
f f (x) =
=
·
1
x(x 2 + 1)
x+
x
f (x) =
http://www.maa.org/editorial/mathgames/mathgames 03 15 04.html
83 / 87
84 / 87
Simultaneous rational approximation and Marko↵
spectrum
Relation between Marko↵
numbers and extremal
numbers : simultaneous
approximation of x and x 2 by
rational numbers with the
same denominator.
Damien Roy
Greatest prime factor of Marko↵ pairs
Pietro Corvaja and Umberto Zannier, 2006 :
The greatest prime factor of the product xy when x, y , z is a
solution of Marko↵’s equation tends to infinity with
max{x, y , z}.
Equivalent statement :
If S denotes a finite set of prime numbers, the equation
x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 3xyz
has only finitely many solutions in positive integers x, y , z,
such that xy has no prime divisor outside S.
(The integers x and y are called S–units. )
Marko↵–Lagrange spectrum and extremal numbers,
arXiv.0906.0611 [math.NT] 2 June 2009
85 / 87
Updated 2016
On the Marko↵ Equation
x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = 3xyz
Michel Waldschmidt
Institut de Mathématiques de Jussieu (Paris VI)
http://www.math.jussieu.fr/⇠miw/
87 / 87
86 / 87