* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Honorable Marsha Blackburn
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
September 11, 2008 The Honorable Marsha Blackburn United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Representative Blackburn: The undersigned organizations, representing a broad array of organizations and associations in all parts of the United States, strongly support H.R. 6666, which would establish that certain greenhouse gases (GHG) not be subject to Clean Air Act regulation. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) recent publication of an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) on regulating Greenhouse Gases illustrates how ill-suited the Clean Air Act is in its current form to regulate GHGs. The ANPR itself acknowledges that “the [Clean Air Act] was not specifically designed to regulate GHGs.” Regulation would lead to what Chairman Dingell described as the “glorious mess.” EPA issued the ANPR in response to Massachusetts v. EPA, a Supreme Court decision that dealt with the issue of the impact of motor vehicles on climate change. Were the provisions of the ANPR to be implemented, they would have the unintended consequence of automatically triggering costly and burdensome regulation of thousands of individual manufacturing facilities, hospitals, farms, schools, office buildings, and even large houses. The ANPR also discusses regulation of emissions from individual motorcycles and lawnmowers. The result would be that businesses and consumers alike would experience significantly higher costs and onerous regulation; business would be put at a global competitive disadvantage; and the public would not see any real improvement in atmospheric GHG levels. Whatever the appropriate response to climate change, it is clear that regulation under the current framework of the Clean Air Act is not the answer. We commend you for introducing H.R. 6666, and we look forward to working with you on this important issue. Sincerely, American Farm Bureau Federation American Forest & Paper Association American Gas Association American Petroleum Institute Agricultural Retailers Association Corn Refiners Association Florida Chamber National Automobile Dealers Association National Oilseed Processors Association National Cattlemen’s Beef Association Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council U.S. Chamber of Commerce