* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Notes - Beit Shalom Messianic Synagogue
The Reform Jewish cantorate during the 19th century wikipedia , lookup
Supersessionism wikipedia , lookup
Jewish views on sin wikipedia , lookup
Conservative Judaism wikipedia , lookup
Jonathan Sacks wikipedia , lookup
Orthodox Judaism wikipedia , lookup
Conservative halakha wikipedia , lookup
Interfaith marriage in Judaism wikipedia , lookup
Homosexuality and Judaism wikipedia , lookup
Hamburg Temple disputes wikipedia , lookup
Index of Jewish history-related articles wikipedia , lookup
Jewish religious movements wikipedia , lookup
Jewish views on evolution wikipedia , lookup
Origins of Rabbinic Judaism wikipedia , lookup
“Faith” Beit Shalom Messianic Synagogue 1425 East Jackson Street Thomasville, Georgia Messianic Judaism; Traditional Judaism? Elements of Rabbinic Theology: Rabbi David Tokajer Messianic Jewish Theology: Rabbi Robert Ackerman Elements of Rabbinic Theology Tonight I am going to talk to you about Rabbinic, or Traditional, Judaism; by Rabbinical or Traditional we are specifically referring to non-Messianic Judaism. We are going to discuss several key things about Rabbinic Judaism, all of which culminate in the traditional Jewish world not accepting Yeshua as Messiah today. We are going to forego the history between Sinai and the destruction of the Second Temple, as much of both of these have been covered in previous discussions here, and will be covered more later on. Let me first start by talking about the concept of the Messiah in the Jewish world. Jewish tradition teaches of the coming of two Messiahs: in Hebrew they are called Mashiach ben Yosef (who is also known as the suffering servant or the suffering Messiah) and Mashiach ben David (who is known as the victorious Messiah or victorious King, who will come and end all war and suffering and usher in eternal peace). As believers, and in reading the Scriptures, we can see that this is identical to what Scripture says, and is very much like what we as believers believe of the two comings of Yeshua as Messiah, He came as the suffering servant (i.e. Mashiach ben Yosef) and died as the atonement sacrifice for our sins, and that He will return to usher in our eternity in peace with ADONAI (i.e. Mashiach ben David). So, our Jewish understanding of the Messiah is very much on point, and truly is also the foundation of the Body of Messiah’s understanding of His two comings as well. However, as a people who, for most of our existence, has been nothing more than a suffering people, albeit often because of our own sins, it is only natural to long and hope for Mashiach ben David to come first. So, all of the Jewish world, even to this day, has been expecting the coming of Mashiach ben David. When Yeshua, who obviously came as Mashiach ben Yosef, came to suffer, even though He carried every attribute that Scripture 1 describes of the Messiah, it was hard for the Jewish world to follow Him and accept Him. It was hard for the Jewish world to grasp the coming of the suffering servant when we have done nothing but suffer our entire existence. Last week I talked about how the Jewish world had lifted up many “Messiah” figures who they thought would lead them to victory over Rome, like Bar Kochba. These individuals were viewed as being the possible Mashiach ben David. Logically speaking, if Scripture speaks of two Messiahs, one who will suffer and one who will be victorious, then either the suffering one must come first, or there can be no Messiah. Once the victorious Messiah has ushered in eternal peace, what suffering will be left for Mashiach ben Yosef? This is where we find ourselves in understanding the Rabbinic Jewish world, a world that, still to this day, is longing for the victorious Messiah, in the same way that we are looking for the same in the Return of Yeshua, but they have completely overlooked the suffering servant who came about 2000 years ago. Ok... I lied; I am going to at least briefly mention the Temple. As we try to understand Rabbinic Judaism we are going to need to understand what led up to its development. As was mentioned last week, with the destruction of the Second Temple by Rome in 70CE came a major void in terms of Jewish worship and relevance in the world in which we lived. Up to this point all of Jewish customs, rituals, and religious worship was centralized around the Temple worship and sacrifice and the priesthood. This Temple stood for about 420 years, with its rebuilding be dated back to Ezra and Nehemiah, and its update in appearance by Herrod. After the Babylonian captivity the Jewish people coming out of captivity and all but complete separation from the faith of our fathers clung to the hope and renewal of faith found in the reestablishment of the Temple service. Once the Temple was destroyed again in 70CE there was a major void left in the worship of the Jewish people. As was mentioned last week, at this point in time there were many different sects of Judaism, but the one thing they all seemed to have in common was the importance of the Temple in their worship. By the time the Temple was destroyed there was already a movement of planting synagogues in towns with large Jewish populations, especially in ones that were farther away from the Temple. Being the Temple was the central part of the Jewish worship experience, and the Jewish people were spread out so far throughout not only the Roman Empire, but throughout the entire world, these synagogues provided a place of worship and Jewish centrality for those that were unable to make the journey to the Temple as often as they would like. Once the Temple was destroyed all that was left in terms of a place of Jewish worship were the synagogues, which were never intended to replace the Temple service or the Temple itself. However, as the Jewish people faced what looked like an impending annihilation, physically, religiously, and culturally, these synagogues are exactly what they clung to. From the very dust of the destruction of the Second Temple arises the beginnings of a new movement in Judaism, one that holds its physical and worship centrality in synagogues established throughout the Jewish world. In a world where, once again, the Jewish people feel completely lost and left out to die, arises one last hope of a continuation of a people whose very existence is one that is based in their very faith and religion. Here enters Rabbi Akiva, of whom we spoke briefly last week. Rabbi Akiva is viewed as the principal person responsible for the development of Rabbinic Judaism. He is referred to in the Talmud as Rosh la-Chachomim (Head of all the Sages) and is one of the most central 2 contributors to the Midrash. It is said that Rabbi Akiva started out as a poor shepherd who was employed by a wealthy man, and apparently the wealthy man’s daughter fell in love with Rabbi Akiva. She agreed to a secret betrothal to Akiva with the single catch being that he had to devote himself to the study of Torah. When her father found out about the betrothal he sent them away and disowned her. It is said that Akiva and his wife agreed that he should leave her, for what became 24 years, and go to study Torah full time. When he returned, tradition says he returned with 24,000 students following him and has been viewed as one of the greatest sages ever since. During the Bar Kochba revolt around 132CE Rabbi Akiva was the primary spiritual leader of the movement. He was also a staunch supporter of Bar Kochba, the general who lead the revolt against Rome, to the extent of believing that Bar Kochba was the promised Jewish Messiah. This revolt all but changed the very face of Judaism, from that time forth, the Jewish people were no longer based in Judea, and the study of Torah and the principals of the faith were outlawed. As was mentioned last week, before this point we had numerous sects of Judaism, the Pharisees, Sadducees, Zealots, Essenes, and the Nazarenes. Well, by this point all but two of these groups had more or less vanished, the two that survived were the Nazarenes (who had by now separated themselves from Judaism and were being called Christians) and the Pharisees who emerged as the preeminent Rabbinic Judaism. Rabbi Akiva’s Rabbinic Judaism held both the Written Torah and the Orah Law as being equally divinely given and equally authoritative in a Jewish person’s life. Traditionally it is believed that the Oral Torah, or Oral Law, was also given at Sinai and that it has been handed down orally since then, until it was written down as the Mishnah, it is also believed that it is impossible to understand the Written Torah without having the Oral Torah to help in interpreting it. This leaning toward the Traditions, or the Oral Law, as being divinely authoritative and equal to Scripture has been a primary key in the development of Rabbinic Judaism, this took the tenants of the faith away from being strictly based in the Torah and put it in the hands of the Rabbis to decide and interpret. The Rabbinic Jewish movement that developed out of Pharisaic Judaism basically pushed all other forms of Judaism out of the picture and gave them an ultimatum of jump on board or get out of the way. It was around 213CE that the Oral Torah, or the traditions handed down by the sages over the years, was compiled into what is known as the Mishna. The Mishna is the first major written redaction of the Jewish oral traditions called the “Oral Torah” and the first major work of Rabbinic Judaism. It was redacted Judah HaNasi when, according to the Talmud, the persecution of the Jews and the passage of time raised the possibility that the details of the oral traditions dating from Pharisaic times would be forgotten. It is thus named for being both the one written authority (codex) secondary (only) to the Tenakh as a basis for the passing of judgment, a source and a tool for creating laws, and the first of many books to complement the Bible in a certain aspect. Rabbinic commentaries on the Mishna over the next three centuries were redacted as the Gemara, which, coupled with the Mishnah, comprise the Talmud. The Mishna reflects debates between 70-200 CE by the group of rabbinic sages known as the Tannaim. The Mishna teaches the oral traditions by example, presenting actual cases being brought to judgment, usually along with the debate on the matter and the judgment that was given by a wise and notable rabbi based on the halakha, Mitzvot, and spirit of the teaching ("Torah") that guided his sentencing. In this way, it brings to everyday reality the practice of the mitzvot as presented in the Bible, and aimed to cover all aspects of human living, serve as an 3 example for future judgments, and, most importantly, demonstrate pragmatic exercise of the Biblical laws, which was viewed as being much needed at the time when the Second Temple was destroyed. Before the development of the Mishna there were a lot of traditions in Judaism, and these traditions, although followed strictly, were viewed as merely traditions. After the Mishna, these very same traditions became laws in and of themselves and are now viewed as being equally as weighted upon the life of a Jewish person as is the very commands of the Torah itself. The compilation of the Mishna single handedly changed the very face of the Jewish religion and solidified it as a unified faith, even when great distances are placed between the adherents of this faith. Also a key in the development of Rabbinic Judaism is what it teaches replaced the sacrificial system of the Temple service. There are three main things that it says replaced the blood sacrifice commanded by the Torah: Good Deeds, Prayer, and Tzedakah, these three are also viewed to be supported with a life of devotion to the study of the Torah and the Talmud. Many people have heard the infamous phrase from a non-believing Jew after doing something nice for someone, “That’s my mitzvah for the day” speaking of their “good works” that they perform in helping them. In Rabbinic Judaism it is believed that a large part of what replaces the need for a blood sacrifice is the idea of “good works” or “good deeds”, in other words doing something nice for someone else. The perfect example I can think of in regards to this concept is that of the University of Mobile in Mobile, AL which is a Southern Baptist Christian Liberal Arts university. The property that the university is built on was donated to them by a wealthy Jewish man in Mobile, he was performing a mitzvah, not only a mitzvah, but the highest mitzvah of all. He was, in his eyes, blessing his enemy by giving them the property and, in a way, trying to buy his righteousness. During the next several centuries a number of very significant things occurred and I am going to briefly describe each to you. Around 358CE- Hillel II, a prominent rabbi in Rabbinic Judaism, established a permanent Jewish calendar, which is based on the Moedim, or appointed times, as well as solidifying the observance of some traditional Jewish celebrations In the 3rd and 4th Centuries CE- The Jerusalem Talmud was compiled. The Jerusalem Talmud predates its counterpart, the Babylonian Talmud, and is written in both Hebrew and Jewish Palestinian Aramaic. It includes the core component, the Mishna, finalized by Rabbi Judah the Prince along with the written discussions of generations of rabbis in the Land of Israel (primarily in the academies of Tiberias and Caesarea) which was compiled c. 350-400 CE into a series of books that became the Gemara. In the 4th and 5th Centuries CE- The Babylonian Talmud was compiled and recorded, which is the more commonly used of the two. The Babylonian Talmud is often viewed as being easier to read and understand, and compiles the discussions of the Mishna from over 300 years. 1040-1105CE- The life of Rashi, Rabbi Shlomo Yitzhaki, a medieval French rabbi famed as the author of the first comprehensive commentary on the Talmud, as well as a comprehensive 4 commentary on the Tanakh. He is considered the "father" of all commentaries that followed on the Talmud and the Tanakh. 1135-1204CE- The life of Rambam, Rabbi Moses Maimonides, the preeminent medieval Jewish philosopher and one of the greatest Torah scholars of the Middle Ages. Although his writings on Jewish law and ethics met with respectful opposition during his life, he was posthumously acknowledged to be one of the foremost rabbinical arbiters and philosophers in Jewish history, his copious work a cornerstone of Jewish scholarship. His fourteen-volume Mishneh Torah still carries canonical authority as a codification of Talmudic law. In the Yeshiva world he is known as "Hanesher Hagadol" (the great eagle) in recognition of his outstanding status as a bona fide exponent of the Oral Torah, particularly on account of the manner in which his Mishneh Torah is elucidated by Chaim Soloveitchik. All in all, by the sixth century CE Rabbinic Judaism was fully developed, and all though Rabbinic Judaism today takes on numerous different appearances, looks, and theologies, all of the modern Jewish world is based out of the begins of Rabbinic Judaism. Today there are a number of sects of Rabbinic Judaism, and each has a number of sub-sects affiliated with it, but the three primary are Orthodox, Conservative, and Reformed Judaism. Orthodox Judaism holds that both the Written and Oral Torah were divinely revealed to Moses, and that the laws within it are binding and unchanging. Orthodox Jews generally consider commentaries on the Shulchan Aruch (a condensed codification of halakha that largely favored Sephardic traditions) to be the definitive codification of Jewish law. Orthodoxy places a high importance on Maimonides' 13 principles as a definition of Jewish faith. Conservative Judaism, known as Masorti outside the United States and Canada, is characterized by a commitment to traditional Jewish laws and customs, including observance of Shabbat and kashrut, a deliberately non-fundamentalist teaching of Jewish principles of faith, a positive attitude toward modern culture, and an acceptance of both traditional rabbinic and modern scholarship when considering Jewish religious texts. Conservative Judaism teaches that Jewish law is not static, but has always developed in response to changing conditions. It holds that the Torah is a divine document written by prophets inspired by God and reflecting his will, but rejects the Orthodox position that it was dictated by God to Moses. Conservative Judaism holds that the Oral Law is divine and normative, but holds that both the Written and Oral Law may be interpreted by the rabbis to reflect modern sensibilities and suit modern conditions. Reform Judaism, called Liberal or Progressive Judaism in many countries, defines Judaism as a religion rather than as a race or culture, rejects most of the ritual and ceremonial laws of the Torah while observing moral laws, and emphasizes the ethical call of the Prophets. Reform Judaism has developed an egalitarian prayer service in the vernacular (along with Hebrew in many cases) and emphasizes personal connection to Jewish tradition. Now that we have covered the basics of the development of modern Rabbinic Judaism, including the different sects that occur today, let’s look at some history that has lead to the current relationship, or rather lack there of, between the Jewish world and their promised Messiah. 5 The persecution of the Jewish people from the Middle Ages and on has been well documented, and sadly enough, most of it was done either in the name of Jesus or in the name of the Church. Here’s a short list some of the persecution: 1096CE- The Crusades Begin 1242CE- The Burning of the Talmud in Paris 1290CE- The Expulsion of all Jews from England 1394CE- The Expulsion of all Jews from France 1478CE- The Spanish Inquisition was established 1492CE- The Expulsion of all Jews from Spain 1933CE- Hitler comes into power 1939-1945CE- The Holocaust These are but a few historical markers of persecution against the Jewish people over the last 2000 years or so, and this does list does not even begin to include the Pogroms either. Many of the persecutions, expulsions, and mass murders that have been performed against the Jewish people are often done in either the name of Jesus or in the name of the Church. Sadly enough, what most Christians do not understand or realize when they are speaking to a Jewish person is that often the name Jesus instantly brings up pain and anger in their hearts, and the image of the Cross is no different. The truth is that, as I mentioned at the beginning of this talk, the Jewish people have done nothing but suffer most of our existence, and in the eyes of most Jews this Jesus can’t possibly be the promised Messiah of Israel because too many atrocities have been done to us in His name. Besides the fact that with as much suffering as has been incurred at the hands of Christians, or supposed Christians, He couldn’t be the Messiah because the Messiah is suppose to usher in peace, not suffering. Rabbinic Judaism is a movement that began about 2000 years ago, it began as a movement trying to answer a lot of questions. Without the Temple how can Judaism exist? Is the Messiah ever going to come? What is the Jewish person’s place in this world? Can the Jewish faith survive outside of Israel? Rabbinic Judaism has also given many things to the Church that most Christians do not realize. The concept of Church planting came from Rabbinic Judaism, it is spawned from the method of establishing synagogues in areas with Jewish populations and where there is Jewish growth. The idea of using a hermeneutical method of studying Scripture comes from Rabbinic Judaism. Even the liturgical prayers used in more traditional or orthodox churches are modeled after the liturgical service of the synagogue. Not to mention, Yeshua... And many other concepts... Messianic Jewish Theology (slide 1). 6 Rabbi David has told you a bit about traditional Judaism. It is a very large subject and we can only lightly touch upon it in our time allotted. He has shown you how Rabbi Yochanan ben Zacchai and his followers developed a theology to fit the situation after the Temple was destroyed in 70CE. That theology ignores a major part of Scripture; a part which ADONAI considered all important, the "substitutionary death" of a sinless one to pay for human sins. We spoke several times last week of Leviticus 17:11 which tells us "without the shedding of blood, there is no remission of sins." As was said last week, Messiah Yeshua's death on the stake, the cross, tzlav in Hebrew, is the key for all of us. Without the redemption that his blood provides we cannot stand before ADONAI and without his blood we are not members of God's family, the family of Abraham, the commonwealth of Israel. So, on this, you and I agree. Messianic Judaism and Christianity fully agree that salvation is by faith alone. Romans 1:16 says: 16 For I am not ashamed of the Good News, since it is God's powerful means of bringing salvation to everyone who keeps on trusting, to the Jew especially, but equally to the Gentile.(CJB). Trusting here refers to remaining in faith. We cannot earn our salvation no matter how perfect we are in following ADONAI's commands. We all fail, and that is why we, through repentance, can be forgiven for our sins which we commit daily. We also fully agree that Messiah Yeshua, the Son of ADONAI is divine. Not only is he the Son of ADONAI, whose personal name is represented in Torah by the Hebrew consonants YHVH, and also in a mysterious way that none of us understands, he is also YHVH. But he is also the Son, Yeshua. We also completely agree with Christianity that Yeshua was born of a virgin. His mother Miryam was overshadowed and impregnated by the Ruach HaKodesh, the Holy Spirit, and her son Yeshua was born not only as the divine Son of God, but also fully as a man who lived out his earthly life in the Land of Israel. With that being said, let's look now at some of the ways that our understanding of Scripture differs from that of traditional Christianity. We'll begin with Acts chapter 1. There we are told that in one of their earlier gatherings with Yeshua, he told them to stay in Jerusalem to wait upon what had been promised, that is, the outpouring of the Ruach HaKodesh, the Holy Spirit. In chapter 2 we find Shimon Kefa, Simon Peter, and all of Yeshua's disciples at the Temple Mount on the day of Shavuot. Why were they not in some upper room in Jerusalem rather than at the Temple? Because they were obedient Jews and they followed Torah. Leviticus 23, verses 15 and 16 say: 15 "'From the day after the day of rest -that is, from the day you bring the sheaf for waving -you are to count seven full weeks, 16 until the day after the seventh week; you are to count fifty days; and then you are to present a new grain offering to ADONAI. This is speaking of Shavuot, the Festival of Weeks, which is also known as Pentecost. Acts 2:1-2 says: 1 The festival of Shavu'ot arrived, and the believers all gathered together in one place. 2 Suddenly there came a sound from the sky like the roar of a violent wind, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting. If you were just reading this in English, and read that they were sitting in a house, you might rightly conclude that they were in some house. But understanding that they were observant Jews and were commanded to be in ADONAI's presence on the Day of Shavuot, you also might agree that they were at the Temple. But then again, you might require more evidence before making that decision. Here it is. In Hebrew, the Temple mount with the Temple upon it is referred to as: Har HaBayit. Har means mountain, Ha means "the," and Bayit means "house." So, Har HaBayit means " the mountain of the House; House with a capital H. Quite often it was shortened to just "The House." So, we understand that Yeshua's disciples 7 were being obedient Jews, and as obedient Jews, were at the place where ADONAI commanded them in His Torah to go. They were at the Temple. At this point we also diverge from the Covenant and Dispensational positions that say that when the Holy Spirit fell on Shavuot, Pentecost, the Church was born, and Jews no longer had a covenantal role outside of "the Church." Our view is that this empowering by the Ruach HaKodesh, the Holy Spirit, to all of these "Jewish" persons on that day, was an empowerment to enable them to carry out Yeshua's words in Matthew 28. He told us in verse 19 that we were to go into all the world and make disciples. And in Acts 1:8 just before his ascension to the Father, Yeshua said: 8 But you will receive power when the Ruach HaKodesh comes upon you; you will be my witnesses both in Yerushalayim and in all Y'hudah and Shomron, indeed to the ends of the earth. The empowerment by the Ruach was to take these men beyond their timid normal selves, and to help them to go fearlessly forward with Yeshua's message of salvation and discipleship for the Nations carrying out their roles as sons of Abraham.. The next event that I would like to talk about tonight is also in Acts. In Acts 10 we read about a Roman army officer named Cornelius. In the KJV he is described as a man who "feared God." In the NIV he is described as "devout and God fearing." But, in the CJB we are told that he was a "God-fearer." Just this small difference in wording makes a difference. A yire shamayim, "fearer of Heaven," was a very specific position in the Judaism of the 1st century. These God-fearers, were followers of the God of Israel, but had not taken the step of becoming full proselytes, that is, converts to Judaism. Cornelius was sincerely seeking to follow ADONAI and because of his devotion, ADONAI gave him a vision. In this vision an angel told him to send men to Yafo, Jaffa, to bring back Shimon Kefa. They were told that he was staying at the house of Shi'mon the tanner. What happened before Cornelius' men reached the house of Simon is well known throughout Christianity. The vision that Kefa had on the rooftop of a sheet coming down is the basis of the entire discourse. But what Christianity says it means is most often completely in opposition to its understanding in Messianic Judaism. Let's read about it. In the CJB in Acts 10:9-16, it says: 9 The next day about noon, while they were still on their way and approaching the city, Kefa went up onto the roof of the house to pray. 10 He began to feel hungry and wanted something to eat; but while they were preparing the meal, he fell into a trance 11 in which he saw heaven opened, and something that looked like a large sheet being lowered to the ground by its four corners. 12 In it were all kinds of four-footed animals, crawling creatures and wild birds. 13 Then a voice came to him, "Get up, Kefa, slaughter and eat!" 14 But Kefa said, "No, sir! Absolutely not! I have never eaten food that was unclean or treif." 15 The voice spoke to him a second time: "Stop treating as unclean what God has made clean." 16 This happened three times, and then the sheet was immediately taken back up into heaven. In Christianity this is usually taken to mean that ADONAI has declared all foods clean and it was now OK for Kefa to eat pork chops. But we have to continue to remember that Shimon was an obedient Jew, one who was careful to follow Torah scrupulously. When Kefa said I have never eaten food that was unclean or treif, he was stating his faithfulness to Torah, and was most likely thinking of Leviticus 11:3-23. These verses of Torah specify that only certain four-footed animals can be eaten, not all kinds of four-footed animals. It also says that "crawling creatures" cannot be eaten; only those specified "jumping" insects. And the Torah is very specific that only certain birds are to be eaten; not every kind of wild bird. It is understandable that some people would make the connection about eating because these verses start out about Shimon Kefa being hungry and waiting for lunch to be prepared. But this is 8 jumping to a conclusion. If we just wait a few verses, we see that Peter reveals the meaning of the vision at Cornelius's house. Here, again, we have to understand the Judaism of the 1st century. This was a very big deal to Kefa. To have ADONAI tell him to go somewhere with Gentiles and to go and enter the home of a Gentile, was something which, up to this point, was just not done. Gentiles, with the term meaning idol worshippers, were considered unclean. Everything about them was unclean. They didn't follow Torah and they usually had foods forbidden by Torah in their homes. However, this was probably not true in Cornelius' case, because he was a "God-fearer," and more than likely he was a scrupulous follower of Torah. Even though Kefa didn't know that, he obediently followed the instructions of ADONAI's voice. You know the story. After entering Cornelius' house, understanding came to Kefa and he fully understood the meaning of the sheet. In chapter 10, verses 34 and 35 Shimon Kefa said: I now understand that God does not play favorites, 35 but that whoever fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him, no matter what people he belongs to. Peter understood that the unclean animals, insects, and birds in the sheet were a reference to the Gentiles that he was being sent to. ADONAI had declared Gentiles to be clean and acceptable to the leaders of Yeshua's Messianic body. From this point on Yeshua's disciples understood that they were to begin to take Yeshua's message to the Gentiles. Up until this point, it was totally a Jewish thing. Even at Shavuot, Pentecost, every person who heard Kefa's message and received Yeshua, were Jews. Acts 2:9-11 says: 9 We are Parthians, Medes, Elamites; residents of Mesopotamia, Y'hudah, Cappadocia, Pontus, Asia, 10 Phrygia, Pamphylia, Egypt, the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome; 11 Jews by birth and proselytes; Jews from Crete and from Arabia. In the Judaism of that day, the proselytes to Judaism, the non-Jews, were also considered Jews. That is a principle which is still followed today. A non-Jewish person who converts to Judaism is considered to be a Jew. Now, Yeshua's disciples were about to take his message to the Nations. But there was still much more understanding which had to come before every kink had been worked out of the process. This leads us to Acts 15. What took place at this meeting and discussion is sometimes called "The Jerusalem Council." How do we understand the message of Acts 15? Unfortunately it, too, has become Christian doctrine against Torah. But there is a way to understand it, and I hope that by the time we finish, you will be convinced. Acts 15:10-11 is one of the key Scriptures which cause Christian theologians to believe that this is a decision against Torah. In these verses, the elders assembled there said: it is: a yoke on the neck of the talmidim which neither we or our fathers could bear. What did they mean? What was it that our fathers could not bear? We will find out. We begin with the issue being discussed which is found in Acts 15: 1-2. 1 But some men came down from Y'hudah to Antioch and began teaching the brothers, "You can't be saved unless you undergo b'rit-milah in the manner prescribed by Moshe." 2 This brought them into no small measure of discord and dispute with Sha'ul and Bar-Nabba. So the congregation assigned Sha'ul, Bar-Nabba and some of themselves to go and put this sh'eilah, this question, before the emissaries and the elders up in Yerushalayim. There were some Messianic Jews, Jews who had accepted Yeshua, who came to Antioch and began to say that they believed that it was necessary for Gentiles to convert to Judaism even though they had accepted Yeshua. This was not Sha'ul's and Bar-Nabba's understanding. As Messianic Jews themselves, they were teaching that Gentiles who had accepted Yeshua were not required to convert to Judaism in order to be a part of the Jewish body. The question was not whether someone who was not a Jew could be saved. The question was: did Gentiles have to convert to Judaism in order to be saved. That is what 9 undergoing b'rit-milah means; undergoing circumcision. To undergo b'rit milah was a "code word" for conversion to Judaism. The real question that was before the Jerusalem Council was: How could a Gentile become a covenant member? The traditional Judaism of the day said that a Gentile had to become a Jew, that is, convert, in order to become a covenant member. And in order to convert, Non-Jews had to be circumcised. In addition, in Acts 15:1, these Messianic Jews said that this circumcision had to be done in the manner prescribed by Moses. You can look as carefully as you wish, but nowhere in Torah will you find that Moshe told us how to do B'rit Milah, the 8th day circumcision. What's going on here? Again, by understanding the Judaism of the day, we know that the reference to "Moshe" is a "code word" reference to "Oral Torah." In that day and also today in Orthodox Judaism, there is the belief that there are two Torahs. Torah she'b'al-Peh is the Oral Torah which has been handed down verbally from Moses, "mouth to ear," through the generations. Torah she-biktav is the written Torah, the Word of ADONAI. As Messianic Jews, we do not believe in the Oral Torah, which among those who accept it, is considered equal in weight to the Written Torah. Moses never did prescribe circumcision. It was ADONAI Who commanded it through Abraham, that b'rit milah, the 8th day circumcision, was to be done for all of his descendants. What then, was the question being asked in Acts15:1-2? It was this: "Do Gentile believers in Yeshua need to become proselytes? That is, do Gentile believers in Yeshua need to be circumcised in order to convert to Judaism? And also very importantly and key to the discussion was: Must Gentile believers in Yeshua keep "Oral Torah," the mouth to ear requirements that were in addition to ADONAI's written Torah? Those Messianic Jews referred to in Acts 15:1 were saying: "You must be a Jew, a part of Judaism, in order to be saved." In their minds, Gentiles had to be circumcised. Then Shimon Kefa stood and told about how ADONAI had through him opened the door for Gentiles to be able to accept Yeshua and become a part of Messianic Israel. After telling those gathered how ADONAI knew the hearts of the Gentiles and had given them the Holy Spirit, in Acts 15: 10 Shimon said: 10 So why are you putting God to the test now by placing a yoke on the neck of the talmidim which neither our fathers nor we have had the strength to bear? What is this "yoke?" The Church says that it is "the Law." And they are partially correct. Yes, it is the Law, but not the written Law of Moses. It is the oral law. It is the Torah she'b'al Peh, the Oral Torah which was supposedly passed down from Moses. I personally don't believe that it was passed down from Moses. It's kind of hard to understand how through the centuries that Israel strayed away from worshipping ADONAI so many times, yet supposedly the Oral Torah was always perfectly preserved. How can this be? During King Josiah's reign, we are told in 2Kings 22 that the "Book of the Torah" was discovered after being lost for many years and they immediately began to follow it. The actual written Torah was lost, but the oral torah was being perfectly preserved? Here is another proof that there is "no oral torah." After Israel left the Wilderness and entered the Land of Canaan under Joshua's leadership, Joshua 8:34-35 makes it clear that there were not other words from Moses which were written down. It says: 34 After this, he read all the words of the Torah, the blessing and the curse, according to everything written in the book of the Torah. 35 There was not a word of everything Moshe had ordered that Y'hoshua did not read before all Isra'el assembled, including the women, the little ones and the foreigners living with them. That settles it for me. So, the yoke that our fathers could not bear was not the Torah of Moses, but was the Oral Torah of traditional Judaism, which was believed to have been passed down by word of mouth from Moses. The question really being asked here was: are we saved by keeping the Oral Torah, 10 or are we saved by the grace of Yeshua? The answer is clear: the Gentiles had been saved because or their faith in Yeshua, not because they kept Oral Torah, and "became Jews." Please understand that this was not a debate about salvation being achieved by works. Not even the Messianic Jews mentioned in 15:1 who wanted Gentiles to be circumcised believed that salvation came by works. They, as well as Ya'acov, James, Kefa, Peter, Yochanan, John, and all the others, believed that a place in the world to come was only through the grace of Yeshua. But, the non-Messianic Jews of that day, who were never a part of this discussion, believed that a place in the world to come was the gift of ADONAI to every member of the Covenant Nation, Israel. According to them, Yeshua was not needed. All that was required was to be a part of Israel, whether Jew or proselyte Gentile. But in order to be able to learn more, there had to be some entering point for these new Gentile believers in Yeshua. This entering point was established through the four requirements found in Acts 15:28-29. The elders said: 28 For it seemed good to the Ruach HaKodesh and to us not to lay any heavier burden on you than the following requirements: 29 to abstain from what has been sacrificed to idols, from blood, from things strangled, and from fornication. If you keep yourselves from these, you will be doing the right thing. Some say that these four were really a short list of the 7 Noachide Laws. You may not be familiar with this. Traditional Judaism says that there are 7 prohibitions based on Genesis 9:1-11 that all Gentiles have the option of keeping in order to be in right standing with ADONAI. What they are saying is that, yes, as a Gentile you can convert to Judaism, but as a Gentile, you also have the choice of just being a Noachide, a follower of the seven Noachide Laws. We don't have time to go into this further tonight. But this is not what the four prohibitions made by the council at Jerusalem were. It could not have been. The Noachide Laws were not even formulated until the Babylonian Talmud of the late 1st century and the early 2nd century. And, they are not mentioned in the Mishnah, which is the written form of the Oral Torah. Getting back to the four requirements; they had nothing to do with salvation by faith through the grace of Yeshua. Acts 15:11 says: 11 No, it is through the love and kindness of the Lord Yeshua that we trust and are delivered- and it's the same with them. In other words, salvation is by faith for the Jews and it's the same for the Gentiles. If the Gentiles had been given a different set of Laws it would have undermined the message of the Gospel. And, Sha'ul never taught one way for Jews and one way for Gentiles. But it is clear that the four requirements are essential. Even so, these four did not in any way suggest that they were the totality of all moral and ethical guidelines, and that all that was needed for Gentiles was to be found in these four things. But, we still have our question: why did the Jerusalem Council prescribe these man-made laws? The answer is actually a simple one. It was in order to be satisfied that the saved Gentiles, those believing in Yeshua, were no longer "idolaters." The elders of the new Messianic body of Messiah had to be certain that these new Gentile believers had turned their backs on the capital Torah offense of "serving other gods." ADONAI was really a "stickler" about that, and these leaders had to provide a way for these former pagans, idol worshippers, to stop their pagan practices and begin to learn about ADONAI and His commandments. Here is what the four prohibitions mean. 1) These new Gentile believers were to abstain from eating meat which they knew that had been presented as a sacrifice to a false god in temple worship. This was not a reference to meat clean according to Torah that was sold in the common market, but specifically a reference to food at a meal of an idolatrous ceremony. 11 2) They were to abstain from blood. This was prohibited by ADONAI in Genesis 9 when He gave Noah new instructions which allowed the eating of meat. It can also be found in a number of places in the Coveanant given at Mount Sinai. This prohibition can refer to both eating meat with blood in it and the drinking of blood as a part of a pagan ritual. 3) They were to abstain from things strangled. Pagan sacrifices were usually killed by cutting the throat of the animal, but strangulation was also known to be used. Meat from animals strangled was saturated with blood. This would have been the eating of meat with blood in it and would also have been a violation of compassionate slaughter, a characteristic of Jewish slaughtering. 4) They were to abstain from fornication. This refers to "temple prostitution." Joining oneself to a prostitute (either male or female) was to negate ADONAI's ownership of everyone called by His Name. 1Corinthians 6:15-17 says: 15 Don't you know that your bodies are parts of the Messiah? So, am I to take parts of the Messiah and make them parts of a prostitute? Heaven forbid! 16 Don't you know that a man who joins himself to a prostitute becomes physically one with her? For the Tanakh says, "The two will become one flesh"; 17 but the person who is joined to the Lord is one spirit. What does all of this actually mean? How can we understand it? Here is the gist of it. The new Gentile believers in Yeshua had to have a complete break with their former idolatrous life. This would show that they had forsaken the "gods of their fathers" and turned to the One God of Israel. This is shown by the final sentence in Acts 15:29, 29b: If you keep yourselves from these, you will be doing the right thing. Let's begin to summarize all of these points. We can begin this by saying that in this case, the Jerusalem Council was dealing with a specific issue. And it was the question of whether it was necessary for Gentiles to become proselytes and take on the full weight of the man-made laws of the rabbis in order to be accepted in the Jewish community, that is to be recognized as Jews. The council voted no to this question. They said that circumcision was not necessary. As we said earlier, circumcision was a "shorthand code word" used to mean: "becoming a proselyte, a Jew by conversion." The council said that Gentiles need not become become proselytes in order to be received into the Messianic Torah community. But there was another need. There was the need to insure that these new Gentile believers had forsaken any form of idolatry. And to insure this, the Apostles required the Gentile believers to accept the man-made rules of the Jerusalem Council regarding idolatry; the four prohibitions. These prohibitions given by the authority of Yeshua's chosen leaders of the Messianic community would then allow new Gentile believers to have fellowship with Jewish believers in Yeshua. But the bottom line of this entire discourse was given long before the last words were spoken and it is found in Acts 15:21. It says: For from the earliest times, Moshe has had in every city those who proclaim him, with his words being read in the synagogues every Shabbat. This meant that the new Gentile believers, by following the four rules of the Council, would be permittted to enter the synagogues each Sabbath Day and to hear and to learn Torah. The proclamation of Moshe, Moses, is another of those "code words," and it means to "study Torah." By attending synagogue and hearing Torah, these new Gentile believers would gradually learn what was further required of them in order to please ADONAI. But remember, as we said last week, keeping ADONAI's Torah was not a means of salvation. The new Gentile believers in Yeshua had obtained salvation through their faith in Yeshua's sacrifice; through grace by faith. Let's reconsider for a moment what we learned last week from Sha'ul, Paul, regarding Law; Torah. When Paul speaks of the Torah, Law, in the "context of salvation," that is, justification, or right standing before ADONAI, he clearly states 12 that Torah keeping, Law keeping, is of no avail. You can't get saved through the Law. Read Romans 3:20. But on the other hand, when Sha'ul speaks of the Torah in the "context of believer's conduct," that is, sanctification, or right living before ADONAI, then, he affirms the value and validity of ADONAI’s Torah. Romans 7:12, 13:8-10, 1Corinthians 7:19, and 1Timothy 1:8-10 are all examples of this. What we have had time to consider tonight is just the tip of the iceberg of Messianic Jewish theology. There are many, many more Scriptures that are very difficult to understand just by reading the English. Most of them are found in Sha'ul's letters. Even though we don't have time to consider them all during our talks, we will try to include some additional printed materials for you to read at home before we conclude our six sessions. What we hope that you have learned during our time tonight is that "the written word is not always what it seems." By understanding Torah and having a knowledge of customs, traditions, and the working of Judaism in the first century, we can many times decipher what is being presented in the Messianic Scriptures, the writings of Yeshua's talmidim, his disciples. And by all means, I hope that you now agree that Torah is still very much alive and in effect. As Sha'ul said to Timothy in 2Timothy 3:16: 16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is valuable for teaching the truth, convicting of sin, correcting faults and training in right living; 17 thus anyone who belongs to God may be fully equipped for every good work. If we understand that the Scripture being spoken of is Torah, the teaching and instruction of ADONAI's commands, then we can and will be fully equipped for every good work. 13