Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Bioscience Reports i, 299-307 (1981) Printed in Great Britain 299 A l i g n m e n t of c l o n e d amiE g e n t of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with the N-terminal sequence of amidase P.H. CLARKE,* R.E. DREW,* C. TURBERVILLE,* W.3. BRAMMAR~% R.P. AMBLERsw and A.D, AUFFRET~w182 *Department of Biochemistry, University College London, London WCIE 6BT, U.K.; %Department of Biochemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester LEI 7RH, U.K.; and w of Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, U.K. (Received 4 March 1981) A restriction enzyme map was constructed for a 5.1-kb f r a g m e n t of Pseudomonas aeruginosa DNA inserted into plasmid pBR322. Restriction enzym e sites were matched to the N-terminal amino acid s e q u e n c e of a m i d a s e to o b t a i n a l i g n m e n t of t h e amiE gent within the cloned fragment. Pseudomonas a e r u g i n o s a strain PAC1 produces an inducible aliphatic amidase whose synthesis is under positive control by a regulator gent , am iR~ c l o s e l y l i nked to the structural gene~ amiE (Brammar et al., 1967; Farin & Clarke~ 1978). Amidase is also subject to c a t a b o l i t e r e p r e s s i o n by s u c c i n a t e and other i nt erm edi at es of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (Smyth & Clarke, 1975a~b). We h a v e c l o n e d a m i d a s e g e n e s in E s c h e r i c h i a c o l i using a derivative of bacteriophage lambda as the cloning vect or (Drew et al., 1980) and confirmed that the enzyme synthesized in phage-infected E. c o l i is identical to t hat of P. a e r u g i n o s a . Preliminary r e s t r i c t i o n e n z y m e m a p p i n g of l a m i R D 1 DNA show ed the loss of one of the HindIII sites used to construct the r e c o m b i n a n t and r e v e a l e d si ngl e Kpr~ and SalI sites within the inserted DNA. Digestion with KpnI and //indIII in c o m b i n a t i o n g a v e DNA f r a g m e n t s c o r r e s p o n d i n g to an insertion of about 9 kb of P. a e r u g i n o s a DNA (Drew et a l , 1980). Cleavage of t a m i DNA w i t h HindIII and S a l I g e n e r a t e d a 5.1-kb f r a g m e n t c o n t a i n i n g amidase genes, which was subcloned in plasmid pBR322 for restriction enzyme mapping. A m i d a s e is a h e x a m e r i c protein with identical subunits of about 33 000 in m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t . The a m i n o a c i d s e q u e n c e has b e e n e s t a b l i s h e d for a major part of the enzyme protein (Auffret~ 1977; R.P. Ambler and A.D. A u f f r e t , u n p u b l i s h e d ) . The d i s t r i b u t i o n of restriction e nz ym e sites suggested that it would be possible to identify the position of the amiE structural g e n t in t h e c l o n e d s e g m e n t by ' t r a n s l a t i n g ' th'e n u c l e o t i d e s e q u e n c e s of t he r e s t r i c t i o n e n z y m e recognition sites and matching all t h e p o s s i b l e s e q u e n c e s with t h e known amino acid sequence of the N-terminal region. The method was applied subsequently to published data for o t h e r g e n e s and p r o t e i n s where the amino acid sequences~ DNA sequences~ and restriction maps were already known. 82 address: Department of Biochemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K. 9 The Biochemical Society 300 Materials CLARKE ET AL. and Methods Bacteria and bacteriophages E. c o l t C600 (Appleyard, 195#) was used as the standard host for growth of lambdoid phages. W3110 polA] (Gross & Gross, 1969) and N3098, ( l i g t s 7, supF) (Pauling & Hamm, 1968) were used to test phages for the Fec + phenotype (Zissler et al., 1971). E. c o l t L910 ( metB, hsdS, supE, s u p F , r e c B , r e c C ) , a d e r i v a t i v e of the nonrestricting strain 803 (Wood, 1966), was used as the host for transformation. The p l a q u e - f o r m i n g lambdoid phages carrying the amiE gene from P. aeruginosa strain PAC433, lamiRDI (Xami ( a t t - x i s ) A imm~1 n i n S ) and l a m i 3 1 4 ( l a m i ( a t t - x i s ) A imm z ci857 n i n +) have been described (Drew et al., 1980). lDB43 (XtrpE (DC)502 BA/lacZ cIAninS) ( D . W . B ur r , u n p u b l i s h e d ) was used as a s o u r c e of a Hina]II-Kpnl linker f r agm e nt carrying the t r p A and l acZ genes. Transfer of the ami gene to a plasmid: Construction of pJB950 The amiE gene was transferred from ),ami314 to the plasmid vect or pBR322 ( B o l i v a r et al., 1977) as part of the fragm ent of P. aerug in o s a DNA flanked by the HindlII and SalI targets. Samples of 0.5 IJg of Xami314 and pBR322 DNAs were digested with Hin4III and SalI simultaneously in HindIII buffer as previously described (Drew et al., 1980). Digested DNAs (1.0 lJg total DNA) were mixed and ligated in a volume of 65 IJl for 16 h at 10~ as described elsewhere (Drew et al., [980). Samples from the ligation mixture were used to transform E. c o l t strain Lg10 made c o m p e t e n t by the method of Mandel and Higa ( 1 9 7 0 ) . A f t e r p r e - i n c u b a t i o n for 1 h at 37~ in L - b r o t h (Lennox, 1955), the t r a n s f o r m a t i o n m i x t u r e was p l a t e d on L - a g a r c o n t a i n i n g a m p i c i l l i n (20 p g / m l ) . A p p r o x i m a t e l y 8000 ampicillinresistant transformants per lJg of total DNA were obtained, of which about 10% were shown to be sensitive to t e t r a c y c l i n e (20 t~g/ml) on subsequent testing. T h e p l a s m i d DNA f r o m t h e p a r e n t a l s t r a i n and f r o m 10 tetr acy clin e - s e ns i t i ve transformants was subjected to electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel, using the rapid screening method of Barnes (1977). One of the ten isolates contained enlarged p l a s m i d DNA, which on s u b s e q u e n t p u r i f i c a t i o n and a n a l y s i s p r o v e d to c a r r y t h e 5. l - k b f r ag men t bounded by SalI and Hin4III s i t e s . St ai ns h a r b o u r i n g t h e r e c o m b i n a n t plasmid p3B950 were shown to have low but d e t e c t a b l e amidase activities. D e l e t i o n o f DNA from kami D e r i v a t i v e s of Xami314 with deletions were obtained by selecting for resistance to the chelating agent sodium pyrophosphate (Parkinson & Huskey, 1971; Shulman & Gottesman, 1971). Dilutions of stocks of Xami314 were adsorbed to indicator st rai n C600 on BBL T r y p t i c a s e agar plates (Parkinson, 1968) containing 10 mM P2OTNa4, pH 7.0, and incubated for 16 h at 37~ P y r o p h o s p h a t e - r e s i s t a n t phages, which a p p e a r e d at a f r e q u e n c y of a b o u t 3"10 -s, were plaque-purified on selective plates and propagated by lytic infection for the isolation of phage DNA as described by Murray et al. (1977). ALIGNMENT OF CLONED amiE GENE 301 Restriction endonuclease mapping AvaI, Avail, Bc!I, Kpnl, Sstl, SstII~ Xbal, XhoI, and Xorll were purchased from Uniscience L t d . , C a m b r i d g e . BamHI, Bglll, EcoRI, Haell, HaeIII, HindlII, HpaI, HpaII, PstI, SalI, and ~ DNA were purchased from Miles Laboratories Ltd., Stoke P o g e s . ItindII, SmaI, and TaqI w e r e p u r c h a s e d from BCL, Lewes, and Sau3A from CP Laboratories Ltd., Bishop's Stortford. Digestions were carried out in t h e b u f f e r s recommended by the manufacturers using 1 IJg of plasmid or bacteriophage DNA in a final volume of 20 Ill. For doubl e d i g e s t i o n s t h e plasmid DNA was digested first with the enzyme requiring the buffer of lower ionic strength and subsequently adjusted b e f o r e adding t h e second enzyme. After addition of 3 Ill of loading buffer (25% Ficoll, Pharmacia, Uppsala; buffer; 0.025% bromophenol blue; 0.1 M EDTA in 0.04 M T r i s - a c e t a t e buffer; pH 9.3), samples were applied to horizontal agarose gels ( i - 2 . 5 % w/v) using 0.04 M T r i s - a c e t a t e buffer, pH 8.0 (Sharp et al., 1973), and run overnight at 35 mA. Other samples were desalted with ethanol and applied to vertical polyacrylamide slab gels ( M a n i a t i s et al., 1975) and run at 10 V per cm. Gels were stained for 30 min in i pg/ml ethidium bromide solution, washed for 30 min with distilled water, and photographed. Calculation of the size of the DNA fragments was based on known s t a n d a r d s of d i g e s t s of )~cI857 wit h EcoRI and HindIII (Phillipsen et al., 1978) and pBR322 with ttpall (Sutcliffe, 1978). Converting nucleotide sequences of restriction enzyme sites to corresponding amino acids The nucleotide s e q u e n c e s w e r e ' t r a n s l a t e d ' i n t o a m i n o aci d sequences in each of the t hr e e reading frames. For example the SstII sequence can be read as CCG.CGG to code for Pro.Arg; as C.CGC.GG to code for X.Arg.Gly; as C C . G C G . G to c o d e for ( S e r , Pro, Thr, A l a ) . A l a . ( G i y , Ala, Asp, Glu, V a l ). Som e of t h e potential sites predicted for individual restriction enzymes could be eliminated on the basis of the restriction data alone. One of the al t ernat i ve sequences for AvaI recognition could be eliminated for sites not also targets for Sinai and a n o t h e r could be eliminated for sites not also targets for XhoI. Similar considerations applied to o v e r l a p p i n g s p e c i f i c i t i e s of Hindll, Sail, and Hpal. It should be emphasized that the restriction targets predicted from the amino acid sequence are only potential sites. A restriction site identified by mapping must correspond to a particular DNA sequence but some of the potential sites identified by e x a m i n a t i o n of ' t r a n s lations' need not exist at all. Results and Discussion Localization of the amiE gene within the cloned DNA The recombinant phage XaraiRD1 contains a p p r o x i m a t e l y 9 kb of D N A derived from P. aeruginosa PACTS33, located between a Kpnl site and a HindlIl site of a vector phage ( D r e w et al., 1980). Information on t h e a p p r o x i f n a t e l o c a t i o n of t h e amiE gene was o b t a i n e d by 302 C L A R K E ET AL. A kami314 J KK | I K H I |,,.(a.tt -xi s)A N cl Q SR "~176176176176176176176176176176 ~'~ ..................... ~176176 ~176176176176176176176 ~176176176176176176 "~176176 X I 1 I I 3 I I 5 I I 7 I I 9kb I Fig. i. Locating the amiE gene within the DNA of %ami314. The map at the top of the figure shows the genome of %ami314, including some of the phage genes. Below the phage map, on expanded scale~ are shown the physical maps of the cloned DNA in %ami314 and three of its derivatives. The single horizontal line represents ~ DNA, an open double line represents DNA originally from P. aeruginosa, and the shaded double line shows the DNA of the E. coli trp/lac fusion operon, isolated from trp/lac phage %DB54. Brackets show the positions of deletions, and arrows indicate the positions of targets for restriction enzymes KpnI(K), HindlII(H), Sail(S), and XhoI(X). The kilobase scale at the bottom applies only to the four expanded maps. i s o l a t i o n and c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n of deletions within Xami314. The only non-essential phage genes carried by Xami318 are the red, gam, and cIII genes located between the cloned D N A and the immunity region of the phage (Fig. I). The presence of the red and gain genes could readily be verified by testing the ability of phages to give plaques on polA and ligts strains (Zissler et al., 1971). Pyrophosphate-resistant phages retaining the red and gain genes, and likely to contain deletions within the cloned DNA, w e r e p r o p a g a t e d for DNA isolation. Positions of t w o of t h e D N A d e l e t i o n s a r e s h o w n in F i g . I . D e l e t i o n A7 r e m o v e s a p p r o x i m a t e l y 4.9 kb of DNA, including the t a r g e t for S a l I , w h i l e l e a v i n g t h e s e c o n d KpnI t a r g e t of X and all the XhoI t a r g e t s intact. D e l e t i o n M o v e r l a p s 47, e l i m i n a t i n g 4.5 kb of DNA including t h e S a / I t a r g e t , and t h e m o s t l e f t w a r d X h o I t a r g e t . T h e s e two deletions t o g e t h e r r e m o v e a b o u t 5.3 kb of DNA at the l e f t end of t h e cloned Pseudomonas fragment. Since both tami31~A1 and 47 r e m a i n strongly a m i d a s e - p o s i t i v e in p l a t e t e s t s , t h e s e results l o c a t e t h e amiE gene in the r i g h t - h a n d half of the cloned DNA. This was c o n f i r m e d by finding a m i d a s e a c t i v i t y in E. c o l i harbouring the recombinant ALIGNMENT OF CLONED amiE GENE 303 Hin 1 0 3.74 Kb 5 'lOKb Xh Kpn H,nUTuSm P p im x i~ 2"0 6 Xh ,6o 260 xh lit (,s., 3"0 4"0 S~'OKb a;o ~60 s~o ,~ ~o = i Fig. 2. Restriction enzyme map of cloned amidase genes: (a) map of plasmid pJB950 (pBR322-ami); (b) map of P. aeruginosa DNA inserted in pJB950; (c) map of first 700 bp from HindIII site. The plasmid was analysed with restriction enzymes AvaI (AI) 9 AvaII (AII)~ HaeII (HII), HaeIII (HIII), HindII (HinII)~ HindIII (HinIII), HpaII (Hp), KpnI (Kpn), PstI (P), SalI (Sal) 9 SmaI (Xh)~ and XorII (Sm)~ SstII (S)~ TaqI (T)9 XhoI (Xo)~ and cleavage sites for these enzymes are indicated. The arrow indicates the location of the N-terminal segment of the amiE gene. See also Table 3. plasmid pJB950 into which the 5.l-kb HindIII-SalI f r a g m e n t had been inserted (Fig. 2a). More p r e c i s e l o c a t i o n of t h e amiE g e n e was o b t a i n e d by c o n s t r u c t i o n of p h a g e XDB219 (Fig. 1) containing the 2.#-kb KpnI-gindIII fragment. This recombinant phage also e x p r e s s e d the Ami + phenotype, indicating that the amiE gene is located within the 2.4-kb f r a gm ent of Pseudomonas DNA f l a n k e d by t h e gpnI and HindIII targets. Restriction map Table 1 gives the total number of f r a g m e n t s produced as a result of digestion of plasmid p3B950ami with restriction endonucleases. The average values for the sums of fragments obtained was around 9 kb as expected. Digestion with enzymes BamHI, BclI, BglII, HyaI, EcoRI, S s t I , and XbaI did not indicate any sites for these enzymes in the 30# CLARKE Table I. Fragments produced by restriction endonuclease digestion of pJB950 Enzyme Fragment size (kb) A HindIII KpnI SalI PstI SmaI XhoI XorII SstII HindlI AvaI 9.14 9.12 8.99 7,94 7.55 7.08 3.80 4.66 4.40 3.09 ET AL. B C 1.20 1.50 1.48 2.62 1.78 3.26 1.60 .603 1.41 .897 .706 1.51 D E .74 .703 .347 1.44 F .59 .583 .243 .614 Sum of Sites fragment in sizes vector (kb) G .162 .133 .468 .228 9.14 9.12 8.99 9.14 9.05 9.16 9.16 8.79 9.07 8.95 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 located from 4 Sites in vector Sutcliffe (1979). (Sutcliffe, 1978) or visually DNA insert. The sites for the rest of the restriction enzymes (Table 1) were mapped by a series of double digests using either Kind[[] or S'alI compared w i t h digests w i t h the enzymes used singly. This procedure with KpnI, PstI, and Sinai was f o l l o w e d by double digests employing this group of enzymes in pairs. Fig. 2b,c shows the map of restriction sites obtained by these methods. The r e p e t i t i v e double digest s were continued until the relative positions could be assigned with confidence. Matching amino acid sequences to restriction-mapping data A catalogue of all potential targets w i t h i n the f i r s t 13# a m i n o acids f r o m the N-terminus was calculated for the enzymes shown in Fig. 2c using the 'translation' method. Examples of the numbers of p o t e n t i a l sites are: none for XorH, 3 for Sma], 6 for PstI, 10 for HaeHI. The mapping data indicated that the amiE gene was located near the Kind[[[ end of the cloned fragment. Therefore the tests for best fits were made around the Sma[ site at 200 bp and the HaeII site at 56t bp allowing for all positions of the N-terminus from 0 to 560 bp from the KindII] site. For each of the 3 potential Sinai sites and the 2 HaeH sites the restriction mapping data were used to calculate the position in the amino acid sequence where the e x p e r i m e n t a l l y d e t e r m i n e d sites for the o t h e r restriction enzymes might be found (Table 2). Thus) if the Glu-Arg-His sequence at residues 105 to 107 is assumed to correspond to the HaM! site at map position 561, the Pstl site at position #30 should correspond to an amino acid sequence about #2 amino acids distant. The nearest f i t for the Pst] 'translation' was found for the Leu-Gln sequence at residues 62-63. Table 27 Set B, shows t h a t the alignment with the best f i t was obtained from calculations based on placing the HaeII site at residues 105-t07 ALIGNMENT OF CLONED amiE GENE 305 Table 2. Possible alignments of the restriction map with the sequence of 132 amino acids from the N-terminus of the amidase protein a.a. = amino acid; M = amino acid residue number calculated from m a p d i s t a n c e ; P = n e a r e s t potential site derived from matching amino acid sequence; D = M - P. Dashes indicate sites outside the matched sequence. Numbers under P are those of the central amino acids of tripeptides, or N + 0.5 for d i p e p t i d e s N to N + I. Sequence predicts no Xorll site in the first 396 base-pairs. Set A: S m a I at a.a. Site M P 2 3 Sau3A XorII Set B: HaeII at a.a. 106 50 D M P Set C: Haell at a.a. 144 D M 37.5 -35.5 No site ~3 . . . . . . . . . . P D //pall HaeII 17 20 23.5 106 -6.5 -86 . . . . . . . . . . AvaI Taqll 28 34 31 35.5 -3 -1.5 . . . . . . . . . . HindlI SstI 88 90 102 76 14 14 24 26 18.5 28 5.5 2 32 34 18.5 29 13.5 5 AvaI PstII 122 127 iii 91 ii 36 57 62 58.5 -1.5 62.5 -0.5 65 70 58.5 70 6.5 0 SstII - - - 79 76 87 76 -3 ii as described above. (Two of the potential SmaI sites were r e j e c t e d as they would place the N-terminus outside the cloned f r a g m e n t . ) T h e r e w e r e not enough restriction enzyme sites to test all other possible alignments within the 2.5-kb fragment. However, the fit for s e t B is so good t h a t it is u n l i k e l y to be due to chance. This alignment places the translation s t a r t of t h e a m i E g e n e a t 247 bp f r o m t h e //indIII s i t e and e x c l u d e s all sites leftward from SmaI to HindIII (Table 3). Preliminary DNA sequencing starting from the SmaI site indicates that this is c o r r e c t (W.3. Brammer, unpublished). Application to o t h e r genes and enzymes The r e l i a b i l i t y of t h i s m e t h o d of aligning r e s t r i c t i o n maps w i t h amino acid sequences was assessed w i t h t w o o t h e r s y s t e m s w h e r e r e s t r i c t i o n maps and DNA sequences had been published. These were the bacteriophage ;k integrase (Hoess et al., 1980) and t h e E n t e r o bacter cloacae C D F I 3 cloacin immunity protein (Van den Elzen et al., 19g0). The potential restriction enzyme targets w e r e e x a m i n e d f o r all p o s s i b l e positions and for both orientations of the gene. In both cases the position and orientation were predicted c o r r e c t l y by our method. 306 CLARKE ET AL. Table 3. Restriction map of amiE and amino acid sequence* Map distance (bp) from Amino acid calculated from Match N-terminus** found Hindlll from N-terminus Estimate 247 0 Hindll 315 68 23 18-19 GTC.AAC Val.Asn Sstll 320 73 24 27-29 CCG.CGG Pro.Arg Aval 415 168 56 58-59 CCC.GAG Pro.Glu Pstl 420 183 61 62-63 CTG.CAG Leu.Gln Sstll 480 233 74 75-77 CC.GCG.G Thr.Ala.Val Haell 561 314 105 105-107 AG.CGC.C Glu.Arg.His Enzyme Amino acid sequence*** Met *Recognition sites from Smal leftward could not be aligned with the amino acid sequence. **Amino acid number calculated from map distance from estimated N-terminus. Base pairs divided by 3. ***Amino acid sequence from Auffret (1977) and R.P. Ambler and A.D. Auffret (unpublished data). Acknowledgements We thank Anne Smith and 3udy Bundick for excellent technical assistance. We are grateful to the SRC :[or grants to PHC, W3B, and RPA for research support. ADA was in receipt of an SRC Research Training Grant. References Appleyard RK (1954) Genetics 39, 440-452. Auffret AD (1977) Ph.D. Thesis) University of Edinburgh. Barnes W (1977) Science 195, 393-394. Bolivar F) Rodrignez RL~ Greene PJ) Betlach MO) Heyneker HL) Boyer HW) Crosa JH & Falkow S (1977) Gene 2, 95-113. Brammar WJ) Clarke PH &Skinner AJ (1967) J. Gen. Microbiol. 47, 87-102. Drew RE) Clarke PH & Brammar WJ (1980) Molec. Gen. Genet. 177) 311-320. Farin F & Clarke PH (1978) J. Bacteriol. 135) 379-392. A L I G N M E N T OF CLONED amiE GENE 307 Gross J & Gross M (1969) Nature (Lond.) 224, 1166-1170. Hoess RH, Foeller C, Bidwell K & Landy A (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 2482-2486. Lennox ES (1955) Virology I, 190-206. Maniatis T, Jeffrey A & Van der Sande H (1975) Biochemistry 14, 3787-3794. Mandel M & Higa A (1970) J. Molec. Biol. 53, 159-162. Murray NE, Brammar WJ & Murray K (1977) Molec. Gen. Genet. 150, 53-61. Parkinson JS (1968) Genetics 59, 311-325. Parkinson JS & Huskey RJ (1971) J. Molec. Biol. 56~ 369-384. Pauling C & Hamm L (1968) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 60, 1495-1502. Phillipsen P, Kramer RA & Davis RW (1978) J. Molec. Biol. 123, 371-386. Sharp PA, Sugden B & Sambrook J (1973) Biochemistry 12, 3005-3063. Shulman M & Gottesman M (1971) in The Bacteriophage Lambda (AD Hershey7 ed.) 7 pp. 477-4887 Cold Spring Harbor Labs. 7 New York. Smyth PF & Clarke PH (1975a) J. Gen. Microbiol. 907 81-90. Smyth PF & Clarke PH (1975b) J. Gen. Microbiol. 90, 91-99. Sutcliffe JG (1978) Nucleic Acids Res. 57 2721-2728. Sutcliffe JG (1979) Cold Spring Harbor Symposium Quant. Biol. 437 77-90. Van den Elzen PJM 7 Gaastra W 7 Spelt CE~ de Graaf FK 7 Velterkamp E & Nijkamp (1980) Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 4349-4363. Wood WB (1966) J. Molec. Biol. 16, 118-133. Zissler J7 Signer ER & Schaefer F (1971) in The Bacteriophage Lambda (AD Hershey 7 ed.) 7 pp. 455-475, Cold Spring Harbor Labs. 7 New York.