Download allergen

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

SR protein wikipedia , lookup

Proteasome wikipedia , lookup

Cell-penetrating peptide wikipedia , lookup

Epitranscriptome wikipedia , lookup

Protein wikipedia , lookup

Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup

Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup

Protein adsorption wikipedia , lookup

QPNC-PAGE wikipedia , lookup

Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup

DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup

Western blot wikipedia , lookup

Two-hybrid screening wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Fátima Ferreira
Department of Molecular Biology
University of Salzburg, Austria
• Derive from a variety of environmental
sources
• Display a broad range of structures and
functions in their respective sources (e.g.
structural, enzymatic, ligand-binding)
• Represent a small fraction of proteins that
humans are exposed to
• The same proteins behave as allergens across
the human population
• Natural exposure: allergens are delivered as
complex mixtures of molecules
How do such diverse proteins
preferentially induce Th2-biased
immune responses?
Allergen source
Allergen
Epithelial
cells
Barrier penetration / capture
DC
DC
Internalization by APCs, processing
and presentation to naïve T cells
Migration
DC
T
B
Naïve
T cell
Th2 differentiation
Th2
IgE
IL-4
IL-13
B
B
Allergen – epithelial interactions and allergic sensitization
Engagement of PRRs
Barrier penetration / capture
Internalization, processing and
presentation to naïve T cells
Th2 differentiation
Gandhi & Vliagoftis, Front Immunol 2015
Post-translational modifications
• Glycosylation
• Disulfide bonds
• Proteolytic processing
• Chemical modifications
(nitration, deamidation)
Biochemical Function
• Enzyme activity
(protease)
• Ligand-binding
(lipids, ions)
• Receptor
binding/activation
(PARs, TLR, MR, CLR)
Oligomerization
• Dimers
• Oligomers
Protein Fold and Stability
• Molecular dynamics
• pH
• Temperature
• Proteolytic
susceptibility
of the antigen
1. Preparation of
endolysosomal fraction
2. In vitro degradation
(pH 4.5)
- Intact protein
+
DCs
APC-derived
endolysosomal
proteases
3. Analysis
SDS-PAGE/
Scanner densitometry
Antigen/Allergen
Homogenization
Centrifugation
0h
0.5h
1h
Post-nuclear
supernatant
- Peptide sequencing (MS/MS)
2h
Ultracentrifugation
3h
Capillary HPLC/ESIQTOF Mass
Spectrometry
4h
Microsomal fraction
Freeze-thaw cycles
Endolysosomal Proteins/proteases
..
..
..
..
5h
48h
Egger et al, PLoS One 2011
Bet v 1.0401 (Bet v 1d)
Bet v 1.0101 (Bet v 1a)
activates DCs much better (elevated differs from Bet v 1.0401 by 7
levels of CD80 and CD86; reduced amino acids (sequence homology of
IL-6 production) and induces 95%)
stronger IgG and IgA responses in
mice3
Bet v 1d
Bet v 1a
Bet v 1d
Zaborsky et al (2010). J Immunol 184: 725-735
Bet v 1a
Egger et al, PLoS One 2011
Natural Pru p 3
(nPru p 3)
Reduced and alkylated
Pru p 3
(R/A Pru p 3)
Toda et al., JACI 2011
Natural Pru p 3
(nPru p 3)
Degradome ½ life:
Approx. 12 hours
Reduced and alkylated
Pru p 3
(R/A Pru p 3)
Degradome ½ life:
approx. 2 hours
Toda et al., JACI 2011
LIGAND-BINDING
NITRATION
Ackaert et al., PlosOne 2014
Kofler et al., J Mol Biol 2012; Asam et al., CEA 2014
Grutsch et al., Biophys J 2014
DIMERIZATION
FOLD STABILITY
Zaborsky et al., J Immunol 2010; Egger et al., PlosOne 2011
Kofler et al., J Biol Chem 2014
Wallner et al., JACI 2011; Machado et al., JACI 2015
Wallner et al. (in preparation)
Bet v 1d
(dimer)
Bet v 1a
(monomer)
Bet v 1a
T. Thermophilus
homologue
POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATIONS (disulfide bridges)
Toda et al., JACI 2011
Susceptibility/resistance to endolysosomal proteases seem to be
linked to “intrinsic” allergenicity/immunogenicity of protein antigens
and influences the type of immune response (Th2 vs. Th1 bias)
Proteolytic resistance
Delamarre, L et al (2005) Science 307: 1630-1634
Delamarre, L et al (2006) J Exp Med 203: 2049-2055
Egger et al, PLoS One 2011
pH 4.5
pH 5.0
Bet v 1a
Bet v 1d
Egger et al, PLoS One 2011
Freier et al, Nature Sci Rep 2015
SAW-measurements
pH 6.7
Freier et al, Nature Sci Rep 2015
Freier et al, Nature Sci Rep 2015
The interplay between fold stability and pHdependent proteolytic susceptibility…
Fold stability
IgE reactivity
pH and proteolytic susceptibility
Immunogenicity/allergenicity
depends on differential fold stability
at different endosomal pH
In vivo immunogenicity/allergenicity
IgG1
IgG2a
IL-4
IFN-g
RBL
IgE
Machado et al., JACI 2015
Machado et al., JACI 2015
Chemical
modifications
Post-translational
modifications
ALLERGEN ENGINEERING
(HYPOALLERGENS)
RECOMBINANT
ALLERGY VACCINES
Ligand-binding
Oligomerization
Machado et al., JACI 2015
• Susceptibility/resistance to lysosomal proteases seem to be linked to intrinsic
allergenicity/immunogenicity of protein antigens and to influence the type of
immune response (allergic vs. non-allergic)
• Differential pH-dependent fold stability along endosomal maturation
(acidification) seem to be an important factor for allergenicity and
immunogenicity
• Fine tuning of resistance/susceptibility to endolysosomal proteolysis may be
an approach for designing allergen vaccines with enhanced immunogenicity
Research
Assistants
Michael Wallner
PhD
students
Gabi Gadermaier
Lorenz Aglas
Stephanie Eichhorn
Isabel Pablos
Sabrina Schuller
Anargyros Roulias
Heidi Hofer
Teresa Stemeseder
Claudia Asam
Sara Huber
Martin Wolf
Markus Steiner
Olivia McKenna
Josef Thalhamer
Peter Lackner
Hans Brandstetter
Peter Briza
Albert Duschl
Christian Huber
Yoan Machado
Gernot Achatz
Barbara Bohle
Beatrice Jahn-Schmidt
Heimo Breiteneder
Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber
Christof Ebner
Martin Tollinger
Klaus Liedl
Adriano Mari
Ronald van Ree
Program BioScience & Health
Ana Paula Valente
Fabio Almeida
(Uni Salzburg)