Download Topic 2 - CaRLO Economics

TOPIC 2
2013
Candidates showed strength in these areas:

understanding exchange rates

explaining both positive and negative effects of movements in the exchange rate on
economic activity

using stimulus to link currency movements to significant economic events in Australia
such as the mining boom and the GFC
Candidates need to improve in these areas:

answering the question rather than writing about a key concept such as exchange
rates

explaining links between movements in exchange rates and economic performance
__________________________________________________________________________________
Candidates showed strength in these areas:

outlining both domestic and global protection policies and considerations of their
economic effects

using relevant economic diagrams to support arguments
Candidates need to improve in these areas:

using accurate data and relevant examples to support arguments

supporting responses with more contemporary references to the Australian economy
2012
Question 25
Sample answer/Answers could include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Differing global growth rates
Exchange rate changes (TWI)
International business cycle
• Impacts on components of BoP
Sources of imports and exports
Changes in prices of imports/exports
Changes in quantities imported/exported of merchandise trade and services
Foreign capital to finance domestic investment/FDI
Interest rate differentials
International competitiveness
Impact of GFC or EU crisis on Australia’s CAD
Structural and cyclical components of BoP
Debt servicing component
Savings ratio
Question 25
Most candidates provided a clear definition of the Balance of Payments, demonstrated a
sound understanding of the components of the Balance of Payments and also defined the
process of globalisation.
In better responses, candidates integrated their knowledge of Australia’s Balance of
Payments with recent changes in the global economy. These candidates substantiated their
analysis with economic data. They demonstrated comprehensive understanding of the impact
on the Balance of Payments of changes in the international business cycle, terms of trade,
appreciation of the Australian dollar as well as the developments in the role of emerging
economies.
The specific effects of changes in the global economy were accurately explained in better
responses. The relationship between Current Account effects and Capital and Financial
Account effects were clearly explained. The significance and relevance of these effects for the
Australian economy were comprehensively analysed. Information provided in the stimulus
was used to enhance better responses.
In weaker responses, candidates, tended to simply rewrite information from the stimulus.
These candidates described the structure of the Balance of Payments with little attempt to
relate changes in the global economy to Balance of Payments outcomes.
In many weaker responses, candidates lacked understanding of the concepts ‘terms of trade’
and ‘international competitiveness’. They frequently confused the Current Account Deficit with
the Budget Deficit. These candidates often failed to grasp that the question required more
than details of the Balance of Payments.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Question 26
Sample answer/Answers could include:
•
Global growth rates
•
Development of emerging economies and their increasing demand for minerals and
agricultural commodities
•
Trade liberalisation
•
Terms of trade
•
Technological development – internet
•
Rise/fall of service industries, tourism, education
•
Appreciation of $A
•
Two speed/patchwork economy
•
Mining boom
•
Decline in manufacturing
•
Structural unemployment
•
Productivity changes
•
Protection and barriers to trade
•
Effects on government revenues and budget outcome
Question 26
In better responses, candidates wrote comprehensively on the relationship between the
changes in the global economy and its impact on the structure of industry in the Australian
economy.
In better responses, candidates also integrated economic theory with both the stimulus
material and their own data, and considered the four main sectors of the Australian economy,
agriculture, mining, manufacturing and services in some detail. In addition, better responses
were well structured and sustained; they often included key definitions and correctly
explained diagrams. These candidates made clear links in a specific manner rather than in a
generalised way.
In weaker responses, candidates tended to be more descriptive and general in nature. They
focused on describing the impact of some changes in the global economy, but with minimal
linkage to their effects on the structure of industry in the Australian economy. These
responses typically included some poorly drawn diagrams (tariffs; subsidies, exchange rates,
etc) that were not linked correctly to the question.
In weaker responses, candidates commonly made limited use of statistics, either from the
stimulus or their own knowledge. They also provided limited examples that directly linked the
impact of changes in the global economy on the structure of the Australian economy. In
many instances, candidates simply chose to rewrite or copy out parts of the stimulus without
demonstrating any clear understanding of the relationships involved.
2011
Question 28
Answers could include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Relative levels of interest rates in the domestic and global economy
Global commodity prices
Levels of trade and investment
Inflation rates
Current account balances
Terms of trade
Currency speculation
Exchange rate intervention by the RBA
Appreciations
Depreciations
Trade weight index
Competitiveness of Australian industry
Question 28
In better responses, candidates clearly distinguished between the domestic and global factors
that affect Australia's exchange rate. Additionally, these candidates often integrated these
factors and examined both the short-term and long-term effects on the exchange rate. These
responses often made reference to global factors such as the commodities boom, movements
in the international business cycle and the impacts of the GFC, and gave a comprehensive
explanation of how these factors influenced the value of the Australian dollar. They also
applied these factors to events that have been occurring in the global and Australian
economies, and provided accurate economic information relating to these events.
Better responses correctly explained the way in which Australia's exchange rate is influenced
by changes to the levels of Australia's exports and imports, and the attractiveness of
Australia as an investment destination, including interest rate differentials between Australia
and the rest of the world and the RBA's ability to manage the exchange rate. These
candidates enhanced the quality of their responses by including correctly labelled and fully
explained demand and supply diagrams of the Australian dollar, which showed the effect of
these changes on the exchange rate. Weaker responses tended to be more descriptive and
general in nature. They provided a range of global and domestic factors that affect Australia’s
exchange rate. These responses made little or no use of data, or to references to current
events in the global and domestic economies. They referred mainly to the effect of changing
trade and investment flows on the Australian dollar as global factors, and the effect of
interest rate changes and inflation in Australia as domestic factors. These responses often
included diagrams of how changes to demand and supply influence the value of the
Australian dollar, but the accompanying explanations of these diagrams were generally poor
or non-existent.
Weaker responses also outlined the effects of changes in the exchange rate on the Australian
economy. These responses described the effects of depreciation and appreciation, thus
limiting these candidates’ ability to access marks.
2010
Question 28
In better responses, candidates addressed the short-term and long-term impacts of both
domestic and international protectionist policies on a range of variables in the Australian
economy, including efficiency, productivity, economic growth, inflation, international
competitiveness, standard of living, unemployment and structural change. These candidates
also drew out implications for the Australian government of protectionist policies. These
included reductions to protection implemented by the Australian government in recent years
to counter the negative effects of high levels of protection until the 1980s. In better
responses, candidates also showed understanding of how international protection policies
such as the EU’s CAP have led to changes in the composition and direction of Australia’s trade
flows and the pursuit of bilateral and multilateral trade agreements for Australia.
In better responses, candidates also integrated economic theory with economic information
and data, including frequent reference to specific Australian industries. Candidates briefly
outlined or described the types and reasons for protection by way of introduction but focused
on the effects of protection on the Australian economy. Responses were well structured,
included key definitions and candidates made clear links in a specific, rather than generalised
way.
In weaker responses, candidates tended to be more descriptive and general in nature. They
focused on describing the types and reasons for protection rather than the effects of
protection. These responses typically included diagrams for tariffs, subsidies and quotas and
provided detailed descriptions of those diagrams, with little reference to the question. Some
weaker responses included diagrams that were incorrect.
In weaker responses, candidates commonly made little or no reference to data and specific
examples in the Australian economy. Many of these responses did not refer to international
protection or Australia’s involvement with bilateral and multinational trade agreements.