* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PSB magnetic cycle 2GeV_2
Electromagnetic field wikipedia , lookup
Friction-plate electromagnetic couplings wikipedia , lookup
Edward Sabine wikipedia , lookup
Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup
Superconducting magnet wikipedia , lookup
Giant magnetoresistance wikipedia , lookup
Magnetometer wikipedia , lookup
Earth's magnetic field wikipedia , lookup
Electromotive force wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic stripe card wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic nanoparticles wikipedia , lookup
Neutron magnetic moment wikipedia , lookup
Magnetotactic bacteria wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup
Magnetotellurics wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnet wikipedia , lookup
Magnetoreception wikipedia , lookup
Force between magnets wikipedia , lookup
Multiferroics wikipedia , lookup
History of geomagnetism wikipedia , lookup
PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Specifications 1. 2.5E13 p from 160 MeV to 2 GeV 2. Current in bending magnets < 2267 ARMS +10% = 2493 ARMS with 1.2 second cycle (no modification of the cooling circuit). 3. Bdot max = 38 G/ms assumed value {= 28 G/ms (present)* 5358 A (2GeV) / 4027 A (1.4 GeV)} 4. Cavity voltage and current taken as free parameters. 5. Longitudinal space charge effects taken into account (assuming elliptic energy distribution) A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 12/05/2010 1 PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Simplifications 1. Pure h=1 acceleration 2. Inductive and resistive wall effect neglected (impedance value to be asked for, but practically assumed to be low !?). The inductive effect counteracts the space charge effect. All these (pessimistic) simplifications lead to conservative figures A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 12/05/2010 2 PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Longitudinal space charge effect Total coupling impedance: Inductive and resistive wall neglected Z0 = 377 Ω Circular beam pipe approximation (real value to be checked for) Parasitic voltage superimposed (each turn) to the accelerating voltage (space charge only): A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 12/05/2010 3 PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Longitudinal space charge effect Parasitic voltage superimposed (each turn) to the accelerating voltage (space charge only): A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 12/05/2010 4 PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Simulation 1: injection at 1.2 T/s, bucket filled up to 80 % with 2.5E13p (1.024 eV.s) The acceleration lasts 330 ms with a 5 ms flat-top (490 ms presently) I MPS = 2341 ARMS (1.2 s cycle) < 2493 ARMS; Total magnetic cycle length from 0G to 0G = 700 ms with 38 G/ms max Bdot. A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 12/05/2010 5 PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Simulation 1: Limitation of Bdot to 38 G/ms (28 G/ms = present max) The required h1 cavity current for the acceleration = 8.73 AP (present max = 3AP) DC current at 2 GeV= 7.2 A = 2.5E13*1.6E-19*1.8E6 MHz A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 12/05/2010 6 PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Simulation 1: The bucket is full (1.024 eV.s +20%) during the first 225 ms of acceleration A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 12/05/2010 7 PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Simulation 1: The cavity voltage has been increased to compensate for space charge effects The net voltage experienced by the beam is 8 kV along the cycle The required h1 cavity voltage is 11.3 kVP (present max = 8kVP). The beam h1 current goes up to 14.3 AP. This value is dealt with by the tuner loop (when there one!) A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 12/05/2010 8 PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Simulation 1: The beam peak-peak current goes up to 52.4 AP-P = 45.2 AP (52.4 – 7.2 DC). With a resonant cavity only, the h1 current was dealt with by the tuner loop. With a wideband cavity this current needs to be supplied! With a narrow-band cavity, the beam-loading instability needs to be checked for. A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 12/05/2010 9 PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Simulation 1: A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 12/05/2010 10 PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Conclusion: These simulations concerns h1 uniquely, for a single harmonic acceleration made as fast as possible with a 1.2 eV.s beam emittance and a max 38 G/ms Bdot . The requirement should be lessened (not much) in a dual harmonic context. The h1 cavity voltage should provide more than 11.3 kVP Its current available for acceleration should be higher than 8.73 AP (Narrow band cavity) It should deal with 45.2 AP of beam current (effective current with a wideband cavity, beam loading instability to be checked with narrow-band cavity) Slowing down the acceleration allows for a lower current demand in a narrow band cavity only. With the fast cycle which has been sketched, the power dissipation in the bending magnets is just below the maximum tolerated (2341 < 2493 ARMS). A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 12/05/2010 11 PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring To be done: Make simulations with h=2 and more precise model of the MPS Check for beam loading instabilities with narrow band cavities Check transverse space charge effects A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 12/05/2010 12