Download Equivalent Fractions - Farmington Municipal Schools

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Vincent's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Addition wikipedia , lookup

Positional notation wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical model wikipedia , lookup

Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup

Continued fraction wikipedia , lookup

Elementary mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
4: Q2
Topic Proficiency Scale
Domain: Numbers and Operations - Fractions
Topic: Fractions
Critical Area: FractionEquivalence and Operations
4.0 I know all of the Simple and Complex Learning Goals and my understanding goes beyond the grade
level target.
COMPLEX
3.0 I know all of the Simple and Complex Learning Goals.
Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators using >, =, or < , and
justify the comparison. (4.NF.2)
Generate and explain equivalent fractions. (a/b is equivalent to a fraction (n x a) (n x b)). (4.NF.1)
2.5 I know all of the Simple Learning Goals plus some of the Complex Learning Goals.
SIMPLE
2.0 I know all of the Simple Learning Goals.
Generate equivalent fractions using visual fraction models. (4.NF.1)
Compare two fractions by comparing to a benchmark fraction, such as 1/2, using <, =, or >. (4.NF.2)
Academic Vocabulary:
1.5 Not applicable.
1.0 I know some of the Simple Learning Goals.
0.5 Not applicable.
0.0 No evidence of knowing the Learning Goals.
©Farmington Municipal Schools - Kindergarten NMCCSS Math
Revised May, 2016
4: Q2
Topic Proficiency Scale
Domain: Numbers and Operations - Fractions
Topic: Fractions
Critical Area: FractionEquivalence and Operations
4.NF.1 Explain why a fraction a/b is
equivalent to a fraction (n × a)/(n ×
b) by using visual fraction models,
with attention to how the number
and size of the parts differ even
though the two fractions themselves
are the same size. Use this principle
to recognize and generate equivalent
fractions.
4.NF.2 Compare two fractions with
different numerators and different
denominators, e.g., by creating
common denominators or
numerators, or by comparing to a
benchmark fraction such as 1/2.
Recognize that comparisons are
valid only when the two fractions
refer to the same whole. Record the
results of comparisons with symbols
>, =, or <, and justify the
conclusions, e.g., by using a visual
fraction model.
4.0 I know all of the Simple and Complex Learning Goals and my
understanding goes beyond the grade level target.
COMPLEX
3.0 I know all of the Simple and Complex Learning Goals.
Compare two fractions with different numerators and different
denominators using >, =, or < , and justify the comparison. (4.NF.2)
Generate and explain equivalent fractions. (a/b is equivalent to a fraction (n x a) (n x
b)). (4.NF.1)
2.5 I know all of the Simple Learning Goals plus some of the Complex
Learning Goals.
SIMPLE
2.0 I know all of the Simple Learning Goals.
Generate equivalent fractions using visual fraction models. (4.NF.1)
Compare two fractions by comparing to a benchmark fraction, such as 1/2,
using <, =, or >. (4.NF.2)
Academic Vocabulary:
1.5 Not applicable.
1.0 I know some of the Simple Learning Goals.
0.5 Not applicable.
0.0 No evidence of knowing the Learning Goals.
©Farmington Municipal Schools - Kindergarten NMCCSS Math
Revised May, 2016
4: Q2
Succes Criteria
Topic: Fractions
Guiding Question:
What is the relationship of the quantities?
How is __________ related to _________?
What are some ways to visually represent this problem?
Can you put this problem into context?
Do you notice any patterns in this problem?
What are some other problems that are similar to this?
Complex Goal:
Generate and explain equivalent fractions. (a/b is
equivalent to a fraction (n x a) (n x b)). (4.NF.1)
Mathematical Practices:
2, 4, and 7
Mastery:
-Conceptual:
-Students will understand a fractional quantity can be
subdivided into an infinite number of equal pieces while
maintaining the original fractional quantity. (e.g. ½ can be
subdivided into 2/4, 4/8, and so on.) Those subdivisions are
called equivalent fractions.
-Students will understand the identity property of
multiplication and its relationships to fractions (1/1, 2/2, 3/3,
4/4, n/n=1)
-Students will understand how the identity property of
multiplication is employed to create equivalent fractions [(n*a)/
(n*b)=na/nb]
Procedural:
-Students can identify differences in two equivalent fractions,
with attention to how the number and size of the parts differ
even though the two fractions themselves are the same size.
-Students can identify how the identity property of
multiplication transforms a fraction into its equivalent fraction.
Representational:
-Students can represent equivalency of fractions pictorially (a/b
is equivalent to (nxa)/(nxb)).
-Students can construct models of equivalent fractions using
manipulatives such as paper, color, tiles, fraction bars, and
fraction circles.
-E.G. A line represents ½ of a box. When ½ is subdivided into
two pieces. The fraction becomes 2/4 because each piece
represents ¼ of the box. When each fourth is subdivided into
two pieces, the fraction becomes 4/8 because each piece
represents 1/8 of the box.
-Using a fraction model, students can divide both numerator
and denominator by multiplying with the same factor (a/b is
equivalent to (n x a)/(n x b), because both a and b were
changed by the same factor n), e.g. 1/2 = 2/4 because (2 x 1)/
(2 x 2)=2/4.
©Farmington Municipal Schools - Kindergarten NMCCSS Math
Revised May, 2016
4: Q2
Note: Expectations in this domain are limited to fractions with denominators 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 100.
This standard refers to visual fraction models. This includes area models, linear models (number lines) or it could be a collection/
set models.
This standard extends the work in third grade by using additional denominators (5, 10, 12, and 100). Students can use visual
models or applets to generate equivalent fractions.
Example:
All the area models show 1/2. The second model shows 2/4 but also shows that 1/2 and 2/4 are equivalent fractions because
their areas are equivalent. When a horizontal line is drawn through the center of the model, the number of equal parts doubles
and the size of the parts is halved.
Students will begin to notice connections between the models and fractions in the way both the parts and wholes are counted and
begin to generate a rule for writing equivalent fractions.
Students’ initial experience with fractions began in Grade 3. They used models such as number lines to locate unit fractions, and
fraction bars or strips, area or length models, and Venn diagrams to recognize and generate equivalent fractions and make
comparisons of fractions.
Students extend their understanding of unit fractions to compare two fractions with different numerators and different
denominators.
Students should use models to compare two fractions with different denominators by creating common denominators or
numerators. The models should be the same (both fractions shown using fraction bars or both fractions using circular models) so
that the models represent the same whole.
Example of Conceptual Reasoning: “I know that 5/8 is a little bit more (1/8 more) than the benchmark 1/2, because
4/8 is equal to 1/2, so I would place 5/8 just to the right of 1/2 on the number line”.
©Farmington Municipal Schools - Kindergarten NMCCSS Math
Revised May, 2016
4: Q2
Complex Goal:
Compare two fractions with different numerators and
different denominators using >, =, or < , and justify the
comparison. (4.NF.2)
Mastery:
Conceptual:
-Students will understand that fractions represent a single
quantity that can be compared.
-Students will understand benchmark fractions (1/4, 1/3, ½,
2/3, ¾).
-Students will understand that fractions can be compared by
attending to either numerators, denominators, or benchmark
fractions.
Procedural:
-Students can identify how fractional pairs can be changed to
have equivalent denominators to determine >, =, <
-Students can identify how fractional pairs can be changed to
have equivalent numerators to determine >, =, <
-Students can use benchmark fractions to determine >, =, < of
various fraction pairs.
Representational:
-Students can change fractional pairs using area model, number
lines, set models, pattern blocks and other manipulatives or
representations in order to compare two fractions.
Teaching Notes
Benchmark fractions are the fractions used as a basis for comparison
such as 1/2, 1/4, 1/3, 3/4, etc.
Students develop understanding of fraction equivalence and operations with fractions. They recognize that two different fractions
can be equal (e.g., 15/9 = 5/3), and they develop methods for generating and recognizing equivalent fractions and
can represent equivalent fractions concretely and/or pictorially.
This standard calls students to compare fractions by creating visual fraction models or finding common denominators or
numerators. Students’ experiences should focus on visual fraction models rather than algorithms.
When tested, models may or may not be included. Students should learn to draw fraction models to help them compare
and use reasoning skills based on fraction benchmarks.
Students must also recognize that they must consider the size of the whole when comparing fractions (ie, 1/2 and 1/8 of
two medium pizzas is very different from 1/2 of one medium and 1/8 of one large). Record the results of comparisons with
symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model.
Example: Use patterns blocks.
1. If a red trapezoid is one whole, which block shows 1/3 ?
2. If the blue rhombus is 1/3, which block shows one whole?
3. If the red trapezoid is one whole, which block shows 2/3?
Example:
Melissa used a 12 x 12 grid to represent 1 and Nancy used a 10 x 10 grid to represent 1. Each girl shaded grid squares to show 1/4.
How many grid squares did Melissa shade?
How many grid squares did Nancy shade?
Why did they need to shade different numbers of grid squares?
©Farmington Municipal Schools - Kindergarten NMCCSS Math
Revised May, 2016
4: Q2
Fractions can be compared using benchmarks, common denominators, or common numerators. Symbols used to describe
comparisons include <, >, =.
It is important that students explain the relationship between the numerator and the denominator, using Benchmark Fractions. See
examples below:
Fractions may be compared using 12 as a benchmark.
©Farmington Municipal Schools - Kindergarten NMCCSS Math
Revised May, 2016
4: Q2
©Farmington Municipal Schools - Kindergarten NMCCSS Math
Revised May, 2016
4: Q2
District Resources: 4.NF.1 Mc Graw My Math Chapter 8 Lesson 3, 4, and 5
4. NF.2 Mc Graw My Math Chpater 8 Lesson 6, 7, and 8
Exemplar:
(4. NF.1)
Which pair of fractions is equivalent? How do you know?
A. 1/3 and 3/5
B. 2/4 and 3/5
C. 6/10 and 4/8
D. 6/10 and 3/5
Student Response 1: The answer is D. I know that because when I compare 6/10 and 3/5, I know that 3 is half of 6 and 5 is
half of 10, that tells me that they are equivalent.
Student Response 2: I picked D. I had to draw a model of each fraction.
I made sure that I drew equal wholes and then partitioned the first one into 5 equal pieces and shaded 3 and the second one into
10 equal pieces and shaded 6. I can clearly see from my models that the fractions are equivalent because the shaded parts take up
the same amount of space in the whole.
(4.NF.2)
Which pairs of fractions show a correct comparison?
Select the two correct answers?
A. 2/5 = 40/100
B. 2/5 > 6/9
C. 2/5 > 2/3
D. 3/5 < 8/12
E. 3/5 > 2/3
F. 3/5 = 98/100
Student Response 1: I chose A and D. I knew that A was a correct comparison because 2 is a factor of 40 and 5 is a factor of
100. That told me that the fractions are equivalent and that the equal sign is correct. I also chose D as a correct comparison and
created a model. From the model I could clearly see that 3/5 < 8/12.
©Farmington Municipal Schools - Kindergarten NMCCSS Math
Revised May, 2016