Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (SWI): Contributions to Multiple Sclerosis Poster No.: C-1019 Congress: ECR 2015 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: R. M. Ruiz Peralbo, B. Brea Alvarez, M. Alfageme Zubillaga, C. Perez Martin, C. Gonzalez Hernando, I. Rivera Campos, A. M. Alcolado Jaramillo, C. De la Rosa Ruiz, L. Esteban Garcia; Majadahonda/ES Keywords: Tissue characterisation, Imaging sequences, MR, Neuroradiology brain DOI: 10.1594/ecr2015/C-1019 Any information contained in this pdf file is automatically generated from digital material submitted to EPOS by third parties in the form of scientific presentations. References to any names, marks, products, or services of third parties or hypertext links to thirdparty sites or information are provided solely as a convenience to you and do not in any way constitute or imply ECR's endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation of the third party, information, product or service. ECR is not responsible for the content of these pages and does not make any representations regarding the content or accuracy of material in this file. As per copyright regulations, any unauthorised use of the material or parts thereof as well as commercial reproduction or multiple distribution by any traditional or electronically based reproduction/publication method ist strictly prohibited. You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold ECR harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, costs, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising from or related to your use of these pages. Please note: Links to movies, ppt slideshows and any other multimedia files are not available in the pdf version of presentations. www.myESR.org Page 1 of 22 Learning objectives Usual MRI sequences used in studies of multiple sclerosis allow detection of lesions both in diagnosis and in the monitoring of disease. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) is a relatively recent sequence with high sensitivity in the detection of paramagnetic substances: hemosiderin, calcium and deoxyhemoglobin. This feature, in the case of multiple sclerosis, can see the relationship between the plaques in white matter and venular structures and the association of lesions with different patterns of iron deposition. Background Multiple sclerosis is the most common neurological disease of young adult caucasian and the most common cause of neurological disability in young adults. It is an inflammatory and demyelinating disease characterized by inflammation, demyelination plaques, axonal loss and gliosis. MRI is nowadays a mainstay in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis. Diagnostic criteria proposed by McDonald et al. (revised 2010) give great importance to the findings of MRI studies with the presence of CNS demyelinating lesions scattered in space and time. Sensitivity in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis using classical protocols with MRI sequences (T2, FLAIR, DP, T1 after gadolinium) is very high, but there are nonspecific findings that can be misinterpreted and lead to false positives with a overestimation in the diagnosis of disease. (1) SWI can increase the specificity of these confusing cases. Page 2 of 22 Findings and procedure details It could increase the specificity of the cases more dubious for a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis getting greater detail some of the typical features of lesions of multiple sclerosis as: location (perivenular), distribution (periventricular) and morphology (ovoid form ,perpendicular to ventricles: Dawson's fingers). In that sense, SWI is an additional sequence providing complementary information to that obtained with conventional sequences in terms of these characteristics. SWI provides a detailed anatomical information of the cerebral venous system, in which the veins are hypointense structures. Typical distribution of multiple sclerosis plaques is associated with perivenular location, which can be viewed by SWI. Venular blood supply is abundant in: periventricular deep white matter (Dawson's fingers) and in the ependymal surface of corpus callosum, so typically, but not specifically, multiple sclerosis lesions are distributed in the interface of corpus callosum unlike in the lesions of another etiologies that affect the entire thickness of corpus callosum (fig1, fig2, fig3). Dawson fingers, finding typical of multiple sclerosis are the morphological expression of perivenular inflammation around venules extending perpendicular to the ventricular surface. (fig3). In cases with nonspecific lesions especially located in deep subcortical white matter, without distribution and location so typical of multiple sclerosis, SWI can delimit venules anatomically and detect lesions with perivenular distribution, such that the identification of the venule within problem lesion can help to catalog this lesion as injury multiple sclerosis (fig 3, fig 5) against other lesions in the white matter of another etiology without perivenular relationship (fig 6). So the visibility of the central vein could be a discriminant score among the white matter lesions of multiple sclerosis of non-multiple sclerosis injuries (2).The central vein within the lesion is identified at 3T with SWI at least 45% of the lesions of multiple sclerosis compared to 8% of the incidental white matter lesions (3). It is already known the relationship between iron deposits in gray and white matter of the brain parenchyma and the aging and neurodegenerative diseases, such as multiple sclerosis. During the first four weeks of the inflammatory process, the activity in the lesions of multiple sclerosis is expressed with an enhancement in open ring after administration of gadolinium, as expression of the interruption of the blood brain barrier, during which Page 3 of 22 extravasation occurs red blood cells,that are kidnapped by microglia cells and whose products metabolic degradation are detected as hypointense signals in sequence SWI. The detection of those iron deposits by SWI is possible because of is capable discriminating subtle changes in susceptibility between areas with degradation products of the blood and surrounding cerebral tissue. Those iron deposits detected by SWI within T2 hyperintense lesions no longer enhanced after administration of gadolinium act as witnesses of an prior inflammatory episode. So SWI allows identification of hypointense signals within the lesions of multiple sclerosis (intralesional signal susceptibility) that have not been identified in white matter lesions of other etiologies and translate as extravasation of erythrocytes through the blood brain barrier.(4) Moreover, the morphology and arrangement of the iron deposits in white matter of MS injuries detected by SWI adopt a characteristic pattern "in border" (fig11) , following the edges delimiting the previous enhancement of this lesion ( as a result of accumulation of the products degradation of extravasated red blood cells through interruption of the blood brain barrier during inflammatory process) opposite the patterns of iron deposit of another pathologies (fig 14, fig 15). SWI is a sequence in T2 weighted ,3D ,high resolution and a post-processing applied. SWI is a particularly sensitive in detecting of paramagnetic substances, than in the brain are represented mainly by iron , bound to heme, deoxyhemoglobin and products derived from the destruction of the same. So all those tissues in which those components are involved may be detected with higher sensitivity by this sequence. Compared to T2* sequence presenting better discrimination between tissues paramagnetic and no paramagnetic. Estimated time to obtain all brain coverage is 3 to 5 minutes, which are used in the signal acquisition and remove incidental phase variations due to non homogeneous static magnetic fields, a process that is automatically achieved by the system providing 3D images .The phase image (previously filtered with a mask) is multiplied to the magnitude image to improve visualization of microvessels. Finally, minIP reconstruction is performed with selected thickness (1-2 cm) generating images to contrast all the hypointense signals produced by the different tissue susceptibility to find hemorrhage, calcium, iron deposits ... As limitations of the sequence, we can mention that despite having very good sensitivity, has enough noise that can limit the anatomic location, the quality of the image is relatively poor in areas that are close to the skull base and although provides a detailed identification of the cerebral venous system, it is not good for the superior sagittal sinus venosus. Page 4 of 22 At present, its main applications include studies of vascular malformations (cavernomas), chronic vasculopathy and future applications are investigated in neoplastic disease and in multiple sclerosis. Images for this section: Fig. 1: FLAIR sagittal : Involvement of the ependymal surface of the corpus callosum showing hyperintense signal in male patient aged 40 diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Page 5 of 22 Fig. 2: FLAIR sagittal : Involvement of the ependymal surface of the corpus callosum showing hyperintense signal in the same patient who is referred in fig.1. Page 6 of 22 Fig. 3: SWI sagittal : Perivenular distribution of the lesion which is referred in fig.1. Correlating lesion of the corpus callosum ependymal surface in FLAIR sagittal with SWI sagittal showing perivenular distribution of the lesion : venulas as hypointense structures linear perpendicular to the ventricular surface. Page 7 of 22 Fig. 4: T2 coronal: Hyperintense injury in periventricular white matter. 43 year old woman with diagnosis MS. Page 8 of 22 Fig. 5: SWI coronal : Detail of structure venular within white matter lesion periventricular white as hyperintense T2 signal of the patient who is referred in Fig.4. Page 9 of 22 Fig. 6: SWI axial: Locator value of SWI, identifying venular structures in a patient with multiple perivascular Virchow-Robin spaces shown as hypointense signals with linear morphology, which are hyperintense in T2 of Fig7. Page 10 of 22 Fig. 7: T2 axial: Perivascular spaces which are referred in Fig. 6 (red arrow). Hyperintense injury in deep subcortical white matter of the left hemisphere (blue arrow) in a patient with known chronic ischemic lesions, in this case, is not distributed as perivenular (No structure as venule is identified within this lesion, probably of ischemic etiology, in SWI in fig.6) Page 11 of 22 Fig. 8: FLAIR axial: Hyperintense juxtacortical left anterior frontal injury in male patient aged 44 diagnosed of multiple sclerosis. Page 12 of 22 Fig. 9: Detail of the left anterior frontal lesion yuxtacortical which is referred in Fig. 8. Page 13 of 22 Fig. 10: FLAIR coronal: Cortical atrophy predominantly in the left hemisphere in the patient who is referred to in fig8 and fig9. Page 14 of 22 Fig. 11: SWI axial: Characteristic pattern of iron deposit of multiple sclerosis, showing hypointense signals, are grouped around the edge, perfectly defined, of the lesion described in fig 8 and fig 9. Page 15 of 22 Fig. 12: T2 axial: Several lesions in deep subcortical white matter of both hemispheres. Page 16 of 22 Fig. 13: FLAIR axial: Involvement of periventricular white matter and brain atrophy associated in the patient who is referred in Fig12. Page 17 of 22 Fig. 14: SWI axial : Findings described in fig 12 and fig 13 are nonspecific and may be shared by several diseases, including MS. SWI in fig 14 and fig 15 shows a pattern of iron deposit, which in this case is not characteristic of multiple sclerosis, with the presence of multiple and small hypointense signals of anarchic distribution suggestive of vasculitis. Page 18 of 22 Fig. 15: SWI axial: Cranial plane to referred in fig14 showing lot of punctate iron deposits in patient with diagnosis of vasculitis. Page 19 of 22 Conclusion SWI is an additional sequence ,that together to usual MRI sequences, helps to characterize the white matter lesions detected by the conventional protocol, in multiple sclerosis diagnosis ,providing an additional valuable information for the diagnosis of CNS pathology, particularly for debugging the differential diagnosis of lesions of multiple sclerosis respect to other lesions of white matter nonspecific , especially in subcortical distribution. Offers interesting insights for understanding the pathophysiology of this disease, and the basis for future research. It could be useful as predictive early marker of inability to identify abnormal iron deposits, which are the first step in the development of neurodegenerative diseases, such as multiple sclerosis. Personal information [email protected] References 1.Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 1. Haacke EM, Mittal S, Wu Z, Neelavalli J, Cheng YC Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30:19-30. 2. Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Haacke EM, Cheng NY, House MJ, et al. Magn Reson Imaging 2005 ; 23:1-25. 3. The place of conventional MRI and newly emerging MRI techniques in monitoring different aspects of treatment outcome. Zivadinov R, Stosic M, Cox JL, Ramasamy DP,Dwyer MG. J Neurol. 2008; 255 Suppl 1:61-74. 4. Multiple Sclerosis, Part I: Background and Conventional MRI, Vol. 18, No. 4 and Part II: Nonconventional MRI Techniques, Vol. 19, No. 1 M. Filippi, guest ed. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America: Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2008, Part I: pages 563-719, 66 figures; Part II: pages 1-132. Page 20 of 22 5."Undiagnosing" multiple sclerosis: The challenge of misdiagnosis in MS , Solomon et al. Neurology June 12, 2012 78:1986-1991; published ahead of print May 11, 2012. (1) 6. Characterizing iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility weighted imaging.Haacke et al. NIH.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 March ; 29(3): 537-544 7. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and iron deposition on susceptibilityweighted imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot casecontrol study. Zivadinov R, Schirda C, Dwyer MG, et al. Int Angiol 2010. 8. Venous and Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow in Multiple Sclerosis: A Case-Control Study.Peter Sundstrom, Anders Wåhlin, Khalid Ambarki, Richard Birgander, Anders Eklund and Jan Malm. ANN NEUROL 2010. 9.MRI Assessment of Iron Deposition in Multiple Sclerosis ,S. Ropele, W.L. de Graaf, M. Khalil, M.P. Wattjes, C. Langkammer, M.A. Rocca, A. Rovira, J. Palace, F. Barkhof, M. Filippi, F. Fazekas ,Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2011. 10. Anomalous venous blood flow and iron deposition in multiple sclerosis. Singh AV, Zamboni P. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009. 11.MR venography of multiple sclerosis .Tan IL, van Schijndel RA, Pouwels PJ, van Walderveen MA, Reichenbach JR, Manoliu RA, et al.. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol (2000) 21:1039-42. 12. Central veins in brain lesions visualized with high-field magnetic resonance imaging: a pathologically specific diagnostic biomarker for inflammatory demyelination in the brain. Mistry N, Dixon J, Tallantyre E, Tench C, AbdelFahim R, Jaspan T, et al.. JAMA Neurol (2013). 13. Presence of a central vein within white matter lesions on susceptibility weighted imaging: a specific finding for multiple sclerosis? Lummel N, Boeckh-Behrens T, Schoepf V, Burke M, Bruckmann H, Linn J. Neuroradiology (2011). 14. Analysis of multiple sclerosis lesions using a fusion of 3.0T FLAIR and 7.0T SWI phase: FLAIR SWI .Grabner G, Dal-Bianco A, Schernthaner M, Vass K, Lassmann H, Trattnig S.. J Magn Reson Imaging (2011). 15. Flair*: A combined MR contrast technique for visualizing white matter lesions and parenchymal veins. Sati P, George IC, Shea CD, Gaitan MI,Reich DS.. Radiology (2012). 16. Ultra-high-field imaging distinguishes MS lesions from asymptomatic white matter lesions .Tallantyre EC, Dixon JE, Donaldson I, Owens T, Morgan PS, Morris PG, et al.. Neurology (2011). (2) Page 21 of 22 17. A comparison of 3T and 7T in the detection of small parenchymal veins within MS lesions .Tallantyre EC, Morgan PS, Dixon JE, Al-Radaideh A, Brookes MJ, Evangelou N, et al. Invest Radiol (2009). (3) 18. Iron deposition and inflammation in multiple sclerosis. Which one comes first? Zivadinov et al. BMC Neuroscience 2011, 12:60 (4) 19. Comparison of multiecho postprocessing schemes for SWI with use of linear and nonlinear mask functions .Quinn MP, Gati JS, Klassen LM, Lin AW, Bird JR, Leung SE, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol (2013). 20. Optimisation of T2(*)-weighted MRI for the detection of small veins in multiple sclerosis at 3t and 7t. Dixon JE, Simpson A, Mistry N, Evangelou N, Morris PG. Eur J Radiol (2013). 21. Venocentric Lesions: An MRI Marker of MS?Quinn, M.P., Kremenchutzky M.,Menon R.S.Front Neurol. 2013. 22. The "central vein sign": is there a place for susceptibility weighted imaging in possible multiple sclerosis? Kau T, Taschwer M, Deutschmann H, Schonfelder M, Weber JR, Hausegger KA. Eur Radiol (2013). Page 22 of 22