* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download VII. Earthquake Mitigation
2010 Haiti earthquake wikipedia , lookup
2009–18 Oklahoma earthquake swarms wikipedia , lookup
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant wikipedia , lookup
1992 Cape Mendocino earthquakes wikipedia , lookup
Seismic retrofit wikipedia , lookup
Casualties of the 2010 Haiti earthquake wikipedia , lookup
1908 Messina earthquake wikipedia , lookup
2011 Christchurch earthquake wikipedia , lookup
2010 Canterbury earthquake wikipedia , lookup
Earthquake engineering wikipedia , lookup
2008 Sichuan earthquake wikipedia , lookup
1880 Luzon earthquakes wikipedia , lookup
1570 Ferrara earthquake wikipedia , lookup
April 2015 Nepal earthquake wikipedia , lookup
2010 Pichilemu earthquake wikipedia , lookup
1985 Mexico City earthquake wikipedia , lookup
Earthquake (1974 film) wikipedia , lookup
1960 Valdivia earthquake wikipedia , lookup
VII. Earthquake Mitigation A. B. C. D. E. Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake “forecasting” (prediction) Engineering and Building Codes Preparation in earthquake prone areas VII. Earthquake Mitigation A. Approach to earthquake mitigation Main approach is survivability ○ ○ ○ ○ Requires hazard identification and risk assessment Identify areas of where materials at risk of seismic wave amplification and enhanced ground shaking risk Engineering solutions to make structures earthquake resistant Preparation and training of emergency response teams and medical personel Earthquake prediction and evacuation is not a reasonable goal in the foreseeable future VII. Earthquake Mitigation A. B. Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Hazard Identification: deals primarily with the science ○ defining and describing a hazard, its physical characteristics, magnitude and severity, probability and frequency, causative factors, and locations or areas affected Risk Assessment: deals with the societal impact issues ○ Estimating vulnerability of and impact on populations, probabilities of events and magnitude, frequency and return period, mitigation planning VII. Earthquake Mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Shaking Hazard map = statistical probability (10% chance in 50 year period) exceeding a stated level of shaking (as % of g = acceleration of gravity) Need to know… Probability of a future EQ of given magnitude (need to understand past behavior and how faults work) Response of materials to shaking (intensity) (need to understand how shaking varies with materials and how materials vary with geographic location) VII. Earthquake Mitigation A. B. C. Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake “forecasting” (prediction) Long-term forecasting (probabilities of future fault slip) • Based on past behavior Historical records + pre-historical records + fault mapping = total record VII. Earthquake Mitigation A. B. C. Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake prediction Long-term forecasting (probabilities of future fault slip) Historical Records • written and verbal accounts (100s of years) • measured seismic activity (~100 years of data) • distribution of earthquake activity on a both a global and local scale Data for U.S. Earthquakes VII. Earthquake Mitigation C. Earthquake prediction Long-term forecasting (probabilities of future fault slip) Fault mapping • Understanding the distribution of faults and linkage of faults together in a fault system Faults in red active during last 4 million years VII. Earthquake Mitigation A. B. C. Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake prediction Long-term forecasting (probabilities of future fault slip) Pre-historical records • Geologic investigations; using the “rock record” to build a history of earthquake activity • Field of study called paleo-seismology Reading the geologic record of past events Paleo-seismology Paleo-seismic study in sediments of a fault sag pond Paleo-seismic study in sediments of a fault sag pond VII. Earthquake Mitigation Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake prediction A. B. C. Long-term forecasting (probabilities of future fault slip) • Based on past behavior Historical records + pre-historical records + fault mapping = total record • • Recurrence Intervals (Frequency - are we over due?) Seismic Gaps (Is a fault segment overdue?) VII. Earthquake Mitigation A. B. C. Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake prediction Long-term forecasting (probabilities of future fault slip) • Seismic Gaps (Is a segment of a fault overdue?) pre-1989 seismic record of San Andreas fault 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake and aftershocks Source: USGS VII. Earthquake Mitigation A. B. C. Approach to earthquake mitigation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Earthquake prediction Short-term warnings ○ Radio transmissions faster than seismic waves ○ Potential to Shutdown public transport such as trains Shutoff gas pipelines Warn rescuers of aftershocks Tsunami warnings Use cell phone applications to warn individuals VII. Earthquake Mitigation D. Engineering and Building Codes “Earthquakes don’t kill people buildings do” • If survivability is the goal, then engineering approaches and building codes are the main solution Reinforced buildings and bridges in earthquake prone areas Identify problem soils and avoid them, anchor foundations in bedrock or use foundation isolators Avoid building sites in areas prone to landslides Images: NOAA VII. Earthquake Mitigation D. Engineering and Building Codes “Earthquakes don’t kill people buildings do” • Engineering approaches and building codes require that we know… • • • site specific risk levels for ground shaking, including enhanced shaking (think shake hazard maps) response of buildings (of varying design) to ground shaking, requires monitoring shaking in buildings during earthquakes consider also survivability of occupants vs. survivability of the building for future use (and how much you are willing to spend) VII. Earthquake Mitigation D. Engineering and Building Codes “Earthquakes don’t kill people buildings do” • Engineering approaches and building codes require that we know… • • • site specific risk levels for ground shaking, including enhanced shaking (think shake hazard maps) response of buildings (of varying design) to ground shaking, requires monitoring shaking in buildings during earthquakes consider also survivability of occupants vs. survivability of the building for future use (and how much you are willing to spend) VII. Earthquake Mitigation E. Preparation in earthquake prone areas Emergency preparedness and training is essential to surviving an earthquake Coordination among emergency response agencies Fire, utilities, police, rescue, medical, public transportation Coordinate communications among emergency response teams and agencies Practice exercises – The Great Shake Out Full scale mock earthquake response exercises Decentralize emergency supplies and equipment Earthquake preparation in homes VII. Earthquake Mitigation E. Preparation in earthquake prone areas ShakeMap – Real time shaking intensity map product from USGS Computer generated shake map (intensity) for a real earthquake generated automatically in real time Allows emergency first responders to be directed to areas with greatest needs without waiting for emergency calls and first hand on the ground accounts