* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Homework Set 2
Casualties of the 2010 Haiti earthquake wikipedia , lookup
1908 Messina earthquake wikipedia , lookup
2011 Christchurch earthquake wikipedia , lookup
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant wikipedia , lookup
2010 Canterbury earthquake wikipedia , lookup
2009–18 Oklahoma earthquake swarms wikipedia , lookup
2008 Sichuan earthquake wikipedia , lookup
1880 Luzon earthquakes wikipedia , lookup
April 2015 Nepal earthquake wikipedia , lookup
Seismic retrofit wikipedia , lookup
2010 Pichilemu earthquake wikipedia , lookup
1906 San Francisco earthquake wikipedia , lookup
Earthquake engineering wikipedia , lookup
Geol 344: Earthquakes and Seismic Hazards Spring 2006 Homework Set 6: Reverse Faults and Subduction Zones 1. Like other fault types, thrust faults tend to be segmented. This poses a problem when trying to determine the along-strike length of blind thrust fault segments. Why is it important to determine the lengths of these segments and what evidence might we look for (or techniques we might use) to identify potential segment boundaries at depth? (5) 2. Why are there thrust faults in the Los Angeles basin? Provide a geologic context for this region and indicate why the thrust faults tend to be approximately east-west oriented. (5) 3. Why do blind thrust faults in the Los Angeles basin potentially provide a higher seismic hazard to this metropolitan region than the nearby San Andreas fault, despite the fact that the SAF can produce M~8 earthquakes whereas the thrust faults have historically produced earthquakes with M<7? (3) 4. Seismic hazards maps of the Los Angeles basin have traditionally been based on expected ground shaking predicted for mapped faults and as well as the seismological history of the region (e.g., earthquake records and instrumental seismicity measurements). In light of the Northridge earthquake in 1994, what are the implications of this earthquake for assessing seismic hazard maps that were produced prior to that event? (5) 5. Examine the attached map showing the rupture extent of the December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake (M9.0). Then answer the following questions: i) What is the tectonic setting of this region that resulted in such a massive earthquake? (3) ii) Search through the earthquake information website that we have used in this class to find the focal mechanism for this event. Include it with your answer and comment on the solution, indicating how it compares to what you know about the fault the produced the earthquake. (5) iii) What is the nature of the plate boundary further south along the coast of Sumatra, beyond the southern extent of the rupture zone, and what may have prevented the rupture from continuing further south than it did? (4) Geol 344: Earthquakes and Seismic Hazards Spring 2006 iv) On 28th March 2005, a M8.7 earthquake struck near the island of Nias. Where is this relative to the December earthquake, and is there likely to be a relationship between these two events? Explain your reasoning in terms of the phenomenon called “triggering.” (5) [35] Geol 344: Earthquakes and Seismic Hazards Spring 2006 Figure 1: Rupture extent of the M9.0 December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake