* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Conclude population genetics - April 13
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Inbreeding avoidance wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup
Population Genetics Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Determination Which of these populations are in HardyWeinberg equilibrium? a) b) c) d) A B both A and B neither A nor B Question 6 – Chap. 23 • Researchers examining a particular gene in a fruit fly population discovered that the gene can have either of two slightly different sequences, designated A1 and A2. Further tests showed that 70% of the gametes produced in the population contained the A1 sequence. If the population is at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, what proportion of flies carries both A1 and A2? • A 0.7 B 0.49 C 0.21 D 0.42 E 0.09 Question from an earlier edition of Campbell • At a locus with a dominant and recessive allele in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, 16% of the individuals are homozygous for the recessive allele. What is the frequency of the dominant allele in the population? • A 0.84 B 0.36 C 0.6 D 0.4 E 0.48 Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium is based on: 1. A very large population where all genotypes are equally viable 2. Random mating (panmixia) 3. No mutations 4. No gene flow (dispersal of individuals and their genes) 5. No natural selection Evolutionary Change • Evolution is a generation to generation change in a population’s frequencies of alleles – change in proportions of alleles in the gene pool is evolution at its smallest scale and is often referred to as microevolution • The two main causes of microevolution are genetic drift and natural selection Natural Selection Genetic Drift • Random changes in gene frequency in a population – this can lead to losses in genetic diversity – the population becomes more homozygous • this is most important in small populations Genetic Drift CRCR CRCR CRCW CWCW CRCR CRCW CRCR CRCR CRCW CRCW Generation 1 p (frequency of CR) = 0.7 q (frequency of CW) = 0.3 Genetic Drift CRCR CRCR CRCW CWCW 5 plants leave offspring CRCR CWCW CRCW CRCR CWCW CRCR CRCW CRCW CRCR CRCR CRCW CRCW Generation 1 p (frequency of CR) = 0.7 q (frequency of CW) = 0.3 CWCW CRCW CRCR CRCW Generation 2 p = 0.5 q = 0.5 Genetic Drift CRCR CRCR CRCW CWCW 5 plants leave offspring CRCR CWCW CRCW CRCR CWCW CRCR CRCW CRCW CRCR CRCR CRCW CRCW Generation 1 p (frequency of CR) = 0.7 q (frequency of CW) = 0.3 CWCW CRCW 2 plants leave offspring CRCR CRCR CRCR CRCR CRCR CRCR CRCR CRCW Generation 2 p = 0.5 q = 0.5 CRCR CRCR CRCR CRCR Generation 3 p = 1.0 q = 0.0 Population Bottleneck Original population Original population Bottlenecking event Original population Bottlenecking event Surviving population Northern Elephant Seal Northern Elephant Seal Population Pre-bottleneck (Illinois, 1820) Post-bottleneck (Illinois, 1993) Greater prairie chicken Range of greater prairie chicken (a) Location Illinois 1930–1960s 1993 Population size Percentage Number of alleles of eggs per locus hatched 1,000–25,000 <50 5.2 3.7 93 <50 Kansas, 1998 (no bottleneck) 750,000 5.8 99 Nebraska, 1998 (no bottleneck) 75,000– 200,000 5.8 96 (b) Pre-bottleneck (Illinois, 1820) Greater prairie chicken (a) Range of greater prairie chicken Post-bottleneck (Illinois, 1993) Location Illinois 1930–1960s 1993 Population size Number Percentage of alleles of eggs per locus hatched 1,000–25,000 <50 5.2 3.7 93 <50 Kansas, 1998 (no bottleneck) 750,000 5.8 99 Nebraska, 1998 (no bottleneck) 75,000– 200,000 5.8 96 (b) Founder effect – founder population and three possible new populations Mal de Meleda – founder effect Serial Founder Effect • Serial founder effects have occurred when populations migrate over long distances. Such long distance migrations typically involve relatively rapid movements followed by periods of settlement. The populations in each migration carry only a subset of the genetic diversity carried from previous migrations. As a result, genetic differentiation tends to increase with geographic distance. Movement of mitochondrial genes out of Africa ‘Wisteria vine’ model of human genetic diversity Gene Flow • Gene flow is the movement of alleles in and out of a population • Gene flow occurs because gametes or fertile individuals move from one population to another and take their genes with them Gene flow Gene Flow in Conifers 60 Survival rate (%) 50 Population in which the surviving females eventually bred Central Eastern Central population NORTH SEA Eastern population Vlieland, the Netherlands 40 2 km 30 20 10 0 Females born in central population Females born in eastern population Parus major Non-Random Mating • Hardy-Weinberg assumes random mating – if mating is not random then the population may change in the short term – the most common form of non-random mating is in-breeding – the mating of closely related individuals • In fact inbreeding is very common – many mammals probably mate with first or second cousins in the wild; many plants self-pollinate – the ultimate form of inbreeding • Inbreeding tends to produce homozygous populations Inbreeding and White Squirrels Mutations • Mutations are the ultimate source of new genetic variations – a new mutation that is transmitted in gametes immediately changes the gene pool of a population by inserting a new allele into the gene pool