Download Human possibilities

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup

Essential gene wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Human possibilities
Introduction
To begin with, I’ll describe the characteristics of the text entitled Human Possibilities which
is an extract from the novel Gattaca written by Andrew Niccol in 1997.
This novel became a movie (Gattaca) shortly after and become famous because it raises a
very sensitive issue: the limits of scientific interference in what should remain a natural
activity: procreation.
This extract describes a scene that takes place in the future and involves a geneticist and his
clients: a couple trying to have a kid. But not just any kid: The perfect child with
predetermined assets!
Announce the plan:
I.
II.
III.
Perfect child syndrome
Genes for sale
Eugenism : return of the uberkid (or the revival of the debate about eugenism)
I. Perfect child syndrome
_It’s an antenatal visit for the parents of an unborn child.
Two unusual facts:
A geneticist replaces the doctor.
The parents have not concerned about their child’s health as it is but how to enhance it.
We can see from the text that there are two main characters: Antonio and Maria who are
expecting a kid.
_They choose the physical and mental characteristics of their kid.
For instance (line 15): “blue eyes, dark hair and fair skin”
_The scene shows a very natural feeling: The parents’ anguish about their kid’s health but the
geneticist uses their fears as a selling argument. The joint is not whether the kid is going to be
healthy but how genetics can make him/her fit for the “perfect society”. Not only should
natural weaknesses be eradicated but also every abnormal trait (like being left handed) which
could stand out in society. All they want would be an average kid, who, if society has to be
taken into account, cannot be less than perfect.
II. Genes for sale!
_The appointment turns into a sale. The least we can say about the geneticist is that he is a
hard seller, ready to close the case. He plays with his clients (we can’t say patients any more),
trying to sell them the most advanced and most expensive options like “mathematical or
musical ability”.
_The scene reminds a visit to the car dealer because the product comes with plenty of options.
He proposes to choose the color of the hair as he would propose to choose the color of the car.
III. Eugenism : return of the uberkid (or the revival of the debate about
eugenism)
_Historically eugenism was in fashion at the turn of the 20th century, in countries such as
Sweden and Nazi Germany. The belief that better genes made better humans has been proved
wrong and is no longer upheld by scientists, fortunately.
Or is it? Recently, a political election raised the issue of natural born criminals. Does it mean
that we are determined by own genes and, if so, do we need to wasp them for a better lot?
_The movie Gattaca tackles this question and in some way provides an answer.
The main character is born “invalid” and is not allowed in the haven for “valid” citizen but
manages to fake his identity and oddly enough, outsmarts the superior people in charge of
security.
The need for security to keep “invalid” people away from Gattaca is a contradiction in terms,
if those people are really so unfit, why worry about them trying to intrude?
They shouldn’t be able to. But they do anyway: which means that the answer for a better life
lies somewhere else than in genes.
Conclusion
This text leaves us with an unsolved question that could be important in the next decades,
which will see the development of advanced processes such as cloning or genetic therapy: do
we want a society with genetically engineered people or keep things natural even if to
perfection is a tempting goal?