* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Title Slide Option (navy) (Scroll for all color
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Crizotinib outcomes in ALK- positive advanced NSCLC patients with brain metastases Keith L. Davis, MA,1 James A. Kaye, MD, DrPH,2 Shrividya Iyer, PhD2 1RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC/United States of America, 2RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, MA/United States of America, 3Pfizer, Inc. New York, NY/United States of America Mini Oral Presentation at the 16th World Conference on Lung Cancer, Sep 6-9, 2015, Denver, CO, USA Financial Disclosure: This study was sponsored by Pfizer, Inc. Background • Brain metastases are reported at initial diagnosis in 15-35% of patients with ALK+ metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)1-3 • Frequency of brain lesions can increase (up to 46% of ALK+ patients by one estimate4) over the course of first-line therapy • Crizotinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with proven efficacy against ALK+ tumors3,5 • Clinical benefits of crizotinib in ALK+ metastatic NSCLC patients with brain metastases have been documented in trial data6 and in single-case reports7 1. Doebele et al. Cancer 2012;118:4502-11. 2. Kang et al. Respir Med 2014;108:388-94. 3. Shaw et al. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2385-94. 4. Weickhardt et al. J Thorac Oncol 2012;7:1807-1814. 5. Ou et al. Ann Oncol 2014;25:415-22. 6. Costa DB et al. J Clin Oncol 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. 7. Kinoshita Y et a.. BMJ Case Rep 2013. doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-200867. 2 Rationale and Objectives • The clinical experience of crizotinib-treated patients with ALK+ metastatic NSCLC and brain metastases has not been widely assessed in real-world settings • To help fill this research gap, we assessed the following in a small cohort of ALK+ metastatic NSCLC patients with brain metastases: – Demographic and clinical characteristics – Objective response rate (ORR) of primary tumor during crizotinib treatment and 1-year survival rates from crizotinib initiation – Status of brain lesions (intracranial response [ICR]) during crizotinib treatment 3 Methods • Retrospective chart review (anonymized data, IRB approved) • Data abstraction performed in 2014 by pooled sample of 147 oncologists in the US (n = 107) and Canada (n = 40) • Patient inclusion criteria: – Adults (age ≥18) diagnosed with ALK+ metastatic NSCLC – Received crizotinib as first- or later-line treatment – First crizotinib treatment received between 8/1/2011 and 3/31/2013 (for US patients), or 4/12/2012 and 3/31/2013 (for Canadian patients) Cohort for main study (n = 212) See 2016 WCLC Abstract No. 929 – Complete medical record through last crizotinib dose – Brain metastases present prior to or upon crizotinib initiation Cohort for present analyses (n = 33) • Analyses were descriptive and exploratory – Kaplan-Meier (K-M) methods used for 1-year survival rate estimates 4 Results – Patient Demographics & Clinical Characteristics Demographics Age at crizotinib 57.6 (11.9) Clinical Characteristics Deceased at date of chart initiation, mean (SD) review, n (%) Sex, n (%) Current/former smoker, n (%) Male 19 (57.6) Female 14 (42.4) 5 22 (66.7) ECOG at diagnosis, n (%) Ethnicity, n (%) 0 or 1 18 (54.5) 2 or 3 15 (45.5) White 25 (75.8) Black 5 (15.2) (%) Asian/Pacific 3 (9.0) Crizotinib treatment duration islander 10 (30.2) Adenocarcinoma histology, n (days), median 28 (84.8) 230 Results – Best Response (Primary Tumor) and Survival Patients Initiating Crizotinib as First-Line Tx (n = 22) 4% Patients Initiating Crizotinib as Second/Later-Line Tx (n = 11) Complete response 13% 17% 18% 48% Complete response 20% Partial response Partial response Stable disease Stable disease 20% 60% Disease progression Disease progression Not assessed Not assessed ORR = 60% ORR = 61% K-M Estimates of 1-Year Survival Probability from Crizotinib Initiation Patients Initiating Crizotinib First-Line 80.7% Patients Initiating Crizotinib Second/Later-Line 77.1% 0% 6 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Results – Status of Brain Lesions During Crizotinib Treatment Intracranial Response During Crizotinib Treatment 100% 90% 27% 80% 44% Stable Disease 70% 14% Progressive Disease 60% 11% 50% 40% Partial Intracranial Response 41% 22% 30% Complete Intracranial Response 20% 10% 18% 22% First-Line Initiators (n = 22) Second-Line Initiators (n = 11) 0% • Note: 71% of patients received either whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery prior to crizotinib initiation. 7 Study Limitations • Estimates based on small subsample (n = 33) of a larger multinational study – Small sample size limited study to descriptive, exploratory analyses (no multivariable adjustments for covariates) – Results may not be generalizable to entire ALK+ metastatic NSCLC population in the US or Canada • No covariate adjustments – ICR, for example, may be confounded by prior treatments (71% rec’d either whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery) • Convenience sample – Non-randomized population – Timing and manner of assessments of ORR and ICR not protocol-driven (i.e., not assessed at pre-defined intervals, but rather at time points determined by the physicians in regular practice) • Chart reviews subject to data entry/coding errors 8 Conclusions • Complete or partial response of the primary tumor during crizotinib treatment was seen in a majority of patients (ORR ~60%) • 1-year survival (~80%) was higher than a recent trial-based report of ALK+ metastatic NSCLC patients with brain metastases (~65%)6 • Results support emerging literature on the possible clinical benefits of crizotinib in ALK+ metastatic NSCLC patients with brain metastases • Findings provide signal that outcomes may be further optimized with earlier (first-line) initiation of crizotinib 6. Costa DB et al. J Clin Oncol 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. 9