Download XPS depth Profiling with the new MAGCIS cluster ion source, from

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Metabolomics wikipedia , lookup

Citric acid cycle wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Butyric acid wikipedia , lookup

Peptide synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup

Metabolism wikipedia , lookup

Genetic code wikipedia , lookup

Hepoxilin wikipedia , lookup

Metalloprotein wikipedia , lookup

Amino acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup

Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
XPS depth Profiling with the new
MAGCIS cluster ion source,
from polymers to inorganic samples
J.J. Pireaux, P. Louette
Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Spectroscopie Electronique, Facult´es Universitaires
Notre Dame de la Paix
, R. G. White, P. Mack and T. S. Nunney
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Contents
2
Monatomic And Gas Cluster Ion Source - MAGCIS
 Monatomic And Gas Cluster Ion Source
(MAGCIS)
 Single source for monatomic and cluster beams
 Available on K-Alpha, Theta Probe and E250Xi
 Cluster mode
 Variable cluster sizes (>2000 atoms)
 Energy/atom: 1 eV upwards
 Monatomic mode
 Based on existing EX06 ion source
 200 eV – 4 keV
 Full control through Avantage software
3
MAGCIS
4
MAGCIS
Electrical
connections
Cluster
Gas inlet
Skimmers
Nozzle
Ionization region
Monatomic
gas inlet
Focus &
scanning
electrodes
5
Mass selection
MAGCIS
Electrical
connections
Cluster
Gas inlet
Skimmers
Nozzle
Ionization region
Monatomic
gas inlet
Focus &
scanning
electrodes
6
Mass selection
Cluster ions v monatomic ions
Monatomic ion beam
7
Cluster ion beam
Introduction
Amino acid multilayer films
 Biosensor applications of amino acid
multilayer films
 Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) biosensors
 Optical sensors exploiting electromagnetic interactions
between[2]
 Analyte in solution
 Biomolecule immobilized on SPR sensor
surface
 Offer benefit of real-time analysis
Schematic of SPR biosensor with amino
acid multilayer[1]
8
 Role of amino acid multilayers in SPR biosensors
 Creates a surface for bioactive ligands to bind to
 Can control ligand packing density, which affects
biosensor performance
 Structure of the amino acid multilayer modifies
resonance with detecting substrate, e.g. Au or Si
[1] J.H. Jeong et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 421 (2006) 373–377
[2] J. Homola, Anal Bioanal Chem (2003) 377 : 528–539
Introduction
Amino acid multilayer films
 Biosensor applications of amino acid
multilayer films
 Amino acid multilayer studied in this work
 Multilayer of phenylalanine (Phe) and tyrosine (Tyr)
 Films deposited by thermal evaporation
Schematic of expected structure of
amino acid multilayer
Tyrosine (Tyr)
9
Phenylalanine (Phe)
Introduction
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
 X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)
 Elemental identification & quantification
 Which elements are present and how much?
 Can detect all elements except H
 Detection limit >0.05 At% for most elements
 Chemical identification & quantification
 Chemical environment
 Functional groups
 Surface sensitivity
 Information sampling depth <10nm
 Excellent depth resolution during profiling
10
Evaluation of XPS analysis
Element
C
O
N
Measured Expected Measured Expected
At%
At%
At%
At%
Tyr
Tyr
Phe
Phe
69.67
69.23
74.05
75.00
21.62
23.08
15.85
16.67
8.71
7.69
10.11
8.33
Phe and Tyr references
Measured as received surface composition
is as expected for Tyr and Phe
Elemental quantification table
C1s
Tyr
O1s
N1s
CAuger
OAuger
NAuger
Phe
11
1300
1200
1100
1000
900
800
700
600
Binding Energy (eV)
500
400
300
200
100
0
Evaluation of XPS analysis
Phe and Tyr references
 Chemical analysis of amino acid films
 XPS is chemically sensitive
Phenylalanineas received
 Spectrum of phenylalanine shows components due
to aromatic ring, C-C-NH2 and OH-C=O groups
 Quantitative chemical & elemental analysis
Caromatic
CCCNH2
CCO2H
N
O
Observed At%
53.34
13.18
7.47
10.13
15.88
Aromatic
Expected At%
50.00
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
C-CNH2
Elemental quantification table
CO2H
p-p* shake-ups
298
296
294
292
290
288
286
Binding Energy (eV)
12
284
282
280
Evaluation of XPS analysis
Phe and Tyr references
 Chemical analysis of amino acid films
 XPS is chemically sensitive
Tyrosineas received
 Addition of a single OH group to phenyl ring shows
clearly in hi-resolution C1s spectrum
 XPS can easily chemically resolve carbon bonding
environments in Phe and Tyr
Caromatic
CCCNH2
CCO2H
N
O
Observed At%
40.50
22.47
6.70
8.71
21.62
Aromatic
Aromatic-OH
and C-CNH2
Expected At%
38.46
23.08
7.69
7.69
23.08
Elemental quantification table
CO2H
p-p* shake-up
296
292
288
Binding Energy (eV)
13
284
280
Evaluation of XPS analysis
 Chemical analysis of amino acid films
 Oxygen chemical analysis
Phe and Tyr references
Pheas received and Tyras received
 High energy resolution O1s spectra allow extra OH
group in Tyr to be tracked and quantified
 Ratio of “red:blue” components in Tyr is
measured at 2:1, as expected
 Small amount of “contaminant” oxygen in Phe O1s
spectrum
Tyr
Phe
542
540
538
536
534
532
Binding Energy (eV)
14
530
528
526
Evaluation of XPS argon cluster profiling
MAGCIS
 Monatomic And Gas Cluster Ion Source
(MAGCIS)
 Single source for monatomic and cluster beams
 Profiling solution for inorganic & organic
samples
 Cluster capability can be added to XPS tool without
taking up valuable extra space
 Available on K-Alpha, Theta Probe and E250Xi
 Profiling in the analysis chamber, at the standard XPS
analysis position
MAGCIS fitted to Thermo Scientific K-Alpha
15
Evaluation of XPS argon cluster profiling
Profiling of amino acid films
 Profiling of amino acid films
 Amino acid films cannot be sputtered with
monatomic argon
 Chemical information is destroyed & composition is
strongly modified
 Cannot observe expected layer structure
 Elemental composition strongly modified
Schematic of expected structure of
amino acid multilayer
16
Elemental profile of amino acid layers with 200eV
monatomic Ar+ beam
Evaluation of XPS argon cluster profiling
Profiling of amino acid films
 Profiling of amino acid films
 Amino acid films cannot be sputtered with
monatomic argon
 Chemical information is destroyed & composition is
strongly modified
 Cannot observe expected layer structure
 Elemental composition strongly modified
 Chemical information is destroyed
p-p* shake-up
disappears
Elemental profile of amino acid layers with 200eV
monatomic Ar+ beam
C1s spectra from monatomic Ar+ profile of amino acid layers
17
Evaluation of XPS argon cluster profiling
Profiling of amino acid films
 Profiling of amino acid films
 Previously demonstrated use of Ar cluster beam
for amino acid profiling
 Subtle compositional changes through multilayer
structure can be observed
 Only slight degradation of sample is observed
throughout profile
Argon cluster profile of amino acid layers
Schematic of expected structure of
amino acid multilayer
18
Evaluation of XPS argon cluster profiling
Profiling of amino acid films
 Profiling of amino acid films
 Previously demonstrated use of Ar cluster beam
for amino acid profiling
 Subtle compositional changes through multilayer
structure can be observed
 Only slight degradation of sample is observed
throughout profile
 Chemical information is preserved
Argon (Ar1000) cluster profile of amino
acid layers
C1s spectra from Ar1000 cluster profile of amino acid layers
19
Evaluation of XPS argon cluster profiling
 Profiling of Tyr films
 Stability of Tyr during argon cluster profiling
MAGCIS cluster profile of Tyr on Si
70
C
60
Composition of Tyr
layer not modified by
cluster profiling
50
Atomic percent (%)
 50nm Tyr on Si
 Elemental composition stays constant throughout
film
 Cluster profiling is NOT modifying
composition of Tyr film
Tyrosine reference
40
30
O
20
Si
N
10
0
0
10
20
30
Etch Depth (nm)
20
40
50
Evaluation of XPS argon cluster profiling
 Profiling of Tyr films
 Chemical stability of Tyr during argon cluster
profiling
Tyrosine reference
MAGCIS cluster profile of Tyr on Si
70
C
 Chemistry of Tyr film NOT destroyed by cluster
profiling
60
Atomic percent (%)
50
p-p* peak
retained
40
30
O
20
Depth
Si
25nm
15nm
0 nm
N
10
0
0
10
20
30
Etch Depth (nm)
C1s spectra during profile
21
40
50
XPS argon cluster profiling of amino acids
 Profiling of amino acid multilayer
 Expected structure of multilayer
80
 Alternating Phe/Tyr layers, with layer of Phe on top
surface and 3 Tyr layers
70
 All three Tyr layers observed
C
OPhe&Tyr
OTyr
N
Si
60
Atomic percent (%)
 Quantification change between Phe and Tyr as
expected
 Slight increase in carbon signal over 300nm depth
(1.2 At%)
 Chemical resolution of Phe and Tyr oxygen
throughout profile
 Reasonable stability on OTyr quantification
 Depth resolution on last Tyr layer slightly degraded
Intact multilayer
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
100
200
300
400
Etch Depth (nm)
MAGCIS cluster profile of intact amino acid multilayer
22
XPS argon cluster profiling of amino acids
Damaged multilayer
 Profiling of amino acid multilayer
 Expected structure of multilayer
 Alternating Phe/Tyr layers, with layer of Phe on top
surface and 3 Tyr layers
 Top Phe layer not observed
 Damaged BEFORE analysis
 Quantification change between Phe and Tyr as
expected
 Slight increase in carbon signal over 300nm depth
(1.2 At%)
 Chemical resolution of Phe and Tyr oxygen
throughout profile
 Excellent stability on OTyr quantification
C
OPhe&Tyr
OTyr
N
Si
60
Atomic percent (%)
 All three Tyr layers observed
70
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
500
150
250
350
Etch Depth (nm)
MAGCIS cluster profile of damaged amino acid multilayer
23
Monatomic v cluster profiling
Cleaning polyimide
• Many polymers cannot be sputtered with monatomic argon
• Chemical information is destroyed & composition is modified
• C1s spectra shown for ion beam etched Kapton
As received
296
294
292
290
288
286
284
Binding Energy (eV)
24
282
296
294
292
290
C-C
C-N
Shake-up
Counts / s
C-C
C-N C-O
N-C=O
Shake-up
Counts / s
Adventitious
contamination
N-C=O
C-O
200 eV
monatomic Ar+,
200s
288
286
284
Binding Energy (eV)
282
Monatomic v cluster profiling
Cleaning polyimide
296
294
292
290
288
286
284
Binding Energy (eV)
25
282
296
C-N
Shake-up
Counts / s
C-C
C-N C-O
N-C=O
Shake-up
Counts / s
Adventitious
contamination
N-C=O
4 keV
2000 atom
Clusters,
200s
C-O
As received
C-C
• Many polymers cannot be sputtered with monatomic argon
• Chemical information is destroyed & composition is modified
• C1s spectra shown for ion beam etched Kapton
294
292
290
288
286
284
Binding Energy (eV)
282
Monatomic And Gas Cluster Ion Source
Irganox
 Profiling of Irganox D-layers
 Check for depth resolution capabilities
 10nm layers Irganox 3114
 FWHM of nitrogen-containing layers almost constant
throughout 300nm sputter depth
-layer
1
2
3
4
FWHM/nm
10.9
10.1
9.8
10.6
MAGCIS cluster profile of Irganox D-layers
Nitrogen portion of MAGCIS cluster profile of Irganox D-layers
26
Irganox sample sourced from NPL
Cleaning metal oxide surfaces
 Benefits of cluster-cleaning Ta2O5:
 Removal of attenuating carbon contamination.
 Increased overall photoelectron signal.
Comparison of XPS survey spectra before
and after argon cluster ion cleaning
Ta4f
As-received
Spectra offset for clarity
27
C1s
O1s
Cluster-cleaned
Cleaning metal oxide surfaces
Tantalum oxide film
Comparison of Ta 4f spectra for monatomic Ar+
and argon cluster ion sputter-cleaning of Ta2O5
 Tantalum oxide film:
 Even low energy monatomic Ar+ ion sputtercleaning causes a significant amount of Ta2O5
reduction.
 Argon cluster-cleaning gives no visible sign of
oxide reduction.
Cleaning method
Ta 4f oxide
None
100
Cluster ions
100
200 eV monatomic
70.4
Substantial
Ta2O5 reduction
with monatomic
Ar+ sputtering
Ta 4f reduced
29.6
Cluster-cleaned
Relative intensities of Ta 4f oxide and reduced
components before & after sputter-cleaning
200 eV clean
As-received
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
Binding Energy (eV)
28
26
24
22
Profiling of organic FET
 Profiling of organic FET
 Copper phthalocyanine (CuPc) is an organic
semiconductor component of field-effect transistors
 Electrical properties of FET modified by
Introduction
CuPc (Semiconductor)
 Composition & chemistry of CuPc layer
 Interfacial chemistry (CuPc / SiO2 and SiO2 / Si)
 Use XPS and MAGCIS to analyze a film of CuPc
deposited on thick SiO2 on Si
 Cluster beam for film composition, chemistry & thickness of
CuPc layer
 Monomer beam for similar information from SiO2 layer
Acknowledgements Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Dietrich R.T. Zahn, Dr Daniel Lehmann, Iulia Korodi
29
Source
Drain
SiO2 (Isolator)
Si (Substrate)
Schematic of organic FET
Profiling of organic FET
Cluster profile of CuPc / SiO2
 Cluster profile of CuPc / SiO2
 Ratio of N : Cu is stable throughout
the profile
MAGCIS cluster profile of CuPc / SiO2
C
70
 cluster profiling is not adversely
changing composition
O
Atomic percent (%)
60
50
40
Si
30
N
20
10
Cu
0
0
4
8
12
16
Etch Depth (nm)
30
20
24
28
Profiling of organic FET
Cluster profile of CuPc / SiO2
 Cluster profile of CuPc / SiO2
 Profiling of copper chemistry
Reduced Cu
Cu(II)
satellite
Increasing depth
 Satellite feature observed 944eV,
indicating Cu(II) chemical state
 Ratio of “satellite/core-level” intensities is
maintained throughout profile
 Cu(II) chemistry is not being
adversely modified by cluster beam
 Some more reduced copper also
observed prior to sputtering
 Disappears after sputtering with
cluster beam, indicating chemical
state is localized to top surface
 Successful profiling of Cu(II) versus
more reduced copper
Cu2p3/2 spectra acquired during profile
942
938
Binding Energy (eV)
31
934
930
Profiling of organic FET
 CuPc film (0-2nm)
CuPc film (0-2nm)
C1s spectrum of CuPc film (0-2nm)
 XPS analysis of as received CuPc surface
 More carbon than expected (adventitious
contamination)
C
N
Cu
Expected At%
78.0
19.5
2.4
Observed At%
82.6
16.5
1.8
 C1s spectrum has some similarities and some
differences compared to reference CuPc powder
296
292
288
Binding Energy (eV)
32
284
280
Profiling of organic FET
 CuPc film (4-8nm)
CuPc film (4-8nm)
C1s spectrum of CuPc film (4-8nm)
 Spectral data from MAGCIS cluster profile (after
removing contamination layer)
 XPS analysis of remaining organic layer
 Quantification agrees well with expectation
C
N
Cu
Expected At%
78.0
19.5
2.4
Observed At%
78.6
19.4
1.9
 C1s spectrum similar to structure of CuPc
reference powder
 Core level peaks due to benzene and pyrrole
rings
 Complex band of satellite features observed
 Due to shake-up transitions involving the
conjugated p-system in Pc
 MAGCIS cluster beam has successfully cleaned
contamination to reveal CuPc layer
 No adverse chemical modification of CuPc
carbon chemistry
33
296
292
288
Binding Energy (eV)
284
280
MAGCIS profiling of organic FET
 Combined cluster/monomer profile of
CuPc / SiO2 / Si
Combined profile of CuPc / SiO2 / Si
MAGCIS cluster
profile
MAGCIS monomer profile
 MAGCIS has been used to profile mixed
organic/inorganic field-effect transistor
 CLUSTER profiling of CuPc / SiO2
C
O
 Composition & chemistry of CuPc is not
adversely affected by cluster profiling
 Cu (II) successfully profiled
 CuPc layer is 12.5nm thick
 MONOMER profiling of SiO2 / Si
 Composition of SiO2 layer as expected
 SiO2 layer is 120nm thick
Si4+
N
Cu
34
Si0
Summary
MAGCIS
(/mæ g´sIs/)
noun
an ion source able to generate both
monatomic and cluster beams of argon
35
 Summary
 XPS cluster profiling is a strong
characterization technique for amino acid
multilayers
 Excellent quantification
 Chemical profiling with minimal damage
 Good depth resolution throughout profile