Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
T H E CELLULAR STRUCTURE O F CARCINOMA O F T H E LUNG BELA HALPERT, M.D., AND BJARNE PEARSON, M.D. (From the Departments of Pathology and Bacteriology of the Charity Hospital of Louisiana at New Orleans and the Louisiana State University School of Medicine) This study of the microscopic structure of carcinoma of the lung was undertaken in order to assemble data concerning the cellular origin of these growths. The material was derived from 92 cases of carcinoma of the lung observed in a series of 7433 necropsies performed at the Charity Hospital of Louisiana at New Orleans on persons over one year old. I t includes 74 cases previously analyzed (1) and 18 additional cases which were encountered between July 1, 1938, and June 30, 1939. Routine microscopic preparations from each primary growth and, when possible, from sites of metastases, were used in the analysis. On the basis of the' individual and group characteristics of the neoplastic cells the 92 growths were classified, as previously suggested (2, 3), as squamous-cell, columnar-cell, and reserve-cell carcinomas. Forty-nine tumors, or 53.26 per cent, were classified as squamous-cell, 17, or 18.47 per cent, as columnar-cell, and 26, or 28.25 per cent, as reserve-cell carcinomas. The distribution among white and colored males and females is given in Table I. TABLEI : Race and Sex Incidence of Pulmonary Carcinomas Number of necropsies on persons over oneyearold.Jan.1.1931-June30.1939 Squamous-cell carcinoma Columnar-cell carcinoma Reserve-cell carcinoma Total White male 2183 23 10 15 I White female 987 1 -48 I Colored male 2618 I Colored female I645 1 Total 1433 2 3 0 24 4 10 0 0 1 49 17 26 5 38 1 92 The growth was classified as squamous-cell carcinoma when the tumor cells were arranged more or less concentrically to form epithelial pearls, and the cells toward the center of the cell nests disclosed varying degrees of keratinization or were transformed into keratinized scales or dCbris. The grouping was not altered by the coincident presence of columnar cells forming acinar or tubular structures and of undifferentiated or reserve cells, either alone or in combination. The cellular and structural variations in this group of carcinomas were marked. All grades of transition were observed, from slight central keratinization to pearl formation. In one instance broad zones of reserve cells con213 tained minute keratinized centers (Fig. 1). In several predominantly squamous-cell growths, low cuboidal or columnar cells forming acinar or tubular structures appeared here and there (Fig. 2 ) . In some fields of such growths cells of all three types were present in almost equal proportions. The number of nuclei in mitosis, the amount and character of the stroma, and the amount of inflammatory reaction, varied in the individual tumors. In the metastases of some of the growths occasional areas were observed composed entirely of reserve cells without keratinization; the peripheral cells in these areas exhibited a palisade arrangement. The growths were classified as columnar-cell carcinomas when the tumor cells were columnar or cuboidal and were arranged in acinar, tubular, or papillary structures. The grouping was not altered by the presence of additional masses of undifferentiated or reserve cells. There was considerable variation. in the individual tumors of this group as regards the height of the cells forming the acini, the number of acinar and tubular structures present, and the number of cells aggregated into solid masses. Among the cells forming these solid masses, reserve cells were occasionally seen. In some growths the acinar and tubular structures simulated in a haphazard way the normal epithelial structures of the air passages in that the columnar cells resembled goblet cells or were ciliated. The lumina of these structures contained pink or lavender-staining secretion in the form of a network. In some growths the papillary arrangement was more marked than the acinar and tubular formations, and there was little variation in the height of the cells (Fig. 3 ) . In the growths in which well formed acinar, tubular, or papillary structures were observed, the stroma was usually scanty. I t was more abundant in the growths composed 'of low cuboidal cells. There was considerable variation in the individual growths as to the number of nuclei in mitosis, the amount of necrosis and hemorrhage, and the inflammatory reaction in the stroma. The growth was classified as reserve-cell carcinoma when the tumor cells were of the same size, the nuclei were round, oval or elongated, and stained deeply, the cytoplasm was scanty, and the cell borders were hardly discernible. The cellular arrangement formed no particular pattern; in some growths the cells were arranged in whorls, in others there was a palisade arrangement of the peripheral cells. The cellular and structural variations were slight in this group. More or less extensive areas of necrosis were present in the centers of some cell sheets. The connective-tissue stroma was usually scanty and delicate, and at times presented little inflammatory reaction about the advancing margins of the growth. The cellular pattern of the primary tumor was perfectly reproduced in the metastases to regional lymph nodes and to distant organs such as the Iiver (Fig. 4) and the kidneys. The concepts of older writers concerning the cellular origin of carcinomas of the lung were lucidly presented by Moi'se (4) in 1921. In 1929 Weller (5) contributed another review in which was assembled most of the information then available on this subject. . I n 1932 Fried (6) ably supported the idea that all carcinomas of the lung are derived from a common ancestor cell, and this view is accepted by a number of recent observers, including Sweany ( 7), JaffC (8),Lindberg (9), Samson ( l o ) , Rosedale and McKay ( 11) , Fabris ( 12), Brines and Kenning ( 13), Stein and Joslin ( 14), Tod ( IS), and Ochsner and DeBakey (16). A consideration of the normal epithelial structures of the air passages and their embryonic derivation suggests a logical explanation for the variety in the cellular structure of carcinoma of the lung. The epithelial cells lining the mucous membrane of the bronchial tree from the stem to the minute branches are entodermal cells which exhibit varying degrees of differentiation and specialization. The entodermal ancestor cell is capable of developing into a variety of cells which include columnar cells with cilia; goblet cells; cuboidal cells, which form acinar or tubular structures and which produce a mucous or serous secretion; indifferent cells lining the ducts of these glands; and cuboidal or low cuboidal cells, without cilia, which line parts of the terminal bronchioles. In addition to these cells, varying numbers of other epithelial cells lie beneath the ciliated columnar and goblet cells, filling the gap between them and the basement membrane. Some of these epithelial cells, like the basal cells in the epidermis, are lined up along the tunica propria, and their oval nuclei form one or several rows. Their cytoplasm is scanty and the cell borders are scarcely discernible. They appear to be the only epithelial cells in the mucous membrane of the bronchial tree which are concerned with cell division and cell differentiation: I t seems reasonable, therefore, to look upon them as the reserve cells from which the ciliated columnar cells and goblet cells are replenished. These reserve cells naturally also possess the qualities of their ancestor cells in that they may differentiate into any kind of epithelium which an entodermal cell is capable of producing. If we assume with Whitmore (17) that the epithelial cells which replace other epithelial cells in a given area retain their embryonic potentialities, it is easy to see how in the course of forced and frequent cell division dominant characteristics may be supplanted by recessive ones and how stratified squamous epithelium may be produced by the reserve cells. The assimption that the reserve cells are the parent cells of all three types of carcinoma'of the lung is substantiated by. the following facts: ( I ) the occurrence of carcinomas of the lung composed entirely of reserve cells; (2) the demonstrable transformation of reserve cells into either squamous cells or columnar cells; (3) the occurrence of carcinomas composed of all three types of cells. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The 92 carcinomas of the lung upon which this study is based were encountered in 7433 necropsies on persons over one year of age. According to their microscopic structure, 49 were squamous-cell, 17 columnar-cell, and 2 6 The cellular pattern of the primary growth is perfectly reproduced in metastasis in the liver ('36204). reserve-cell carcinomas, a distribution of approximately 50 per cent, 20 per cent, and 30 per cent respectively. The occurrence of growths composed entirely of reserve cells, the demonstrable transformation of reserve cells into. either squamous cells or columnar cells, and the occurrence of carcinomas composed of all three types of cells seem to support the concept that the reserve cell is the parent cell of all carcinomas of the lung. 1. D'AUNOY,R., PEARSON, B., AND HALPERT, B.: Am. J. Path. 15: 567, 1939. 2. HALPERT, B.: New Orleans M. & S. J. 91: 439, 1939. 3. HALPERT,B.: Surgery 8: 903, 1940. 4. MOISE,T . S.: Arch. Int. Med. 28: 733, 1921. 5. WELLER,C. V.: Arch. Path. 7: 478, 1929. 6. FRIED,B. M.: Primary Carcinoma of the Lung, Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1032. 7. SWEANY, H. C.: Am. J. Clin. Path. 5: 1, 1935. 8. JAFFE,R. H.: J. Lab. & Clin. Med. 20: 1227, 1935. 9. LINDBERG, K.: Arb. a. d. path. Inst. d. Univ. Helsingfors 8: 225, 1935. 10. SAMSON, P. C.: Am. J. Cancer 23: 741, 1935. 11. ROSEDALE, R. S., AND MCKAY,D. R.: Am. J. Cancer 26: 493, 1936. 12. FABRIS,A,: Tumori 23: 19, 1937. 13. BRINES,0 . A., AND KENNINC,J. C.: Am. J. Clin. Path. 7: 120, 1937. 14. STEIN,J. J., AND JOSLIN,H.L.:Surg., Gynec. & Obst. 66: 902, 1938. 15. Ton, M. C.: Edinburgh M. J. 46: 95, 1939. 16. OCHSNER, A., AND DEBAKEY, M.: Surg., Gynec. & Obst. 68: 435, 1939. 17. WHITMORE,E. R.: Bol. Liga contra el ciincer 13: 263, 1938.