* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Document
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Large Hadron Collider wikipedia , lookup
Strangeness production wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
Grand Unified Theory wikipedia , lookup
Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear force wikipedia , lookup
ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup
Super-Kamiokande wikipedia , lookup
Antiproton Decelerator wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear structure wikipedia , lookup
ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup
Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup
16.451 Lecture 13: Isospin and symmetries 16/10/2003 1 • Nucleon: T = ½, mt = ½. For a nucleus, by extension: mt = ½ (Z - N). • If neutrons and protons are really “identical” as far as the strong interaction is concerned, then nuclei with the same mass number but (Z,N) interchanged ought to be very similar. These are called “mirror nuclei”, e.g. 11B (5,6) and 11C (6,5) • Energy spectra line up after correction for Coulomb energy difference in the ground state. J 2 Two nucleon (NN) system and isospin: Pauli exclusion principle: wave function for identical fermions must be antisymmetric if the particle labels are exchanged How do we tell what symmetry the isospin configurations have? T = 0 or 1 for NN. Use symbolic representation: = ½ and = - ½ The 4 configurations (m1, m2) are: (), (), () , () () and () are symmetric – exchanging the symbols (1,2) has no effect. These correspond to total isospin (T, mT) = (1, 1) and (1, -1) (), () states correspond to mT = 0, but they have mixed symmetry. Solution: make symmetric and antisymmetric combinations of the mixed states: symmetric: () + () () + () anti – () - () () - () = - {() - () } Bottom line: : (T=1, mT = 0) T = 1 states are symmetric, T = 0 antisymmetric. (T=0, mT=0 (Same for spin, S) implications of isospin symmetry: 3 (Krane, ch. 11) • pp and nn systems are always T = 1 • np system is () , ie it can be partly T = 1 and partly T = 0 • for a nucleus, mT = ½ (Z-N) and T = |mT|, ie lowest energy has smallest T • Example: “isobaric triplet” 14C, 14N, 14O: 14O: Z = 8, N= 6 mT = + 1, T = 1 14C: Z = 6, N = 8 mT = -1, T = 1 14N mT = 0, T = 0 (g.s) and T = 1 (8 MeV) 4 Final example, evidence for isospin: Consider the deuteron, 2H = (np) bound state (d) Quantum numbers: mT = 0, T = 0 J = 1 + (S = 1, L = 0, = (-1)L ) How do we know it has T = 0 ? “Isospin selection rules”: The reaction: 1) isospin analysis: 2) isospin analysis: d + d 00 00 d + d 00 10 + 4He occurs, but (T = 1 deuteron also works) ° + 4He does not (only T = 0 prevents this!) Bottom line: T is conserved by the strong interaction. Energy depends on T but not on mT Isospin and Quarks: 5 There are a total of 6 quarks in the Standard Model (u,d,s,c,t,b – more later!) but only two play a significant role in nuclear physics: u and d. Not surprisingly, isospin carries over into the quark description: the “up” quark has isospin T = ½ “up” and similarly for the “down” quark: Quark “flavor” Spin, s Charge, q/e Isospin projection, mt u (“up”) 1/2 + 2/3 1/2 d (“down”) 1/2 - 1/3 -1/2 Isospin addition for the proton: p = (uud), neutron: n = (udd), mt = ½ + ½ - ½ = ½ mt = ½ - ½ - ½ = - ½ What about the delta? Addition of 3 x isospin- ½ vectors: T = 1/2 or 3/2; T = 3/2 is the : ++ = (uuu), + = (uud), ° = (udd), - = (ddd) What about antiquarks? same isospin but opposite mt e.g. pion: (+, °, - ) 1 1 u d, mt 2 2 1, etc... Back to the neutron: 6 Lifetime: 885.7 0.8 sec (world average) n p e e Neutron Beta Decay: n p e e 7 • a fundamental Weak Interaction process • lifetime is relatively long: ~ 1 , ~ * f V (r ) i d 3 r 2 (lecture 6!) large implies small transition rate , therefore ‘weak’ interaction V(r) compare to resonance decay: + p + °, a strong interaction process, with = 5.7 x 10-24 seconds!!! • precision studies of neutron decay are a very important testing ground for the “Standard Model” of fundamental interactions, as we shall see.... • interaction is almost pointlike, that is, the neutron disappears and the decay products appear almost instantaneously at the same place. (Fermi theory) • modern picture (Assignment 3): W- boson Closer look: electron energy spectrum 8 (m 0, K p ) e p n e “before” “after” 1) mn m p me K p K e K 2) p p pe p 0 Define the “Q – value”: (energy cons.) (momentum) (in general, Q > 0 for a reaction to proceed) Q mn m p me K p Ke K From Particle Data Group entries: Q = 0.78233 0.00006 MeV ( 60 eV!) Electron Energy Spectrum from “PERKEO” expt. at ILL reactor, France: 9 Bopp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 919 (1986) Fit to expected spectrum shape including detector model. Note: presence of neutrino affects this shape dramatically – otherwise it would be a sharp peak at a value determined by momentum /energy conservation! Endpoint smeared with detector resolution Case study: “state of the art” neutron lifetime measurement 10 Outline of the method: decay rate: n p e e 11 dN N dt measure rate by counting decay protons in a given time interval (dN/dt) and normalizing to the neutron beam flux (N) decay proton, to detector transmitted beam neutron detector incoming n beam decay volume, length L Ideally done with “cold neutrons”, e.g. from a reactor, moderated in liquid hydrogen... Issues: 1. precise decay volume ? 2. proton detection ? 3. beam normalization ? ... Neutron beam distribution – definitely not monoenergetic: 12 • ~ MeV neutrons from a reactor are “moderated” by scattering in a large tank of water (“thermal”) or liquid hydrogen (“cold”) • after many scatterings, they come to thermal equilibrium with the moderator and are extracted down a beamline to the experiment • velocity distribution is “Maxwellian”: energies in the meV range (kT = 26 meV @ 293K) Krane, Fig 12.4 Neutron detection at low energy: (Krane, ch. 12) 13 • several light nuclei have enormous neutron capture cross sections at low energy: (recall, cross sectional area of a nucleus, e.g. 10B is about 0.2 barns, lecture 4) (barns) • key feature: cross sections scale as 1/velocity at low energy 10B + n + 7Li + 2.79 MeV = ovo/v with o = 3838 b kinetic energy of ionized fragments can be converted into an electrical signal detector Put this together for detector counting rates as shown: N beam N dN / dt N decay 14 N decay dN beam dt decay proton, to detector transmitted beam incoming n beam N beam 10B neutron detector N det decay volume, length L L vT N v det ~ N beam ( o v o ) Decays and transmitted detector counts accumulated for time T neutrons must be captured to be detected! N beam (const) N det (DC beam, thermal energy spread) L T (const) N det L N decay Experimental details (all in vacuum, at ILL reactor, France): • use Penning trap to confine decay protons 15 ~ • let them out of the trap after accumulation interval T N det L N decay • measure the ratio Ndet/Ndecay as a function of trap length L slope gives Ndecay proton detector N det L particle detectors for capture products thin 10B foil to capture beam n’s variable length Penning trap (16 electrodes) protons spiral around field lines when let out of the trap Amazing results: 16 Rate versus trap length L proton energy from timing: about 34 keV (after kick – raw energy is only 0.75 keV) Result: 893.6 5.3 seconds (1990) PDG average: 885.7 0.8 (2003)