Download ultrasonic cleaning

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Biochemical switches in the cell cycle wikipedia , lookup

Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup

Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Mitosis wikipedia , lookup

Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup

Amitosis wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Cell cycle wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
INDUSTRY BULLETIN
ULTRASONIC CLEANING
Ultrasonic is sound energy that creates cavitation when introduced into a liquid. The cavitation is caused by pressure
differentials, providing the cleaning action of this process. In order to restore the anilox roll to full cell volume, a twostep ultrasonic cleaning process should be followed – soaking and cleaning.
Presoak Cycle
Due to the characteristics of modern water-based inks, many ultrasonic cleaner manufacturers employ an extensive
presoak cycle to soften the hardened deposits that typically plug the engraved cells of a ceramic anilox roll before
ultrasonic cleaning. This step is considered essential to cleaning without damaging the engraved substrate material. It
frequently comprises 80 to 90 percent of the total cleaning time (this can take up to 15 minutes – longer for first time
cleanings. First time cleanings can take up to one hour) The presoak cycle utilizes specially formulated – MEYER
LABORATORY’S – US1 SONIC CLEANER – cleaning solutions with a very high pH to loosen deposits so that the
ultrasonic cleaning cycle can effectively dislodge them at power levels that will not damage the surface of the roll itself.
Cleaning Cycle
The ultrasonic cleaning cycle uses sound waves to produce cavitation – the formation of microscopic gas bubbles by
mechanical means. These bubbles are under pressure and implode when they contact the surface of the roll. The energy
released at the implosion point creates an agitation, or scrubbing action, of great intensity that dislodges material from the
roll surface. This agitation by many small and intense imploding bubbles scrubs both exposed and hidden surfaces of parts
immersed in the solution carrying the ultrasonic waves. The design of most ultrasonic cleaning systems requires
constantly rotating the roll while ultrasonic cleaning is underway, and either total or partial immersion of the roll in
cleaning solution.
Careful balance of the following factors is required to control cavitation intensity in a manner that will confine this
process to the deposits and protect the roll coating:


Ultrasonic frequency has an inverse relationship to cavitation intensity. As the frequency increases, bubble size is
reduced, as is intensity. As a guideline, a frequency of 43 kilohertz (43,000 cycles/sec.) is recommended to minimize
intensity and create bubbles of a size that will fit into the engraved cells, where they can then dislodge deposits at the
bottom of the cell. Here again, this value is not absolute. The process design of an individual piece of equipment may
employ a different frequency.
Temperature of the cleaning solution greatly affects cavitation intensity. Elevated temperatures reduce the viscosity of
the cleaning solution and increase intensity, while heating is essential to the effectiveness of most cleaning solutions.
Cleaning solution temperatures are normally maintained between 120°F. and 140°F. Only cleaning solutions
designated for specific equipment cycles — and for cleaning laser-engraved ceramic anilox rolls—should be used.
Operating temperatures must be limited to those recommended by the ultrasonic cleaning equipment manufacturer.

Cleaning time is critical. The longer an engraved coating is exposed to ultrasonic cavitation, the more it is likely to be
damaged. As a rule, higher line screen engravings require shorter cleaning times. If an anilox roll is exposed to
ultrasonic energy for long intervals, damage to the engraved cells could result. Here again, this value is not absolute.
The process design of an individual piece of equipment may require a different cleaning time.
Common Cleaning Methods
Cleaning Method
Advantages
Baking Soda Blast
Cleans cells well
Disadvantages
Comments
May damage cell walls
LP1>600
Requires enclosed blast area;
may leave deposits behind
Plastic Bead Blast
Safe, effective, reusable
May damage cell walls
LPI>600
Requires enclosed blast area
Dry Ice Blast
Removes dried ink
May crack ceramic
None Known at this time
High Water Pressure
Should remove ink residue May push ink residues
in deeper
Requires enclosed area and
highly alkaline cleaner
Ultrasonic Systems
New units clean excellent
LPI<800
May cause stress cracks
and lead to corrosion
Requires chemical cleaner
US1 – Sonic Cleaner
Alkaline Cleaners
Effective Cleaners
Corrosive to aluminum
Many products available
ID-55, NA-55, RM-55