* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Data Analysis
Diamond anvil cell wikipedia , lookup
Elastic recoil detection wikipedia , lookup
Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
Particle-size distribution wikipedia , lookup
Computational chemistry wikipedia , lookup
Liquid–liquid extraction wikipedia , lookup
Atomic absorption spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Rutherford backscattering spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
Total organic carbon wikipedia , lookup
Gamma spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Metabolomics wikipedia , lookup
Gaseous detection device wikipedia , lookup
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
Ion chromatography wikipedia , lookup
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Countercurrent chromatography wikipedia , lookup
Analytical chemistry wikipedia , lookup
Size-exclusion chromatography wikipedia , lookup
High-performance liquid chromatography wikipedia , lookup
Monolithic HPLC column wikipedia , lookup
Data Analysis Introduction Since analytical chemistry is the science of making quantitative measurements, understanding the difference between accuracy and precision is vital. Also, it is important that raw data is manipulated and reported correctly to give a realistic estimate of the uncertainty in a result. Presentation of data in the form of graphs is extremely useful. Simple data manipulations may only require keeping track of significant figures. More complicated calculations require propagation-of-error methods. The uncertainity in a result can be categorized into random error and systematic error. See the statistical formula document for more quantitative descriptions of describing and testing data sets. See the statistics of sampling document for information about uncertainty involved in sampling. Accuracy and Precision Accuracy The accuracy of an analytical measurement is how close a result comes to the true value. Determining the accuracy of a measurement usually requires calibration of the analytical method with a known standard. Precision Precision is the reproducibility of multiple measurements and is usually described by the standard deviation, standard error, or confidence interval. Calibration Introduction Making measurements with any analytical method or instrument requires calibration to ensure the accuracy of the measurement. There are two common calibration procedures: using a working curve, and the standard-addition method. Both of these methods require one or more standards of known composition to calibrate the measurement. Instrumental methods are usually calibrated with standards that are prepared (or purchased) using a non-instrumental analysis. There are two direct analytical methods: gravimetry and coulometry. Titration is similar but requires preparation of a primary standard. The chief advantage of the working curve method is that it is rapid in that a single set of standards can be used for the measurement of multiple samples. The standard-addition method requires multiple measurements for each sample, but can reduce inaccuracies due to interferences and matrix effects. Graphs and Graphical Methods By a graph we mean a representation of numerical values or functions by the positions of points and lines on a two-dimensional surface. A graph is inherently more limited in precision than a table of numerical values or an analytic equation, but it can contribute a "feel'' for the behavior of data and functions that numerical tables and equations cannot. A graph reveals much more clearly such features as linearity or nonlinearity, maxima and minima, points of inflection, etc. Graphical methods of smoothing data and of differentiation and integration are sometimes easier than numerical methods. Graphs and graphical methods suffer, of course, from the limitations of a two-dimensional surface. Thus, normally, a plotted point has only two degrees of freedom, which we assume here to be represented by one independent variable x (increasing from left to right) and one dependent variable y (increasing from bottom to top). The word "normally" is required in the above sentence because three-dimensional plots, representing, for example, points with coordinates x, y, and z, can be represented in oblique projection on a twodimensional surface by computer techniques. Wherever possible, the data from an experiment should be plotted at an early stage, even if numerical methods will be used subsequently for greater accuracy. This is particu-larly true when functions are to be fitted by least-squares or other methods, since a graph may make evident special problems or requirements that might otherwise be missed. Following are sections on: A. Manual preparation of graphs B. Computer generated plots C. Graphical uncertainties A. Manual preparation of graphs For constructing a graph by hand, the following six step procedure is recommended. 1. Design your graph first 2. Choose your graph paper 3. Define the plotting area 4. Plot the points; Draw the lines or curves 5. Add a legend 6. Check the overall appearance 1. Design Your Graph First. Plan it so as to make best use of the area available and present the data in a manner that will be clearest to the viewer. In most cases the entire useful area of a normal-sized sheet of graph paper should be dedicated to the graph. In some cases, the paper should be turned sideways (i.e., with the binding margin on top) so that the independent variable, x, runs longways on the page, to provide an aspect ratio more favorable for displaying the desired features. Determine the maximum and minimum values of x and y (remember, it is not necessary that they both be zero at the lower left corner!) so as to fit the points, lines, and curves into the available area. Be sure to make adequate allowance of space for borders all around, scale numbers and scale labels, at least at the bottom and at the left, and a legend telling what the graph is about. Return to top. 2. Choose Your Graph Paper. The graph paper should be of good quality, accurately ruled with thin, lightweight lines. In most cases these will constitute a grid of lines equally spaced in two perpendicular directions; special papers are available for plotting logarithmic functions in one direction ("semilog paper") or in both directions ('log-log paper"), or for plotting in polar coordinates, etc. Most good graph papers are ruled in colors that are soft enough that they do not distract the viewer from the plotted lines and points, which are usually in black. The most commonly used graph papers are ruled with a 1-mm spacing, the lines at 5 and 10 mm being heavier. The smallest divisions on the paper should preferably represent multiples of 1 or 2 or perhaps 5 in the plotted variable. Return to top. 3. Define the Plotting Area. Draw, with heavy pencil lines, a rectangle within which all points and lines will be plotted, leaving sufficient margins all around, extra width for the binding margin, and also adequate allowance for the scale numbers and legends mentioned above. Indicate the major scale divisions with short, heavy pencil marks and label them with appropriate numerical values. Under the scale numbers for the independent variable enter the scale label, stating the quantity that is varying, and its units, e.g., T(K) for absolute temperature in kelvin. To avoid scale numbers that are too large or too small for convenient use, multiply the quantity by a power of 10, e.g., x l04 (g cm-3) for the density of a gas. This is equivalent to multiplying all the scale numbers by 10-4 but is much more convenient. Similarly, enter the scale label for the dependent variable along the side scale on the left; if necessary, turn the paper sideways to write the label so that it will run vertically. Return to top. 4. Plot the Points; Draw the Lines and Curves. Using a sharp, hard pencil, plot the experimental points as small dots, as accurately as possible. Try to plot with an accuracy of one-fifth of the smallest grid division. Draw small circles (or squares, triangles, etc.) of uniform size (2 or 3 mm) around the points in ink to give them greater visibility. If it is desired to draw a straight line to provide a linear fit to the plotted points, draw a faint pencil line with a good straightedge such as a transparent ruler or draftsman's triangle, and do not hesitate to erase the line and try again. When you are satisfied that you have made the best possible visual fit, go over the line again with a softer pencil or a pen to make it sufficiently heavy; this time, do not allow the line to cross the circles or other symbols drawn around the experimental points. Smooth nonlinear curves may be drawn either freehand or with ships curves, splines, or other devices, with as much trial and error and erasing as required. If a "theoretical curve" is to be drawn based on an analytic function representing predicted behavior, plot the function at as many points, closely spaced, as reasonably possible; do not draw symbols around them. Carefully draw a smooth curve through the points, lightly at first, and then "heavy it up" as desired. Return to top. 5. Add a Legend. Somewhere on the graph (if possible, at the bottom) enter a legend with an identifying figure number. The legend should state what the graph is about, identify symbols .and line types used, and provide all needed information that will not be provided in the document to which the graph will be attached. Return to top. 6. Check the Overall Appearance. After all points, lines, curves, scales, and legends are in place, check the overall clarity and legibility of the graph. If points or lines are too faint, make them heavier; if the graph is messy or confusing, attempt to improve it by erasing and redrawing the features concerned. If the end result falls seriously short in the expected qualities, start over. Your second attempt will probably take much less time to prepare, and it will look much better and will better suit its intended purpose. Return to top. B. Computer generated plots In most cases, you should take advantage of the ability of computer spreadsheet programs to generate graphs. These may be generated on the computer's monitor screen for inspection and editing and then printed out on ink-jet or laser printers. Much of the above discussion of manual preparation of graphs applies also to computer graphs. Since computer graphs can be produced quickly, it may be worth while to make several tries to obtain the best results. The first plot may be a "default plot'' to see the overall appearance of the plotted data; then user-chosen scales, symbols, aspect ratio, and labels may be introduced as needed. If the computer output uses generic labels such as x and y, be sure to relabel with appropriate variables. Return to top. C. Graphical uncertainties It frequently happens that an intermediate or final result of the calculations in a given experiment is obtained from the slope or intercept of a straight line on a graph - for example, a plot of y against x. In such a case it is desirable to evaluate the uncertainty in the slope or in the position of the intercept. A rough procedure for doing this is based on drawing a rectangle with width 2(xi) and height 2(yi) around each experimental point (xi, yi), with the point at its center. The significance of the rectangle is that any point contained in it represents a possible position of the ''true'' point (xi, yi) and all points outside are ruled out as possible positions. Having already drawn the best straight line through the experimental points, and having derived from this line the slope or intercept, now draw two other (dashed) lines representing maximum and minimum values of the slope or intercept, consistent with the requirement that both lines pass through every rectangle. as shown in the figure below. Where there are a dozen or more experimental points, it may be justifiable to neglect partially or completely one or more obviously "bad'' points in drawing the original straight line and the limiting lines, provided that good judgment is exercised. The difference between the two slopes or intercepts of the limiting lines can be taken as an estimate of twice the limit of error in the slope or intercept of the best straight line. Figure Caption: A graphical method of determining the limit of error in a slope. Where the number of points is sufficiently large, the limits of error of the position of plotted points can be inferred from their scatter. Thus, an upper bound and a lower bound can be drawn, and the lines of limiting slope drawn so as to lie within these bounds. Such graphical methods are justifiable only for rough estimates. In either case, the possibility of systematic error should be kept in mind. General rules for Significant Figures reporting results Results are generally reported with one uncertain significant figure (usually +/-1). Example: reporting a mass of 12.554 g indicates that the experimenter is certain that the true mass lies in the range 12.553 - 12.555 g. If the uncertainty in the last significant figure is greater than +/- 1 it should be written explicitly: 12.554 g +/- 0.003 g. addition and subtraction The answer must be truncated to the same least significant decimal place as the number with the least significant figure from the right. Example: 8.9444 g +18.52 g -------27.46 g multiplication and division The answer has the same number of significant figures as the factor with the smallest number of significant figures. Example: 8.9 g / 12.01 g/mol = 0.74 mol It is common to carry one additional significant figure through extended calculations and to round off the final answer at the end. Standard Addition Introduction Due to matrix effects the analytical response for an analyte in a complex sample may not be the same as for the analyte in a simple standard. In this case, calibration with a working curve would require standards that closely match the composition of the sample. For routine analyses it is feasible to prepare or purchase realistic standards, e.g. NIST standard reference materials. For diverse and one-of-a-kind samples, this procedure is time consuming and often impossible. An alternative calibration procedure is the standard addition method. An analyst usually divides the unknown sample into two portions, so that a known amount of the analyte (a spike) can be added to one portion. These two samples, the original and the original plus spike, are then analyzed. The sample with the spike will show a larger analytical response than the original sample due to the additional amount of analyte added to it. The difference in analytical response between the spiked and unspiked samples is due to the amount of analyte in the spike. This provides a calibration point to determine the analyte concentration in the original sample. Example Calculation (F--selective electrode) Two 10.0 ml aliquots are taken from a sample of wastewater effluent and one is spiked with 1.00 ml of 0.0207 M NaF standard solution. The response from a F--selective electrode is 66.2 mV for the unspiked sample and 28.6 mV for the spiked sample. The Fconcentration (Note: we use [F-] for clarity but the electrode actually measures activity.) in the original sample is: E = constant - 2.303 * (RT/nF) * log[F-] Measurement of the unspiked sample: 0.0662 V = constant - (0.0591 V) * log[F-] Measurement of the spiked sample: 0.0286 V = constant - (0.0591 V) * log{([F-]0.0100 L + 0.0207 M * 0.00100 L)/0.0110 L} 0.0286 V = constant - (0.0591 V) * log{0.909[F-] + 0.00188} Combining equations: 0.0662 V - 0.0286 V = -(0.0591 V) * log{[F-]/(0.909[F-] + 0.00188)} -0.636 = log{[F-]/(0.909[F-] + 0.00188)} 0.231 = [F-]/(0.909[F-] + 0.00188) [F-] = 5.50 x 10-4 Statistical Methods Introduction The following methods are used to describe, analyze, or test sets of data. Statistical Formulas standard deviation A measure of the uncertainty due to random error in a set of data (also: precision of a set of measurements). Q-test A test to determine if one data point in a set of data is significantly different enough to be discarded. linear regression A method to find the best straight line through a set of data. Working Curve or Calibration Curve Introduction A working curve is a plot of the analytical signal (the instrument or detector response) as a function of analyte concentration. These working curves are obtained by measuring the signal from a series of standards of known concentration. The working curves are then used to determine the concentration of an unknown sample, or to calibrate the linearity of an analytical instrument. Example of a working curve Determining the best line for calibration data is done using linear regression. Electrochemistry Introduction Electrochemistry can be broadly defined as the study of charge-transfer phenomena. As such, the field of electrochemistry includes a wide range of different chemical and physical phenomena. These areas include (but are not limited to): battery chemistry, photosynthesis, ion-selective electrodes, coulometry, and many biochemical processes. Although wide ranging, electrochemistry has found many practical applications in analytical measurements. Electroanalytical chemistry A good working definition of the field of electroanalytical chemistry would be that it is the field of electrochemistry that utilizes the relationship between chemical phenomena which involve charge transfer (e.g. redox reactions, ion separation, etc.) and the electrical properties that accompany these phenomena for some analytical determination. This relationship is further broken down into fields based on the type of measurement that is made. Potentiometry involves the measurement of potential for quantitative analysis, and electrolytic electrochemical phenomena involve the application of a potential or current to drive a chemical phenomenon, resulting in some measurable signal which may be used in an analytical determination. Electrolytic Methods Introduction Unlike potentiometry, where the free energy contained within the system generates the analytical signal, electrolytic methods are an area of electroanalytical chemistry in which an external source of energy is supplied to drive an electrochemical reaction which would not normally occur. The externally applied driving force is either an applied potential or current. When potential is applied, the resultant current is the analytical signal; and when current is applied, the resultant potential is the analytical signal. Techniques which utilize applied potential are typically referred to as voltammetric methods while those with applied current are referred to as galvanostatic methods. Voltammetric Methods Voltammetry refers to the measurementof current that results from the application of potential. Unlike potentiometry measurements, which employ only two electrodes, voltammetric measurements utilize a three electrode electrochemical cell. The use of the three electrodes (working, auxillary, and reference) along with the potentiostat instrument allow accurate application of potential functions and the measurement of the resultant current. The different voltammetric techniques that are used are distinguished from each other primarily by the potential function that is applied to the working electrode to drive the reaction, and by the material used as the working electrode. Common techniques to be discussed here include: Hydrodynamic Voltammetry o o o o o Polarography Normal-pulse polarography (NPP) Differential-pulse polarography (DPP) Cyclic voltammetry Anodic-stripping voltammetry Time Based Techniques o o Chronoamperometry Chronocoulometry Chromatography Introduction Chromatography is a separations method that relies on differences in partitioning behavior between a flowing mobile phase and a stationary phase to separate the the components in a mixture. A column (or other support for TLC, see below) holds the stationary phase and the mobile phase carries the sample through it. Sample components that partition strongly into the stationary phase spend a greater amount of time in the column and are separated from components that stay predominantly in the mobile phase and pass through the column faster. As the components elute from the column they can be quantified by a detector and/or collected for further analysis. An analytical instrument can be combined with a separation method for on-line analysis. Examples of such "hyphenated techniques" include gas and liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS and LC-MS), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (GC-FTIR), and diode-array UV-VIS absorption spectroscopy (HPLC-UV-VIS). Specific chromatographic methods: Gas chromatography (GC) Applied to volatile organic compounds. The mobile phase is a gas and the stationary phase is usually a liquid on a solid support or sometimes a solid adsorbent. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) A variation of liquid chromatography that utilizes high-pressure pumps to increase the efficiency of the separation. Liquid chromatography (LC) Used to separate analytes in solution including metal ions and organic compounds. The mobile phase is a solvent and the stationary phase is a liquid on a solid support, a solid, or an ion-exchange resin. Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) Also called gel-permeation chromatography (GPC), the mobile phase is a solvent and the stationary phase is a packing of porous particles. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) A simple and rapid method to monitor the extent of a reaction or to check the purity of organic compounds. The mobile phase is a solvent and the stationary phase is a solid adsorbent on a flat support. Chromatography Theory Introduction The underlying principles that determine chromatographic separations are dynamic behaviors that depends on partitioning and mass transport. These phenomena are too complex to model directly, and chromatography theory consists of empirical relationships to describe chromatographic columns and the separation of peaks in chromatograms. Description of Chromatograms The retention of an analyte by a column is described by the capacity factor, k', where: k' = tr - tr ------tm where tr is the time for the analyte to pass through the column, and tm is the time for mobile phase to pass through the column. More info: Resolution of peaks in a chromatogram Description of chromatographic columns The resolution of chromatographic columns is described by the theoretical plate height, H, or the number of theoretical plates, N. These two quantities are related by: N=L/H where L is the length of the column. H and N provide useful measures to compare the performance of different columns for a given analyte. Useful expressions are: H = L W2 / 16 tr2 and N = 16 (tr / W)2 where W is the width of the peak at its base. Gas Chromatography (GC) Introduction Gas chromatography is a chromatographic technique that can be used to separate volatile organic compounds. A gas chromatograph consists of a flowing mobile phase, an injection port, a separation column containing the stationary phase, and a detector. The organic compounds are separated due to differences in their partitioning behavior between the mobile gas phase and the stationary phase in the column. Instrumentation Mobile phases are generally inert gases such as helium, argon, or nitrogen. The injection port consists of a rubber septum through which a syringe needle is inserted to inject the sample. The injection port is maintained at a higher temperture than the boiling point of the least volatile component in the sample mixture. Since the partitioning behavior is dependant on temperture, the separation column is usually contained in a thermostatcontrolled oven. Separating components with a wide range of boiling points is accomplished by starting at a low oven temperture and increasing the temperture over time to elute the high-boiling point components. Most columns contain a liquid stationary phase on a solid support. Separation of low-molecular weight gases is accomplished with solid adsorbents. Separate documents describe some specific GC Columns and GC Detectors. Schematic of a gas chromatograph Pictures of some gas chromatographs Gas Chromatography Columns Columns Gas chromatography columns are of two designs: packed or capillary. Packed columns are typically a glass or stainless steel coil (typically 1-5 m total length and 5 mm inner diameter) that is filled with the stationary phase, or a packing coated with the stationary phase. Capillary columns are a thin fused-silica (purified silicate glass) capillary (typically 10-100 m in length and 250 µm inner diameter) that has the stationary phase coated on the inner surface. Capillary columns provide much higher separation efficiency than packed columns but are more easily overloaded by too much sample. Picture of a packed GC column, Picture of capillary GC column Stationary Phases The most common stationary phases in gas-chromatography columns are polysiloxanes, which contain various substituent groups to change the polarity of the phase. The nonpolar end of the spectrum is polydimethyl siloxane, which can be made more polar by increasing the percentage of phenyl groups on the polymer. For very polar analytes, polyethylene glycol (a.k.a. carbowax) is commonly used as the stationary phase. After the polymer coats the column wall or packing material, it is often cross-linked to increase the thermal stability of the stationary phase and prevent it from gradually bleeding out of the column. Small gaseous species can be separated by gas-solid chromatography. Gas-solid chromatography uses packed columns containing high-surface-area inorganic or polymer packing. The gaseous species are separated by their size, and retention due to adsorption on the packing material. Gas Chromatography (GC) Detectors Introduction After the components of a mixture are separated using gas chromatography, they must be detected as they exit the GC column. The links listed below provide the details of some specific GC detectors. The thermal-conductivity (TCD) and flame-ionization (FID) detectors are the two most common detectors on commercial gas chromatographs. The requirements of a GC detector depends on the separation application. For example, one analysis might require a detector that is selective for chlorine-containing molecules, another analysis might require a detector that is non-destructive so that the analyte can be recovered for further spectroscopic analysis. Specific GC detectors Atomic-emmision detector (AED) Chemiluminescence detector Electron-capture detector (ECD) Electron Capture Detector (ECD) Introduction The ECD uses a radioactive Beta emitter (electrons) to ionize some of the carrier gas and produce a current between a biased pair of electrodes. When organic molecules that contain electronegative functional groups, such as halogens, phosphorous, and nitro groups pass by the detector, they capture some of the electrons and reduce the current measured between the electrodes. The ECD is as sensitive as the FID but has a limited dynamic range and finds its greatest application in analysis of halogenated compounds. Schematic of an ECD The ECD is as sensitive as the FID but has a limited dynamic range and finds its greatest application in analysis organic molecules that contain electronegative functional groups, such as halogens, phosphorous, and nitro groups. Flame-ionization detector (FID) Flame-Ionization Detector (FID) Introduction An FID consists of a hydrogen/air flame and a collector plate. The effluent from the GC column passes through the flame, which breaks down organic molecules and produces ions. The ions are collected on a biased electrode and produce an electrical signal. The FID is extremely sensitive with a large dynamic range, its only disadvantage is that it destroys the sample. Schematic of FID The FID is extremely sensitive with a large dynamic range, its only disadvantage is that it destroys the sample. Flame-photometric detector (FPD) Mass spectrometer (MS) Mass spectrometers provide structural information to identify the analyte in a chromatographic peak. Photoionization detector (PID) Photoionization Detector Introduction The reason to use more than one kind of detector for gas chromatography is to achieve selective and/or highly sensitive detection of specific compounds encountered in particular chromatographic analyses. The selective determination of aromatic hydrocarbons or organo-heteroatom species is the job of the photoionization detector (PID). This device uses ultraviolet light as a means of ionizing an analyte exiting from a GC column. The ions produced by this process are collected by electrodes. The current generated is therefore a measure of the analyte concentration. Theory If the energy of an incoming photon is high enough (and the molecule is quantum mechanically "allowed" to absorb the photon) photo-excitation can occur to such an extent that an electron is completely removed from its molecular orbital, i.e. ionization. A Photoionization Reaction If the amount of ionization is reproducible for a given compound, pressure, and light source then the current collected at the PID's reaction cell electrodes is reproducibly proportional to the amount of that compound entering the cell. The reason why the compounds that are routinely analyzed are either aromatic hydrocarbons or heteroatom containing compounds (like organosulfur or organophosphorus species) is because these species have ionization potentials (IP) that are within reach of commercially available UV lamps. The available lamp energies range from 8.3 to 11.7 ev, that is, lambda max ranging from 150 nm to 106 nm. Although most PIDs have only one lamp, lamps in the PID are exchanged depending on the compound selectivity required in the analysis. Selective detection using a PID Here is an example of selective PID detection: Benzene's boiling point is 80.1 degrees C and its IP is 9.24 ev. (Check the CRC Handbook 56th ed. page E-74 for IPs of common molecules.) This compound would respond in a PID with a UV lamp of 9.5 ev (commercially available) because this energy is higher than benzene's IP (9.24). Isopropyl alcohol has a similar boiling point (82.5 degrees C) and these two compounds might elute relatively close together in normal temperature programmed gas chromatography, especially if a fast temperature ramp were used. However, since isopropyl alcohol's IP is 10.15 ev this compound would be invisible or show very poor response in that PID, and therefore the detector would respond to one compound but not the other. Instrumentation Since only a small (but basically unknown) fraction of the analyte molecules are actually ionized in the PID chamber, this is considered to be a nondestructive GC detector. Therefore, the exhaust port of the PID can be connected to another detector in series with the PID. In this way data from two different detectors can be taken simultaneously, and selective detection of PID responsive compounds augmented by response from, say, an FID or ECD. The major challenge here is to make the design of the ionization chamber and the downstream connections to the second detector as low volume as possible (read small diameter) so that peaks that have been separated by the GC column do not broaden out before detection. Schematic of a gas chromatographic photoionization detector Thermal conductivity detector (TCD) The TCD is not as sensitive as other dectectors but it is non-specific and nondestructive. Introduction A TCD detector consists of an electrically-heated wire or thermistor. The temperature of the sensing element depends on the thermal conductivity of the gas flowing around it. Changes in thermal conductivity, such as when organic molecules displace some of the carrier gas, cause a temperature rise in the element which is sensed as a change in resistance. The TCD is not as sensitive as other dectectors but it is non-specific and nondestructive. Instrumentation Two pairs of TCDs are used in gas chromatographs. One pair is placed in the column effluent to detect the separated components as they leave the column, and another pair is placed before the injector or in a separate reference column. The resistances of the two sets of pairs are then arranged in a bridge circuit. Schematic of a bridge circuit for TCD detection The bridge circuit allows amplification of resistance changes due to analytes passing over the sample thermoconductors and does not amplify changes in resistance that both sets of detectors produce due to flow rate fluctuations, etc.