* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Emerging equity markets and commodities: joined at the hip?
Survey
Document related concepts
Ease of doing business index wikipedia , lookup
Exchange rate wikipedia , lookup
Internationalization wikipedia , lookup
Group of Eight wikipedia , lookup
Development economics wikipedia , lookup
Balance of payments wikipedia , lookup
Currency war wikipedia , lookup
Financialization wikipedia , lookup
Transformation in economics wikipedia , lookup
Economic globalization wikipedia , lookup
Currency War of 2009–11 wikipedia , lookup
International monetary systems wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Emerging equity markets and commodities: joined at the hip? This document is for Professional Clients only and is not for consumer use. Commodity prices peaked in 2011 and have been under pressure ever since. This period has also coincided with the underperformance of global emerging equity markets versus their peers in the developed world. Why is this the case and can we assume that all emerging economies are affected in the same manner? In this paper we set out to explain why all developing countries and sectors should not be grouped into a one-size-fits-all bracket – a sharp fall in oil prices may have a negative impact on energy producers such as Saudi Arabia and Russia, whereas lower import prices for oil dependent nations such as India and Turkey are likely to bring bonanzas to their local economies. We will challenge the traditional notion that depressed commodity prices are bad news for emerging markets (EM) generally by arguing that given the vast depth and breadth of the developing world, there will be losers and winners in such an environment. As active fund managers, it is our duty to separate the ‘wheat from the chaff’ and ensure that our funds invest where future cash flows are likely to positively surprise market expectations. Economic headwinds Over the past five years, trading conditions for emerging equity markets have been tough. Oil prices have dropped sharply from above US$100 a barrel to below US$30, US interest rates have risen for the first time in a decade, doubts have been expressed about China’s growth outlook and EM currencies have come under heavy pressure from a resurgent US dollar. At the beginning of 2011, the energy and materials sectors accounted for about a third of the MSCI EM Index, a far higher concentration than that of the S&P500. In the latter, healthcare, technology and consumer-related stocks were the heavyweight divisions, sectors that have performed relatively better during this period of historic low interest rates. Weakening global demand, compounded by oversupply factors, has contributed to a significant drop in commodity prices since January 2011. While the Thomson Reuters/Core Commodity CRB Index has nearly halved in value since then – the benchmark measures a composite of food, metals and energy prices – the relative performance of emerging equity markets versus those in the Western world has closely tracked it. (See exhibit 1). Exhibit 1 Close relationship between EM performance and commodity prices Materially linked 2011 2012 2013 EM relative performance vs DM Commodity prices 2014 2015 2016 120 100 80 60 Source: Bloomberg. MSCI EM relative to MSCI World. Thomson Reuters/Core Commodity CRB Index. Data as at 29 July 2016. 1 January 2011 = 100 . At first sight it might appear to be the case that a downturn in commodity prices leads to the underperformance of emerging equity markets. This is a generalisation, however, because if we dig beneath the surface we find a divergence of performance at both a sector and country level. The investment universe for EM is wide and diverse, covering economic powerhouses like China to the smaller economies of Hungary and Peru. A common thread that unites all emerging countries is secular factors such as favourable demographics, urbanisation and a growing middle (aka consumer) class. These are the areas which are likely to provide the most attractive opportunities going forward. 01 merging equity markets and E commodities: joined at the hip? Benefits of sector diversification Exhibit 2 shows how certain MSCI EM sectors have performed in relative terms versus the broader index since 2011. While materials and energy – the sectors most closely connected to commodities – have underperformed significantly during this time period, consumer discretionary and technology stocks have fared considerably better. Exhibit 2 Opportunities outside energy and materials Sector divergence 2011 2012 2013 2014 Energy Materials Consumer Disc Technology MSCI EM index 2015 2016 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 Source: Bloomberg. Data as at 29 July 2016. 1 January 2011 = 100. MSCI EM sectors. Old versus new industries While the Chinese authorities continue to transition their economy away from heavy industries towards services, demand for commodities has noticeably cooled. Given that China is the major market for almost all internationally traded commodities, accounting for almost half of global demand for industrial metals, energy producers and suppliers of natural resources have faced considerable headwinds. By contrast, companies that operate in growth industries such as technology have generally done relatively well in recent times. Technology advances have had a significant impact on all of our lives at both a business and consumer level. The rapid growth of internet usage has provided huge opportunities for companies able to tap into increasing demand for online services in areas such as shopping, banking platforms, mobile games and social media. While the commodity super cycle appears to be now over, the number of internet users in China has grown massively, rising from about 20 million in 2000, to half a billion in 2011 and to an estimated 700 million plus users today. (Source: Internet Live Stats, 16 May 2016). With a total population of about 1.4 billion, market penetration is just over 50% - still room for expansion given favourable trends in urbanisation. With real wages and living standards rising, we believe demand for higher-value goods elsewhere in the consumer space should continue to increase. 02 merging equity markets and E commodities: joined at the hip? Winners and losers Asian countries are normally recognised to be the big winners from weaker commodity prices as they tend to be consumers of natural resources. Although their economies are more exposed to any weakening in global trade flows, they are generally perceived to be beneficiaries of lower energy bills and cheaper imports. This could boost discretionary spending in countries such as China, India, South Korea and Taiwan. In other Asian nations where significant fuel subsidies – the difference between the price charged to consumers and the ‘true’ price – exist, government savings from lower subsidies could mean more money for investments in infrastructure, healthcare and education. The most significant savings are likely to come from places with the highest fuel subsidies - Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam. Many emerging European countries should also enjoy economic benefits from cheaper energy prices, for example Turkey, Poland and Czech Republic. By contrast, the big producers of commodities – Brazil and Russia – have suffered from weaker prices in iron ore, oil and metals. We can also include South Africa in this group because it is a major exporter of gold, diamonds and platinum even though its top import is petroleum. Lower revenues also make it more challenging for governments here to introduce fiscal stimulus packages aimed at boosting flagging economies. However, we believe that these countries have the necessary tools to boost their resilience to counter the effect of lower oil and commodity prices, as emphasised in the latest IMF report (April 2016) on Global Financial Stability. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfsr/ Exhibit 3 Currencies take the strain % change versus the US$ since 2011 -60 -50 -40 -30 Commodity producers Commodity consumers -20 -10 0 Russia South Africa Brazil Turkey Colombia Thailand Taiwan Philippines China South Korea Source: Bloomberg. Data as at 29 July 2016. Contrast between commodity producers and consumers With floating exchange rates being the norm in EMs today (China being the main exception) exhibit 3 shows how EM currencies have fared against the US dollar. Apart from the South Korean won, all have depreciated in value against the US dollar since the beginning of 2011. Some of the declines have been significant – more than 50% in the cases of the South African rand, the Russian rouble and the Brazilian real. It is noticeable that currency weakness has been more pronounced for commodity producers than commodity consumers. The sole exception being Turkey where other external factors – the country runs a large current account deficit, although this is narrowing - have weighed on sentiment. There are two important points to make regarding these large currency gyrations. Firstly, commodity prices generally have an inverse relationship with the US dollar, for instance if the US dollar strengthens then commodity prices fall. The opposite happens as the US dollar moves lower. It is not a perfect correlation but fairly close. Secondly, currency devaluation improves a country’s competitiveness by making exports cheaper. 03 merging equity markets and E commodities: joined at the hip? Floating exchange rates Exhibit 4 shows what impact a weaker exchange rate can have on a commodity when it is re-priced into another currency. In this example we look at Brent crude oil and the rouble. Whereas revenues for Russian oil companies are derived in US dollars, their costs and overheads are invoiced in roubles. With further assistance provided by a flexible tax system that is less onerous with falling crude oil prices, Russian oil companies have much lower break-even levels than their peers in the Western world. Even with oil at US$30 a barrel, Lukoil is still capable of generating free cash flow and paying dividends, according to our own analysis. US$ Rouble Exhibit 4 Weak rouble shields Russian oil companies Brent crude oil (rebased) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 140 120 100 80 60 40 Source: Bloomberg. Data as at 29 July 2016. 1 January 2011 = 100. Pegged currencies Many oil-producing countries in the Middle East – Saudi Arabia, Qatar and United Arab Emirates - have currencies that are pegged to the US dollar. The rationale for fixing an exchange rate to the US dollar is to stabilise the local economy, making it less volatile in an uncertain world. The downside risks associated with a pegged rate is that it requires the country to have large reserves, which can have unwanted economic side-effects such as higher inflation. The capital outflow pressure is visible in declining FX reserves. For example, Saudi Arabia lost close to US$120 billion of FX reserves in 2015, 17% of its total. (Source: JP Morgan March 2016). The risk of devaluation for pegged currencies in this region increases with lower oil prices. In recent months, China’s central bank has loosened the yuan’s peg to the US dollar by letting it track the currencies of its broader trading partners. The composition of the currency basket includes the US dollar, euro, yen and ten other currencies. China, too, has recently depleted a significant amount of its foreign exchange reserves in an attempt to keep the yuan at a relatively stable level. For commodity exporters with floating exchange rates, for example Russia, the price movement has been significant. The advantage of having an underperforming currency whose value is determined by market forces is that it helps to adjust the current account (typically from deficits) towards sustainable levels. While we are seeing an improvement in the current account deficits for Turkey and Brazil, there has been deterioration in the current account balances for South Africa and Colombia. This suggests that some countries still have more rebalancing to do. 04 merging equity markets and E commodities: joined at the hip? Exports and GDP If we classify exports from EM into two simple categories; (1) commodities and (2) manufactured goods, there has been a divergence in performance between the two since 2011. While the former has struggled somewhat, manufacturing exports have held up far better. A clear example is the manufacturing sector in Mexico which, supported by competitive labour costs and a recovering US economy, continues to press ahead. We believe that other manufacturing countries such as China, Philippines, South Korea and Taiwan also have good long-term prospects. Exports are a key component of a country’s output. Given the weakness of commodity prices, the real GDP growth rate of commodity producers has suffered with some economies in recession, for example Brazil and Russia. By contrast, the manufacturing economies of Mexico and the East Asian countries listed above, national output continues to expand at a healthy rate, although there are signs now that growth momentum is slowing down. Structural changes and reform During the years of high oil prices, many energy-dependent emerging countries took steps to reduce their reliance on the expensive commodity. The search for alternative sources of energy gas gained momentum, particularly in renewables such as solar and wind. The adoption of renewable energy programmes is growing twice as fast in EM than in the developed world. China is now the world leader in terms of installed wind and solar capacity and Brazil held its first solar-only energy auction in October 2014 (Source: The Guardian February 2016). Solar energy is cheaper than coal in India with more than one million households here using distributed renewable energy systems to provide them with basic electricity (Source: Renewable Energy World, February 2016). Unfortunately, not all commodity producing countries fixed the roof while the sun was shining during the boom years of 2003-2010 when economic growth was strong and stable. While some governments implemented structural reforms back then, others did not do enough. With public finances under increasing pressure, the room for manoeuvre today is more limited. However, we are seeing encouraging signs of progress with reforms in Mexico opening up the domestic energy sector to the private sector for the first time in years. Reform in India is heading in the right direction, albeit at a slower pace than first envisaged following the election of a more market friendly government. Even in Russia, we are seeing some positive developments as the government attempts to modernise the economy, expand its privatisation programme and promote Moscow as a financial centre in an attempt to shift the economy away from a dependence on the energy sector. Business friendly If these reforms are to be successful it would help if they were implemented in a business friendly environment. All economies need some form of business regulation but if the rules and processes are too complex it may deter investment and the startup of new enterprises in areas of growth. With too much red tape and bureaucracy, a company will open up a new production facility elsewhere. Encouragingly, we believe emerging countries are going in the right direction in making their economies a more attractive place to invest and do business in, a view supported by the findings of the latest World Bank ‘Doing Business’ survey. http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings Out of a global index of 189 countries, the 2016 report showed three Latin American countries – Mexico, Chile and Peru – in the top 50, and there are several emerging Asian nations now in the top 20. Furthermore, we believe many emerging countries have made significant progress in addressing concerns over corrupt government practices as well as implementing structural and institutional reforms aimed at increasing productivity growth. Conclusion We believe the EM investment universe is more than just a commodity play. As active fund managers we seek to exploit market opportunities through long-term exposure to strong and healthy companies through our highly selective, bottom-up investment process. As part of a balanced portfolio, where stock selection is fundamental, we believe the long-term investment case for EM remains attractive. 05 merging equity markets and E commodities: joined at the hip? Important information This document is for Professional Clients only and is not for consumer use. The value of investments and any income will fluctuate (this may partly be the result of exchange-rate fluctuations) and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Where Dean Newman, Head of Emerging Markets Equity Team at Invesco Perpetual, has expressed opinions, they are based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Invesco Perpetual professionals. Invesco Perpetual is a business name of Invesco Asset Management Limited Perpetual Park, Perpetual Park Drive, Henley on Thames, Oxfordshire RG9 1HH, UK Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority UK3544/60939/PDF/080816