Download Claudia Eberlein Mass, energy-level and magnetic

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Nitrogen-vacancy center wikipedia , lookup

Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics) wikipedia , lookup

Spin (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Perturbation theory wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Paul Dirac wikipedia , lookup

Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Magnetoreception wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Claudia Eberlein Mass, energy‐level and magnetic‐moment shifts near surfaces The magnetic moment of an electron as predicted by the Dirac equation is well known to receive corrections from quantum electrodynamics, and the accurate prediction of g‐2 corrections is one of the big successes of QED. If the electromagnetic field is modified by the presence of a material boundary nearby, then this also affects the QED corrections to the magnetic moment. This effect had previously been investigated, but only for the spin close to a perfectly reflecting boundary, for which the magnitude of the correction is minute. We have now investigated the corrections to the spin magnetic moment due to the presence of imperfectly reflecting surfaces of various kinds: non‐dispersive dielectric as well as dispersive dielectric and metallic ones. We find that the magnetic moment shift is very different near different material boundaries, and that, while still very small, it can be several orders of magnitude bigger than previously predicted on the basis of perfect‐reflector models. The theory of the shift turns out to be markedly different from that of other cavity QED effects and results of different models cannot be recovered as limiting cases of each other. We have explored various methods of calculating the magnetic moment shift. The standard QED approach of working out the vertex correction is fraught with technical difficulties; perturbation theory in the Dirac equation is technically much easier.