* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download lecture notes on “why do we study classical social theory
Social psychology wikipedia , lookup
Social contract wikipedia , lookup
Political economy in anthropology wikipedia , lookup
Social Bonding and Nurture Kinship wikipedia , lookup
Criminology wikipedia , lookup
Community development wikipedia , lookup
Class conflict wikipedia , lookup
Behavioral modernity wikipedia , lookup
History of social work wikipedia , lookup
Sociocultural evolution wikipedia , lookup
Frankfurt School wikipedia , lookup
Anthropology of development wikipedia , lookup
The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism wikipedia , lookup
Social Darwinism wikipedia , lookup
Social stratification wikipedia , lookup
Postdevelopment theory wikipedia , lookup
Sociology of culture wikipedia , lookup
Social history wikipedia , lookup
State (polity) wikipedia , lookup
Structural functionalism wikipedia , lookup
History of sociology wikipedia , lookup
Social group wikipedia , lookup
Social theory wikipedia , lookup
Sociological theory wikipedia , lookup
Unilineal evolution wikipedia , lookup
LECTURE NOTES: WHY DO WE STUDY CLASSICAL SOCIAL THEORY? Fall 2013 Deniz Yükseker Why are Marx, Weber and Durkheim considered to be classics? Why were their works canonized and not others? Why do we still read them? A work is called a classic if it is still read long after it was written. Canon: approved corpus of works deemed to be important. Canon formation is part of the social process whereby those in power seek to perpetuate the authority of certain authors in order to enhance their own vested interests. These three men are classics because what they said about society is still relevant today and still merits reading. All three men were good observers of modernity. What is modernity: In the second half of the 19th century, western European populations witnessed the collapsing of everything that they held dear. The growth of cities, the destruction of rural life, revolutions, rapid social change, etc. “Modernity could be defined as that culture in which people are promised a better life – one day. Until then, they are expected to tolerate contradictory lives in which the benefits of modernity are not much greater than its losses.” People were “expected to love a world that was killing what was dear to them.” Weber, Marx, Durkheim and Georg Simmel told the story of modernity with a regard for its two sides: the official story of progress, and the repressed story of destruction, loss and the terror of life without meaningful traditions. That is why we don’t read Comte and Herbert Spencer today because they saw society to be inevitably progressing towards good. But Durkheim, who was influenced both by Comte and Spencer, did not necessarily only see progress. He thought sociology was needed because the chaos of modern society had devastating effects on many individuals. Marx talked about conflict and class struggle in modern society. He also talked about alienation (estrangement). Weber talked about how modernity is accompanied by rationalization and bureaucratization; but in the end, rationalization became an “iron cage.” “Social theories, like personal narratives, are ways of understanding social life by bringing its story out of memory, where it lies hidden and distorted.” 1 There is a further reason why Marx, Durkheim and Weber were canonized, and not, say, Comte or Saint-Simeon. We can talk about three “axioms” of the “culture of sociology” with which almost all sociologists would agree today. These can be summarized as follows: Axiom 1: There exist social groups that have explicable, rational structures. We owe this statement to Emile Durkheim, who famously said “social facts must be treated as things.” And “Social phenomena are external to individuals.” Axiom 2: All social groups contain subgroups that are ranked in a hierarchy and are in conflict with each other.” We owe this axiom to a “diluted” form of Marxism, which owes to Marx’s famous phrase in the opening of the Manifesto of the Communist Party: “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” Axiom 3: To the extent that groups/states contain their conflicts, it is in large part because lower-ranked subgroups accord legitimacy to the authority structure of the group on the grounds that this permits the group to survive, and the subgroups see long-term advantage in the group’s survival. We owe this axiom to Max Weber, who studied authority and legitimacy and thus explained why groups characterized by conflict and struggle do not simply explode or fall apart. All of the above pertains to the merits of classical sociological theory. However, these perspectives (and the axioms associated with them) came under increasing challenge in the past 3-4 decades. There are feminist, postmodern and post-colonial challenges to classical social theory which we shall take up later in the course. 2