Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Introduced species wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Fauna of Africa wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu – CCCLXXIII (2005) NATALIA KUCZYŃSKA-KIPPEN THE SPECIES DIVERSITY OF ROTIFERS (ROTIFERA) OF DIFFERENTIATED MACROPHYTE HABITATS OF LAKE BUDZYŃSKIE From Department of Water Protection Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznań ABSTRACT. In the Budzyńskie Lake there were 147 taxa of rotifers in total identified. The species composition differed significantly between various habitats. The pelagic zone was less diverse, while the vegetated zones were much more differentiated. The most diverse genera were Lecane, Trichocerca and Cephalodella. The mean index of species diversity was considerably high, reaching values between 2.7 and 4.3, depending on particular zone. Key words: macrophyte habitat, rotifers, zooplankton, shallow lake Introduction There are over 2000 species of rotifers known in total, however, from Europe about 1350 until the 80’s of XX century (Dumont 1983) and about 1600 at present (including over 500 species in Poland) (Radwan et al. 2004). So as the intensive examination carried out within about 10 years contributed to enriching the taxonomical list of european rotifers of 250 new species, what indicated that the number of identified species is mainly connected with the stage of fauna recognition in particular parts of earth but not the real state. The study conducted by Dumont and Segers (1992) revealed that as a result of astute analysis of zooplankton of freshwaters, including the seasonal aspects, in each lake of the temperate climate a presence of 150 rotifer species may be found. This is why the analysis of various areas and habitats as well as systematic examination within short temporary spaces is so important (Chengalath and Koste 1983). Representatives of rotifers are found in aquatic and semi-aquatic habitats, but are predominantly freshwater inhabitants (Pejler 1995). Rotifers may also be abundant in the interstitial water of soils. They contribute to a very important part of these ecosystems due to extremely fast reproductive rates. The rotifer fauna consists mainly of cosRocz. AR Pozn. CCCLXXIII, Bot.-Stec. 9: 171-176 Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej im. Augusta Cieszkowskiego w Poznaniu, Poznań 2005 PL ISSN 1896-1908 172 N. Kuczyńska-Kippen mopolitan species. Ecological barriers have stronger influence on their distribution than geographical isolation. Rotifers also belong to pioneer organisms, which first appear in new created water bodies. Pelagic zone of lakes is the best documented environment, while the remaining water biocoenosis require still more studies. Therefore, the aim of my work was to describe the relationship between the taxonomical richness of rotifer communities and particular zones of aquatic vegetation zones of Lake Budzyńskie. Rotifers are evolutionary the littoral forms (Pejler 1995) and this is why only some species managed to adapt to living within the open water areas. They are then classified as pelagic or littoral forms (Wetzel 1975). Material and methods The study was conducted on a shallow Lake Budzyńskie (52°14,8’N-16°49,5’E). It has an area of 17.4 ha and mean depth of 1.4 m. This is a typical macrophytedominated lake with an extensive cover of aquatic vegetation. Research on the spatial distribution of rotifers in the various phytocoenoses of water vegetation, including two zones of submerged macrophytes (Chara tomentosa L. and Myriophyllum verticillatum L.), one zone of floating macrophyte leaves (Potamogeton natans L.), rush station (Typha angustifolia L. and Phragmites australis (Cav.) Steud.) and the zone of open water surrounding the vegetation beds was carried out at two week intervals (including the spring, summer and autumn seasons) between 1996 and 1999. The material was taken using a plexiglass core sampler (∅ 50 mm), concentrated using a 45-µm plankton net and fixed immediately with 4% formalin. To define the species diversity of rotifers inhabiting different types of water vegetation the Shannon-Weaver index was applied (Margalef 1957). The ANOVA test was used in order to evaluate the differences in rotifera number of species between particular habitats of Budzyńskie Lake. Results and discussion The analysis of the rotifers of the Budzyńskie Lake revealed the presence of 147 taxa, representing 41 genera, what accounts for 29% of the native fauna, since from the area of Poland over 500 species have been identified so far (Radwan et al. 2004). However, it is probably only 50-90% of a real state (Polskie studium... 1996). The number of species differed, depending on the investigated year or sampling station. In 1997 the poorest taxonomical structure (82 species) and in 1998 the richest (127) was recorded. The number of species is a result of factors of the space (diversity of explored habitats), of time (taking into consideration the seasonality of particular species), as well as briefness of life cycles of some species. In 1998 the highest number of samples was analysed as well as more habitats were examined, which reflected in the highest taxonomical diversity of rotifer communities of this year. Chengalath and Koste (1983) stated that the extent of species recognition depends on the sampling frequency as well as on seasonality of particular species. The species diversity of rotifers (Rotifera)... 173 As a result of comparing the number of species statistically significant differences were found between stations (F4, 101 = 26.15, p < 0.0001). The most diverse were macrophyte habitats, while poorest the open water zone, however, there were 73 species found here, which is quite a high number of species for a pelagic community. This station is not a typical open water zone but only a small area of unvegetated part of a lake, surrounded by submerged macrophytes, which may provide this zone with littoral species being washed out from among plants. Among all the vegetated stations the lowest taxonomical diversity (81 species) was recorded for Potamogeton zone, what was probably due to the shortest vegetative period of this plant species in the examined lake as well as examining this zone for only two years. Contrary, the Typha bed possessed the richest species composition (117 species) compared to other zones of the Budzyńskie Lake. The mean values of rotifer species diversity were considerably high and accounted for between 2.7 and 4.3, depending on particular station. Zone of Myriophyllum was characterised by highest values, than Potamogeton, Typha, Chara and open water. The highest values of diversity index obtained from the Myriophyllum bed suggest the most optimal conditions within this macrophyte stand, where the food conditions connected with nutritional content of periphyton were best out of all habitats of the Budzyńskie Lake (Kuczyńska-Kippen 2001). Moreover, this plant species was of greatest morphological complexity, what provided inhabiting organisms with numerous ecological niches due to the fact that most physically and biologically complicated habitats create more niches (Krebs 1996). Analysing seasonal variation in the diversity index it was found that the summer period, when macrophytes reached their optimal development, was characterised by highest values at all the stations. The lowest values were recorded in the spring, when macrophytes were slowly developing (Fig. 1). In the investigated material the most species (20) were found among genus Lecane with most often occurring L. aculeata (Harring), L. closterocerca (Schmarda), L. hamata (Stoces), L. luna (Müller), L. bulla (Gosse), L. furcata (Murray), L. flexilis (Gosse) and L. lunaris (Ehrenberg). Segers et al. (1993) examining zooplankton in six lakes, four rivers, rice field and forest pond in the area of the Niger delta have also found the highest species diversity among the Lecane spp. This genus constitute a group of both freshwater and saline rotifers. They mainly remain in the littoral environments, although some can frequently be found in the open water zone of lakes. This group reaches its highest diversity in the tropics and subtropics, where communities may contain up to 40 different species (Pejler and Bērziņš 1994, Segers 1995). There are 163 species of this genus recorded from the whole world, so the Budzyńskie Lake contributed to over 12% of the total Lecane fauna, which is considerably high for the temperate climate. Some of the species (eg. L. bulla, L. luna, L. closterocerca, L. lunaris) are among the most common Rotifera. In the studied material these species also belonged to most often occurring species. The remaining species (L. hamata, L. furcata, L. flexilis) are also cosmopolitan, often eurytopic form. Lecane aculeata, occurring frequently in Lake Budzyńskie is cosmopolitan, but uncommon. It is encountered more often in tropical and subtropical than in temperate waters (Segers 1995). The second most diverse genus was Trichocerca (13 species), whose most representatives were characteristic for vegetated areas – T. capucina Wierzejski & Zacharias, T. cylindrica (Imhof), T. elongata (Gosse), T. longiseta (Schrank), T. porcellus (Gosse), T. rattus (Müller), T. rattus f. minor (Fadeew), T. rouselleti Voigt, T. vernalis Hauer and T. tigris (Müller), apart from T. pusilla, whose single specimen were found in open 174 N. Kuczyńska-Kippen water zone. This is a typical pelagic form (Pejler and Bērziņš 1993 a). In the Budzyńskie Lake T. similis belonged to most common species, often being a dominant. There were 52 Trichocerca species identified in total from Sweden, where research was carried out between years 1945-1982 on a number of differentiated water bodies. Most of those species were found in relation to variety of habitats, only some were a part of periphytic environments. The presence of littoral representatives of Trichocerca genus within the pelagic zone is often accidental connected with washing them out from among aquatic plants or as a result of the trophy increase (Pejler and Bērziņš 1993 a). Typha Potamogeton 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 Chara Water – Woda 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 Myriophyllum 5 4 3 spring – wiosna 2 summer – lato 1 autumn – jesień 0 1997 1998 1999 Fig. 1. The value of the species diversity index in particular seasons in the Budzyńskie Lake in the period of 1997-1999 Ryc. 1. Wartość współczynnika różnorodności gatunkowej w poszczególnych sezonach w Jeziorze Budzyńskim w latach 1997-1999 The third genus that had an impact on the taxonomical structure of Rotifera community of the Budzyńskie Lake was Cephalodella consisting of nine species (with most often occurring C. ventripes Dixon-Nuttall, C. auriculata (Müller), C. forficula (Ehrenberg) and C. gibba (Ehrenberg)). There are about 190 species belonging to this genus. The species diversity of rotifers (Rotifera)... 175 In the material collected from swedish lakes the presence of 80 species was recorded (Pejler and Bērziņš 1993 b). However, much poorer taxonomical structure from Lake Budzyńskie was connected with examining only one water body, not investigating the bottom habitats where species of the genus Cephalodella find most optimal conditions as well as problems with identification to species level, since determination is often hindered by preserving artifacts and also due to the fact that many Cephalodella representatives are closely related and therefore reveal a striking resemblance to each other. It is a known fact that family Notommatidae, where genus Cephalodella belongs, is the group of Rotifera most difficult for identification (Guides... 1995). This genus, comprising illoricate or partly loricate forms, is found in many habitats, mainly in macrophytes and psammon (Guides... 1995). The remaining genera of rotifers were represented only by single species. Rotifers of Lake Budzyńskie created taxonomically rich composition due to a wide variety of habitats they can inhabit. Rotifer distribution is often related to different habitat conditions present, providing differences in the suitability for typically littoral and pelagic species (Preissler 1977) as well as the morphological adaptations of rotifers inhabiting particular zones of the lake (Preissler 1983). References Chengalath R., Koste W. (1983): Rotifera from northern Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Hydrobiologia 104: 49-56. Dumont H.J. (1983): Biotic factors in the population dynamics of rotifers. Biogeography of rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104: 19-30. Dumont H.J., Segers H. (1992): Estimating lacustrine zooplankton species richness and complementarity. Hydrobiologia 341, 2: 125-132. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world. (1995). Ed. T. Nogrady. Vol. 3. The Notommatidae by T. Nogrady & R. Pourriot and The Scaridiidae by H. Segers. Academic Publishing B.V. The Hague, Belgium. Krebs Ch.J. (1996): Ekologia. Eksperymentalna analiza rozmieszczenia i liczebności. PWN, Warszawa. Kuczyńska-Kippen N. (2001): Struktura przestrzenna zespołów Rotifera w wybranych fitocenozach roślinności zanurzonej i szuwarowej Jeziora Budzyńskiego (The spatial structure of Rotifera communities in the chosen phytocoenosis of the submerged and rush vegetation of the Budzyńskie Lake). Typescript. PhD thesis. Zakład Hydrobiologii UAM, Poznań. Margalef R. (1957): Information theory in ecology. Gen. Syst. 3: 36-71. Pejler B. (1995): Relation to habitat in rotifers. Hydrobiologia 313-314: 267-278. Pejler B., Bērziņš B. (1993 a): On the ecology of Trichocercidae (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 263: 55-59. Pejler B., Bērziņš B. (1993 b): On the ecology of Cephallodella. Hydrobiologia 259: 125-128. Pejler B., Bērziņš B. (1994): On the ecology of Lecane (Rotifera). Hydrobiologia 273: 77-80. Polskie studium różnorodności biologicznej. (1996). Eds R. Andrzejewski, A. Weigle. NFOS, Warszawa. Preissler K. (1977): Do rotifers show ‘avoidance of the shore’. Oecologia 27, 3: 253-260. Preissler K. (1983): Adaptations in anatomy and orientation behaviour of rotifers and crustaceans of the littoral and pelagic region. Verh.-Ges.-Oekol. 10: 575-582. Radwan S., Bielańska-Grajner I., Ejsmont-Karabin J. (2004): Wrotki Rotifera. A. Część ogólna, Monogononta – część systematyczna, B. Monogononta atlas gatunków. Oficyna Wydawnicza Tercja, Polskie Towarzystwo Hydrobiologiczne i Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź. 176 N. Kuczyńska-Kippen Segers H. (1995): Rotifera. Vol. 2. The Lecanidae (Monogononta). Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world. SPB Academic Publishing bv., Hague. Segers H., Nwadiaro Ch.S., Dumont H.J. (1993): Rotifera of some lakes in the floodplain of the river Niger (Imo State, Nigeria). Hydrobiologia 250: 63-71. Wetzel R.R. (1975): Limnology. Sauders, Philadelphia. RÓŻNORODNOŚĆ GATUNKOWA WROTKÓW (ROTIFERA) ZRÓŻNICOWANYCH SIEDLISK MAKROFITÓW JEZIORA BUDZYŃSKIEGO Streszczenie Ogółem stwierdzono występowanie 147 taksonów wrotków, reprezentujących 41 rodzajów. Strefy roślinne charakteryzowały się większym zróżnicowaniem taksonomicznym niż otwarta toń wodna. Rodzaje Lecane, Trichocerca i Cephalodella były najbogatsze jakościowo w badanym materiale. Średnia wartość wskaźnika różnorodności gatunkowej osiągnęła stosunkowo duże wartości (w zakresie od 2,7 do 4,3), w zależności od analizowanej strefy Jeziora Budzyńskiego. Author’s address: Natalia Kuczyńska-Kippen, Zakład Ochrony Wód, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, ul. Drzymały 24, 61-613 Poznań