* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Metabolic regulation of nitrogen fixation in Rhodospirillum rubrum
Survey
Document related concepts
Protein folding wikipedia , lookup
Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup
Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup
Protein mass spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation wikipedia , lookup
Trimeric autotransporter adhesin wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Protein purification wikipedia , lookup
Western blot wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
160 Biochemical Society Transactions (2006) Volume 34, part 1 Metabolic regulation of nitrogen fixation in Rhodospirillum rubrum H. Wang and A. Norén1 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Abstract Nitrogenase activity in Rhodospirillum rubrum is post-translationally regulated by DRAG (dinitrogenase reductase glycohydrolase) and DRAT (dinitrogenase reductase ADP-ribosylation transferase). When a sudden increase in fixed nitrogen concentration or energy depletion is sensed by the cells, DRAG is inactivated and DRAT activated. We propose that the regulation of DRAG is dependent on its location in the cell and the presence of an ammonium-sensing protein. Introduction Rhodospirillum rubrum is a photosynthetic, nitrogen-fixing bacterium within the group of α-proteobacteria, which has the capacity to survive under a wide range of environmental conditions. Nitrogenase, which catalyses the nitrogen fixation reaction, is expressed when cells are grown anaerobically in the light with a carbon source (i.e. malate) but also under other conditions, e.g. fermentative growth in the dark. Reduction of N2 to ammonia is a highly energy-demanding reaction which needs to be tightly regulated in the cell. In R. rubrum, nitrogenase is regulated both at the transcriptional as well as at the metabolic level. The metabolic regulation is a modification of one of the two subunits of dinitrogenase reductase, which has been shown to be an ADP-ribosylation of Arg101 , and, subsequently, nitrogenase becomes reversibly inactivated [1,2]. The short-term inactivation of nitrogenase is carried out by DRAT (dinitrogenase reductase ADPribosylation transferase) and the reversible activation/ demodification by DRAG (dinitrogenase reductase glycohydrolase) in a ‘switch-off/on’ mode. A similar system for short-term regulation of nitrogenase has also been found in other photosynthetic bacteria as well as species of Azospirillum and archaea (Methanococcus). The ‘switch-off’ effect A nitrogen-fixing R. rubrum culture is not modified/ ‘switched-off’ until a sudden change in fixed nitrogen (increased concentrations) or energy status appears. Neilson and Nordlund [3] showed that upon addition of low concentrations of ammonium, asparagine or glutamine, nitrogenase was reversibly inactivated within minutes, and this phenomenon was also observed in later studies when R. rubrum cells Key words: dinitrogenase reductase activating glycohydrolase (DRAG), membrane association, dinitrogenase reductase ADP-ribosylation transferase (DRAT), nitrogen fixation, nitrogenase, Rhodospirillum rubrum. Abbreviations used: DRAG, dinitrogenase reductase glycohydrolase; DRAT, dinitrogenase reductase ADP-ribosylation transferase. 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed (email [email protected]). C 2006 Biochemical Society were subjected to darkness or NAD+ [4]. The regulatory cycle is shown in Figure 1. Regulation of the DRAG/DRAT system These two enzymes are encoded by genes that are within the same operon (draT/draG/draB) and the expressed proteins have to work in a reciprocal manner; therefore it is postulated that both DRAG and DRAT themselves have to be posttranslationally regulated in vivo, but the signal transduction pathways involved in the regulation of DRAG and DRAT have not yet been identified in detail. Upon cell breakage, the regulation is lost and both DRAG and DRAT are found to be always active. No in vitro experiments have been able to show inactivation of active DRAG. We have shown previously that the internal pool of NAD+ is of importance for the regulation of DRAT since NAD+ can act as a switch-off effector and the NAD(P)+ concentration increases when effectors like glutamine and ammonium are added to the cells, or they are grown in the dark [4]. The regulation of DRAG/DRAT is surprisingly observed in a mutant of Klebsiella pneumoniae harbouring the R. rubrum draG/draT genes on a plasmid; thus it is likely that the DRAT/DRAG regulatory molecules/ proteins are present in K. pneumoniae and are of a more prevalent nature among nitrogen-fixing organisms [6]. We are presently focusing on the regulation of DRAG in R. rubrum and postulate that the interaction with the chromatophore membrane is part of the mechanism for DRAG regulation. PII proteins in R. rubrum An important nitrogen and carbon signal transducer protein in R. rubrum is, as in many other organisms, the PII protein encoded by the glnB gene. Zhang et al. [7] have identified a role for the three PII -like proteins in R. rubrum, GlnB, GlnJ and GlnK. GlnB is required for activation of NifA activity, whereas GlnJ and GlnK do not appear to be involved in this process. GlnJ expression is regulated by the NtrBC two-component regulatory system, whereas the expression of GlnB and GlnK is NtrBC-independent. glnB is co-transcribed with glnA, glnJ with amtB1, and glnK with amtB2. Mutations The 11th Nitrogen Cycle Meeting 2005 Figure 1 Regulatory cycle of dinitrogenase reductase (data taken from [5]) of glnB, glnJ and glnK in all combinations were constructed by Zhang et al. [7] and revealed that GlnB, GlnJ or both were involved in the regulation of the DRAT/DRAG system and surprisingly this included both the response to fixed nitrogen (ammonium) and energy (dark) switch off. All three PII proteins show high amino acid sequence similarity to each other (64–69%). Membrane association of DRAG DRAG is a well-characterized protein that has been purified and sequenced, but still the regulation of DRAG is not yet clarified. Two models of regulation have been put forward and both of those include protein–protein interactions as a mode of regulation. We are advocating an interaction with a membrane protein, based on the fact that DRAG is always found associated with the membrane when the cells are subjected to switch-off and subsequently harvested and broken. DRAG is considered as a peripheral membrane protein since it is easily removed by 0.5 M NaCl and the sequence does not reveal any strong hydrophobic stretches, indicating that there is no transmembrane helix structure present. The addition of guanine nucleotides can also dissociate the protein from the membrane [8], and Halbleib and Ludden [9] also showed the re-association of DRAG with DRAG-free chromatophore membranes. Furthermore, if DRAG activity is regulated by association with the chromatophores, as we suggest, a specific membrane-protein interaction is likely to occur. Results from liposome–DRAG interaction studies by Halbleib and Ludden [9] support a protein–protein inter- action, since no lipid interactions with DRAG could be observed. Two specific high-molecular-mass protein complexes are formed when treating DRAG-containing chromatophores with chemical cross-linkers. These complexes have been found to react with anti-DRAG antibodies in Westernblot experiments [10]. Localization studies of DRAG in R. rubrum show that the protein is sequestered to the membrane during switch-off but this sequestration also is affected by other proteins involved in nitrogen metabolism. Mutant studies confirm the reversibility of the DRAG membrane association in R. rubrum. References 1 Ludden, P.W. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 138, 123–129 2 Pope, M.R., Murrell, S.A. and Ludden, P.W. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 3173–3177 3 Neilson, A.H. and Nordlund, S. (1975) J. Gen. Microbiol. 91, 53–62 4 Norén, A., Soliman, A. and Nordlund, S. (1997) Biochem. J. 322, 829–832 5 Nordlund, S. and Ludden, P.W. (2004) in Genetics and Regulation of Nitrogen Fixation in Free-Living Bacteria (Klipp, W., Masepohl, B., Gallon, J.R. and Newton, W.E., eds.), pp. 175–196, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 6 Zhang, Y., Pohlmann, E.L., Halbleib, C.M., Ludden, P.W. and Roberts, G.P. (2001) J. Bacteriol. 183, 1610–1620 7 Zhang, Y., Pohlmann, E.L., Ludden, P.W. and Roberts, G.P. (2001) J. Bacteriol. 183, 6159–6168 8 Norén, A. and Nordlund, S. (1997) J. Bacteriol. 179, 7872–7874 9 Halbleib, C.M. and Ludden, P.W. (1999) Arch. Microbiol. 172, 51–58 10 Norén, A. and Norlund, S. (1998) in Biological Nitrogen Fixation for the 21st Century, vol. 31 (Elmerich, C., Kondorosi, A. and Newton, W.E., eds.), pp. 145–146, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Paris Received 23 September 2005 C 2006 Biochemical Society 161