Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Heart arrhythmia wikipedia , lookup
Ventricular fibrillation wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
40 JACC Vol. 6, No. I July 1985:40 Editorial Comment Role of Ventricular Ectopic Activity in Sudden Death* HEIN J. J. WELLENS, MD, FACC Maastricht, The Netherlands One of the challenges in cardiology today is the recognition of patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death. Although there is agreement on the importance of the degree of impairment of left ventricular function, debate continues on the role of ventricular ectopic activity. Recently, attention has been given to the induction of sustained ventricular arrhythmias by programmed electrical stimulation of the heart as an independent marker to identify survivors of myocardial infarction at high risk for sudden cardiac death. Currently, there is no unanimous opinion on the value of programmed electrical stimulation in these patients (1-7). In this issue of the Journal, Spielman et al. (8) reported on patients who had spontaneously occurring non sustained ventricular tachycardia in the presence of abnormal left ventricular function. They found a high incidence of inducible ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the presence of left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in these patients. From that finding they conclude that: ". . . electrophysiologic testing may allow further substratification of risk of sudden cardiac death in high risk patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. " I believe that further study is required before this conclusion can be accepted. One cannot exclude that the electrical induction of a sustained ventricular tachy*Editorials published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology reflect the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of JACC or the American College of Cardiology. From the University of Limburg, Annadal Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Address for reprints: Hein J. J. Wellens, MD, University of Limburg, Annadal Hospital, St. Annadall, Postbus 1918,6201 Bx, Maastricht, The Netherlands. © 1985 by the American College of Cardiology cardia is related to abnormal wall motion as such, and that the occurrence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia is entirely coincidental. This is, in fact, suggested by the authors when they say that: "the goal of electrophysiologic testing ... is simply to expose a latent abnormality, not reproduce a clinical arrhythmia"! What is lacking, therefore, is a control group with similar left ventricular functional impairment, but without spontaneously occurring non sustained ventricular tachycardia. Before accepting one of the three approaches listed in the final paragraph of their article, Spielman et al. have to give us information on such a control group so that one can decide not only on the ethical or practical aspects of antiarrhythmic drug treatment in these patients but also on its true value. References I. Richards DA, Cody DV, Denniss AR, Russell PA, Young AA, Uther JB. Ventricular electrical instability: a predictor of death after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:75-80. 2. Hamer A, Vohra J, Hunt D, Siowman G. Prediction of sudden death by electrophysiologic studies in high risk patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1982;50:223-9. 3. Denniss AR, C()(\y DV, Ho B, et al. Prognostic significance of inducible ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction (abstr). J Am Coli Cardiol 1984;3:610. 4. Marchlinski FR, Buxton AE, Waxman HL, Josephson ME. Identifying patients at risk of sudden death after myocardial infarction: value of the response to programmed stimulation, degree of ventricular ectopic activity and severity of left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 1983;52: 1190-6. 5. Roy D, Marchand E, Theroux P, et al. Reproducibility and significance of ventricular arrhythmias induced after an acute myocardial infarction (abstr). Circulation 1984;70(suppl 11):11-18. 6. Gonzalez R, Arriagada D, Corbalan R, et al. Programmed electrical stimulation of the heart does not help to identify patients at high risk post-myocardial infarction (abstr). Circulation I 984;70(suppl 11):11-19. 7. Brugada P, Waldecker B, Wellens H11. Characteristics of induced ventricular arrhythmias in four subgroups of patients with myocardial infarction (abstr). Circulation 1984;70(suppl II):II-29. 8. Spielman SR, Greenspan AM, Kay HR, et al. Electrophysiologic testing in patients at high risk for sudden cardillc death. I. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and abnormal ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;6:31-9. 0735-1097/85/$3.30