Download Circ editorial

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup

Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup

Heart failure wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup

Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup

Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup

Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup

Aortic stenosis wikipedia , lookup

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup

Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Stiff arteries, stiff ventricles: correlation or causality in heart failure?
Declan P. O’Regan FRCR PhD
From the MRC Clinical Sciences Centre (CSC), Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN
Correspondence to: Dr Declan P O’Regan, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre (CSC), Du Cane
Road, London W12 0NN, UK. E-mail: [email protected].
Keywords:
Pulse wave velocity
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Aortic stiffness
Heart failure
Diastolic dysfunction
The biophysical properties and neuro-hormonal regulation of arterial function are influential
mediators of cardiovascular disease. Over the last three decades the prognostic importance of
arterial stiffness, as a measurable indicator of arterial function, has been recognized in both
unselected populations and amongst patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Although there
is a correlation between vascular stiffness and outcomes the temporal and causal
interrelationships with aging, hypertension, atherosclerosis and the progression to heart
failure are not fully understood. Aortic stiffening increases systolic load on the left ventricle
contributing to ventricular hypertrophy and leading to increased myocardial oxygen demand,
as well as indirectly promoting coronary disease and impaired perfusion.1 Arterial stiffness
and wave reflection effects augment systolic blood pressure and place additional mechanical
load on the heart leading to diastolic dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis.2, 3 Increasing
vascular stiffness precedes the onset of hypertension and may promote alterations in wall
stress that accelerate atherosclerosis.4 This body of evidence has generated renewed interest
in discovering whether arterial stiffness is more than a correlated risk factor and if it could
play a role in the causative pathway to adverse cardiovascular events.
The proximal elastic arteries serve as capacitance vessels that distend to accommodate the
stroke volume as it is transferred from the heart to the circulation and maintain efficient
coupling with the mechanical properties of the myocardium.5 During systole a pulse wave is
propagated along the aorta that travels at a velocity which is an accurate surrogate for arterial
stiffness.6 With advancing age elastin fibers in the tunica media become degraded and
fragmented leading to a less compliant collagen-dominant state with an associated rise in
pulse wave velocity (PWV) and reflected pressure waves. Endothelial dysfunction plays a
pivotal role in the progression to heart failure with neuro-hormonal interactions between the
myocardium and endothelium driving unfavourable outcomes.7 Genetic factors are also
influential but, although the heritability of carotid femoral PWV is around 40%, the genetic
variants that independently influence vascular stiffness are not well defined.8 An important
unanswered question in cardiovascular medicine is what role aortic stiffness may play in the
initiation of myocardial dysfunction and subsequent progression to heart failure in the general
population.
See Article by Ohyama et al
In this issue of Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, Ohyama et al explored the relationship
between aortic PWV and left ventricular (LV) function using phase contrast imaging and
strain analysis of tagged cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in a large multi-ethic
cohort.9 Age-related changes in proximal aortic stiffness have previously been associated
with LV mass and concentricity independent of central blood pressure and conventional
cardiovascular risk factors.10 Ohyama et al’s new data indicate that higher aortic arch PWV is
also associated with impaired circumferential systolic strain and diastolic function in a
community-based population. This study provides further evidence implicating aortic
stiffness in adverse cardiac remodeling and impaired myocardial function. A previous
longitudinal MESA study investigated 5960 participants using radial artery tonometry and
found that the magnitude of wave reflections was strongly predictive of new-onset heart
failure, but did not assess PWV itself.11 It has been argued that systolic load ultimately
determines LV remodeling and the indirect effects of aortic mechanical properties are of
secondary importance, but measures of aortic stiffness are also relatively less confounded by
the degree of LV dysfunction.12 A Framingham cohort study of 2539 middle-aged to elderly
adults followed for a median of 10.1 years reported that carotid-femoral PWV was associated
with an increased risk of incident heart failure – and comparable risk was conferred by PWV
in heart failure patients with either preserved or reduced ejection fraction.13 These data would
suggest that, as there is no treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction of
proven benefit, modulating vascular function may be a promising target for intervention.14
Recent observational longitudinal data, also from the same MESA investigators, suggest that
blood pressure control may be effective in halting the progression of aortic stiffening and
breaking the vicious circle between hypertension and vascular aging.15 Measurement of aortic
wall stiffness could provide a sensitive indicator for the initiation of vascular disease, but
interventional studies have yet to determine whether a lowering of PWV leads to a reduction
in cardiovascular events independent of alterations to classical risk factors.16 Endothelial cells
are mechanosensitive and directly respond to stiffening of the extracellular matrix leading to
enhanced permeability and uptake of cholesterol into the vessel wall.17 Endothelial
dysfunction is not irreversible and a number of emerging non-pharmacological and
pharmacological therapeutic strategies are under investigation that aim to reduce oxidative
stress and promote nitric oxide release.18 Ohyama et al’s observational study, taken with
other longitudinal data, provide supportive evidence of the role that declining arterial
elasticity may have in the development of subclinical impairment of both systolic and
diastolic function.
There are number of approaches and technologies used to assess vascular stiffness which
present both challenges and opportunities for advancing our understanding of hemodynamic
factors in heart disease.1 In Ohyama et al’s study the velocity of the propagating systolic
wavefront in the aorta was determined using phase contrast imaging – a non-invasive
approach for assessing vascular stiffness that offers good agreement with intra-aortic pressure
measurements.19 Phase contrast imaging depends on adequate temporal sampling of the flow
waveform particularly when model-fitting the systolic upstroke to minimise the influence of
wave reflection effects.20 The most relevant blood pressure metric is also debatable as,
although 24 hour ambulatory monitoring may better represent the cumulative exposure to
hypertension, transient changes in vascular stiffness also occur with acute variations in blood
pressure. Another factor not addressed in this study is the variation in elastic properties of the
aorta as the pulse wave travels distally, as both extracellular matrix composition and
expression of vascular disease vary in different territories. A limitation of the tagged
deformation imaging used is the absence of data on long axis function which is an
independent predictor of survival, after adjustment for clinical variables and short axis
function, in patients with heart failure.21 It would be appealing to combine complementary
CMR datasets from the MESA cohort, including feature-tracking for strain assessment in
each axis, to establish a comprehensive picture of longitudinal adaptations in LV mass,
function and aortic stiffness – findings which may not always be congruent with crosssectional associations.22 The right heart is also an important determinant of outcome in heart
failure, and there is emerging evidence that a similar relationship exists between pulmonary
artery stiffness and right ventricular function to that observed in the systemic circulation.23
Convincing data are still required on the putative feedback mechanisms between aortic and
ventricular dysfunction, what processes might initiate and amplify the progression to heart
failure in the general population, or any certainty as to whether outcomes in heart failure may
be improved by modifying aortic elasticity independent of conventional risk factors.
Pharmacological approaches to treat vascular stiffness, including angiotensin converting
inhibitors and calcium channel blockers, have achieved only modest results but there is
promising data that Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibition, including pleiotropic actions of statins,
may prevent atherosclerosis due to vessel wall stiffening.17 Aortic PWV improves risk
stratification independently of conventional cardiovascular risk factors, but its clinical value
will ultimately depend on whether it can be proven to guide treatment and improve
outcomes.24
Conflict of Interest Disclosures
None
References
1.
Townsend RR, Wilkinson IB, Schiffrin EL, Avolio AP, Chirinos JA, Cockcroft JR,
Heffernan KS, Lakatta EG, McEniery CM, Mitchell GF, Najjar SS, Nichols WW,
Urbina EM, Weber T. Recommendations for Improving and Standardizing Vascular
Research on Arterial Stiffness: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart
Association. Hypertension. 2015;66:698-722
2.
Russo C, Jin Z, Palmieri V, Homma S, Rundek T, Elkind MSV, Sacco RL, Di Tullio
MR. Arterial Stiffness and Wave Reflection: Sex Differences and Relationship With
Left Ventricular Diastolic Function. Hypertension. 2012;60:362-368
3.
Rommel KP, von Roeder M, Latuscynski K, Oberueck C, Blazek S, Fengler K, Besler
C, Sandri M, Lucke C, Gutberlet M, Linke A, Schuler G, Lurz P. Extracellular
Volume Fraction for Characterization of Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved
Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1815-1825
4.
Kaess BM, Rong J, Larson MG, Hamburg NM, Vita JA, Levy D, Benjamin EJ, Vasan
RS, Mitchell GF. Aortic stiffness, blood pressure progression, and incident
hypertension. Jama. 2012;308:875-881
5.
Borlaug BA, Kass DA. Ventricular-vascular interaction in heart failure. Heart Fail
Clin. 2008;4:23-36
6.
Wagenseil JE, Mecham RP. Elastin in large artery stiffness and hypertension. Journal
of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 2012;5:264-273
7.
Marti CN, Gheorghiade M, Kalogeropoulos AP, Georgiopoulou VV, Quyyumi AA,
Butler J. Endothelial Dysfunction, Arterial Stiffness, and Heart Failure. Journal of the
American College of Cardiology. 2012;60:1455-1469
8.
Proust C, Empana JP, Boutouyrie P, Alivon M, Challande P, Danchin N, Escriou G,
Esslinger U, Laurent S, Li Z, Pannier B, Regnault V, Thomas F, Jouven X, Cambien
F, Lacolley P. Contribution of Rare and Common Genetic Variants to Plasma Lipid
Levels and Carotid Stiffness and Geometry: A Substudy of the Paris Prospective
Study 3. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015;8:628-636
9.
Ohyama Y, Ambale-Venkatesh B, Noda N, Chugh AR, Teixido-Tura G, Kim J,
Donekal S, Yoneyama K, Gjesdal O, Redheuil A, Liu C, Nakamura T, Wu C,
Hundley G, Bleumke DA, Lima JAC. Association of Aortic Stiffness with Left
Ventricular Remodeling and Reduced Left Ventricular Function Measured by MRI:
The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation: Cardiovascular
Imaging. 2016
10.
Redheuil A, Yu WC, Mousseaux E, Harouni AA, Kachenoura N, Wu CO, Bluemke
D, Lima JA. Age-related changes in aortic arch geometry: relationship with proximal
aortic function and left ventricular mass and remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol.
2011;58:1262-1270
11.
Chirinos JA, Kips JG, Jacobs DR, Jr., Brumback L, Duprez DA, Kronmal R, Bluemke
DA, Townsend RR, Vermeersch S, Segers P. Arterial wave reflections and incident
cardiovascular events and heart failure: MESA (Multiethnic Study of
Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2170-2177
12.
Fernandes VR, Polak JF, Cheng S, Rosen BD, Carvalho B, Nasir K, McClelland R,
Hundley G, Pearson G, O'Leary DH, Bluemke DA, Lima JA. Arterial stiffness is
associated with regional ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction: the MultiEthnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:194-201
13.
Tsao CW, Lyass A, Larson MG, Levy D, Hamburg NM, Vita JA, Benjamin EJ,
Mitchell GF, Vasan RS. Relation of Central Arterial Stiffness to Incident Heart
Failure in the Community. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e00218
14.
Canepa M, AlGhatrif M. From Arterial Stiffness to Heart Failure: Still a Long Way to
Go. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e002807
15.
Ohyama Y, Teixido-Tura G, Ambale-Venkatesh B, Noda C, Chugh AR, Liu CY,
Redheuil A, Stacey RB, Dietz H, Gomes AS, Prince MR, Evangelista A, Wu CO,
Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Lima JA. Ten-year longitudinal change in aortic stiffness
assessed by cardiac MRI in the second half of the human lifespan: the multi-ethnic
study of atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;[Epub ahead of print]
16.
Antonini-Canterin F, Carerj S, Di Bello V, Di Salvo G, La Carrubba S, Vriz O, Pavan
D, Balbarini A, Nicolosi GL. Arterial stiffness and ventricular stiffness: a couple of
diseases or a coupling disease? A review from the cardiologist's point of view.
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging. 2009;10:36-43
17.
Huynh J, Nishimura N, Rana K, Peloquin JM, Califano JP, Montague CR, King MR,
Schaffer CB, Reinhart-King CA. Age-related intimal stiffening enhances endothelial
permeability and leukocyte transmigration. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:112ra122
18.
Schnabel RB, Wild PS, Schulz A, Zeller T, Sinning CR, Wilde S, Kunde J, Lubos E,
Lackner KJ, Warnholtz A, Gori T, Blankenberg S, Munzel T. Multiple endothelial
biomarkers and noninvasive vascular function in the general population: the
Gutenberg Health Study. Hypertension. 2012;60:288-295
19.
Grotenhuis HB, Westenberg JJM, Steendijk P, van der Geest RJ, Ottenkamp J, Bax
JJ, Jukema JW, de Roos A. Validation and reproducibility of aortic pulse wave
velocity as assessed with velocity-encoded MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Imaging. 2009;30:521-526
20.
Dogui A, Redheuil A, Lefort M, DeCesare A, Kachenoura N, Herment A, Mousseaux
E. Measurement of aortic arch pulse wave velocity in cardiovascular MR: comparison
of transit time estimators and description of a new approach. J Magn Reson Imaging.
2011;33:1321-1329
21.
Svealv BG, Olofsson EL, Andersson B. Ventricular long-axis function is of major
importance for long-term survival in patients with heart failure. Heart. 2008;94:284289
22.
Eng J, McClelland RL, Gomes AS, Hundley WG, Cheng S, Wu CO, Carr JJ, Shea S,
Bluemke DA, Lima JA. Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling and Age Assessed with
Cardiac MR Imaging: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Radiology.
2016;278:714-722
23.
Dawes TJ, Gandhi A, de Marvao A, Buzaco R, Tokarczuk P, Quinlan M, Durighel G,
Diamond T, Monje-Garcia L, de Cesare A, Cook SA, O'Regan DP. Pulmonary Artery
Stiffness Is Independently Associated with Right Ventricular Mass and Function: A
Cardiac MR Imaging Study. Radiology. 2016:151527
24.
Ben-Shlomo Y, Spears M, Boustred C, May M, Anderson SG, Benjamin EJ,
Boutouyrie P, Cameron J, Chen CH, Cruickshank JK, Hwang SJ, Lakatta EG, Laurent
S, Maldonado J, Mitchell GF, Najjar SS, Newman AB, Ohishi M, Pannier B, Pereira
T, Vasan RS, Shokawa T, Sutton-Tyrell K, Verbeke F, Wang KL, Webb DJ, Willum
Hansen T, Zoungas S, McEniery CM, Cockcroft JR, Wilkinson IB. Aortic pulse wave
velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: an individual participant metaanalysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol.
2014;63:636-646