* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Rapid ventricular pacing versus adenosine administration for
Survey
Document related concepts
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Pericardial heart valves wikipedia , lookup
Lutembacher's syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup
Artificial heart valve wikipedia , lookup
Mitral insufficiency wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Aortic stenosis wikipedia , lookup
Ventricular fibrillation wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Rapid ventricular pacing versus adenosine administration for reduction of systemic arterial pressure during aortic valve baloon angioplasty Nikolas Kipshidze, Tamaz Shaburishvili, George Khabeishvili, Maia Abdushelishvili. Academician N.Kipshidze’s Central University Hospital, Tbilisi, Georgia Open heart surgery for patients who needs valvular replacement is standard approach. Many patients with a single diseased valve were declined for surgery because of advanced age, end-stage disease and comorbidities with short life expectancy. In such patients percutaneous transfemoral aortic valve implantation has been proposed as an alternative traetment. The aim of this work was to study pacing versus adenosine administration for reduction in systemic arterial pressure during ballon placement for aortic valve dilatation. 12-24 mg rapid intravenous Adenosine infusion caused transient (10-15 sec) high degree atrioventricular (AV) block. This is enough time for rapid baloon inflation and deflation at the level of the aortic valve determined by fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography. 55 patients were studied. To achive adequate reduction in arterial pressure during baloon inflation and deflation rapid ventricular pacing was used. As above mentioned, patients with advanced age, endstage disease and comorbidities are usualy selected for percutaneous heart valve implantation. This cohort is expected to increase complications during rapid ventricular pacing, such as ventricular rhythm disturbances. Suggested method to stop heart beat using adenosin infusion was safe (no serious complication were observed) and effective ( ability to produce transitory high degree atrioventricular block was 100%). To minimize transaortic flow and cardiac motion rapid ventricular pacing is used Rapid ventricular pacing-1:1 capture-hypotension. Cessation of pacing is associated with rapid normalization of arterial pressure. Rapid intravenous administration of adenosine can provoke high degree AV-block. Continues echocardiographic registration of aortic valve. 35 sec asystolic epizode was observed after 4 ml adenosine infusion. Conclusion: Rapid intravenous administration of adenosine is a best way for reduction of arteril blood pressure. It successfully substituted rapid ventricular pacing used during ballon angioplasty for achiving adequate reduction in systemic arterial pressure.