Download Conflict ofOrders: Fifth to Fourth Centuries BCE

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Military of ancient Rome wikipedia , lookup

Roman tribe wikipedia , lookup

Daqin wikipedia , lookup

Centuriate Assembly wikipedia , lookup

Factorum ac dictorum memorabilium libri IX wikipedia , lookup

Food and dining in the Roman Empire wikipedia , lookup

Roman historiography wikipedia , lookup

Roman army of the late Republic wikipedia , lookup

Roman law wikipedia , lookup

Education in ancient Rome wikipedia , lookup

Roman funerary practices wikipedia , lookup

Roman agriculture wikipedia , lookup

Roman economy wikipedia , lookup

Switzerland in the Roman era wikipedia , lookup

Romanization of Hispania wikipedia , lookup

Culture of ancient Rome wikipedia , lookup

Executive magistrates of the Roman Republic wikipedia , lookup

Constitutional reforms of Sulla wikipedia , lookup

First secessio plebis wikipedia , lookup

Legislative assemblies of the Roman Republic wikipedia , lookup

Demography of the Roman Empire wikipedia , lookup

Early Roman army wikipedia , lookup

Cursus honorum wikipedia , lookup

History of the Constitution of the Roman Republic wikipedia , lookup

History of the Roman Constitution wikipedia , lookup

Conflict of the Orders wikipedia , lookup

Constitution of the Roman Republic wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
('nnflir.t
of Ornp.r<::
P::IOP.1 of 1
Conflict of Orders: Fifth to Fourth Centuries BCE
Patricians:
In early Rome, the patricians (patrieii) were a highly privileged aristocratic class of Roman citizens; membership in
this class was hereditary and could be achieved only by birth until the end of the Republic. The name probably stems
from the Latin word patres, "fathers," which was applied to the earliest members of the Roman Senate, from whom
the patrician clans claimed descent.
Plebeians:
The plebeians (plebei, fromplebs, "common people") were all the Roman citizens who were not patricians.
Originally, patricians were forbidden to marry plebeians, so there was no possibility of movement from one order to
another.
The history of the development of the Roman system of government is based on the struggle for power between
these two classes (ordines, hence our word "orders"). In the early years of the Roman Republic, patricians controlled
all the religious and political offices; plebeians had no right of appeal against decisions of the patrician government,
since no laws were codified or published. The struggle of the plebeians to gain rights and an opportunity for
advancement within Roman society and political structures is known as "the conflict of orders." The one advantage
plebeians had over patricians lay in their numbers, and they used this effectively through the strategy of secession
(seeessio), withdrawal or the threat of withdrawal from the Roman state during times of crisis. Here are some of the
major landmarks in the conflict of orders, which was largely bloodless and free of violence:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
494 BCE: traditional date of the First Secession of the Plebs, during which they established their own
assembly (the Concilium Plebis) and elected their own magistrates, the Tribunes and the Plebeian Aediles.
450 BCE: traditional date of the Law of the Twelve Tables, the first codification of Roman law
445 BCE: patricians and plebeians were permitted to intermarry
367 BCE: plebeians became eligible for the consulship
342 BCE: law passed making it mandatory that one of the two Consuls must be a plebeian.
339 BCE: law passed making it mandatory that one of the two Censors must be a plebeian
300 BCE: half of the priesthoods (which were also state offices) must be plebeian
287 BCE: Third Secession, won the concession that all plebiscites, measures passed in the Concilium Plebis,
had the force of laws for the whole Roman state
What was essentially won during the conflict of orders was the breakdown of an aristocracy of birth and its
replacement with an aristocracy that was based on the holding of political offices and on wealth. particularly landbased wealth. The conflict did not destroy the hierarchical, class-based nature of Roman society. nor did it greatly
improve the lives or the prospects of the poorer segments of society.
Return to RQl11ill1~~Q!J1;>licanGovernment
- Barbara F. McManus, The College of New Rochelle
September, 1998