* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download reading here
Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup
History of invasive and interventional cardiology wikipedia , lookup
Jatene procedure wikipedia , lookup
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
The online version of this article, along with access to discussion threads on NATF’s eForum, is available at: www.NATFonline.org/ethrombosis.php (September, 2008) The Universal Definition for Myocardial Infarction for the 21st Century (Part 1) JOSEPH S. ALPERT, MD Professor and Head, Department of Medicine; University of Arizona Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona USA The clinical definition of myocardial infarction (MI) is based on the clinical presentation of the patient combined with various laboratory tests. In the recent past, clinicians frequently defined myocardial infarction in different ways. Seeking a consistent universal definition for MI, the four major international cardiac societies (European Society of Cardiology, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and the World Heart Federation) recently completed a second consensus process to define MI in a universally acceptable and standardized manner. Myocardial infarction is defined pathologically as myocardial cell, myocyte, necrosis as a result of prolonged ischemia. These conditions are met in the clinical setting when the following is observed: A rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers, preferably troponins, with at least one value above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit together with evidence of myocardial ischemia as recognized by one of the following: symptoms of ischemia, ECG changes of new ischemia, new pathological Q waves, new regional wall motion abnormality or imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium. Myocardial infarctions are divided into 5 subtypes: 1) spontaneous, 2) secondary, 3) related to sudden cardiac death, 4) percutaneous coronary intervention (with a subtype of stent thrombosis) or 5) coronary artery bypass grafting. [1,2] Introduction: In 2000, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) redefined criteria for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI), standardizing the criteria for older MI definitions that were based on epidemiology. The new definition of MI was a more clinically oriented definition involving elevation of blood troponin levels in the clinical setting of myocardial ischemia [1]. Since 2000, a number of advances occurred in the diagnosis and management of MI. Therefore, the leadership of the ESC, the ACC and the American Heart Association (AHA) convened, together with the World Heart Federation (WHF), a Global Task Force whose goal was to update the 2000 consensus document. The Global Task Force involved expert working groups in the following areas: biomarkers, ECG, imaging, interventional cardiology, clinical investigation, and global perspectives. The recommendations of the various working groups were co-coordinated, and an updated consensus document was created.[2]. Definition of myocardial infarction 1 The online version of this article, along with access to discussion threads on NATF’s eForum, is available at: www.NATFonline.org/ethrombosis.php (September, 2008) Myocardial infarction is defined pathologically as myocardial cell death resulting from ischemia. This usually occurs in the setting of coronary arterial thrombosis. In the clinical setting these conditions can be identified when the following criteria are met: detection of a rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers, preferably troponin, with at least one value above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit (URL) together with evidence of myocardial ischemia as recognized by at least one of the following: symptoms of ischemia, ECG changes of new ischemia or development of pathological Q waves, or imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality (Table 1) [2] Cardiac biomarkers Cardiac troponins (cTn) I and T are the preferred biomarkers for the diagnosis of myocardial injury because troponins have nearly absolute myocardial tissue specificity, as well as high sensitivity, thereby reflecting very small zones of myocardial necrosis [3]. Optimal precision at the 99th percentile URL for each assay should be a coefficient of variation ≤10% [4, 5]. When troponin assays are not available, the best alternative is the MB fraction of CK measured by mass assay. As with troponin, an increased CKMB mass value is defined as a measurement above the 99th percentile URL using gender appropriate normal ranges [6]. However, given its greater sensitivity and specificity, troponin is definitely the preferred biomarker for the diagnosis of MI. Both cTn I and cTnT perform comparably in terms of diagnostic accuracy. The one difference between these two troponin assays (I and T) is seen in patients with renal failure in whom there are greater numbers of elevations of cTnT unrelated to myocardial ischemic necrosis as compared with cTnI. These elevations are usually stable over time [7] and do not rise and fall as in acute myocardial infarction. Pathologic and longitudinal clinical studies suggest that these persistently elevated troponin values denote real cardiac abnormalities in these patients with renal insufficiency [8]. Moreover, these troponin elevations are highly prognostic [7]. Therefore, patients with renal insufficiency who have elevated levels of cTnT require further cardiac clinical evaluation. When patients with renal failure demonstrate the characteristic rise and/or fall of cTnT values, even from an abnormal baseline, these individuals should be considered to be having an acute cardiac event, and they should be assessed and treated accordingly [9,10]. It is important for the clinician and clinical scientist to remember that many disease entities can injure myocardium (for example, trauma, myocarditis, chemotherapeutic agents, etc.) thereby leading to elevated blood levels of troponin. These other entities are not the result of acute ischemic heart disease. Careful clinical evaluation should be used to prevent these patients from being diagnosed with an acute MI (Table 2). Classification of myocardial infarction Myocardial infarction can be a spontaneous event related to plaque rupture, fissuring, or dissection of an atherosclerotic plaque or, as recently described, nodular plaque rupture with ensuing coronary arterial thrombosis; this form of infarction is classified as a type 1 MI. Alternatively, MI can result from increased myocardial oxygen demand and/or inadequate 2 The online version of this article, along with access to discussion threads on NATF’s eForum, is available at: www.NATFonline.org/ethrombosis.php (September, 2008) myocardial supply of oxygen and nutrients in the setting of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease without luminal thrombosis. This may be the result of anemia, arrhythmia, and hyperor hypotension. Vasoconstriction or arterial spasm in patients with coronary artery disease can cause a marked reduction in myocardial blood flow and also lead to severe myocardial ischemia and MI. This second group of entities is termed type 2 MI (Table 3) [2]. One circumstance in which biomarkers are not of value in the diagnosis of MI is when the patient presents with a typical clinical scenario for myocardial ischemia/infarction. The patient then dies before the physician can detect blood biomarker elevation either because blood samples for troponin determination were not obtained, or because the patient succumbed too soon after the onset of symptoms for troponin values to become elevated. Such patients are designated as having a type 3 MI (Table 3) [2]. Patients with an initially normal baseline blood troponin value who develop elevated troponin values (greater than 3 X 99th percentile URL) following a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are designated as having had an acute MI (type 4a MI ). A second category of type 4 MI is caused by stent thrombosis (termed type 4b MI; troponin values must be above the 99th percentile URL). Elevated troponin values (greater than 5 X 99th percentile URL) following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are defined as a type 5 MI (Table 3). [2]. Electrocardiography (Tables 4 and 5) The ECG criteria for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction from the 2007 consensus document are listed in Table 4 [2]. ST elevation is measured from the J-point. J-point elevation in men decreases with increasing age; however, this is not the case with women in whom J point elevation is less than in men [11, 12]. The term “posterior MI” reflecting an infarct at base of the left ventricle is no longer recommended. It is preferable to refer to this MI as inferobasal [13]. As shown in Table 5, Q waves or QS complexes are usually diagnostic of a prior MI[13]. ST or T wave abnormalities by themselves are non-specific findings that may reflect myocardial ischemia or infarction, but also may be caused by other processes, e.g., electrolyte abnormalities, drugs, etc. However, when ST-T abnormalities occur in the same leads as Qwaves, the likelihood of MI is increased [2]. Imaging techniques Imaging techniques can be useful in the diagnosis of MI because of their ability to demonstrate wall motion abnormalities or myocardial perfusion deficits in the presence of elevated cardiac biomarkers. If for some reason, biomarkers have not been measured or may have normalized, demonstration of new loss of myocardial viability alone, in the absence of non ischemic causes, satisfies the diagnostic criteria for MI. However, if biomarkers have been measured at appropriate times and are normal, the results from the biomarker determinations take precedence over the imaging criteria. 3 The online version of this article, along with access to discussion threads on NATF’s eForum, is available at: www.NATFonline.org/ethrombosis.php (September, 2008) Echocardiography is the imaging technique of choice for detecting complications of acute myocardial infarction including myocardial free wall rupture, acute ventricular septal defect, and mitral regurgitation secondary to papillary muscle rupture or ischemia. Unfortunately, echocardiography cannot distinguish regional wall motion abnormalities due to myocardial ischemia from those that result from infarction. An important role for acute echocardiographic study or radionuclide imaging is in patients with suspected MI and a non-diagnostic ECG. A normal echocardiogram or resting ECG-gated scintigram has a 95-98% negative predictive value for excluding acute MI [14, 15]. In this manner, imaging techniques can be quite useful for early triage and discharge of patients with suspected MI [16]. References: 1. The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee: Myocardial infarction redefined — A consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Eur Heart J 2000; 21:1502-1513; J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36: 959969. 2. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD: joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2007;28: 2525-2538; Circulation 2007;116: 2634-2653; J Am Coll Cardiol 2007.50:2173-2195. 3. Katus HA, Rempris A, Neumann FJ, et al. Diagnostic efficiency of troponin T measurement in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1991; 83: 902-912. 4. Apple FS, Jesse RL, Newby LK, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry and IFCC Committee for Standardization of Markers Cardiac Damage Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Analytical issues for biochemical markers of acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2007; 115:e352-e355. 5. Jaffe AS, Ravkilde J, Roberts R, et al. Its time for a change to a troponin standard. Circulation 2000; 102: 1216-1220. 6. Panteghini M, Pagani F, Yeo KT, et al. Evaluation of imprecision for cardiac troponin assays at low-range concentrations. Clin Chem. 2004; 50:327-332. 7. Apple F, Murakami M, Pearce L, Herzog C. Predictive value of cardiac troponin I and T for subsequent death in end-stage renal disease. Circulation 2002; 106: 2941-2945. 8. Ooi DS, Isotalo PA, Veinot JP. Correlation of antemortem serum creatine kinase, creatine kinase-MB, troponin I, and troponin T with cardiac pathology. Clin Chem 2000; 46: 338-44. 9. Hayashi T, Obi Y, Kimura T, Iio K-I, Sumitsuji S, Takeda Y, Nagai Y, and Imai E. Cardiac troponin T predicts occult coronary artery stenosis in patients with chronic 4 The online version of this article, along with access to discussion threads on NATF’s eForum, is available at: www.NATFonline.org/ethrombosis.php (September, 2008) kidney disease at the start of renal replacement therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008 Apr 10. [Epub ahead of print] 10. Le Ehy, Klootwijk PJ, Weimar W, Zietse R. Significance of acute versus chronic troponin T elevation in dialysis patients. Nephron Clin Pract 2004; 98:c87-c92. 11. Mcfarlane PW. Age, sex, and the ST amplitude in health and disease. J Electrocardiology 2001; 34: S35-S41. 12. Bayés de Luna A, Wagner G, Birnbaum Y, et al. A new terminology for the left ventricular walls and for the location of myocardial infarcts that present Q wave based on the standard of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A statement for healthcare professionals from a Committee appointed by the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiography. Circulation 2006; 114: 1755-1760. 13. Pahlm US, Chaitman BR, Rautaharju PM, et al. Comparison of the various electrocardiographic scoring codes for estimating anatomically documented sizes of single and multiple infarcts of the left ventricle. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 809-815. 14. Saeian K, Rhyne TL, Sagar KB. Ultrasonic tissue characterization for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the coronary care unit. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74:12111215. 15. Tatum JL, Jesse RL, Kontos MC, et al. Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med 1997; 29: 116-125. 16. Udelson JE, Beshansky JR, Ballin DS, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 2693-2700. 5 The online version of this article, along with access to discussion threads on NATF’s eForum, is available at: www.NATFonline.org/ethrombosis.php (September, 2008) Table 1: The Universal Definition from 2007 Acute myocardial infarction-- Any one of the following criteria meets the diagnosis for myocardial infarction: 1. Detection of elevated values of cardiac biomarkers (preferably troponin) above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit (URL) together with evidence of myocardial ischemia with at least one of the following: a) Ischemic symptoms; b) ECG changes indicative of new ischemia (new ST-T changes or new left bundle branch block (LBBB)); c) Development of pathological Q waves in the ECG; d) Imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality. 2. Sudden unexpected cardiac death, including cardiac arrest, with symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia, accompanied by new ST elevation, or new LBBB, or definite new thrombus by coronary angiography but dying before blood samples could be obtained, or in the lag phase of cardiac biomarkers in the blood. 3. For percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with normal baseline values, elevations of cardiac biomarkers above the 99th percentile URL are indicative of peri-procedural myocardial necrosis. By convention, increases of biomarkers greater than 3 X 99th percentile URL have been designated as defining PCI-related myocardial infarction. 4. For coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with normal baseline values, elevations of cardiac biomarkers above the 99th percentile URL are indicative of peri-procedural myocardial necrosis. By convention, increases of biomarkers greater than 5 X 99th percentile URL plus either new pathological Q waves or new LBBB, or angiographically documented new graft or native coronary artery occlusion, or imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium have been designated as defining CABG-related myocardial infarction. 5. Pathological findings post-mortem of an acute myocardial infarction. Prior myocardial infarction: 1. Development of new pathological Q waves with or without symptoms. 2. Imaging evidence of a region of loss of viable myocardium that is thinned and fails to contract, in the absence of a non-ischemic cause. 3. Pathological findings post-mortem of a healed or healing MI. 6 The online version of this article, along with access to discussion threads on NATF’s eForum, is available at: www.NATFonline.org/ethrombosis.php (September, 2008) Table 2: Elevations of troponin in the absence of overt ischemic heart disease [2] Cardiac contusion, including ablation, pacing, cardioversion, or endomyocardial biopsy Congestive heart failure - acute and chronic Aortic dissection, aortic valve disease or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Tachy- or bradyarrhythmias, or heart block Apical ballooning syndrome (Takatsubo syndrome) Rhabdomyolysis with cardiac injury Pulmonary embolism, severe pulmonary hypertension Renal failure Acute neurological disease, including stroke, or subarachnoid hemorrhage Infiltrative diseases, e.g., amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, sarcoidosis, and scleroderma Inflammatory diseases, e.g., myocarditis, , or myocardial extension of endo/pericarditis Drug toxicity, e.g., adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil, herceptin, snake venoms Critically ill patients, especially with respiratory failure, or sepsis Burns, especially if affecting >30% of body surface area 7 The online version of this article, along with access to discussion threads on NATF’s eForum, is available at: www.NATFonline.org/ethrombosis.php (September, 2008) Table 3: Clinical classification of different types of myocardial infarction [2] Type 1: Spontaneous myocardial infarction related to ischemia due to a primary coronary event such as plaque erosion and/or rupture, fissuring, or dissection. Type 2: Myocardial infarction secondary to ischemia due to either increased oxygen demand or decreased supply, e.g. coronary artery spasm, coronary embolism, anaemia, arrhythmias, hypertension, or hypotension. Type 3: Sudden unexpected cardiac death, including cardiac arrest, often with symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia, accompanied by presumably new STelevation, or new LBBB, or evidence of fresh thrombus in a coronary artery by angiography and/or at autopsy, but death occurring before blood samples could be obtained, or at a time before the appearance of cardiac biomarkers in the blood. Type 4a: Myocardial infarction associated with PCI; Type 4b: Myocardial infarction associated with stent thrombosis as documented by angiography or at autopsy. Type 5: Myocardial infarction associated with CABG. 8 The online version of this article, along with access to discussion threads on NATF’s eForum, is available at: www.NATFonline.org/ethrombosis.php (September, 2008) Table 4: ECG manifestation of acute myocardial ischemia (in absence of LVH and LBBB) [2] ST elevation New ST elevation at the J point in two contiguous leads with the cut-off points: ≥ 0.2mV in men or ≥ 0.15mV in women in leads V2-V3 and/or ≥0.1 mV in other leads ST depression and T wave changes New horizontal or down-sloping ST depression ≥0.05 mV in two contiguous leads; and/or T inversion ≥0.1 mV in two contiguous leads with prominent R wave or R/S ratio >1 Table 5: ECG changes associated with prior myocardial infarction [2] Any Q wave in leads V2-V3 ≥0.02 sec or QS complex in leads V2 and V3. Q-wave > 0.03 sec and > 0.1 mV deep or QS complex in leads I, II, aVL, aVF or V4 -V6 in any two leads of a contiguous lead grouping (I, aVL,V6; V4-V6; II, III, aVF). R-wave ≥ 0.04 sec in V1-V2 and R/S ≥1 with a concordant positive T-wave in the absence of a conduction defect. 9