Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Rheumatic fever wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup
Myocardial infarction wikipedia , lookup
Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup
Atrial fibrillation wikipedia , lookup
Cardiovascular Research 45 (2000) 177–184 www.elsevier.com / locate / cardiores www.elsevier.nl / locate / cardiores Update review The normal range and determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man q Tobias Opthof* Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22700, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands Abstract Jose and Collison published a study on the normal range and the determinants of intrinsic heart rate in man in Cardiovascular Research in 1970 [Jose AD, Collison D. The normal range and determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man. Cardiovasc Res 1970; 4: 160–167)]. The intrinsic heart rate is the heart rate under complete pharmacological blockade. They showed that (i) the resting heart rate is lower than the intrinsic heart rate and that (ii) the intrinsic heart rate declines with age. They also established that the variability in intrinsic heart rate between individuals of the same age is of the same order as the effect of ageing at the population level. This update discusses the relevance of these data with emphasis on sinus node function and autonomic balance. The paper of Jose and Collison was cited more than 200 times. The frequency of citation started to increase more than 10 years after publication. 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Aging; Autonomic nervous system; Gender; Heart rate (variability); Sinus node 1. Introduction In 1970 Jose and Collison published a study on the normal range and the determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man in Cardiovascular Research. [1]. They did not only study ‘intrinsic heart rate’, which they defined as the heart rate under the simultaneous presence of the nonselective b-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol (0.2 mg / kg) and the muscarinic receptor blocker atropine (0.04 mg / kg), they also established the inverse relation between age and intrinsic heart rate. Furthermore they made separate analyses in females and males. Therefore the paper included – apart from the measurement of the intrinsic heart rate itself – additional important pieces of information for later studies on areas varying from sinus node dysfunction, autonomic balance, heart rate variability, gender and aging (see preceding historical note [2]). The authors could have made their paper even more attractive by choosing another title. Fig. 1 taken from the original paper [1] shows the relation between age and intrinsic heart rate in normal males and females. Both in males and females the intrinsic heart rate decreases, on the average, from 107 beats / min at 20 years to 90 beats / min at 50 q An update of the original paper by Jose AD and Collison D: (Cardiovasc Res 1970;4:160–167) *Tel.: 131-20-566-3265; fax: 131-20-697-5458. E-mail address: [email protected] (T. Opthof) years. At the same time Fig. 1 shows that the intrinsic heart rate has 95% confidence limits of 615%. This implies that the variability between individuals of the same age is of the same order as the decrease of the mean intrinsic heart rate of the whole population over about 55 years. In other words, the intrinsic heart rate of an individual of 20 years may actually be lower than that of another individual of 50 years. Obviously, this sets limits to the significance of the aging induced decrease in heart rate. The interest of the authors in the pharmacological concept of intrinsic heart rate had been raised by previous work of Jose published in 1966 [3] and of Jose and Taylor published in 1969 [4]. In those studies it had already been established that heart rate becomes fixed under the combined presence of atropine and propranolol, which is considered to cause complete autonomic blockade. However, propranolol only partially interferes with the activity of the sympathetic limb of the autonomic nervous system, because it blocks b-adrenoceptors but not a-adrenoceptors. Furthermore, there is a classic, small, but convincing literature which claims that vagal chronotropic effects include – apart from the well known negative components mediated by acetylcholine – also positive, i.e. acceleratory, components (see section on autonomic balance). The previous studies [3,4] were directed to normal individuals as well as to patients with heart failure. Thus, Jose and Taylor [4] showed that the intrinsic heart rate is different 0008-6363 / 00 / $ – see front matter 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S0008-6363( 99 )00322-3 178 Determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man Fig. 1. The intrinsic heart rate in males and females as observed in the combined presence of propranolol (0.2 mg / kg body weight) and atropine sulphate (0.04 mg / kg body weight). Reprinted from Jose AD, Collison D, The normal range and determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man. Cardiovasc Res 1970;4:160–167, with permission from Elsevier Science. in normal individuals and in NYHA class I, class II and class III / IV patients. In normal patients (mean age 25 years) the intrinsic heart rate was 107 beats / min (comparable to the data in Fig. 1 taken from the paper published by Cardiovascular Research in 1970 [1]). In class III / IV patients the intrinsic heart rate was 79 beats / min in a subgroup of patients with nonvalvular heart disease and 75 beats / min in a subgroup of patients with aortic stenosis. The mean age of those patients was 50 years. The significance of the paper of Jose and Collison [1] is that the difference in intrinsic heart rate between normal individuals and patients with heart failure can partially be explained by the difference in age. The lower intrinsic heart rate in patients with heart failure thus may in part result from the underlying pathology. A lower intrinsic heart rate has also been demonstrated in dogs with heart failure (127 beats / min) compared with normal dogs (175 beats / min) [5]. A lower intrinsic heart rate in patients with heart failure may point to impaired sinus node function. A prolongation of cycle length in the isolated right atrium of rabbits with heart failure has indeed been demonstrated [6]. Moreover, the effect of the combined administration of propranolol and atropine, i.e. the difference between heart rate at rest and intrinsic heart rate, is different in normal individuals and in heart failure both in patients [4] and in dogs [5]. The data of Jose and Collison [1] have been confirmed by Alboni and colleagues [7] and extended to younger age by Marcus and colleagues [8]. Intrinsic heart rate can be assessed by three ways: (i) in vivo by pharmacological tools, (ii) in vivo by surgical interventions, (iii) in vitro after isolation of the whole heart (Langendorff perfusion) or the right atrium. Finally, cardiac transplantation is of interest, because those patients Key publication: A.D. Jose and D. Collison / Cardiovascular Research 1970 179 have two sinus nodes, one innervated (in a rim of remaining tissue of the explanted heart) and one denervated (the implanted-donor-heart). 2. Intrinsic heart rate and sinus node The human heart beats about 100 000 times a day resulting in 2 billion heartbeats during a lifetime. Normally each cardiac activation originates from the sinus node which was discovered by Martin Flack and Arthur Keith in 1906 in the mole’s heart [9–11]. The relevance of this new anatomic structure was appreciated with little debate, because electrophysiological techniques, needed to verify the pacemaker hypothesis, were available at about the same time as the anatomical discovery of the sinus node [12–14]. The myogenic-neurogenic controversy with respect to cardiac automaticity started to be definitely settled in 1921 by Eyster and Meek [15]. 2.1. Differences in heart rate between species Specific metabolic rate, that is metabolic rate relative to body size, decreases in larger mammals [16,17]. Therefore cardiac output relative to body size also decreases in larger animals. Thus, it is a little surprising that all mammals have the same relative heart mass: about 0.6% of body mass [18]. Stroke volume, one of the two components of cardiac output, increases also linearly with body weight [16,17]. The decrease in relative cardiac output is solely brought about by the other component of cardiac output: heart rate. Fig. 2 (upper panel) shows the relation between body weight and cycle length according to the formula [17,19]: BCL 5 0.249 ? BW 0.25 (1) with basic cycle length (BCL) in seconds and body weight (BW) in kilograms. Cycle length is thus longer (or heart rate lower) in larger species. Fig. 2 (upper panel) further shows that longevity (life span) also relates to body weight according to the formula [20]: Life span 5 11.8 ? BW 0.20 (2) as far as mammals in captivity without the effects of predation or critical food supply are concerned. Interestingly, by dividing formula (2) by formula (1) we obtain the formula for the total number of heartbeats: Total heartbeats ¯ 1.5 billion ? BW exp 20.05 (3) Fig. 2 (lower panel) shows that the total number of heartbeats during the whole life is more or less similar in smaller and larger mammalian species, i.e. between 1 and 2 billion. Readers applying this formula to themselves, may be surprised to be still alive. The formula is not Fig. 2. Upper panel: Relation between body weight (BW; in kg) and cycle length (BCL; in ms) according to the formula (1) BCL50.249? BW 0.25 for mammals. See also Refs. [17,19]. Relation between body weight (BW; in kg) and life span (in years) according to the formula (2) Life span511.8?BW 0.20 for mammals. See also Refs. [17,20]. Lower panel: Relation between body weight (BW; in kg) and total heart beats (?billion) for mammals. This relation has been obtained by dividing formula (2) by formula (1). pertinent to humans, because we live much longer than expected from body weight. How is it possible that the heart of a small animal beats so much faster than the heart of a larger animal? For instance, at one side of the mammalian spectrum of pacemaking we find the bat. During flight its heart rate may increase to more than 1000 beats / min [21]. More recently, by the interest in transgenic mice, data have become available on heart rate in freely moving mice. It is about 500 beats / min in rest [22,23] and it can easily increase to 800 beats / min ([22]; but see also Rappaport in Ref. [24]). Heart rate in big animals as elephants is about 25 beats / min [25] and in whales it can be well below 20 beats / min [24]. Are the intrinsic properties of the pace- 180 Determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man maker fibres in these species so very different, or does a longer cycle length, also result from the coupling of increasing numbers of more or less similar cells? Coupling of sinus node cells is a prerequisite for regularity, because isolated pacemaker cells have a variable beat-to-beat interval [26,27]. Also the sinus node beats faster if detached from the right atrium [28] and subdivision of a whole rabbit sinus node (73230.3 mm) into small specimens (0.830.830.3 mm) renders numerous pieces with a substantially higher rate than the whole sinus node [27]. Coupling of more and more automatic elements thus results in lower heart rate. The decrease in intrinsic heart rate with age (Fig. 1) may result from changes in density of specific membrane currents (beyond the scope of this paper, but see [29–32]), intercellular coupling by specific connexins forming gap junctions (beyond the scope of this paper, but see [33,34]) and / or fibrosis (see next section). 2.2. Differences in nodal dimensions between species In the previous section we have shown that larger hearts have lower heart rates. Also, we have seen that coupling of more pacemaker cells yields regularity, but also a lower rate. Thus, the question arises whether larger hearts have larger sinus nodes. There is surprisingly little information on sinus node dimensions. As with the atrioventricular node node [35], there is a tendency towards larger sinus nodal dimensions in larger animals (for review [36]). Thus, in rodents the nodal length is in the mm range [36], whereas reports on the length of the human sinus node vary from 7 mm [37] to 20 mm [14]. In cow and horse the length is 30 mm [38,39]. It is not clear, whether a larger sinus node is a prerequisite for pacemaking in a larger heart per se, or that, alternatively, a larger sinus node is a prerequisite to obtain a slower heart rate, which is necessary to maintain adequate pump function in a larger heart. It is emphasised that the boundaries of the SAN cannot be determined accurately. 2.3. Differences in heart rate with aging: collagen and myocyte content or intrinsic electrophysiological changes? Electrical coupling is important for the automaticity of the sinus node, but also for driving the whole heart. Too much electrical coupling may lead to quiescence of the sinus node caused by the hyperpolarizing atrium, whereas too little electrical coupling may lead to a ‘pace, but not drive’ condition [40]. There are no data on the effects of aging on intercellular coupling to explain a change in intrinsic heart rate as observed by Jose and Collison [1]. Fibrosis may, however, present another parameter that may substantially affect intercellular coupling. A substantial amount of collagen is present in the sinus node [41]. In normal human hearts the amount of collagen increases until 20 years [41–46]. According to some authors this gradual increase stabilizes at 20 years [46] or at 40 years [43], whereas a more gradual increase until 80 years [45] and a relatively late increase (above 70 years) have also been described [44]. This confusion is presumably explained by the fact that at any age the differences between individuals are more striking than the effect of aging itself [42,46]. Unfortunately, it is unknown whether the amount of collagen is of any value at all in assessing pacemaker function. There are both clinical [47] and experimental examples [48] of extreme structural abnormalities with apparently normal function. An increase in collagen content is not synonymous with a decrease in myocyte content, because collagen fibres may also substitute for fibroblasts or amorphous matrix. A decrease in myocyte content with age has been determined in normal hearts [41,43,49,50], but such a decrease would in itself not necessarily lead to a decrease in heart rate. Despite the availability of a relatively large amount of studies on collagen content, we cannot be sure that an increased amount of collagen explains the constant decrease in intrinsic heart rate with age as shown by Jose and Collison in Fig. 1 [1]. Even the large interindividual variability in intrinsic heart rate at any age (615%, see Fig. 1) may be associated, but not necessarily causally related with the large interindividual variability in collagen content of human sinus nodes of the same age (see Fig. 4 in Ref. [46]). An experimental study in cat and rabbit sinus node has demonstrated that the rate of diastolic depolarisation decreases with aging [51]. Therefore decreased diastolic depolarisation of the sinus node with aging constitutes the only parameter with a causal relation with the decrease in intrinsic heart rate. 2.4. Differences between individuals within the same species of the same age So far we have dealt with interspecies differences in heart rate and with differences caused by age. There are, however, also striking differences between individuals of the same species and age. In a selection of studies on isolated rabbit right atrium preparations sinus rate varied from 77 to 218 beats / min (Fig. 3 in Ref. [52]). A subselection of studies with identical temperature and extracellular K 1 concentration still showed sinus rates from 114 to 185 beats / min [52]. These were averaged sinus rates in different studies in the rabbit. Fig. 3 (from Ref. [53]) shows that sinus rate of individual isolated rabbit right atria varies from 120 to 200 beats / min (cycle length 300–500 ms) within the same study. Lower and higher sinus rates probably result from different sets of membrane currents. Fig. 3 shows that this interindividual variability disappears when both the Na 1 and Ca 21 concentrations are lowered by 50% resulting in a constant sinus rate of 143 beats / min (cycle length 418 ms). Apparently the intrinsic differences between individual Key publication: A.D. Jose and D. Collison / Cardiovascular Research 1970 Fig. 3. Cycle length of rabbit sinus node at normal Na 1 concentration (100%) and normal Ca 21 concentration (2.2 mMol / l), at normal Na 1 concentration (100%) and low Ca 21 concentration (1.1 mMol / l), at low Na 1 concentration (50%) and normal Ca 21 concentration (2.2 mMol / l) and at low Na 1 concentration (50%) and low Ca 21 concentration (1.1 mMol / l). Under all circumstances there is a large variability between individual sinus nodes despite identical experimental circumstances. However, if both the Ca 21 and the Na 1 concentrations are low, this interindividual variability disappears and cycle length is about 420 ms in sinus nodes from all animals (n510). Reproduced with permission of the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics from Ref. [53]. sinus nodes disappear under those circumstances by impaired driving force for currents responsible for diastolic depolarisation. Unfortunately, voltage- or patch-clamp studies on single cells isolated from intact sinus nodes cannot easily explain these differences in intrinsic rate, because single cells are irregular [27]. 3. Innervation and the autonomic balance 3.1. Innervation and receptor density Papers on innervation of the sinus node report that ‘nerve supply is rich’ [54–56], but there is little detailed information available. The location of ganglion cells in or near the sinus node is species dependent [57]. There is inhomogeneity in innervation because vagal stimulation [58–62] and sympathetic stimulation [63,64] both cause shifts in the site of pacemaker dominance and activation pattern. There is also dispersion in receptor density, because addition of acetylcholine and adrenaline also changes pacemaker hierarchy [65–67]. Small nerves in the sinus node in general contain 5–15 axons. When the nerves become smaller and smaller they gradually lose the Schwann sheet and they end as naked axons in clefts between the nodal cells. Gaps between varicosities and nodal cells are 20–100 mm depending on the species [68]. Adrenergic and non-adrenergic varicosities are found in 181 close vicinity of each other. In one study, electrophysiological measurements preceded the analysis of nerve supply in the rabbit sinus node [69]. There is a large ganglionic complex inferior to the sinus node. Nerves impinge on the sinus node from the direction of the superior and inferior venae cavae and from the interatrial septum. Two or more major intrinsic nerves traverse the sinus node parallel to the crista terminalis. Moreover, small neurons (10–12 mm) seem to be clustered, forming baskets around nodal cells [69] rather than being homogeneously distributed over the nodal area. This may explain why pacemaker shifts due to changes in temperature or ionic composition of the extracellular fluid are more or less gradual, whereas adrenaline or acetylcholine produce more abrupt changes in activation pattern, because the dominant pacemaker area ‘jumps’ from one area with a certain ratio of adrenoceptors and muscarinic receptors towards another with another ratio [36]. With respect to muscarinic receptors it should be kept in mind that areas with the lowest density are more prone to establish pacemaker dominance than areas with a high density. Probably, also afferent nerve endings are present in the sinus node [68,70,71]. Quantitative data on receptor density are scarce. Given the more dense nerve supply to the sinus node compared to normal atrium, it is not surprising that the density of muscarinic and b 1 -adrenoceptors are five and three times larger respectively in the canine sinus node than in atrial myocardium [72]. 3.2. Autonomic balance The interrelations of vagal and sympathetic effects on cardiac rate were for the first time quantitatively assessed by Rosenblueth and Simeone in 1934 [73] by the formula: HR 5 m ? n ? HR 0 in which HR is heart rate (beats / min), m is sympathetic influence (m$1), n is vagal influence (0,n#1) and HR 0 is intrinsic heart rate (beats / min). The sympathovagal balance can be approached by HR / HR 0 . Fig. 4 (adapted from the original Figs. 1 and 2 in Ref. [52]) shows that the rate of an isolated rabbit right atrium is much lower than the in vivo heart rate. Also, there is much more beat to beat variability in the in vivo heart rate. Thus, there is a prevailing sympathicotonus in the rabbit (as in rodents). This does not imply that there is no vagal influence: deafferentiation of the aortic and carotid baroreceptors increases heart rate. Table 1 (compiled from Refs. [74,75]) shows vagal predominance in the dog: the spontaneous heart rate in the instrumented conscious dog is lower (112 beats / min) than under combined muscarinic plus b-adrenoceptor blockade (160 beats / min) [74]. Also, in man vagal predominance results in a much lower resting heart rate than in the intrinsic heart rate shown by Jose and Collison [1]. 182 Determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man Fig. 4. Heart rate in normal conscious rabbits (‘in vivo’) and in rabbits with deafferentiated baroreceptors in the carotic and aortic sinuses (‘deafferentiated’). The isolated right atrium has a lower rate and displays hardly beat to beat variability (‘right atrium’). The in vivo heart rate is faster indicating a prevailing sympathetic tone. A vagal tone is nevertheless present, because deafferentiation causes a further increase in heart rate. Compiled from Ref. [52]. The effect of pharmacological autonomic blockade is complicated. The Table 1 shows differences between the effects of combined muscarinic blockade and b-adrenoceptor blockade and vagotomy and b-adrenoceptor blockade. Obviously, in the conscious dog [74] the intrinsic heart rate is much higher during (complete?) pharmacological blockade (160 beats / min) than during the combination of vagotomy and b-adrenoceptor blockade (95 beats / min). This discrepancy may be due to the presence of Table 1 Heart rate in conscious dogs (1) without pharmacological blockade and (2) with pharmacological autonomic blockade by timolol (0.2 mg / kg and 0.2 mg / kg / h i.v.) and methylatropine (0.5 mg / kg and 0.5 mg / kg / h i.v.) and (3) with vagotomy during b-adrenoceptor blockade (timolol; 0.2 mg / kg and 0.2 mg / kg / h i.v.) and (4) in isolated right atria from dogs a Condition Spontaneous Vagotomy b-adrenoceptor blockade b-adrenoceptor1 muscarinic blockade b-adrenoceptor blockade1 vagotomy Isolated right atrium a Heart rate (beats / min) Reference 112 128 77 [74] [74] [74] 160 [74] 95 127 [74] [75] Compiled from Ref. [74] (‘spontaneous and autonomic blockade’) and Ref. [75] (‘isolated sinus node’). The isolated sinus node data were from pups [75]. cardio-accelerator fibres in the vagal nerves [76–81]. The mediators of this ‘non-muscarinic’ effect is probably a peptide factor [80,81]. Pacemaker shifts are relevant for the chronotropic response to changes in sympathetic (autonomic) tone [36]. The same amount of (nor)epinephrine produces little acceleration, when the acetylcholine concentration or vagal tone is higher [66,82,83]. In contrast, in the presence of a high noradrenaline concentration or a high sympathetic tone, the effect of acetylcholine is large. This phenomenon has been named ‘accentuated antagonism’ and has been explained by interaction between the two limbs of the autonomic nervous system at the pre- and postjunctional sites [82,84]. Although this explanation seems valid, it should be noted that at least the rabbit sinus node comprises areas with low, intermediate and high responsiveness to both transmitters of the autonomic nervous system [67]. A high vagal tone shifts pacemaker dominance to areas with low responsiveness to both transmitters, whereas a high sympathetic tone shifts pacemaker dominance to areas with high responsiveness to both transmitters. It has been observed in dogs that bilateral vagal stimulation results in lower heart rate in combination with stellate ganglion stimulation than in combination with norepinephrine infusion [85]. Although a prejunctional interaction may explain this observation, there certainly is an alternative explanation. High vagal tone will shift the pacemaker to an area with lowest innervation. Such an area may still accelerate in response to circulating catecholamines, but not or much less to sympathetic stimulation, simply because there is little innervation of that particular area. Thus, in addition to pre- or post-junctional interaction, pacemaker shifts certainly in part explain the ‘accentuated antagonism’. We emphasise the intricate mechanism by which the sinus node responds to catecholamines, because heart rate often is taken as an index for general sympathetic or autonomic input to the whole heart. However, even if heart rate is kept constant, although exerted by different combinations of vagal and sympathetic input, it has been demonstrated that refractoriness in atria and ventricles may change substantially [86] (see also [87–89]). 4. Concluding remarks Jose and Collison have demonstrated that the intrinsic heart rate decreases with age in man [1]. Unfortunately, it is not completely certain that the intrinsic heart rate as determined by Jose and Collison [1] really reflects an intrinsic characteristic of the heart. Two issues remain to be settled: (i) The observed decrease in heart rate with age in the combined presence of propranolol and atropine may also be caused by a change in a-adrenoceptor density in the sinus node area. (ii) The non-muscarinic effects of vagal stimulation may change during aging. As long as Key publication: A.D. Jose and D. Collison / Cardiovascular Research 1970 these two issues have not been settled, changes in ‘intrinsic heart rate’ between control groups of patients and groups of patients with heart disease cannot unequivocally be ascribed to an intrinsic property of the heart (the sinus node), even if there is no age difference between the groups. References [1] Jose AD, Collison D. The normal range and determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man. Cardiovasc Res 1970;4:160–167. [2] Opthof T, Coronel R. The normal range and determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man. Historical note on the paper by Jose AD, Collison D. (Cardiovasc Res 1970; 4: 160–167). Cardiovasc Res 2000;45:175–176. [3] Jose AD. Effect of combined sympathetic and parasympathetic blockade on heart rate and cardiac function in man. Am J Cardiol 1966;18:476–478. [4] Jose AD, Taylor RR. Autonomic blockade by propranolol and atropine to study intrinsic myocardial function in man. J Clin Invest 1969;48:2019–2031. [5] Vatner SF, Higgins CB, Braunwald E. Sympathetic and parasympathetic components of reflex tachycardia induced by hypotension in conscious dogs with and without heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 1974;8:153–161. [6] Opthof T., Rademaker H., Vermeulen J.T. et al. Intrinsic sinoatrial cycle length and the responsiveness to acetylcholine increase during the progression of heart failure in the rabbit. Eur Heart J 1997;18 (Abstr Suppl):358 (abstract). [7] Alboni P, Malacarne C, Pedroni P, Masoni A, Narula OS. Electrophysiology of normal sinus node with and without autonomic blockade. Circulation 1982;65:1236–1242. [8] Marcus B, Gillette PC, Garson A. Intrinsic heart rate in children and young adults: an index of sinus node function isolated from autonomic control. Am Heart J 1990;119:911–916. [9] Keith A, Flack M. The form and nature of the muscular connections between the primary divisions of the vertebrate heart. J Anat Physiol 1907;41:172–189. [10] Keith A. The sino-auricular node: a historical note. Br Heart J 1942;4:77–79. [11] Brooks CMC, Lu HH. The sinoatrial pacemaker of the heart, Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1972. [12] Flack M. An investigation of the sino-auricular node of the mammalian heart. J Physiol 1910;41:64–77. [13] Lewis T, Oppenheimer BS, Oppenheimer A. The site of origin of the mammalian heart-beat; the pacemaker in the dog. Heart 1910;2:147–169. [14] Lewis T. The mechanism of the heartbeat, London: Shaw, 1911. [15] Eyster JAE, Meek WJ. The origin and conduction of the heart beat. Physiol Rev 1921;1:1–43. [16] Kleiber M. The fire of life. An introduction to animal energetics, New York: Wiley, 1961. [17] Schmidt-Nielsen K. Scaling. Why is animal size so important, Cambridge / New York / Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1984. [18] Prothero J. Heart weight as a function of body weight in mammals. Growth 1979;43:139–150. [19] Stahl WR. Scaling of respiratory variables in mammals. J Appl Physiol 1967;22:453–460. [20] Sacher GA. Relation of life span to brain weight and body weight in mammals. In: Wolstenholme GEW, editor, Ciba foundation colloquium on aging, Vol 1, 1959, pp. 115–141. [21] Studier EH, Howell DJ. Heart rate of female big brown bats in flight. J Mammal 1969;50:842–845. 183 [22] Kramer K, Van Acker SA, Voss HP et al. Use of telemetry to record electrocardiogram and heart rate in freely moving mice. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 1993;30:209–215. [23] Desai K, Sato R, Schauble E et al. Cardiovascular indexes in the mouse at rest and with exercise: new tools to study models of cardiac disease. Am J Physiol 1997;272:H1053–H1061. [24] White PD, King RL, Jenks J. The relation of heart size to the time intervals of the heart beat, with particular reference to the elephant and the whale. New Engl J Med 1953;248:69–70. [25] Kolbe E. Lehrbuch der physiologie der haustiere, 4th ed., Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1981. [26] Jongsma HJ, Tsjernina L, De Bruijne J. The establishment of regular beating in populations of pacemaker heart cells. A study with tissue cultured rat heart cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1983;15:123–133. [27] Opthof T, Van Ginneken ACG, Bouman LN, Jongsma HJ. The intrinsic cycle length of small pieces isolated from the rabbit sinoatrial node. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1987;19:923–934. [28] Kirchhof CJHJ, Bonke FIM, Allessie MA, Lammers WJEP. The influence of the atrial myocardium on impulse formation in the ¨ rabbit sinus node. Pflugers Arch 1987;410:198–203. [29] Brown HF. Electrophysiology of the sinoatrial node. Physiol Rev 1982;62:505–530. [30] Noble D. The initiation of the heartbeat, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979. [31] Noble D. The surprising heart: a review of recent progress in cardiac electrophysiology. J Physiol 1984;353:1–50. [32] Irisawa H, Brown HF, Giles WG. Cardiac pacemaking in the sinoatrial node. Physiol Rev 1993;73:197–227. [33] Opthof T. Gap junctions in the sinoatrial node: immunohistochemical localization and correlation with activation pattern. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1994;5:138–143. [34] Verheule S. Distribution and physiology of mammalian cardiac gap junctions. Utrecht: University of Utrecht, 1999 (Thesis). [35] Meijler F, Janse MJ. Morphology and electrophysiology of the mammalian atrioventricular node. Physiol Rev 1988;68:608–647. [36] Opthof T. The mammalian sinoatrial node. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1988;1:573–597. [37] Truex RC, Smythe MQ, Taylor MJ. Reconstruction of the human sinoatrial node. Anat Rec 1967;159:371–378. [38] Glomset DJ, Glomset AT. Morphologic study of cardiac conduction system in ungulates, dog and man. Am Heart J 1940;20:389–397. [39] Hayashi K. An electron microscopic study on the conduction system of the cow heart. Jpn Circ J 1962;26:765–842. [40] Joyner RW, Van Capelle FJL. Propagation through electrically coupled cells. How a small SA node drives a large atrium. Biophys J 1986;50:1157–1164. [41] James TN. The sinus node. Am J Cardiol 1977;40:965–986. [42] James TN. Anatomy of the human sinus node. Anat Rec 1961;141:109–139. [43] Lev M. Aging changes in the human sinoatrial node. J Gerontol 1954;9:1–9. [44] Fujino M, Okada R, Arakawa K. The relationship of aging to histological changes in the conduction system of the normal human heart. Jpn Heart J 1983;24:13–20. [45] Buruljanowa I, Wassilew G, Radanov S. Altersbedingte Strukturver¨ anderungen in dem Reizleitungssystem des menslichen Herzens. Zentralbl allg Pathol pathol Anat 1987;133:433–438. [46] Alings AM, Abbas RF, Bouman LN. Age-related changes in structure and relative collagen content of the human and feline sinoatrial node. A comparative study. Eur Heart J 1995;16:1655– 1667. [47] Demoulin JC, Kulbertus HE. Histopathological correlates of sinoatrial disease. Br Heart J 1978;40:1384–1389. ´ [48] Opthof T, De Jonge B, Masson-Pevet M, Jongsma HJ, Bouman LN. Functional and morphological organization of the cat sinoatrial node. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1986;18:1015–1031. [49] James TN, Sherf L, Fine G, Morales AR. Comparative ultrastructure of the sinus node in man and dog. Circulation 1966;34:139–163. 184 Determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man [50] Davies MJ, Pomerance A. Quantitative study of ageing changes in the human inoatrial node and internodal tracts. Br Heart J 1972;34:150–152. [51] Alings AM, Bouman LN. Electrophysiology of the aging rabbit and cat sinoatrial node. A comparative study. Eur Heart J 1993;14:1278– 1288. [52] Bouman LN, Opthof T, Mackaay AJC, Bleeker WK, Jongsma HJ. On the intrinsic cardiac rhythm. In: Bouman LN, Jongsma HJ, editors, Cardiac rate and rhythm, Boston / Dordrecht / Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982, pp. 483–493. [53] Opthof T, Mackaay AJC, Bleeker WK et al. Dependence of the chronotropic effects of calcium, magnesium and sodium on temperature and cycle length in isolated rabbit atria. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1980;212:183–189. [54] Trautwein W, Uchizono K. Electron microscopic and electrophysiologic study of the pacemaker in the sinoatrial node of the rabbit heart. Z Zellforsch 1963;61:96–109. [55] Nilsson E, Sporrong B. Electron microscopic investigation of adrenergic and non-adrenergic axons in the rabbit SA-node. Z Zellforsch 1970;111:404–412. [56] Yamauchi A. Ultrastructure of the innervation of the mammalian ´ heart. In: Challice CE, Viragh S, editors, Ultrastructure of the mammalian heart, London: Academic Press, 1973, pp. 127–172. [57] King TS, Coakley JB. The intrinsic nerve cells of the cardiac atria of mammals and man. J Anat 1958;92:353–379. [58] Meek WJ, Eyster JAE. Experiments on the origin and propagation of the impulse in the heart. Am J Physiol 1914;34:368–383. [59] Toda N, West TC. Interaction between Na, Ca. Mg and vagal stimulation in the S.-A. node of the rabbit. Am J Physiol 1967;212:424–430. [60] Bouman LN, Gerlings ED, Biersteker PA, Bonke FIM. Pacemaker ¨ shift in the sino-atrial node during vagal stimulation. Pflugers Arch 1968;302:255–267. [61] Toda N. Cholinergic actions in the sinoatrial node of the reserpinepretreated rabbit. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1968;159:290–297. [62] Spear JF, Kronhaus KD, Moore EN, Kline RP. The effect of brief vagal stimulation on the isolated rabbit sinus node. Circ Res 1979;44:75–88. [63] Toda N, Shimamoto K. The influence of sympathetic stimulation on transmembrane potentials in the S-A node. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1968;159:298–305. [64] Geesbrecht JM, Randall WC. Area localization of shifting cardiac pacemakers during sympathetic stimulation. Am J Physiol 1971;220:1522–1527. [65] West TC. Ultramicroelectrode recording from the cardiac pacemaker. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1955;115:283–290. [66] Mackaay AJC, Opthof T, Bleeker WK, Jongsma HJ, Bouman LN. Interaction of adrenaline and acetylcholine on cardiac pacemaker function. Functional inhomogeneity of the rabbit sinus node. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1980;214:417–422. [67] Mackaay AJC, Opthof T, Bleeker WK, Jongsma HJ, Bouman LN. Interaction of adrenaline and acetylcholine on sinus node function. In: Bouman LN, Jongsma HJ, editors, Cardiac rate and rhythm, The Hague / Boston / London: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982, pp. 507–523. [68] Tranum-Jensen J. The fine structure of the sinus node: a survey. In: Bonke FIM, editor, The sinus node. Structure, function and clinical relevance, The Hague / Boston / London: Martinus Nijhoff Medical Division, 1978, pp. 149–165. [69] Roberts LA, Slocum GR, Riley DA. Morphological study of the innervation pattern of the rabbit sinoatrial node. Am J Anat 1989;185:74–88. [70] Kostreva DR, Zuperku EJ, Purtock RV, Coon RL, Kampine JP. Sympathetic afferent nerve activity of right heart origin. Am J Physiol 1975;229:911–915. [71] Malliani A, Lombardi F, Pagani M. Sensory innervation of the heart. Prog Brain Res 1986;67:39–48. [72] Beau SL, Hand DE, Schuessler RB et al. Relative densities of muscarinic cholinergic and b-adrenergic receptors in the canine sinoatrial node and their relation to sites of pacemaker activity. Circ Res 1995;77:957–963. [73] Rosenblueth A, Simeone FA. The interrelations of vagal and accelerator effects on the cardiac rate. Am J Physiol 1934;110:42– 45. [74] Roossien A, Brunsting JR, Nijmeijer A, Zaagsma J, Zijlstra WG. Effects of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide on heart rate in relation to vagal cardioacceleration in conscious dogs. Cardiovasc Res 1997;33:392–399. [75] Woods WT, Urthaler F, James TN. Spontaneous action potentials of cells in the canine sinus node. Circ Res 1976;39:76–82. [76] Dale HH, Laidlaw PP, Symons CT. A reversed action of the vagus on the mammalian heart. J Physiol 1910;41:1–18. [77] Kabat H. The cardio-accelerator fibers in the vagus nerve of the dog. Am J Physiol 1940;128:246–257. [78] Donald DE, Samueloff SL, Ferguson D. Mechanisms of tachycardia caused by atropine in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol 1967;212:901– 910. [79] Rigel DF, Lipson D, Katona PG. Excess tachycardia: heart rate after antimuscarinic agents in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol 1984;246:H168–H173. [80] Henning RJ. Vagal stimulation during muscarinic and b-adrenergic blockade increases atrial contractility and heart rate. J Autonom Nerv Syst 1992;40:121–130. [81] Roossien A, Brunsting JR, Nijmeijer A, Schuil HA, Zijlstra WG. Mechanism of the decline in vagal acceleration in dogs in neuroleptanaesthesia. J Autonom Nerv Syst 1995;54:1–8. [82] Levy MN. Sympathetic-parasympathetic interactions in the heart. Circ Res 1971;29:437–445. [83] Opthof T, Mackaay AJC, Bleeker WK, Jongsma HJ, Bouman LN. Cycle length dependence of the chronotropic effects of adrenaline and acetylcholine in the rabbit sinoatrial node. J Autonom Nerv Syst 1983;8:193–204. [84] Zipes DP, Miyazaki T. The autonomic nervous system and the heart: basis for understanding interactions and effects on arrhythmia development. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, editors, Cardiac electrophysiology. from cell to bedside, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1990, pp. 312–330. [85] Takahashi N, Zipes DP. Vagal modulation of adrenergic effects of canine sinus and atrioventricular nodes. Am J Physiol 1983;244:H775–H781. [86] Inoue H, Zipes DP. Changes in atrial and ventricular refractoriness and in atrioventricular nodal conduction produced by combinations of vagal and sympathetic stimulation that result in a constant spontaneous cycle length. Circ Res 1987;60:942–951. [87] Schwartz PJ, Vanoli E, Stramba-Badiale M et al. Autonomic mechanisms and sudden death. New insights from analysis of baroreceptor reflexes in conscious dogs with and without a myocardial infarction. Circulation 1988;78:969–979. [88] Coumel P, Leenhardt A. Mental activity, adrenergic modulation, and cardiac arrhythmias in patients with heart disease. Circulation 1991;83:II58–II70. [89] Rea RF, Martins JB, Mark AL. Baroreflex impairment and sudden death after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1988;78:1072–1074.