Download the rationalized giorgi systemwith absolute volt and ampere

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Electrical resistance and conductance wikipedia , lookup

Electric charge wikipedia , lookup

Quantum vacuum thruster wikipedia , lookup

Time in physics wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic field wikipedia , lookup

History of electromagnetic theory wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup

Field (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Maxwell's equations wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Electrostatics wikipedia , lookup

Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnet wikipedia , lookup

Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup

Metadyne wikipedia , lookup

Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
SEPTEMBER 1948
79. "
THE RATIONALIZED GIORGI SYSTEM WITH ABSOLUTE VOLT AND AMPERE
AS APPLIED IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
by
:P.
CORNELIUS.
537.713
Various systems of electrical units are in use today, these having been introduced in the
course of the development of the theory or practical application of electricity in various
fields. By an efficient combination of the conventional units the rationalized Giorgi
system with absolute volt and ampere has been developed and made suitable to cover the
who I e range of electromagnetism, In this system several electrical quantities are 'given
not only a different value but also a difinition different from that previously employed.
As a result the current in conductors as well as the electrical and the magnetic field
can all be dealt with in an analogous manner. In this article, after a brief review of the
older systems, the rationalized Giorgi units are summarised and explained. The most
important formulae for electromagnetism are tabulated in the form which they assume
when expressed in these units. This table and several of the quantities occuring therein'
are discussed.
Introduetion
The electrostatic
c.g.s. system with its concepts of charge and potential follows naturally
when one starts from the Coulomb's
law and
adopts the mechanical units cm, g, sec with the
accompanying concepts of force and work as given.
The electromagnetic
c.g.s. system with the
concepts of magnet pole, magnetic field strength
and electric current is obtained just as naturally
when one starts from Coulomb's
magnetic law,
and the relation between current and magnetism is
described for instance with the aid of the Biot and
Savart
law.
From electrostatics and electromagnetism one
can arrive at a combined theory, based on
Ma xw e Il a laws with the inherent concepts of
field. If, then, the two c.g.s. systems are taken as
being equivalent, the so-called Gauss
system
is an obvious solution.
The theory of electromagnetism as represented
by the G a u's s system and the requirements of
electrical engineering, in which "practical units"
, are employed, are reconciled in an extremely simple
manner by means of the rationalized
Giorgi
sys tem with absolute volt and ampere. This system
is built up from the conceps of current
and
v oIt a g e, The concept "current", represented as a
charge in motion or as the cause of magnetic
phenomena, plays an important part also in the
line of thought covering the three c.g.s. systems.
The concept "voltage" on the other hand ocoupics a
less prominent place in these systems and is represented therein as a difference in potential or as the
line integralof
the electric field strength. In electrical engineering, however, this concept of voltage
is so fundamental as to be of predominant importance, for here it is commonly said that "the voltage drives the current; through an împedance"
t
and "that the voltage between two conductors
causes an electric field". Regarded from this point
of view the concepts of electromagnetism are of
course often given a different aspect.
Bearing
this
in
mind,
the
rationalized
Giorgi system 1) may be summarized as follows.
The rationalized Giorgi system
The rationalized 2) Gior gi system is based, for
all electrical and magnetic quantities and thus also
for field quantities, upon the volt and ampere, the
units with which everyone is familiar. Further, the
usual e1ectrical units of the ohm (.0), the coulomb
(C), the farad (F) and the henry (H) are maintained. The electrical field strength E is measured
in volts per meter (V/m), and the magnetic field
strength H in amperes per meter (A/m).
The electric flux P passing from positive to
negative charges is measured, like the charge Q
itself, in ampere-seconds or coulombs. The displacement D (a better name is electric induction) may
be regarded as electric flux density and is therefore
measured in A· secfm2 or C/m2.
.
The magnetic flux <P, which encircles a conductor
through which a current is flowing, or which is
induced by the molecular circuit currents of permanent magnets or magnetized iron, is given in
1) Cf. W. de Groot [4]. (Figures between brackets refer to'
the bibliography at the end of this article). There the historical development of electromagnetism is outlined and
the position 'occupied therein by the Giorgi system is
shown. It also deals with the difference between the "absolute" and the "international" volt and ampere. The present
article will show mainly how the rationalized Giorgi
system witb absolute volt and ampere can be applied in
electromagnetism.
2) We are discussing here exclusively the rationalized
Giorgi system. No attention is paid to the question
whether the formulae given here mayalso hold for the
non-rationalized system.
80
VOL. 10, No. 3
PHILIPS TECHNICAL REVIEW
volt-seconds, also called webers (V· sec = Wh).
The magnetic induction B can be regarded as
magnetic flux density and is therefore measured in
V . sec/m2 or Wh/m2.
Giorgi chose as the unit of length the metre instead of the
centimetre, so as to give a simple relation between electrical
and mechanical quantities (see below). The Wh takes the place
of the maxwell, the Wb/m2 the place of the gauss and the Alm
the place of the oersted. In engineering the Alcm, under the
'name of ampere-turns per cm, has long been adopted in the
place of the oersted. It is then a very short step to the Alm.
The Vlcm and also the Giorgi unit VIm have likewise
already become of common use.
In the G a u s s system the displacement D has
the same dimensions as the electric field strength E
at the same point, whilst moreover in vacuum D
and E are identical. Giorgi on the other hand
ascribes to D a value and a dimension different
from E, not only i~ matter but also in vacuum.
The same applies for the magnetic field strength H
and the magnetic induction B. The advantages that
are to be set against this complication will be seen
farther on.
It is to he pointed out that this complication in the Giorgi
system is partly met with also in the electrostatic and the
electromagnetic c.g.s. system. It is true thatin the electrostatic
system D = E in vacuum hut B = HJc2; in the electromagnetic system on the other hand B = H in vacuum hut D =
EJc2• As opposed to the advantage of the Gauss system
that in vacuum D = E and B = H, is the drawback that wc
. find the factor c occuring in many important formulae.
From this it is to he seen that the difference hetween the
electrical systems is not merely a question of numerical factors.
Whereas calculating with say feet instead of metres does not
in principle present any difficulties, the trouble when changing
over from one electrical systcm to another is that quantities
change not only in value hut also in definition and dimension.
This fact is not always sufficiently realized when the three
c.g.s. systems are employed, because in these systems the
electrical quantities are expressed in the same mechanical
units.
It is, therefore, a great advantage of the rationalized
Giorgi system that the definition, or at least the meaning, of
the electrical quantities can easily he recognized from thetnit.
From the' internationally
recognized decimal
system of mass and length units Giorgá took
, the kilogram as mass unit and, as mentioned above,
the metre as length unit. The unit of force in the
Gior gi system is the newton (N), the force inducing in a mass of 1 kg an acceleration of 1 m/sec2
(in some publications the rather misleading expression m/sec/sec is used instead). Provided one
uses the "absolute" (instead of the "international")
volt and ampere, the unit of mechanical work, the
newton-metre, and the unit of electrical energy,
the watt-second (= volt-ampere-second = joule (J))
are exactly identical:
11 N· m = 1 V . A . sec. 1
The relation between the voltage, charge and'
current expressed respectively in the units of the
volt, coulomb and ampere and the forces occuring in
the corresponding fields thus assumes a simple form.
As an application of the Giorgi system a summary is given of the more important relations and
laws of electromagnetism expressed in rationalized
Giorgi units (table I). This table is discussed below.
At the end of this article two other tables are
given in which the formulae and, units of the older
systems are compared with those of the rationalized Giorgi system.
We shall now discuss some of the quantities given ,
in table' I and explain the line of thought underlying the compilation of this table.
Field quantities
Owing to the historical development of electromagnetism, to which expression .is given in the
c.g.s. systems, when speaking of field quantities
one is accustomed to thinking in the first place of
forces. The electric field strength E is there defined
as the force acting on the unit of charge and the
magnetic induction B- as the force acting on the
unit of current element. According to this point
of view D and H are auxiliary quantities for describing fields in matter and are superfluous when
describing vacuum fields.
Since in the Giorgi system the field units are
derived from the voltage and current units volt and
ampere, it is advisahle to replace the usual definitions of field quantities by others based upon me~surements of voltage and current. When represented
in this' manner all four field quantitiee are of
equivalent importance. E and B describe the electromagnetic field with the aid of voltage measurements, D and H with the aid of current measurements, regardless w het,her the field occurs in
matter or in vacuum.
It is then found that 'hy employing rationalized
Giorgi units the current in conductors, the "current field", as well as the electric and the magnetic
field can he dealt with in a manner which in many
respects is similar.
The current field
In homogeneous as well as inhomogeneous cases"]
3) There may be inhomogeneity in the current distribution,
material, etc.
.
SEPTEMBER
THE RATIONALIZED
1948
GIORGI
Table J. Some formulae expressed in rationalized
Current
:field
Ohm's
law
,1
-
(A)
S (siemens)
Electric
Law of self-induction
(1 turn)
G
V
P
(V)
(C)
-
(A/ma)
E
D
(S/m)
(V/m)
(C/ma)
Relations
-
s
V
(V/m)
(m)
(V)
.rJSn
dA .
E-
-
V
(V)
<P
L
1
(Wh)
(H)
(A)
Wb (weber) = V-sec
H = V-secjA
11-
H
(H/m)
(A/m)
B
A
-
s
E
B
(F/m)
(V/m)
(Wh/m2)
the field quantities
homogeneous :fields
D
-
E
s
(V/m)
(m)
-
<P
A
(C/ma) (mD)
(C)
(A/II,12) (ma)
(A)
-
P
A
·S
V
(V)
equations
between
a) in
1
C
(F)
C (coulomb) = A-sec
F = A-secfY
v
-
Magnetic field
field
(lJf = Q)
Vector
S
Giorgi units
Law of capacity
(S)
= AfY
81
SYSTEM
(Wh)
(Wb/mD) (mD)
s *)
H
-
1
(A)
(A/m)
(m)
dA
<P
- JIBn
dA
(C/mD) (m)
(Wh)
b) general
1
-
(A/mD) (mD)
(A)
V
-
-
JEs
ds
V
(V/m)
(m)
(V)
-
(V)
Po
JIDn
(C)
JEs
ds
1
(V/m)
(m)
(A)
lIomogeneous
(S/m)
(S)
C
Capacitor
p
1
V
W
(A)
(V)
(W-sec)
WJm3)
=
ds
(m)
(1 turn)
L
AJs
11-
(H/m) (m2/m)
(H)
Energy
(W)
Space density
fHs
(A/m)
Self-induction
AJs
(F/m) (mD/m)
(F)
(mD/m)
Power
Conductor
(in
8
-
cases
Capacity
Conductance
y
AJs
G
(Wh/mD) (mD)
lP
-
(C)
of the power
(in W-secJm3)=
E
S
tD
(CJmD)
(A/mD) (V/m)
Coil
(IJl = Q)
V
W
(V)
(W-sec)
(1 turn)
t<P
=
Space density of energy
(in W·secJm3) =
Ë
I
_
(Vlm)
1
(Wh)
(A)
tB
H
(Wb/mD) (A/m)
Laws of force
Maxwell
f Es ds
f H, ds
equations
cp
=
-
-
+P
1
(V)
K=<PH
P
<P
Energy
=
ftBndA
equivalent:
,
"
/
I
,
?~
~}~'!r
- ];_
':: ':.~ -:..-_-_
cp
I:
-,
\
"i-. H
"'.
(A)
For the surface A enclosing a part of the space:
= ft Sn dA
= ft »; dA
"I
.'
~+.+
I
!j'."K
"l-, .. : / ,,"
- - - it..
= -
Q ...
(A)
=
Q...
(C)
=
O· ...
(Wjl)
1 V·A·sec = 1 N'm
Value of 11-0:
~
J!!!!!!!!l!IlP
K
[/
=
t PE
KK=IlB
• I
Relation to velocity
11-0 = 4 n/107 ... (lIjm)
of light:
80
Po c2 = 1
*) In this table L represents the entire current surrounded by the flux, in technical language the ampere-turns; s in the case
of a long coil is the length of the coil, and in the case of a toroid th~ length of the circular centre liue.
.
82
PHILIPS TECHNICAL REVIEW
the current in conductors is expressed, as stated
by Ohm, by:
I=GV
(I ... (A); V ... (V); G is the conductance, unit
A/V = 0.-1 = mho = siemens (S)).
In a homogeneous
case we can divide the
current by the cross section perpendicular to its
direction and the voltage by the length in the
direction of current. We may therefore write
Ohm' s law for specific quantities and take these
quantities in the direction in which they have the
greatest value. Thus we arrive at the vector eT,Iation of the current field 4):
8= yE
(8 denotes the current density in A/m2: E is the
electric field strength in V/m and y the conductivity
in AfV·m = Slm). This relation, although it has
been deduced for a homogeneous case, can likewise
serve for describing inhomogeneous
cases. In
most cases the quantity y is a scalar material constant. The numerical value of y is equal to the con, ductance of the "unit conductor" (with dimensions:
length = 1m; cross section = 1m2) of the material
in question in the case of homogeneous distribu. tion of current ..
The electric field
When the voltage on a capacitor is increased
by 1 V then th~ same current impulse
I dt ...
(A . sec) or quantity of charge Q... (coulomb
(e) = A· sec) is always taken up, regardless of the
rate at which the voltage is increased. The value C
of a capacitor denotes the magnitude of this current
impulse or quantity of charge; the unit is the farad
(F) = A· secfV = e/v. The concept of capacitance
and the phenomena related thereto may he described, following Faraday
and Maxwell, as follows. Between 'the plates of a charged capacitor is
an ele~t~ic field. This :fieldaccumulates the energy ..
(V . A . sec) used for the ~harge, and the voltage V ..
(V) between the plates sets up an electric flux
lp. " (A· sec), passing from the positive charge
Q . • • . (A· sec) on one' plate to the negative.
charge Q on the other plate, where the general
relation is:
f
lp=
4)
VOL. 10, No. 3
In a homogeneous
case (plane capacitor in
which. the distance between the plates is small
compared with the plate surface) the electric flux
can he divided by the cross section perpendicular
to its direction and the voltage by th~ length in
that direction. Thus we write the ordinary law of
capacitance for specific quantities and take these
specific quantities in the direction in which they
have the greatest value 5).
Thus we arrive at the vector equation of the
electric field :
D=eE
(D denotes the displacement, i.e. electric flux
density in e/m2; E ... (V/m); 8 is the "(absolute)
dielectric constant" in A· sec/V· m = F/m).
This relation, though deduced for a homogeneous case, can likewise serve for describing inhomogeneous
cases. In the simplest case the quantity 8 is a scalar constant of the dielectric medium
(matter or vacuum). The numerical value of 8 is
equal to the capacity of the "unit capacitor" (with
dimensions: plate separation = 1m; plate surface
= 1m2) in the case of homogeneous field distribution 6). 8 ... (F/m) performs the same function. for
the electric fluoc, as the conductivity y . . . (Slm) for
the electric current.
When using the absolute volt and ampere and
substituting the velocity of light c = 2.9977 6 X lOBm/
sec, the value of the dielectric constant of the vacuum, called the "electric induction constant", is:
80
= l07/4nc2
~
8.855XlO-12
•••
(F/m).
5) The electric flux through a surface can be measured with
the aid of electric 'induction, See e.g. R. W. Pohl [3], p. 29.
6) Homogeneous field distribution can be obtained by means
of a guard ring, see fig. 1.
.
Q= CV.
Vector quantities, which in contrast with scalar quantities
are characterized not only by a dimcnsion and a numerical
value but also by direction, are denoted by letters printed
in heavy type (except in the tables). The equation 'given
here expresses the fact that Sand E bear a certain relation
in value and also have the same direction.
Fig. 1. Plane capacitor with guard ring. Inhomogeneity of the
field occurs only at the outer edge of the ring. Only the charge
of the middle part M is measured, where the field is homogeneous. A ballistic ammeter; B battery; S switch for charging
and discharging the capacitor; V voltmeter.
SEPTEMBER 1948
From the Maxwell
THE RATIONALIZED
theory we have the fundamental relation
Eo(LoC2 =
1.
To derive the value of Eo one therefore has to remember, in
addition to the velocity of light, only the valde of the "magnetic induction constant" (Lo= _4nfl07 ••• (H/m). The meaning
of (Lois explained farther on.
GIORGI SYSTEM
83
(A) of the enclosed current is used to drive the
magnetic flux through the length of the coil.
In this homogeneous
case the magnetic flux
Can be divided by the cross section perpendicular to
its direction and the current by the length in that
The dielectric constant of a material dielectric is
usually denoted by the product of its "relative
dielectric constant" er and eo:
e = ereo ••• (Firn).
er is a non-dimensional
number, the material
constant known of old.
The force exercised upon a charge Q .•. (C) in
an electric field having the field strength E ...
(V/m) is:
K
=
(N).
QE ...
Whenever it is desired to regard the electric field strength E
as a force vector this can also he measured not in V/m but in
the identical unit N/C.
With the aid of the equation given above Coulomb's
law can be deduced by calcnlating the field strength at the
point where there is a charge Q2 from the flux proceeding in
spherical symmetry from a charge Ql"
The magnetic field
Fig. 2. Single-turn coil made from a wide strip of metal, the
width of the strip being the length s of the coil.
direction., We therefore write the normal selfinduction law for specific quantities and take these
quantities in the direction in which they have the
greatest value 8). Thus we arrive at the vector
equation of the magnetic field:
B =!LH
(B denotes the magnetic induction, i.e. magnetic
flux density, in Wb/m2; H is the magnctie field
strength in A/m and !Lthe "(absolute) permeability" in V'· sec/A· m = Hjm},
Although deduced for .a homogeneous case, this
relation can also serve for describing inhomo geneous cases. In the simplest case the quantity !L
is a scalar constant
of the magnetic medium
(matter or vacuum). The numerical value of !L is
equal to the self-inductance of the "unit coil" (1 turn)
having a length of 1 m and an enclosed area of 1
m2) in the case of homogeneous :field distribution 9).
!L. .. (H/m) performs the same function for the
magnetic flux, as e ... (F/m) does for the electricflux
When the current flowing through a loss-free coil
is increased by 1 A, then the same voltage impulse
V dt ... (V . sec) always arises between the ends
of the coil, regardless of the rate at which the current increases. The self-inductance D of a coilindicates the magnitude of this voltage impulse;
the unit is the henry (H) = V . sec/A.
According to the method of representation followed by Faraday
and Maxwell a current is surrounded by a magnetic field. This field accummulates the energy ... (V· A . sec) that is used for
starting a current. The current I ... (A) flowing in
(S/m) for the current.
a coil of a single turn thereby gives rise to a
In the case of ferromagnetic, media !Lis often
magnetic flux (jj... (V· sece=weher (Wh)) enveloping
a scalar quantity but depending on H and
the wire, the general relation applying for a single previous history of the material (hysteresis).
turn being:
The permeability of the vacuum, called
"magnetic induction constant", when using
(jj=LI.,
f
Let, us now consider a long coil of a single turn
consisting, for instance, of a wide strip of metal.
The width of the strip is the length of the coil (see
fig. 2) 7). In this coil the field is practically homogeneous, and negligible in the space outside the
coil. Practically the entire "magnetomotive force".
I
7) This is the ideal solenoid, without any Ieakage of the
magnetic field between the windings, which occurs in the
case of a solenoid whose windings are mutually insulated.
still
the
the
the
8) The magnetic flux through a surface can he measured by
means of an induction test. See e.g, R. W. Pohl [3], P74. The "magnetic tension" between two points .•• (Al
can be measured by the Rogowski method. See e.g, R.
W. Pohl [3], pp. 76-80. For practical reasons this
'measurement is carried out as measurement of the impulse
of an open voltage (fVdt).
When we imagine a
Rogowski coil as having a negligible resistance and shortcircuited with a resistance-free ammeter, then in this
manner the "magnetic tension" can also be measured
directly as a number of short-circuit ampere-turns.
9) Homogeneous field distribution can he obtained by using
extension coils (see jig. 3.)
\
.,.
00
Table IT. Comparative table of formulea
-
Rationalized Giorgi
rot E = _: B ... (V/m2)
rot H = D
S ... (A/m2)
Maxwell's
laws
ë
rot E = - B!e
rot H = Die
4nSIe
rot E = rot H = ÏJ
ë
.. , (A/m3)
... (C/m3)
... ,(Wb/m3)
div S = div D = 4n e
0
div B =
E ... (A/m2)
E ' ... (C/m2)
H .,. (Wh/m2)
S = y E
D = 8r E
B = ftr H
'e
0
S = y
D=8
B = ft
Electrostatic c.g.s.
(e ~ 3.1010 cm/sec)
+
+
div S = div D =
div B =
Gauss
(e ~ 3.1010 cm/sec)
Law of induction
V =-(p
...
(V)
V = - eP/e
Plane capacitor
C = 8A/s
...
(F)
C = 8rA/4 n s
...
.,.
C = r
...
(H)
L. = 4 n n ftr A]« ...
Field strength in long coil , H = n I]s
...
(A/m)
H = 4 nn I/cs
Space density of encrgy
iED+1HB
... (W·sec/m3)
K=
...
C = 8·4nr
l:0ng coil
L, = n2ftA/s
(n t~s)
, .,.
(n turns)
Force on a charge
Coulomb's
law
~
QE
K
=
QvB
Force on straight
K
=
IlB
K
=
ft I1I21j2nr
Force between two
parallel "wires
Force between to
charged plates
K=lQE=llJlE
Force between to
plane magnet poles
K'
.
rot E = rot H = iJ
ë
div S = div D = 4n e
0
div B =
+. 4nS
ë
div S = div D = 4n e
·0
div B =
S = y E
D = 8r E/c2
B = ftr H
S = y E
D =.:: e-: E
B = ftr H/c2
"ti
2
(cm)
(cm)
C = 8rA/4ns
••. (cm)
C = r
...
....IJ::t-<
...."ti
tn
t-,3
..
(cm)
l'j
C')
L '= 4 n n2 ftr A/s .,. (cm)
(cm)
1E D/4 n
...
+ 1H B/4 n
K = QE
H = 4 in n
(oersted)
Ï
/
s ... (oersted)
(erg/cm3)
...
(dyne)
K=
(dyne)
K
l'j
:a
=
QE
...
(dyne)
Ql Q2/err2
•••
(dyne)
Ql Q2/êrr2
...
.. , (N)
K
=
QvBlc
.. , (dyne)
K=
QvB·
. ... (dyne)
...
(N)
K = 1Z B/c
...
(dyne)
K=
I ZB
... (dyne)
...
(N)
K
=
2ftrltI21/c2 r ...
(dyne)
K
K
= 1Q E = 1A
(N).
=iCPH
... (N)
K
=i
D E/4 n
... (dyne)
cp H/4 n
... (dyne)
E:;
~
....
...
=
...
~
....
C')
K
K = Ql Q2/e'4nr2 . .• (N)
Force on charge in motion
wire
(N)
B
B
+ 4.nS
V=-eP
(F),
Sphere
Electromagnetic c.g.s,
(e ~ 3.1010 cm/sec)
K
=
iQ E
= i AD
...
=
2p.rI1121/r... (dyne)
-<
o
E/4 tn:
(dyne)
r-'
,_.
?
K
= i CPH/4n
••• (dyne)
~
?
tIJ
en
Table ill. Comparison of the units of different systems
Notes:
t<:I
"d
i
1) It is to be borne in mind that the formulae denoting the relation between the various quantities may differ for the different systems (cf. table II).
2) In this table c is the numerical value of the velocity of light in m/sec: 2.99776 . lOB
I
A
Voltage V
V
Charge Q
1 C (coulomb)
= 1 A'sec
Resistance R
In
= 1 V/A
Capacitance C
IF
= 1 A'sec/V
Self-induction L
lH
,
Electric field strength E
s; dA)
Magnetic induction B
Magnetic field strength
Force K
Energy W
1 V·sec/A
C
(lJ! = Q)
C/m2
V/m
1 Wh (weber)
= 1 V'sec
Wh/m2
If
c.g.s.
1 e.s.u. = I/lOc
~ 3.33.10
... (A)
1 e.s.u, = c/l06
~
...
~
...
,
Electric flux lJ!
(= If »; dA)
Displacement,
electric induction D
t::C
3 . lOB •.
~
.....
..,.
Gauss
Electromagnetic c.g.s.
\0
00
Current I
Magnetic flux tjj
(= If
Electrostatic
Giorgi
R:i
A/m
1 e.s.u, = I/lOc
1 e.s.u. = c2/105
lcm
= 105/c2
1 e.s.u, = c2/105
300
(V)
3.33.10
(C)
10
10
1 e.m.u,
= 10
.•. (A)
1 e.m.u,
= 10-8
... (V)
1 e.m.u.
= 10
... (C)
= 10-9
... (n)
= 109
•.. (F)
= 10-9
... (H)
~ 9.1011
1 e.m.u,
... (n)
~ 1.1l·1O-12
1 e.m.u,
... (F)
~ 9.1011
lcm
... (H)
1 e.s.u. = 10 1/4nc ~ 2.65.10-11
... (C)
1 e.s.u, = 103/4nc ~ 2.65.10-7
... (C/m2)
4
~ 3.104
1 e.s.u. = c/l0
... (V/m)
1 e.s.u. = c/l06'
~ 300
... (Wb) .
~ 3.106
1 e.s,u, = c/l02
... (Wh/m2)
~ 2.65.10-9
1 e.s.u. = 10/4nc
... (A/m)
,
1 dyne = 1 g·cmfsec2 = 10-5N
1 N (newton)
= 1 kg'm/sec2
1 N'm = 1 W'sec
1 erg = 1 dyne·cm
= 1 V·A'sec
,= 10-7 N'm
= 1 J (joule)
1 e.m.u,
1 maxwell = 10-8
1 gauss
... (Wh)
= c/l0s
lcm
.. , (C)
5
= 10 /4n ~ 7.96,103
... (C/m2)
.•. (V/m)
1 e.s.u.
1 e.s.u,
= 10/4n ~ 7:96.10
= 10-6
= I/lOc
1 e.s.u.
1 e.m.u,
1 e.m.u,
1 e.s.u,
I
I
-
= 10-9
1 e.s.u,
,
= 10 1/4nc~ 2.65.10
1 e.s.u,
1 e.s.u.
10
~ 300
... (V)
= I/lOc ~ 3.33.10 10
... (C)
2
5
= c /10 ~ 9.1011
... (n)
= 105/c2. ~ 1.1l·10-12
.,. (F)
lcm
... (H)
...
3
--: 10 /4nc ~
...
4
~
= c/l0
...
1 maxwell= 10-8
= 10.-4 ... (Wh/m2) 1 gauss
I oersted = 103/4n ~ 79.6
.. , (A/m)
~ 3.33.10
... (A)
= 10-4
M
!:d
~
o
~
>-<
@
11
(C)
2.65.10-7
(C/m2)
3.104
(V/m)
S3
o
a:5
>-<
~
~
s:::
... (Wh)
... (Wb/m2)
1 oersted = 103/4n ~ 79.6
... (Alm)
1 dyne
= 19'cmfsec2= 10-5N 1 dyne
= 1 g·cmfsec2= 10-5 N
I erg
= 1 dyne·cm
= 1 dyne·cm
= 10-7 N'm
= 10-7N'm
~
1 erg
00
CIl
PHILIPS
86
TECHNICAL REVIEW
VOL. 10, No. 3
flowing through it and it is directed perpendicular
to the direction of a homogeneous magnetic field,
is at right-angles to these two directions and has
the value:
K= IlB ... (N).
Whenever it is reqnired to regard the magnetie induction
B as à force vector this can also be measured not in Wbfm2
but in the identical unit NfA' m..
By means of' this equation one can find the force between
two parallel conductors by calculating the induction caused
at 12 by the field strength due to 11, It is with the aid of
this force that the "Comité international des Poids et Mesures"
has defined the absolute ampere 10).
Fig. 3. Coil consisting of a centre piece with extension coils.
Inhomogeneity of the field occurs at the ends. Only the voltage impulse of the centre piece is measured, where the field
is homogeneous and equals Ijs. A denotes ammeter; B battery,
R and RI variable resistors for making IJSI = Ijs; S switch
for switching the currents I and lIon and off; V ballistic
voltmeter not consuming any current.
absolute volt and ampere has the value:
1
ILo = 4']1;/107
•••
(H/m)·1
Now that we have learnt the meaning of (lo we can remember
the definition of the absolute volt and ampere from the following: the product of V and A is given by the energy equation
1 N . m = 1 V . A . sec: the quotient of V and A is given by
(lo = 417,JI07 •••
(V, secjA' m). The reader will now understand why in this article these two formulae - upon which
the whole Giorgi system can be built up - have been given
special promineuce by framing them.
It is common practice to indicate the permeability
of a material magnetic medium as the product of
its "relative permeability" ILr and ILo:
IL = ILrlLo •••
(Him) ..
!Lris a non-dimensional number, the material constant k310~ of old.
.
The force exercised upon a straight conductor
of the length 1 : .. (m), when a current I ... (A) is
The foregoing should have made it clear how, by
using the rationalized Giorgi
system, one can
deal in like manner with the important concepts of
electromagnetism, viz. current field, electric field,
magnetic field, and the phenomena related thereto.
For those who are accustomed to working with
the older systems and now wish to change over to
the rationalized Giorgi
system it may well be
useful to be able to compare the formulae and units
of the old systems with those of the new one.
For this purpose we have compiled tables IJ and
Ill. For practical application particular attention
is drawn to the note 1) to table Ill.
BmLIOGRAPHY
[1] G. Giorgi, La mëtrologie ' éleetrique classique et les
systèmes d'unités qui en dérivent. Examen critique,
Revue Gén. d'Electr. 40, 459-4.68, 1936.
[2] G. Giorgi, La métrologie électrique nouvelle et la construction de système électrotechnique absolu M.K.S.,
Revue Gén. d'Electr. 42, 99-107, 1937.
[3] R. W. Pohl, Elektrizitätslehre,
1943 (8th and 9th editions).
publ.
Springer, Berlin,
[4] W. de Groot, The origin ofthe Giorgi system of electrical
units, Philips Techn. Rev. 10, 55-60, 1948 (No. 2).
10) W. de Groot
[4], p. 58.