* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Senate Passes Amended Version of Emergency Economic
Short (finance) wikipedia , lookup
Private money investing wikipedia , lookup
Market (economics) wikipedia , lookup
Stock trader wikipedia , lookup
Private equity secondary market wikipedia , lookup
Interbank lending market wikipedia , lookup
Mutual fund wikipedia , lookup
Financial crisis wikipedia , lookup
Investment management wikipedia , lookup
Troubled Asset Relief Program wikipedia , lookup
Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act wikipedia , lookup
Global Financial Restructuring Client Alert Global October 2, 2008 This information is intended to provide clients with information on recent legal developments and issues of significant interest. It should not be regarded as legal advice or opinion. Our Global Financial Restructuring Team brings together an interdisciplinary team of lawyers with the combined experience needed to address and resolve the complex issues currently confronting clients. Through our extensive network of 70 offices worldwide, we provide expertise and seamless service to clients across multiple jurisdictions and practice areas including Financial Restructuring and Creditor’s Rights, Purchase and Sale of Distressed Assets, Distressed Debt Trading, Derivatives, Structured Finance, Real Estate, Dispute Resolution, M&A, Post Acquisition Integration and Tax. Our experienced lawyers have guided clients through the turbulent times over the last three decades, including the 1980s debt crisis in Latin America, the early 1990s debt crisis in the US and Europe and the 1997 Asian financial crisis. For further information please contact the current Baker & McKenzie LLP attorney with whom you work, or any of the individuals listed below Barry Metzger North America Banking and Finance Tel: +1 212 626 4812 [email protected] Richard D. Rudder North America Banking and Finance Tel: +1 212 861 3704 [email protected] Andrew Lockhart Asia Pacific Banking and Finance Tel: +852 2846 1912 [email protected] Olaf Gebler Europe and Middle East Banking and Finance Tel: +49 69 29908 240 [email protected] Maritza Meszaros Latin America Banking and Finance Tel: +58 212 276 5031 [email protected] We will be running a series of webinars related to these alerts. If you would be interested in these webinars please contact [email protected] www.bakernet.com This may qualify as “Attorney Advertising” requiring notice in some jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Senate Passes Amended Version of Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008; SEC Clarifies FASB 157; Treasury Acts on Money Market Guarantees The United States Senate has approved a modestly amended version of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as previously rejected by the House of Representatives, as part of a combined legislative package which includes the Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008 and the Tax Extenders and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008. Neither of these additional elements of the legislative package directly addresses provisions of the proposed Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “Act”), though Congressional leaders viewed the combination of the three pieces of proposed legislation as enhancing the likelihood of the Act’s passage. Please see Baker & McKenzie’s September 30, 2008 Client Alert: If Enacted, Proposed Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 Leaves Many Questions Unanswered Regarding Participating Financial Institutions. This Client Alert addresses the changes adopted by the Senate, and separate actions taken by the Securities and Exchange Commission interpreting mark-to-market standards under FASB 157 and by the Treasury Department to implement the money market guarantee program announced on September 19, 2008. Senate Version of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 The Act increases, from the date of its enactment through December 31, 2009, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) coverage of insured deposits at insured depository institutions and National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund coverage of shares at insured credit unions from $100,000 to $250,000. Such temporary increases in deposit and share insurance are to be disregarded by the FDIC and the National Credit Union Administration Board in assessing premiums against insured depository institutions and credit unions (meaning that no additional assessments will be levied on the covered institutions for the enhanced coverage). For the purpose of effecting this increased coverage, the FDIC and the National Baker & McKenzie Credit Union Administration Board may obtain loans from the Secretary of the Treasury. [Section 136; note, numbering in the Senate version of the Act is identical to that in the earlier House version, save for the addition of this Section 136 and the renumbering of subsequent sections.] The Senate version of the Act also makes changes to the earlier House version, clarifying certain provisions and eliminating a number of inconsistencies in the draft legislation, as follows: • • Any financial institutions participating in the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), the securities of which are traded on a national securities exchange, is to provide the Secretary with a warrant to receive non-voting common stock or preferred stock or voting stock which the Secretary agrees not to vote, as determined appropriate by the Secretary. In respect of any financial institution participating in TARP, the securities of which are not traded on a national securities exchange, such institution is to provide to the Secretary a warrant for non-voting common stock or preferred stock or a senior debt instrument. Warrants provided to the Secretary by a financial institution whose shares are nationally traded are to provide for conversion to a senior debt instrument or contain other provisions to ensure that the Secretary is appropriately compensated for the value of the warrant in the event the shares of such financial institution are no longer nationally traded. Other provisions of the House version of the Act relating to such warrants and senior debt instruments (as described in yesterday’s Client Alert) continue in the Senate version. [Section 113] The inconsistency between the persons (executive officers) to whom restrictions on executive compensation set out in the House bill are applicable in respect of direct purchases of troubled assets [Section 111(b)(2)A)] and the persons (senior executive officers) to whom restrictions on executive compensation set out in the House bill are applicable in respect of auction purchases of troubled assets [Section 111(c)(2)] has been corrected by making all such restrictions applicable to “senior executive officers” who are defined as any of the five most highly paid executives, whose remuneration is required to be disclosed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and their “non-public company counterparts.” SEC Interpretation of Mark-to-Market Requirements On September 30, 2008, the SEC issued a press release entitled “SEC Office of the Chief Accountant and FASB Staff Clarifications on Fair Value Accounting” (SEC Release 2008-234, the “SEC Clarifications”). The SEC Clarifications are of the standards for fair value measurement of assets set out in FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. The SEC’s release emphasizes that, in the absence of an “active market” for a security, the determination of fair value “often requires significant judgment” by a company’s management and by its auditors. It states that “broker quotes may be an input when measuring fair value, but are not necessarily determinative if an active market does not exist for the security.” It goes on to say that: 2 Client Alert The results of disorderly transactions are not determinative… The concept of a fair value measurement assumes an orderly transaction between market participants… Distressed or forced liquidation sales are not orderly transactions… Determining whether a particular transaction is forced or disorderly requires judgment. …Transactions in inactive markets may be inputs when measuring fair value, but would likely not be determinative… [I]f prices in an inactive market do not reflect current prices for the same or similar assets, adjustments may be necessary to arrive at fair value. A significant increase in the spread between the amount sellers are “asking” and the price that buyers are “bidding,” or the presence of a relatively small number of “bidding” parties, are indicators that should be considered in determining whether a market is inactive … [which] requires judgment. The SEC Clarifications also address the standards which should be applied, in the exercise of judgment, as to whether a decline in value is an “other-thantemporary decline,” including consideration of the length of time and the extent to which the market value of the asset has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent and ability of the holder to retain its investment for a period sufficient to allow a recovery in market value. It is anticipated that the SEC Clarifications will assist issuers, in preparation of their 3Q2008 financial statements, to take a more robust view of asset values of mortgage-related securities and derivatives than would otherwise be the case. The Senate version of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as noted in our Client Alert dated September 30, 2008, grants to the SEC the authority to suspend the application of FASB 157 and mandates an SEC study of the impact of FASB 157 within 90 days of the Act’s enactment. Treasury Money Market Guarantee Program The Treasury Department has now opened its Temporary Guarantee Program for Money Market Funds (the “Money Market Guarantee Program”). The Money Market Guarantee Program is available to any money market fund which (i) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, (ii) has a policy of maintaining a stable net asset value or share price of $1, (iii) operates in compliance with Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act (the principal rules and regulations applicable to money market funds, as promulgated by the SEC), (iv) publicly offers its shares under an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, and (v) had a net asset value per share as of the close of business on September 19, 2008 of not less than $0.995 and was then accepting redemption requests. Money market funds may elect to participate in the Money Market Guarantee Program by application prior to October 8, 2008 and by entering into a standard form of Guarantee Agreement with the Treasury Department and paying the required participation fee. Both taxable and taxexempt money market funds and retail and institutional money market funds can participate, but not individual investors in such funds. 3 Baker & McKenzie The program guarantees the payment of $1 per share upon liquidation of the participating money market fund for shares held at the close of business on September 19, 2008 (or, if less, for the number of shares held upon the fund’s liquidation), to the limit of funds available to the Treasury for the Money Market Guarantee Program. A participating fund must agree to maintain, and extend if possible, any agreement in effect on September 19, 2008 obligating a third party to support the fund’s net asset value and, upon the occurrence of a Guarantee Event, must promptly demand payments due under any such agreement. Treasury will make guarantee payments to a participating fund provided that the fund has initiated liquidation within five business days of a Guarantee Event and the fund being liquidated within 30 days of the Guarantee Event. A Guarantee Event is triggered if a participating fund’s net asset value falls below $0.995, unless promptly cured. Participating funds must pay an upfront fee of one basis point on the value of the fund’s shares, for funds with a net asset value per share of at least $0.9975 at the close of business on September 19, 2008 or of 1.5 basis points for funds with a net asset value per share of less than $0.9975 but greater than $0.995 on that date. The Money Market Guarantee Program has an initial term ending on December 31, 2008 and may be renewed by the Secretary of the Treasury up to the close of business on September 18, 2009. The Program only covers Guarantee Events occurring before expiration of the Program’s term. If the Program is extended, additional fees will be payable by participating funds. Payments under the Money Market Guarantee Program are to be made from the Exchange Stabilization Fund (which has approximately $50 billion in assets). The Senate version of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act requires the Secretary of the Treasury to reimburse the Exchange Stabilization Fund for any payments from the Fund made under the Program. Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a “partner” means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an “office” means an office of any such law firm. ©2008 Baker & McKenzie All rights reserved. 4