* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Document
Survey
Document related concepts
Challenger expedition wikipedia , lookup
Marine geology of the Cape Peninsula and False Bay wikipedia , lookup
Anoxic event wikipedia , lookup
Marine biology wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on oceans wikipedia , lookup
Marine life wikipedia , lookup
Arctic Ocean wikipedia , lookup
Physical oceanography wikipedia , lookup
Marine habitats wikipedia , lookup
Abyssal plain wikipedia , lookup
Critical Depth wikipedia , lookup
Marine microorganism wikipedia , lookup
Ecosystem of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54(1), 2009, 160–170 2009, by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc. E Seasonal changes of bacterial and archaeal communities in the dark ocean: Evidence from the Mediterranean Sea Christian Winter,1,2 Marie-Emmanuelle Kerros, and Markus G. Weinbauer Microbial Ecology and Biogeochemistry Group, CNRS, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche, 06234 Villefranchesur-Mer CEDEX, France; Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche, BP 28, 06234 Villefranche-sur-Mer CEDEX, France Abstract The study site located in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea was visited nine times in 2005–2006 to collect water samples from the epipelagic (5 m), mesopelagic (200 m, 600 m), and bathypelagic (1000 m, 2000 m) zones. The relative abundance of Bacteria, Crenarchaea, and Euryarchaea was determined by catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH). Apparent richness (total number of phylotypes detected) and community composition (different phylotypes detected) of Bacteria and Archaea were assessed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified fragments of the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene followed by sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of selected phylotypes. The relative abundance of Crenarchaea and Euryarchaea in the epipelagic zone increased as stratification decreased. Apparent bacterial richness increased with decreasing stratification in the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones. Deep vertical mixing at the study site represented the beginning of a seasonal succession. The effects of this succession were detectable throughout the water column and led to distinct prokaryotic communities in different depth layers during the stratified period. The seasonal variability in the relative abundance of Bacteria, as well as apparent prokaryotic richness and community composition, was comparable between the different depth layers. This suggests that prokaryotic communities of the dark ocean can be as dynamic as those found at the surface. Our study site in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea is characterized by unusually warm (,13uC) deep waters year round and a uniform water column in winter with the potential for deep vertical mixing. As early as 1990, the deep water of the western Mediterranean Sea was shown to have warmed by 0.12uC in the period from 1959 to 1988, reflecting the increased surface temperatures in winter (Béthoux et al. 1990). The study by Béthoux et al. (1990) also suggests that deep vertical mixing appears to be very effective in distributing changes occurring at the surface to deeper waters within a relatively short period of time. The mesopelagic (200–1000-m depth) and bathypelagic (1000–4000-m depth) zones together comprise ,75% of the volume of the global ocean and, thus, constitute the world’s largest aquatic ecosystem. Yet our knowledge of the microbial processes in the deep ocean is still limited. Only recently, significant progress has been made in our understanding of deep-water prokaryotic communities and their roles in the carbon and nitrogen cycle (Herndl et al. 2005; Ingalls et al. 2006; Wuchter et al. 2006). Owing to logistical difficulties in sampling deep waters over the course of months to years, few studies on potentially occurring seasonal developments in the prokaryotic compartment of mesopelagic and bathypelagic waters exist (Karner et al. 2001; Tanaka and Rassoulzadegan 2002; Fuhrman et al. 2006). The aim of this study was to collect data on seasonal changes of prokaryotic communities in deep waters as compared with the surface. A combination of methods was used to be able to progressively home in on specific prokaryotic groups or taxa. We used catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARDFISH) to enumerate Bacteria, Crenarchaea, and Euryarch- Seasonality in surface waters of temperate oceanic regions is a well characterized and annually reoccurring succession of events (Longhurst 1998) that can be traced through all levels of the pelagic food web including bacterial communities (Fuhrman et al. 2006). Although the specifics may vary depending on the study area, seasonality in the surface layer is usually coordinated by the buildup and erosion of a thermocline that limits the exchange of nutrients between the epipelagic zone and deeper waters during the stratified period. A thermocline also allows for the accumulation of a substantial phytoplankton biomass by preventing single-celled photosynthetic organisms to sink out of the epipelagic zone. 1 Present address: University of British Columbia, Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Oceanography, 1461-6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada. 2 Corresponding author ([email protected]). Acknowledgments We thank Jean-Claude Marty, Jacques Chiaverini, Floriane Girard, and Stéphane Gouy for organizing the cruises to the Dynamique des Flux de Matière en Mediterranée (DYFAMED) site and for making room in the already tight schedule to incorporate yet another hydrocast for this study. The captains and crews of RV Tethys II are greatly acknowledged for their assistance at sea. Maria-Luiza Pedrotti kindly provided the epifluorescence microscope for analyzing the catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH) samples. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. The European Commission was financially supporting this study in the form of a Marie Curie postdoctoral fellowship to C.W. (project ILVIROMAB, 007712). The cruises were financed by Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers—Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (INSU-CNRS). 160 Prokaryotic communities in deep waters 161 September 2005 and June 2006 the sampling scheme was amended to cover 5-m, 200-m, 600-m, 1000-m, and 2000-m depth. From each depth a total volume of 2 liters was retrieved and processed aboard ship immediately after sampling as described below. Fig. 1. Geographic map of the location of the Dynamique des Flux de Matière en Mediterranée (DYFAMED) time series station. Bathymetry outlines the basin of the Ligurian Sea and is based on 5-min gridded elevation data (ETOPO5). The inset shows southwestern Europe and highlights the area of the main map for better orientation. The map was created using the online map creation tool at http://www.aquarius.ifm-geomar.de/ and was subsequently modified. aea. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified portions of the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene was used to assess the bacterial and archaeal community composition followed by sequencing of selected taxa. Methods Study site and sampling—The study was conducted at the Dynamique des Flux de Matière en Mediterranée (DYFAMED) time series station, a former Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS) station. The DYFAMED time series station is located in the center of the Ligurian Basin of the Mediterranean Sea (43u259N, 07u529E) in ,2400 m of water (Fig. 1). The central part of the Ligurian Sea is composed of a homogenous waterbody isolated from direct coastal inputs by the Liguro-Provençal current and is easily accessible by ship. The site was visited nine times with RV Tethys II in 2005–2006 (02 July 2005, 27 September 2005, 25 October 2005, 19 December 2005, 07 February 2006, 07 March 2006, 02 April 2006, 06 May 2006, 30 June 2006). Sampling was performed using 12-liter Niskin bottles mounted on a carousel sampler (SBE 32; Sea-Bird Electronics) also holding the conductivity–temperature– depth (CTD) sensors (SBE 911; Sea-Bird Electronics). In July 2005, samples were retrieved from 5 m, 600 m, and 2000 m, whereas during the next eight visits between CARD-FISH—Samples for CARD-FISH (10–50 mL depending on sampling depth) were fixed with formaldehyde (2% final concentration) aboard ship and stored at 4uC for up to 24 h. Subsequently, prokaryotic cells were collected on 0.22-mm pore size membrane filters (Cyclopore polycarbonate membrane, 25-mm diameter, cat. No. 7060-2502; Whatman). The filters were air dried and stored at 220uC until analysis. CARD-FISH was performed using the probes Eub338 (targeting Bacteria; 59GCT GCC TCC CGT AGG AGT-39; Amann et al. 1990), Non338 (antisense probe to assess nonspecific background; 59-ACT CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC-39; Wallner et al. 1993), Cren537 (targeting Crenarchaea; 59-TGA CCA CTT GAG GTG CTG-39; Teira et al. 2004), and Eury806 (targeting Euryarchaea; 59-CAC AGC GTT TAC ACC TAG-39; Teira et al. 2004). Permeabilization, hybridization, and mounting of filter slices on slides followed the protocol of Teira et al. (2004). The slides were examined under an Axioskop 2 microscope (Zeiss) equipped with a 100 Watt mercury lamp and appropriate filter sets for 49,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and Alexa488 (Invitrogen-Molecular Probes). More than 250 DAPI-stained cells in a minimum of 20 fields of view were counted per sample. Determination of bacterial and archaeal community composition—Sample preparation and nucleic acid extraction: Samples (1 liter) were filtered through 0.22-mm pore size filters (Cyclopore polycarbonate membrane, 47-mm diameter, cat. No. 7060-4702; Whatman) to collect the prokaryotic cells on the filters within 1 h of sampling. Subsequently, filters were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at 280uC until analysis. Extraction of nucleic acids from the filters was performed using an Ultraclean Soil DNA Kit (cat. No. 12800100; MO BIO Laboratories). The filters were cut into small pieces and transferred into the extraction tubes using ethanol-flamed forceps and scissors. In order to minimize shear damage to the nucleic acids, the alternative lysis method as detailed in the manufacturer’s instructions involving two heating steps to 70uC for 5 min was performed. Nucleic acid extracts had a final volume of 50 mL in solution S5 (the solution contains no ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]; contents are proprietary information by MO BIO Laboratories) and were directly used as template in subsequent PCR reactions. PCR amplification: The primer pair 341F (59-CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC AG-39; Muyzer et al. 1995) and 907R (59-CCG TCA ATT CMT TTG AGT TT-39; Schäfer et al. 2001) was used to amplify a 586-bp long fragment (E. coli numbering positions 341–927) of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. A 591-bp long fragment (E. coli numbering positions 344–935) of the archaeal 16S rRNA gene was amplified using primers 344F (59-ACG GGG YGC AGC AGG CGC 162 Winter et al. GA-39; Raskin et al. 1994) and 915R (59-GTG CTC CCC CGC CAA TTC CT-39; Stahl and Amann 1991). A 40-bp long GC clamp (59-CGC CCG CCG CGC CCC GCG CCC GTC CCG CCG CCC CCG CCC G-39; Muyzer et al. 1996) was attached to the 59 end of the forward primers 341F and 344F to obtain PCR fragments suitable for DGGE analysis. The resulting PCR fragments had a length of 626 bp and 631 bp for the bacterial and archaeal amplifications, respectively. We used 1–2 mL of the nucleic acid extracts as template in PCR reactions. PCR chemicals were from MBI Fermentas, primers were purchased from MWG-Biotech, and cycling was performed in a Mastercycler thermal cycler (Eppendorf). Each 50-mL PCR reaction contained 5 mL of 103 Taq buffer (100 mmol L 21 Tris-HCl [pH 8.8], 500 mmol L 21 KCl, 0.8% Nonidet P40), 4 mL of 25 mmol L21 MgCl2, 1.25 mL of 10 mmol L21 dNTP (deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate) mix, 0.5 mL of 100 mmol L21 primers, and 0.25 mL of 5 U mL21 Taq polymerase. Bacterial PCR reactions started with an initial denaturation at 95uC for 1 min followed by 30 cycles with denaturation at 95uC for 1 min, annealing at 56uC for 1 min, and elongation at 72uC for 1 min. A touchdown protocol was used for archaeal PCR reactions (Casamayor et al. 2000) with an initial denaturation at 95uC for 5 min, followed by 20 cycles with 95uC for 1 min, 71uC for 1 min decreasing every cycle by 0.5uC to 61uC, and 72uC for 3 min, followed by another 15 cycles at 95uC for 1 min, 61uC for 1 min, and 72uC for 3 min. The final elongation step of bacterial and archaeal PCR reactions was performed at 72uC for 30 min in order to prevent the formation of artificial double bands in subsequent DGGE analysis (Janse et al. 2004). PCR fragments were cleaned and concentrated using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions resulting in a final volume of 28 mL in elution buffer (Qiagen). Standard agarose gel electrophoresis was used to size and quantify the PCR fragments. DGGE analysis: DGGE analysis was performed on an Ingeny phorU (Ingeny International) DGGE electrophoresis system. PCR products (200 ng per sample) were loaded on 6% polyacrylamide gels containing linear gradients (20–70%) of formamide and urea. Electrophoresis was performed at 100 V and 60uC for 16 h in 13 TAE (tris-acetic acid-ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid) buffer (40 mmol L21 Tris, 20 mmol L21 acetic acid, 1 mmol L21 EDTA, pH 8.3). The gels were stained with SYBR gold (1 : 10,000 dilution of stock solution; Invitrogen-Molecular Probes) for 30 min before digitized gel images were obtained using a gel doc EQ (Bio-Rad) gel documentation system. The images were analyzed for the number of bands per sample (presence vs. absence; Moeseneder et al. 1999) serving as a measure of apparent bacterial and archaeal richness. Additionally, the peak patterns were translated into a binary data matrix for further statistical analysis. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of selected DGGE bands—In total 107 bands from 40 samples (93 bacterial bands from 34 samples and 14 archaeal bands from 6 samples) were excised from the DGGE gels. The gel slices were incubated in 200 mL of autoclaved Milli-Q water for 24 h at 4uC. Subsequently, 1 mL of the supernatant was used to reamplify the extracted nucleic acids. The reamplified PCR fragments were separated by DGGE under identical conditions as described above using the original samples as standards. Reamplified PCR products were sequenced by a commercial sequencing service (MWG Biotech). Alignments and tree calculations were performed using Geneious Pro software (version 3.5.6; Biomatters). The nucleotide sequences were aligned against their closest relatives from GenBank identified by basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) searching (Altschul et al. 1990). A consensus tree from 1000 replicates based on 475 nucleotide positions was calculated by the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic average (UPGMA) using the Tamura–Nei genetic distance model (Tamura and Nei 1993). Nucleotide sequence accession numbers—In total, 26 distinct (17 bacterial and 9 archaeal) partial 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained and deposited into GenBank under the accession numbers EF368225–EF368241 and EF382650–EF382658. Statistical analysis—The mathematical software package Mathematica (Wolfram Research, version 5.2.2) was used for statistical analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test based on the Studentized range distribution of average values was used to test for significant differences between depth layers. Student t-tests were used to test for significant differences between the means of two populations based on the two-tailed tdistribution. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated to test relationships between the parameters. Temporal variability of parameters is given as the coefficient of variation. The DGGE banding patterns were used to calculate detection frequencies of bands in each depth layer for which nucleotide sequences were obtained and were used to identify differences between depth layers. The temporal variability in the binary presence–absence matrices obtained by DGGE analyses for each depth layer was determined as the percentage of variable bands. For each depth layer, variable bands are defined as the difference between the total number of bands and the number of bands that were detected in all samples throughout the sampling period. For selected statistics, bootstrap analysis was performed to determine the influence of stochastic effects on the statistics based on 1 3 105 bootstrap replicates. The results of the statistical tests were assumed to be significant at p values #0.05. Results Seasonal and depth-related variability of parameters— Physicochemical parameters: Salinity and potential density (sT) were significantly lower in the epipelagic zone compared with the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones (ANOVA, salinity, F ratio 5 4.53, p 5 0.0185; sT, F ratio 5 15.84, p , 0.0001; Table 1; Fig. 2). Temperature averaged 16.98uC, 13.11uC, and 12.94uC in the epipelagic, mesopelagic, and bathypelagic zones, respectively (Ta- Prokaryotic communities in deep waters 163 Table 1. Parameters measured in the three depth layers (epipelagial, mesopelagial, and bathypelagial). The average (Avg), standard deviation (SD), minimum, maximum, and number of samples (n) are given. Parameters are salinity; temperature in uC; potential density (sT) in kg m23; the fraction of Bacteria, Crenarchaea, Euryarchaea; total probe-positive cells as percentage of DAPI-stained cells; and bacterial and archaeal richness as the number of bands. Avg SD Parameter epi. meso. bathy. Salinity Temperature sT Bacteria Crenarchaea Euryarchaea Probe positive Richness Bacteria Richness Archaea 38.14 16.98 27.87 25.2 1.8 0.9 27.9 26.7 10.3 38.51 13.11 29.09 13.0 11.4 1.8 26.2 27.2 10.3 38.48 12.94 29.10 13.4 7.4 0.6 21.5 28.2 9.7 epi. Minimum meso. bathy. 0.70 0.02 3.97 0.13 1.29 0.02 18.1 7.4 2.4 8.9 1.4 1.8 18.8 11.8 3.4 4.3 0.6 0.7 0.02 0.08 0.01 8.9 5.2 0.6 11.6 2.7 0.7 ble 1), and was significantly higher in the epipelagic zone compared with the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones (ANOVA, F ratio 5 17.48, p , 0.0001). Total variation of temperature in the epipelagic zone was ,10uC, whereas in the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones variation was smaller than 0.5uC (Table 1). At the study site, the water column was stratified during July–October 2005 and May–June 2006 with a mixed layer depth of 30–50 m (Fig. 2). Water column stratification epi. meso. bathy. 36.30 12.97 25.50 10.3 0.1 0.0 10.4 22 10 38.47 12.94 29.05 3.3 0.2 0.0 4.3 17 9 38.45 12.83 29.10 4.5 0.4 0.0 5.3 24 9 Maximum n epi. meso. bathy. epi. meso. bathy. 38.5 22.44 29.10 56.7 7.0 4.2 62.0 31 11 38.54 13.30 29.11 27.4 30.7 6.6 44.9 31 11 38.51 13.09 29.11 35.8 19.6 2.3 47.5 32 11 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 9 3 17 17 17 15 15 15 15 17 15 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 15 started to deteriorate in December 2005 and was building up in April 2006 (Fig. 2). The nonstratified period in February–March 2006 was characterized by a uniform salinity of ,38.5 and a temperature of ,13uC throughout the water column (Table 1). sT was used as indicator for seasonality because it takes the variation of both salinity and temperature into account. With decreasing stratification sT increased to ,29.1 kg m23 (Table 1; Fig. 2) throughout the water column in February–March 2006. Fig. 2. Depth profiles of potential density (sT) at the DYFAMED station. Depth profiles of sT in kg m23 on (A) 02 July 2005, (B) 27 September 2005, (C) 25 October 2005, (D) 19 December 2005, (E) 07 February 2006, (F) 07 March 2006, (G) 02 April 2006, (H) 06 May 2006, (I) 30 June 2006. The inset show details for the upper 250 m of the water column. 164 Winter et al. Fig. 3. Relative abundance of Bacteria, Crenarchaea, Euryarchaea, and total probe-positive cells. The temporal development of the relative abundance of Bacteria, Crenarchaea, Euryarchaea, and total probe-positive cells as percentage of 49,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-stained cells is shown for each sampling depth. Relative abundance of Bacteria, Crenarchaea, and Euryarchaea: Bacteria averaged 25.2%, 13.0%, and 13.4% of DAPI-stained cells in the epipelagic, mesopelagic, and bathypelagic zones, respectively (Table 1; Fig. 3), and the proportion was significantly higher in the epipelagic zone compared with the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones (ANOVA, F ratio 5 6.19, p 5 0.0058). On average, Crenarchaea constituted 1.8%, 11.4%, and 7.4% of DAPIstained cells in the epipelagic, mesopelagic, and bathypelagic zones, respectively (Table 1; Fig. 3). Significantly fewer Crenarchaea than Bacteria were found in the epipelagic and bathypelagic zones (t-test, epipelagic, p 5 0.0078, degrees of freedom [df] 5 7; bathypelagic, p 5 0.0236, df 5 16), whereas in the mesopelagic zone the relative abundance of both groups was similar (t-test, p 5 0.5909, df 5 14). The relative abundance of Crenarchaea was significantly lower in the epipelagic compared with the mesopelagic zone (ANOVA, F ratio 5 7.25, p 5 0.0028). The fraction of Euryarchaea did not differ significantly between depth layers (Table 1; Fig. 3) and averaged 1.1% throughout the water column. The relative abundance of Euryarchaea was significantly lower than Bacteria in all depth layers and throughout the water column (t-test, in all cases p , 0.05; epipelagic, df 5 7; mesopelagic, df 5 14; bathypelagic, df 5 16). Significantly fewer Euryarchaea than Crenarchaea were detected in the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones (t-test, in all cases p , 0.001; mesopelagic, df 5 14; bathypelagic, df 5 16) but not in the epipelagic zone (t-test, p 5 0.3630, df 5 7). On average, the percentage of probe-positive cells (Eub338, Cren537, Eury806) did not differ significantly between the depth layers and varied between 10.4% and 62% in the epipelagic zone, 4.3% and 45% in the mesopelagic zone, and 5.3% and 47.5% in the bathypelagic zone (Table 1; Fig. 3). Nonspecific background hybridization as tested using the antisense probe Non338 was not detected. Seasonal variability of the relative abundance of Bacteria was similar in the three depth layers (coefficient of variation, 55–64%; Fig. 4). However, the variability for Crenarchaea and Euryarchaea was higher in the epipelagic zone as compared with the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones (coefficient of variation, Crenarchaea, 68–127%; Euryarchaea, 90–135%; Fig. 4). Seasonal variability of the percentage of probe-positive cells was similar between the Prokaryotic communities in deep waters 165 communities was small (Figs. 4 and 7). Thus, seasonal variability in apparent bacterial and archaeal richness and community composition was also detected for the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones and was comparable to the epipelagic zone. Relationships between parameters—sT decreased with increasing stratification particularly in the epipelagic zone and increased as stratification broke down during the winter months (Fig. 2). The relative abundance of both Crenarchaea and Euryarchaea increased with increasing sT in the epipelagic zone (Table 2). Throughout the water column, apparent bacterial richness increased, whereas apparent archaeal richness decreased with increasing sT (Table 2). Furthermore, apparent bacterial richness correlated positively with sT in the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones (Table 2). In the epipelagic zone, the relative abundance of Crenarchaea and Euryarchaea decreased with increasing temperature (Crenarchaea, r 5 20.71, p 5 0.0465; Euryarchaea, r 5 20.81, p 5 0.0149). Fig. 4. Seasonal variability. Seasonal variability given as the coefficient of variation (%) of the relative abundance of Bacteria, Crenarchaea, Euryarchaea, total probe-positive cells, apparent bacterial and archaeal richness in the epipelagic, mesopelagic, and bathypelagic zones, respectively. The means and standard deviations (error bars) of 1 3 105 bootstrap replicates are shown. depth layers (coefficient of variation, 44–60%; Fig. 4). Stochastic effects as determined by bootstrapping had little influence on the relative abundance of Bacteria, Crenarchaea, and Euryarchaea, as well as total probe-positive cells (Fig. 4). Apparent bacterial and archaeal richness and community composition: Apparent bacterial richness did not differ between depth layers and varied between 22 and 31 bands (,1.43), 17 and 31 bands (,1.83), and 24 and 32 bands (,1.33) in the epipelagic, mesopelagic, and bathypelagic zones, respectively (Table 1). Apparent archaeal richness was significantly higher in the mesopelagic compared with the bathypelagic zone (ANOVA, F ratio 5 6.06, p 5 0.0080). Apparent archaeal richness ranged from 10 to 11 bands (,1.13), 9 to 11 bands (,1.23), and 9 to 11 bands (,1.23) in the epipelagic, mesopelagic, and bathypelagic zones, respectively (Table 1). Seasonal variability of apparent bacterial and archaeal richness was small and similar in the three depth layers (coefficient of variation, bacterial, 9–15%; archaeal, 4–7%; Fig. 4). However, seasonal variation in bacterial and archaeal community composition based on the DGGE banding patterns was much higher (Figs. 5–6). The percentage of variable bacterial bands (i.e., bands only detected during certain periods of time within a depth layer) was 84%, 86%, and 80% in the epipelagic, mesopelagic, and bathypelagic zones, respectively (Fig. 7). Seasonal variability of the archaeal community composition was 31%, 38%, and 31% in the epipelagic, mesopelagic, and bathypelagic zones, respectively (Fig. 7). Based on bootstrapping analysis, the influence of stochastic effects on the seasonal variability of bacterial and archaeal Phylogenetic analysis of prokaryotes and depth distribution—In total, 26 distinct (17 bacterial and 9 archaeal) partial 16S rRNA gene nucleotide sequences were obtained. The bacterial sequences varied in length between 486 and 532 bp and the archaeal sequences were between 428 and 513 bp long. Henceforth, the term ‘‘phylotype’’ will be used when referring to the nucleotide sequences. Phylogenetic analysis placed the bacterial phylotypes into six different groups (Fig. 8). Seven phylotypes were related to dProteobacteria, five to a-Proteobacteria, two to c-Proteobacteria, and one phylotype each was related to Cyanobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi. All archaeal phylotypes clustered within the Marine Group II Euryarchaea (Fig. 8). In no case did we detect 16S rRNA genes related to phyoplankton plastids (Rappé et al. 1998), suggesting that the influence of plastid signals on our results particularly from the epipelagic zone was low. Based on detection frequencies calculated for each depth layer throughout the study period, the phylotypes DYFBac7 and DYFBac16 showed a preference for the mesopelagic (DYFBac7, 71%; DYFBac16, 53%) and bathypelagic zones (DYFBac7, 88%; DYFBac16, 76%) and were rarely detected in the epipelagic zone (DYFBac7, 11%; DYFBac16, 22%; Fig. 5). On the other hand, the phylotype DYFBac13 was frequently found in the epipelagic (67%) and mesopelagic zones (59%) and rarely in the bathypelagic zone (35%; Fig. 5). The phylotype DYFArch3 was primarily found in the epipelagic (100%) and mesopelagic zones (80%) as compared with the bathypelagic zone (40%; Fig. 6). DYFArch9 was most often found in the epipelagic zone (67%), was found less frequently in the mesopelagic zone (40%), and was never found in the bathypelagic zone (Fig. 6). Discussion Variability of parameters within and between depth layers—Our results on the depth distribution of Bacteria and Crenarchaea support previous work from the Pacific 166 Winter et al. Fig. 5. Seasonal and depth-related variability of bacterial community composition. Schematic representation of the DGGE banding patterns obtained for each cruise and sampling depth. Presence and absence of bands is indicated by black and white squares, respectively. Additionally, the figure indicates the position and designation of excised and subsequently sequenced bands. Fig. 6. Seasonal and depth-related variability of archaeal community composition. Schematic representation of the DGGE banding patterns obtained for each cruise and sampling depth. Presence and absence of bands is indicated by black and white squares, respectively. Additionally, the figure indicates the position and designation of excised and subsequently sequenced bands. Prokaryotic communities in deep waters Fig. 7. Temporal variability of the percentage of variable bands for Bacteria and Archaea. Variable bands are defined as the difference between the total number of bands detected by DGGE analysis for each depth layer and the number of bands that were detected in all samples throughout the sampling period. The means and standard deviations (error bars) of 1 3 105 bootstrap replicates are shown. Ocean (Karner et al. 2001). However, on average the detectability of DAPI-stained cells by CARD-FISH at the study site (Table 1) was well below previously reported values from the North Atlantic of ,70% using the same method (Teira et al. 2004, 2006). Our low average detection rates might be due to mismatches between the probes used in CARD-FISH and the majority of prokaryotic cells at our study site. However, at least the probe Eury806 perfectly matched the euryarchaeal nucleotide sequences (Fig. 8) obtained from the study site. This analysis was not possible with the probe Eub338 because the target sequence was outside the amplified region and with Cren537 because no crenarchaeal sequences were obtained. Also, although average detectability of DAPI-stained cells was low, seasonal variability was high throughout the water column 167 (Fig. 4), and the percentage of probe-positive cells reached 62% in April 2006 (Fig. 3). The relative abundance of Bacteria, Crenarchaea, and Euryarchaea varied by more than twofold (Fig. 4) throughout the water column, suggesting that seasonality is clearly a feature of surface as well as deep waters at the study site. The DNA probes used in CARD-FISH target the 16S rRNA molecule in ribosomes. Prokaryotic cells are capable of adjusting the number of ribosomes according to metabolic activity; thus, the intensity of the signal in FISH is proportional to cellular activity (Amann et al. 1995). If this assumption holds also for CARD-FISH, our data suggest that prokaryotic metabolic activity as assessed by CARD-FISH varied substantially in surface and deep waters throughout our study period. Such seasonality in bacterial productivity has been shown for surface waters (down to 130 m) at our study site (Lemée et al. 2002). In contrast to previous studies conducted in the Mediterranean Sea (Moeseneder et al. 2001), we did not find any significant trend of apparent bacterial richness with depth. Winter et al. (2008) also did not find differences in apparent bacterial and archaeal richness between surface and mesopelagic waters in the tropical Atlantic Ocean. These data suggest that although specific bacterial communities exist in surface and deep waters they appear to be composed of a similar number of detectable taxa. This was also found in our study where certain bands were mainly detected in specific depth layers (Fig. 5) while the number of bands in different depth layers was similar (Table 1). Also, although seasonal variability of apparent prokaryotic richness was low, variability of prokaryotic community composition was much higher (Figs. 5–7). These results suggest that the number of presumably dominant phylotypes detectable by DGGE analysis appears to be more rigorously controlled than the actual composition of the prokaryotic communities in all depth layers. Thus, changing environmental conditions (e.g., availability of nutrients, mortality due to grazers and viruses) led to the replacement (in the sense of detectability) of specific phylotypes by others with only slight changes in the total number of dominant phylotypes. Even more interesting is that the resulting seasonal variability in apparent prokaryotic richness and community composition was similar in surface and deep waters, further supporting the conclusion that seasonality is a feature of deep waters at the study site. Table 2. Spearman rank correlation coefficients. The Spearman rank correlation coefficients between potential density (sT) and other parameters measured in this study are given for the entire water column and the three depth layers. Abbreviations as in Table 1. Relevant (20.5 . r . 0.5) and statistically significant (p # 0.05) correlation coefficients are in bold. Salinity Temperature (uC) Bacteria Crenarchaea Euryarchaea Probe positive Richness Bacteria Richness Archaea Total Epipelagial Mesopelagial Bathypelagial 0.20 20.80 20.34 0.17 0.03 20.27 0.54 20.51 0.64 20.93 20.02 0.71 0.86 0.13 0.50 n.a. 20.45 20.90 20.06 20.40 20.13 20.44 0.67 20.28 0.12 0.07 20.38 20.37 20.24 20.43 0.88 20.37 168 Winter et al. Fig. 8. Phylogenetic tree of the 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained in this study. Values at nodes represent bootstrap values, and the scale bar represents substitutions per nucleotide position. See main text for further details. Seasonality and the role of vertical mixing—Phylogenetic analysis based on sequencing archaeal DGGE bands revealed that all of the obtained nucleic acid sequences represented members of the Marine Group II Euryarchaea (Fig. 8). Thus, it appears that DGGE analysis of the archaeal community using previously developed primers and PCR conditions (Casamayor et al. 2000) is heavily skewed toward Euryarchaea at the study site. However, Euryarchaea comprised only a marginal fraction of the prokaryotic community (Table 1; Fig. 3). It is interesting to note that archaeal PCR products in the epipelagial could only be obtained during periods with weak or no stratification (December 2005 and February–March 2006; Fig. 6) underlining the positive correlation between the Prokaryotic communities in deep waters relative abundance of Euryarchaea detected by CARDFISH and sT in the epipelagic zone (Table 2). Similarly, the relative abundance of Crenarchaea increased with increasing sT in the epipelagic zone (Table 2). Together, these data suggest that stratification in the epipelagic zone appears to create a situation that is not favorable for archaeal growth (e.g., bacterial competition, availability of nutrients). The positive correlation between sT and apparent bacterial richness in the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones (Table 2) is best explained by vertical mixing fueling deeper waters with detectable bacterial taxa either by importing them from the surface or by stimulating growth through changing the availability of nutrients. In summary, our data on the seasonal development of bacterial and archaeal communities (Table 2) are compatible with deep vertical mixing during the nonstratified period that led to identical bacterial communities throughout the water column in February–March 2006 (Fig. 5). The most significant finding of this study is that prokaryotic communities of deep waters exhibit seasonal changes in terms of relative abundance and composition. At the study site, deep vertical mixing during the nonstratified period represents the beginning of an annual succession. This succession is detectable throughout the water column and leads to clearly different prokaryotic communities in the epipelagic, mesopelagic, and bathypelagic zones during the stratified period. The basin-scale vertical mixing of the water column suggests that the Mediterranean Sea is especially vulnerable and/or adaptable to man-made alterations (e.g., climate change; Béthoux et al. 1990) including the deliberate or accidental release of hitherto in the study area unknown prokaryotic taxa (e.g., genetically modified organisms, prokaryotes transported in ships’ ballast water). Depending on the strength of vertical mixing in winter and early spring, alterations in surface waters will be relayed to deep waters within a very short time. The seasonal variability in the relative abundance of Bacteria as well as apparent prokaryotic richness and community composition is comparable between the different depth layers indicating that the effects of seasonal changes on the prokaryotic compartment do not diminish with depth. Thus, prokaryotic communities of the dark ocean can be as dynamic as those found at the surface. References ALTSCHUL, S. F., W. GISH, W. MILLER, E. W. MYERS, AND D. J. LIPMAN. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403–410. AMANN, R. I., B. J. BINDER, R. J. OLSON, S. W. CHISHOLM, R. DEVEREUX, AND D. A. STAHL. 1990. Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 1919–1925. ———, W. LUDWIG, AND K.-H. SCHLEIFER. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59: 143–169. BÉTHOUX, J. P., B. GENTILI, J. RAUNET, AND D. TAILLIEZ. 1990. Warming trend in the western Mediterranen deep water. Nature 347: 660–662. 169 CASAMAYOR, E. O., H. SCHÄFER, L. BAÑERAS, C. PEDRÓS-ALIÓ, AND G. MUYZER. 2000. Identification of spatio-temporal differences between microbial assemblages from two neighboring sulfurous lakes: Comparison by microscopy and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 499–508. FUHRMAN, J. A., I. HEWSON, M. S. SCHWALBACH, J. A. STEELE, M. V. BROWN, AND S. NAEEM. 2006. Annually reoccurring bacterial communities are predictable from ocean conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 13104–13109. HERNDL, G. J., T. REINTHALER, E. TEIRA, H. VAN AKEN, C. VETH, A. PERNTHALER, AND J. PERNTHALER. 2005. Contribution of Archaea to total prokaryotic production in the deep Atlantic Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 2303–2309. INGALLS, A. E., S. R. SHAH, R. L. HANSMAN, L. I. ALUWIHARE, G. M. SANTOS, E. R. M. DRUFFEL, AND A. PEARSON. 2006. Quantifying archaeal community autotrophy in the mesopelagic ocean using natural radiocarbon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 6442–6447. JANSE, I., J. BOK, AND G. ZWART. 2004. A simple remedy against artificial double bands in denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. J. Microb. Methods 57: 279–281. KARNER, M. B., E. F. DELONG, AND D. M. KARL. 2001. Archaeal dominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific Ocean. Nature 409: 507–510. LEMÉE, R., E. ROCHELLE-NEWALL, F. VAN WAMBEKE, M.-D. PIZAY, P. RINALDI, AND J.-P. GATTUSO. 2002. Seasonal variation of bacterial production, respiration and growth efficiency in the open NW Mediterranean Sea. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 29: 227–237. LONGHURST, A. 1998. Ecological geography of the sea. 1st ed. Academic. MOESENEDER, M. M., J. M. ARRIETA, G. MUYZER, C. WINTER, AND G. J. HERNDL. 1999. Optimization of terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for complex marine bacterioplankton communities and comparison with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 3518–3525. ———, C. WINTER, AND G. J. HERNDL. 2001. Horizontal and vertical complexity of attached and free-living bacteria of the eastern Mediterranean Sea, determined by 16S rDNA and 16S rRNA fingerprints. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46: 95–107. MUYZER, G., S. HOTTENTRÄGER, A. TESKE, AND C. WAWER. 1996. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified 16S rDNA—a new molecular approach to analyse the genetic diversity of mixed microbial communities, p. 1–23. In A. D. L. Akkermans, J. D. van Elsas and F. J. de Bruijn [eds.], Molecular microbial ecology manual. Kluwer. ———, A. TESKE, AND C. O. WIRSEN. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of Thiomicrospira species and their identification in deep sea hydrothermal vent samples by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S rDNA fragments. Arch. Microbiol. 164: 165–172. RAPPÉ, M. S., M. T. SUZUKI, K. L. VERGIN, AND S. J. GIOVANNONI. 1998. Phylogenetic diversity of ultraplankton plastid smallsubunit rRNA genes recovered in environmental nucleic acid samples from the Pacific and Antlantic Coasts of the United States. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 294–303. RASKIN, L., J. M. STROMLEY, B. E. RITTMANN, AND D. A. STAHL. 1994. Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60: 1232–1240. SCHÄFER, H. L., AND oTHERS. 2001. Microbial community dynamics in Mediterranean nutrient-enriched seawater mesocosms: Changes in the genetic diversity of bacterial populations. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 34: 243–253. 170 Winter et al. STAHL, D. A., AND R. AMANN. 1991. Development and application of nucleic acid probes, p. 205–248. In E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow [eds.], Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley. TAMURA, K., AND M. NEI. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 512–526. TANAKA, T., AND F. RASSOULZADEGAN. 2002. Full-depth profile (0– 2000 m) of bacteria, heterotrophic nanoflagellates and ciliates in the NW Mediterranean Sea: Vertical partitioning of microbe trophic structures. Deep-Sea Res. II 49: 2093–2107. TEIRA, E., P. LEBARON, H. v. AKEN, AND G. J. HERNDL. 2006. Distribution and activity of bacteria and archaea in deep water masses of the North Atlantic. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51: 2131–2144. ———, T. REINTHALER, A. PERNTHALER, J. PERNTHALER, AND G. J. HERNDL. 2004. Combining catalyzed reporter depositionfluorescence in situ hybridization and microautoradiography to detect substrate utilization by bacteria and archaea in the deep ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 4411–4414. WALLNER, G., R. AMANN, AND W. BEISKER. 1993. Optimizing fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for flow cytometric identification of microorganisms. Cytometry 14: 136–143. WINTER, C., M. M. MOESENEDER, G. J. HERNDL, AND M. G. WEINBAUER. 2008. Relationship of geographic distance, depth, temperature, and viruses with prokaryotic communities in the eastern tropical Atlantic Ocean. Microb. Ecol. 56: 383– 389. WUCHTER, C., AND oTHERS. 2006. Archaeal nitrification in the ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 12317–12322. Edited by: Peter G. Verity Received: 1 June 2008 Accepted: 12 September 2008 Amended: 24 September 2008