* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Amino Acid Analogs, and Nucleases on the Synthesis of DNA in
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Autoradiographic Studies of the Effects of Antibiotics, Amino Acid Analogs, and Nucleases on the Synthesis of DNA in Cultured Mammalian Cells* VIN0D C. SHAHt (Zoolo@ryDepartment, Columbia University, New York, New York) SUMMARY Autoradiographic studies of the effects of some antibiotics, amino acid analogs, and nucleases on the synthesis of DNA have been carried out to gain information on the regulatory mechanism of DNA replication within the cell. Cultured cells of the Chinese hamster and human cancer (HeLa) were used as experimental material. Puromycin, chloramphenicol, p-fluoro-phenylalanine, and methylated tryptophan analogs inhibited in varying degree the synthesis of protein. They also affected the synthesis of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) by changing the number of cells able to in corporate thymidine-H3 as well as by reducing the rate of thymidine incorporation in the replicating cells. The relationship of histone and DNA synthesis was studied cyto chemically, and data obtained indicate that histones do not seem to play any direct role in DNA replication. Actinomycin D inhibited intracellular ribonucleic acid (RNA) synthesis but did not affect DNA synthesis. This suggests that there is no necessary coupling of RNA and DNA syntheses. The nucleases (DNase I, DNase II, and RNase), within a short time after contact with the cells in culture medium, caused an increase in the number of cells able to incorporate thymidine. After 3 hours of treatment both DNase II and RNase resulted in decreases in DNA synthesis. The results are discussed with regard to the hypothesis that RNA may act as re pressor for DNA synthesis and that the repressor activity is regulated by amino acids or proteins. The requirements free systems have for DNA replication been defined in cell by Kornberg and others (17) . However, the mechanisms which regu late DNA synthesis within the cell are still obscure (920).These control mechanisms could con ceivably operate at three levels : (a) in the forma tion of precursors—i.e. , the conversions of ribo nucleotides to deoxyribonucleotides (392), the for mation of thymidylate (192), or the phosphoryla tion of deoxyribonucleotides to the corresponding * A portion of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment triphosphates (921); (b) by the synthesis or activa tion of DNA polymerase; and (c) by the formation of an active primer or template for synthesis. In 1954 Cohen and Barner (8) suggested that protein and/or ribonucleic acid synthesis might be direct ly involved in the replication of DNA on the basis of the behavior of a thymine-requiring strain of Escherichia coli. Protein and RNA synthesis with out concomitant DNA synthesis was found lethal, but the cell death was prevented if protein syn thesis was also blocked. Various studies since then of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophyin (7, the Faculty of Pure Science, Columbia University. This investigation was supported in part by a grant from shown 13, 924) have extended a requirement these for protein observations synthesis and to initi ate but not for the continuation of DNA synthesis in E. coli and its phages. In addition, studies of bacterial mutants re t Present address: Medical Research Center, Brookhavenquiring various amino acids have indicated a re National Laboratory, Upton, L.I., New York. quirement for amino acids in the synthesis of RNA, apparently in some process that does not Received for publication March 25, 1963. the Atomic Energy Commission AT (30-1)-1304 to J. Herbert Taylor and by a Faculty Fellowship from Columbia Univer sity. 1137 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. Cancer Research 1138 involve protein synthesis (35). A recent report by Kellenberger et al. (16) indicates that synthesis of both RNA and DNA in E. coli operates by a mechanism that requires amino acids. However, “relaxedstrain― mutants of E. coli were found in which DNA synthesis would proceed in the ab sence of a required amino acid. Chloramphenicol could be substituted for various amino acids except serine. Bendich and Rosenkranz (3) have found phosphoserine linked to DNA by a covalent bond which suggests that serine may be directly involved in the synthesis of DNA. In the somatic cells of higher forms, DNA ap pears to be conjugated with the basic proteins (histones). Bloch and Godman (5) showed that DNA and histones are synthesized simultaneously during the interphase. It has been shown recently that protein synthesis is necessary for DNA syn thesis in mammalian cells, as was found earlier for bacteria (923,927).On the basis of the above obser vations, one might suspect that one type of protein necessary for the DNA synthesis in higher forms may be the histones. The present investigations were undertaken to examine, in mammalian cells in culture, the effects of various agents which alter one or more of the processes suspected to be involved in the control of DNA replication. 1963 hydrated. The cover glasses with cells exposed were then attached to microscopic slides with “Euparol― according to the method described by Taylor (36). After 92days, the surface to which the cells were attached was covered with Kodak AR 10 stripping 70 C. for film 1—3 and exposed weeks. The in the dark preparations at about were de veloped in D-19 (half strength) for 5 minutes at 18°C., rinsed in water, and fixed in Kodak acid fixer (half strength) for 10 minutes. They were again rinsed in water briefly and transferred to a diluted solution (9 : 1) of Kodak hypo clearing agent for 92minutes. After two rinses (3 minutes each), they were dried and stained by azure B bromide at pH 4, for 10 minutes. After a short rinse in distilled water, the slides were dried again. The thymidine-H3 (specific activity, 1.88 c/ mmole) and cytidine-H3 (specific activity, 0.36 c/ mmole) were obtained from Schwarz Laboratory, Mount Vernon, New York. The lysine-H3 (spe cific activity, 1.5 c/mmole) was a gift to Dr. Taylor from Dr. Klaus Hempel, Institute of Chemical and Medical Isotope Research, Univer sity of Köln, Germany. The leucine-H3 (specific initiated from embryonic tissues of Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus), was kindly supplied by Dr. George Yerganian, Children's Cancer Re search Foundation, Boston. A strain of human cancer cells (HeLa) was obtained from Dr. Berge Hampar, Department of Microbiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York. The stock cultures of both the strains were maintained in milk dilution bottles in Puck's activity, 3.57 c/mmole) was purchased from New England Nuclear Corporation, Boston, Massa chusetts. A reticle with concentric circles was placed in one of the eyepieces of the microscope. At a magni fication of 19250X , its smallest circle with a diameter of 5.1 delimited an area of 920.492sq. j@, which was taken as the unit area for grain count ing. Antibiotics, amino acid analogs, and nucleases.— Puromycin, chloramphenicol, and actinomycin D were generous gifts from the laboratories of American Cyanamid Co., Chas. Pfizer & Co., and Merck, Sharp and Dohme, respectively. $-Methyl tryptophan, isomers A and B, were kindly supplied by Dr. H. R. Snyder, Department of Biochemis (929) medium try, MATERIALS @ Vol. 923, September AND METHODS Cell culture.—A strain of hamster cells (Al), containing 8 per cent calf serum, 8 per cent fetal calf serum, 500 units/nd penicillin, and 100 @g/ml streptomycin. For most experi ments the cells were transferred to screw-cap Leighton tubes (Bonus Laboratory Products, P.O. Box 66, North Andover, Massachusetts) and were grown attached to 10 X 50-mm. No. 1 cover glasses. Each tube contained 1 ml. of medium with 4—5X l0@cells (counted by hemocytometer). Experiments were performed after 50—70hours of growth in the culture tubes. Autoradiography.—The cultures on the cover glasses were routinely fixed in Duboscq-Brassil fixative (11) for 92hours; however, other fixatives were also used, depending on the nature of an ex periment. They were then rinsed in water and de University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois. The other amino acid analogs, 5-methyl tryptophan and p-fluorophenylalanine, were purchased from Nutritional Biochemical Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio. The nucleases, RNase, DNase I, and DNase II, were bought from Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Freehold, New Jersey. The compounds were dissolved in glass-distilled water and used to dilute the double-strength medium to give the final appropriate concentra tion. RESULTS Generation method, studying time of the celLi.—A pulse-labeling described by Taylor (36), was used for the generation cycle of the hamster cells. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. SHAH—DNA Synthesis in Cultured Mammalian A group of cultures was incubated for 10 minutes in a medium containing thymidine-H3 (1 j@c/ml), washed briefly with Tris buffer, and placed in a conditioned medium containing unlabeled thymi dine at a concentration 50 X the radioactive thy midine. The cells were fixed at intervals in for maldehyde, 40 per cent solution, 5 parts; 70 per cent ethanol, 90 parts; and glacial acetic acid, 5 parts, for 1 hour and stained by the Feulgen method after a hydrolysis of 10 minutes. After an exposure of 92 weeks to the stripping film, the autoradiograms were developed and examined for labeled interphase and division stages by random sampling. The ratio of labeled interphases was de termined by examination of @50—300 cells at each time interval. To obtain the ratio of labeled divi sion stages 150—9200 division figures on each slide were scored. Cells 1189 cells dropped during the first 1—92 hours and then increased to reach a peak of approximately 64 per cent at 8 hours after labeling. It again dropped, became equal to the fraction initially labeled by 192 hours—which was one generation sults are similar to the measurements cycle. The re by Hsu et at. (14)in a similar strain of hamstercells,sincethey have found the mean generation time of 11—192 hours with S-period of 5.8 hours, with the use of McCoy's 5a medium supplemented with 920 per cent fetal calf serum. No attempt was made to find the exact genera tion time of the HeLa cells in culture. According to the estimation of Painter and Drew (926), the generation time of HeLa cells was approximately 928 hours, with 8@ hours for the DNA synthetic period 8, 14 hours for Gi, and 3—10hours for G92.The cycle for the HeLa cells in these cultures U 0 z U U U 0@ CHART 1.—Frequency treatment I 2 3 4 of labeled interphases with thymidine-H3 in hamster 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 2 3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TIME IN HOURS (circles) and labeled division stages (bars) at various After a lag of 1 hour (Chart 1) a small percent may be slightly shorter, age of labeled dividing cells began to appear, and here is richer in nutrients @ @ intervals after 10 minutes, cells. by the 6th hour ca. 97 per cent of the division figures were labeled. The frequency of the labeled divisions then declined until the 11th hour, when it reached 19 per cent, after which there was again a rise and a second peak at 18 hours, with approxi mately 78 per cent of mitotic cells labeled. The average generation time, therefore, was about 192 hours, the interval between the two peaks of labeled division stages. The DNA synthetic period S obtained by multiplying the fraction of labeled interphase cells, after a short contact with thymidine, by the generation time (0.48 X l@, Chart 1) was 5.76 hours. Taking 1—92 hours as the initial lag time for the appearance of labeled divi sion figures as post-DNA synthetic period G92and approximately 1 hour for mitosis M, the pre DNA synthetic time Gi can be estimated to be about 4 hours. The frequency of labeled interphase Painter and Drew. Effects of puromycin, since the medium used than the one used by chioramphenicol, and two amino acid analog8 on the incorporation of amino acids into protein.—The amino acids leucine-H3 and lysine-H3 were used in these experiments. Pre liminary studies showed that leucine-H3, even with a high specific activity (3.57 c/mmole), failed to label HeLa and hamster cells, if used in concen trations below 10 sc/ml for hour with an ex posure to film for weeks. However, lysine-H5 (10 @sc/ml), after a treatment of 10 minutes, pro duced satisfactory autoradiographs. Thus, the leucine pool in these cells seemed to be consider ably greater than that of the lysine. The hamster cells were incubated with differ ent concentrations of puromycin, chioramphenicol, 5-methyltryptophan, and p-fluorophenylalanine in the culture medium and at certain intervals Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. Cancer Research 1140 @ were labeled with lysine-H3 (10 /Lc/nil) for hour. They were then fixed and autoradiograms were prepared as described previously with an exposure of 92weeks to the film. Charts 92and 3 show the effects of puromycin and chloramphenicol on the incorporation of PUROMYCIN -J -J Vol.923, September 1963 The amino acid analogs p-fluorophenylalanine and 5-methyl tryptophan also inhibit protein syn thesis (Charts 4, 5). The 5-methyl tryptophan in the concentration of 1 mg/ml (about 500 times the tryptophan concentration in Puck's medium) re duced protein synthesis more than 90 per cent after 924hours of incubation. However, p-fluoro phenylalanine even in higher concentration (1.5 mg/mi) (about 9200 times the phenylalanine con centration in Puck's medium) inhibited no more than 40 per cent after similar incubation. In both U U p -FLUOROPHENYLALAN NE (1) z 4 -J -J Ui U CD -j 4I-. 0 Vi) z 4 CD -J 4 6 9 HOURS OF INCUBATION 0 I- Ca&RT2.—Effect of various concentrations of puromycin on the incorporation of lysine-H3 (10 @sc/ml—30 minutes) in hamster cells. Average of SOcells for each time interval. CHLORAMPHENICOL 3 6 9 2 5 18 21 HOURS OF INCUBATION CHART 4.—Effect of various phenylalanine on incorporation minutes) in hamster 24 concentrations of p-fiuoro of lysine-H1 (10 @@c/ml—30 cells. Average of 30 cells for each time interval. @ -J -J U C.) 5- METHYL TRYPTOPHAN I I I I 35 C/) z C/) -J .J 30 Ui U 4 0 %,. S@@@O@7RoL 25 U) z @ @ 0 1- CD @ 4 @ 6 9 I HOURS OF INCUBATION of various concentrations of chioram phenicol on the incorporation of Iysine-H1 (10 pc/ml—S0mm utes) in hamster •%___. 2Oug N@@'%@%lr..@_ 5 . 10 ug . @S%%% ‘@‘ 5 @ CHART 5.—Effect @20 - cells. Average of SO cells for each time interval. lysine-H3. Puromycin in concentrations of 925,50, and 100 @.ig/m1rapidly inhibited protein synthesis, although the effects increased in intensity with the increasing concentrations. By 192hours 100 @g/ml of puromycin reduced the incorporation into the total protein by about 90 per cent. Higher concen trations of chioramphenicol were required to in hibit protein synthesis significantly. It may be noticed that as much as 92mg/ml chioramphenicol for 924hours was required to reduce protein syn thesis by 95 per cent. 0 I I 3 6 CHART 5.—Effect I I I I I 9 12 5 8 21 24 HOURS OF INCUBATION of various concentrations of 5-methy tryptophan on incorporation of lysine-H' (10 j@c/ml—S0 mm utes) in hamster cells. Average of 30 cells for each time interval. cases concentrations lower than 1 mg/mi pro duced little effect. In all the above experiments, although the pro tein synthesis may be reduced as much as 95 per cent, the effects on cell morphology were not severe. However, treatments for longer time than mentioned above with maximum concentration of inhibitors resulted in loss of cells by detachment from the glass. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. SHAH—DNA Synthesis in Cultuned Mammalian Ei7e@t of the inhibitors of protein sijnthesis on DNA replication.—Cultures of hamster cells were incubated after changing to fresh medium with appropriate amounts of inhibitors. Control cul tures also received fresh medium without the in hibitors at the same time. At several intervals cul tures were rinsed and incubated in conditioned medium containing thymidine-H3, 1 @ic/mlfor 30 minutes. They were then washed briefly with Tris buffer, fixed, and autoradiograms were made as described before. Puromycin at a concentration of 100 zg/ml in hibited the incorporation of thymidine-H3 within a short time of incubation (Chart 6, Fig. 1). The effect was gradual and cumulative, since the de crease in incorporation (which may be interpreted as rate of synthesis) occurred slowly until at 192 hours, with 100 @g/ml,the incorporation of thymi dine was negligible. Chloramphenicol (92mg/nil) also reduced the rate of incorporation of thymi dine-H3 (Chart 6). After a lag of 3 hours there was a rapid decrease in the incorporation of thymidine up to 192hours. Afterward there was slower de crease, and by 924hours DNA synthesis was hard CelLi 1141 incorporation of thymidine-H3 was observed with 5-methyl tryptophan. Both isomers A and B of $-methyl tryptophan were less effective than 5methyl tryptophan, since no significant decrease of grains was found with them even up to 924 hours of incubation. Effects of the protein inhibitors on DNA syn thesis were also studied by examining the per centage of labeled cells in the above experiments. The results areshown inChart7. The percentage of labeled cells after treatment with puromycin (50 @ug/ml)increased by about 18 per cent during the first 4 hours and then rapidly dropped to 77 per cent at 924hours of incubation. Cliloramphenicol (92 mg/mi) also had a similar 4 Ui 2 4 6 8 20 HOURS OF INCUBATION 4 CHART 7.—Frequency z of labeled hamster 22 24 cells after treat D ment with various protein inhibitors for different lengths of U) time z and then incubated in medium containing thymidine-H3 4 (1 j@c/ml—3O minutes). Counted about 200 labeled cells for CD each time interval of each compound. 5 grains were counted. Cells having more than effect, except that no initial rise in the percentage 3 6 9 12 15 18 HOURS OF INCUBATION CHART 6.—Shows incorporation 21 of thymidine-H3 24 in ham ster cells after treatment with the protein inhibitors for various lengths of time. Average of 80 cells for each time interval. ly detectable. The amino acid analog p-fluoro phenylalanine (Chart 6) also produced a reduction in the incorporation of thymidine-H3. The inhibi tion began from the very onset of the treatment with this analog, and, after an incubation of 924 hours, p-fluorophenylalanine (1 mg/mi) reduced the DNA synthesis by about 80 per cent. No inhibition in the incorporation of thymi dine-H3 was noticed until 18 hours of incubation in tryptophan analogs (Chart 6). After 18 hours for hamster cells an abrupt change in the rate of of labeled cells was found in this case. No sig nificant decrease was observed with 5-methyl tryptophan (1 mg/mi) up to 18 hours, after which a slight decrease was observed. There was a gradual drop from the beginning of the treatment in the percentage of labeled cells treated with p-fluorophenylalanine. Isomers of $-methyl tryp tophan seemed to be slightly more effective than 5-methyl tryptophan. In this case, after 6 hours of treatment, a slow decrease was observed. Between 6 and 18 hours of incubation, @9-methyl tryptophan B appeared to have more effect, but after 18 hours the A isomer was more effective than the B. Studies on the rate of incorporation of thymi dine-H3, after treatment with the various protein inhibitors, have also been made on HeLa cells (Chart8).The results werelargely inagreement Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. Cancer Research 11492 with the observations (50 @@g/mi)and on hamster cells. Puromycin cbloramphenicol effective inhibitors (92 mg/mi) were of both protein and DNA syn 85 Effect of puromycin and 5-methyl tryptophan on 75 70 65 60 55 50 @:45 z @ 1963 thesis in HeLa cells. The analog p-fluorophenylal anine (1 mg/mi) had some effect, whereas 5methyl tryptophan (1 mg/mi) had no effect on DNA synthesis until 9292 hours of incubation. After 9292 hours the effect was marked. 80 @ Vol. 923, September 40 @ I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HOURS OF INCUBATION CHART 8.—HeLa cells showing H1 after the treatment 9 incorporation of protein inhibitors 0 II 12 of thymidine for various lengths of time. Average of SOcells having more than 5 grains. Puro mycin, 100 pg/ml; chloramphemcol, 2 mg/mI; hi@tone synthesis.—Since the histones in mam malian cells do not contain tryptophan (9), and since the tryptophan analogs will inhibit the syn thesis of tryptophan-containing proteins, it was thought desirable to study the effects of 5-methyl tryptophan on histone synthesis. Rasch and Woodard (30) showed that his tones can be extracted by 1/100 N HC1 at 925° C. for 4 hours, after removal of nucleic acids in methanol-fixed tissues. De (10) has modified this method by using methanol freeze-substitution, which provides better preservation and extraction of histones. A few experiments were conducted to study the effects of 5-methyl tryptophan and puromycin on histone synthesis in hamster cells. A group of cul tures were incubated in the medium containing 5-methyl tryptophan (1 mg/mi) or puromycin (50 hg/mi) for 192,18, and 924hours. At the end of each time they were incubated in a conditioned medium containing lysine-H3 (10 Mc/ml) for hour and fixed as described by De (10) with methanol freeze-substitution. Controls were similarly pre pared, except that they were not treated with the inhibitors. All the cultures were then hydrolyzed p-fluorophenyl with 5 per cent 920 minutes alanine, 1 mg/mi; 5-methyl tryptophan, 1 mg/ml. TABLE trichloroacetic to remove nucleic acid at 900 C. for acids. The prepara 1 EFFECT OF 5-METHYLTRYPTOPHAN(1 MG/MI) ANDPUROMYCIN(50 pG/ML@ ON HISTONE SYNTHESIS IN HAMSTER tryptophan ± S. E.Puromycin Hours of E.12A incubation5-Mthyl B 13.6±1.2 CELLS ±S. E.Control 7.2±0.8 ±S. 17.1±1.8 4.5±2.618AHistone18.3±1.4 2.4±1.321.6±1.19 4.7±1.89.6±1.1 B 10.1±0.9 4.3±0.6 15.8±1.2 4.1±1.924AHistone13.9±1.2 1.5±1.019.9±1.5 3.8±1.55.8±0.8 3.6±0.5 B Histone8.5±0.8 15.3±1.1 5.8±0.4 3.2±0.3 2.7±0.9 0.4±0.5819.6±1.3 4.3±1.7 Mean grains='average of 50 cells of each group. Lysine-H' (10 pc/mI, SO minutes). Grains represent nuclear incorporation. Exposure to the film, 10 days. A=treated with 5 per cent trichioroacetic acid at 9O@C. for 20 minutes. B=treated with 5 per cent trichioroacetic acid at 900 C. for 20 minutes and 1/100 N HC1 for4 hoursat 25°C. Histoneindicated by difference between A and B. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. SHAH—DNA @ Syntheth in Cultured tions were then rinsed with 70 per cent alcohol and later with water. The cover glasses with the at tached cells were now transferred to small tubes which contained 1/100 N HC1. They were marked previously by cutting one corner and placed in such a manner that only the lower half was dipped in the acid. They were left there for 4 hours at 9250 C. Later they were rinsed in water, incorporation of lysine-H3 dehy Puromycin inhibited synthesis in the histone histone synthesis remained essentially unaffected by 3). No significant number of grains was observed over the nucleolus after 1 hour of incubation in the drug. The cytoplasmic grains were not recorded in these experiments, since cytidine-H3 at concen mar kedly; after 18 hours of incubation there was a! most complete cessation of the histone synthesis. Effect of actinomycin D on the synthesis of DNA and RNA.—Actinomycin D was dissolved in @ 1143 actinomycin D at the concentration used here. In the experiments in which cells were treated with cytidine-H3 after 1, 92,and 4 hours of incuba tion with actinomycin D (5 X l08 M) some reduc tion in the grains per cell was observed. Although both chromatin and nucleolar RNA were affected, there was a greater effect on nucleolar RNA (Table fraction was low but significant; 92. There was no detectable effect of 5-methyl tryptophan on the synthesis of histone, since even after 18 hours or 924hours the rate of incorporation of lysine-H3 into histone remained unaffected; 3. CelL!@ Later they were dehydrated, dried, and autoradio grams were prepared. The film was exposed for 92 weeks. Table 92shows the results from cells incubated in actinomycin D for 1, 92,and 4 hours and thymi dine-H3 for hour. There was no significant de crease in grains per cell in the cultures treated with the drug. Thus, for 4 hours the rate of DNA drated in alcohol, dried, and autoradiograms were prepared. The results of these experiments are shown in Table 1. The data show that: 1. The Mammalian TABLE water (l0@ M with pH adjusted to 7) and then added to the medium to give a final concentration of 5 X 108 M. The HeLa cells were incubated in a medium containing actinomycin D for 1, 92,and 4 hours and then transferred to a conditioned medium containing thymidine-H3 (0.5 @@c/ml) or cytidine-H3 (1 j@c/mi) for hour. They were then fixed in ethanol :acetic acid (3 : 1) for 1 hour. The cover glasses with cells attached, which were treated with cytidine-H3, were subjected to hy drolysis in 1 N HC1 at 60°C. for 7 minutes to re move RNA on the lower half of the cover glass. Cells on the other half retained the labeled RNA. 2 EFFECTS OF AcTIN0MYCIN INCORPORATION D (5X108 M) ON OF THYMIDINE-H3 IN HELA CELLS 0.5 @sc/mlfor SO minutes; number of grains per unit area (20 sq. p) is an average of 50 cells having more than 5 grains. Hours of incubationControl S.D.1 ± ± S.D.Experimental 55.46±4.1 2 29.21±3.5 33.16±4.3 434.11±5.6 38.23±5.651.45±3.2 TABLE S EFFECT OF ACTIN0MYcIN D (5X108 M) ON INCORPORATION OF CYTIDINE-H3 (A) Total grains of cytidine-H3 (1 pc/mI for SO minutes); (B) Grains after hydrolysis in 1 N HC1 for 7 minutes at 60°C.; figures represent each time interval. grains before RNANucleolus extractionMean IN HELA CELtS mean from about grains after RNA extractionLabel 50 cells at in HoussABA—BMean ± 2 4 ± S. D.Chromatin D.1 ± S. D.Nucleolus ± S. D.Chromatin ± S. D.Nucleolus ± S. D.Chromatin S. Control Experimental 1.15±0.15 16.06±2.8 0.90±0.17 5.84±1.0 0.25±0.22 10.22±2.9 Control 4.78±0.6 22.56±5.6 Experimental 0.95±0.4 16.29±2.7 0.83±0.15 0.80±0.15 8.25±1.6 5.16±1.4 3.95±0.25 0.13±0.19 14.31±5.2 11.13±5.0 Control 4.36±0.7 22.53±3.1 0.72±0.11 7.08±1.6 3.64±0.22 15.45±4.5 Experimental4.83±0.6 0.82±0.0918.91±3.2 16.68±2.50.89±0.12 0.78±0.096.52±1.2 11.27±2.5 5.41±1.153.94±0.22 0.04±0.01212.59±4.4 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. Cancer Research 1144 @ tration 1 @zc/mlfor hour did not show much in corporation into the cytoplasm. Vol.923, September 1963 and 48 per cent with RNase, compared with the controls incubated under similar conditions but without the enzymes in the medium. Later there was a gradual drop in the percentage of cells able to incorporate thymidine-H3 except those growing in DNase I. Between the period of 192hours and Effects of nucleases on DNA synthesis.—The ef fects of the nucleases (DNase I, DNase II, and RNase) on the incorporation of thymidine-H3 were studied with HeLa cells. The cultures were incubated in Puck's medium containing one of these enzymes at a concentration of 1 mg/mi. After various intervals the enzymes were removed 792 hours a reduction of about 924 per cent was ob served with DNase II, whereas within the same period a reduction of 60 per cent was found with RNase. During this period no significant varia by rinsing thecultures inTrisbuffer, and a pre (1) -J -j U U 0 U -J U. 0 U CD z U U U aI CHART 9.—Frequency 2 3 4 of thymidine-H@-labeled 5 6 7 8 9 10 II HOURS OF INCUBATION HeLa 200 labeled cells having more than 5 grains were counted cells after incubation in enzymes for each time interval TABLE for various lengths of time. About of each enzyme. 4 EFFECT OF NUcLEASES ON INCORPORATION OF THYMIDINE-H' IN HELA CELLS Grains per unit area (20 sq. ii); average of SO cells having more than five grains. @ .H0@@@.5?f incubationDNase D.0 II I ± D.DNase ± ± S. D.RNase S. 1).Control ± @. 35.57±3.4 S 55.08±5.2 41.26±4.9 58.45±5.6 56.52±5.8 6 37.85±5.5 39.12±5.8 34.48±3.6 41.18±5.6 12 53.51±5.4 52.27±5.3 58.95±4.7 57.02±5.2 24 4836.88±4.559.65±4.857.62±3.952.88±3.138.76±4.734.16±4.132.98±4.440.23±5.9 @ conditioned medium containing thymidine-H3 (1 ac/mi) was added for hour. They were fixed in the Duboscq-Brassil mixture for 92 hours, and autoradiograms were made as described previous ly. The exposure to the film was for 10 days. After the film was processed, the cells were stained with azure B bromide at pH 4. The initial effect of the nucleases was to induce cells to incorporate thymidine-H3 into nuclei (Chart 9). By 3 hours the number of cells capable of incorporating thymidine increased by 17 per cent with DNase I, 929per cent with DNase II, tion was noticed with DNase I. The average amount of thymidine incorporated per labeled cell was equivalent to the controls at all times during the 48 hours of incubation with the enzymes (Table 4). Similar amounts of other proteins, such as bovine hemoglobin, ovalbumin, and horse heart myoglobin, failed to produce any significant dif ference in the ability of cells to incorporate thymidine. DISCUSSION It is evident from the above studies that all the protein inhibitors which were tried on hamster Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. SHAH—DNA Synthesis in Cultured Mammalian and HeLa cells, and which inhibit protein syn thesis, also affect to various degrees the synthesis of DNA. The inhibitors differ widely in their mode of action—for example, puromycin (37) and chlor amphenicol (925) act to block the formation of polypeptides at ribosomes; p-fluorophenylalanine CelLi 1145 One might suspect that the inhibition synthesis would exert a control of protein through the ab sence of some enzymes necessary in the following three steps of DNA synthesis : (a) the regulation of the supply of precursors, (b) polymerization of the nucleoside triphosphates, or (c) the activation of (92)isincorporated to formfalseproteins, whereasthe DNA template. the methyl tryptophan analogs (33) prevent the Kornberg and his associates (18) found that, incorporation of tryptophan into proteins by immediately after an infection of E. coli with T2 competition with it for enzyme activation. Thus phage, three new enzymes are formed and can be it is interesting that, though the inhibitors differ detected within 4 minutes after infection. They in their actions and operate at different levels of the protein synthetic pathway, they all affect DNA synthesis. These observations suggest that it is a polypeptide or a finished protein rather than individual amino acids which is necessary for the DNA synthesis in this system. If it were otherwise the antibiotics, puromycin and chior amphenicol, which are known to prevent polypep tide formation, would not be effective. The in volvement of amino acids as shown for E. coli by Kellenberger et al. (16) is not, of course, ruled out. The inhibition of protein synthesis reveals its effects on DNA synthesis in two ways in auto radiographs of hamster cells. There is a progres sive reduction in the number of cells which in corporate thymidine-H3 (Chart 7) and also a gradual decrease in the amount of thymidine-H3 incorporated per cell per unit time (Chart 6, Fig. 1). In an asynchronously dividing system, like the hamster cells in tissue culture, at any one time ap proximately 48 per cent of the cells are synthesiz ing DNA (Chart 1). The reduction in the number of cells synthesizing DNA indicates that the pro tein inhibition prevents cells from entering the S-phase—i.e., prevents the initiation of DNA syn thesis. Apparently cells already in the S-phase continue to incorporate thymidine-113, and this accounts for the cells which continue to synthesize DNA. The reduction in rate of thymidine incor poration per cell suggests that protein synthesis is necessary for the continuation of the duplication of the chromosome complement even in cells which have entered the S-phase. These experiments do not reveal whether those cells which enter syn thesis before or during the early period of treat ment continue to complete replication of the chromosome complement. However, if synthesis is completed, the reduced rate of thymidine incor poration indicates that the S-period would be ex tended. Mueller et al. (923) have obtained data on HeLa cells with puromycin inhibition following synchronization by aminopterin, which indicates that continued protein synthesis is necessary for the acceleration of synthesis which occurs upon release of the aminopterin block. also found an increase of about twe!vefo!d in the DNA polymerase. The nature of the bases incor porated in phage DNA during its synthesis is governed by a specific kinase system (34), since each of the four nucleotides has its own kinase which regulates the rate of production of triphos phates for the polymerization system (15). A con trol mechanism might then operate by inhibiting some of these enzymes along the path. However, the measurements of DNA polymerase and deoxy nucleotide kinases in bacteria have shown their presence in adequate amounts in cells in which protein or DNA synthesis has been blocked for considerable length of time (4). Powell (928) found in mouse L-fibroblasts that, despite the marked depression in intracellular DNA synthesis ob served 5—8hours after the treatment with puromy cm, virtually no inhibition of the phosphorylation of thymidine to thymidine triphosphate or the activity of DNA polymerase could be detected at the same time. These observations seem to suggest that the control mechanism is not likely to operate at the first two steps—namely, the regulation of precursors or the inhibition of the nucleotide polymerizing enzymes. In view of these results, Billen (4) suggested that DNA replication requires protein synthesis to make primer DNA available to the Kornberg enzyme system. Because the histones in higher forms are closely conjugated with DNA and are synthesized simul taneously with it during the interphase, many have speculated that the histones act as gene modifiers or as inhibitors of gene functions. Since there exists some genetic control of the sequence of the replication of chromosomes in mammalian cells (36), one might suspect that at least in higher forms the histones may play an important role in the control of DNA synthesis in these cells. The cytochemical studies (Table 1) suggest that there is no detectable effect of 5-methyl tryptophan on histone synthesis. The observations on DNA syn thesis after the treatment with 5-methyl trypto phan show that the DNA synthesis is affected after 18 hours (1@ generation cycle) in hamster (Chart 6) and 9292hours (about one generation Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. Cancer Research 1146 cycle) in HeLa cells. These results suggest that the histones are not the proteins necessary for the synthesis of DNA, since there is considerable histone synthesis when a marked reduction (60—70 per cent) in DNA synthesis occurs. The experiments with actinomycin D on HeLa cells (Tables 92,3) show that, although there is a progressive decrease in the rate of RNA synthesis, DNA synthesis remains essentially unaffected for 4 hours. Reich et al. (31) have also reported in L-9929mouse fibroblasts that the actinomycin D which selectively inhibits the synthesis of cellular RNA has no effect on DNA synthesis. These re sults show that there is no necessary coupling of RNA and DNA synthesis. However, a possible role of RNA as inhibitor or modulator of the DNA synthetic process is not excluded. The initial increase and subsequent decrease in the number of cells able to incorporate thymidine with nucleases, particularly RNase (since DNase I has little effect and DNase II is known to contain some RNase), can be explained in at least two ways. The first possibility is that the RNase may reduce the rate of DNA replication without pre venting cells from entering the S-phase and thereby result in the accumulation of thymidine H3—incorporating cells. However, this seems un likely, since the rate of increase in number of cells in synthesis during the first 3 hours exceeds the rate at which cells normally enter the S-phase. A second possibility is a modification of the hy pothesis of Kurland and Maa1Øe (19), based on regulatory mechanisms proposed by Monod and Jacob (9292)(see also [16]), in which they proposed that transfer RNA might act as a repressor only when it is not coupled with activated amino acid. The amino acids thus act as inducers which corn bine with RNA to inactivate its repressor func tion. Alfert et at. (1) have shown that, in the living onion root tips exposed to RNase, the enzyme forms a complex with RNA but does not remove it and that this complex formation results in masking of RNA-phosphate groups and suppres sion of basophilia. It could be assumed that RNase in this system could also combine with RNA and inactivate its repressor function. The later depression in the number of cells incorporat FIG. 1.—Effect of puromycin on incorporation of lysine -H' (25 pc/mI) and thymidine-H3 (1 pc/mi) in HeLa cells treated forlhour.ExposuretothefilmforS weeks.Preparedwithhigh grain density for photographic purposes. Approximately 2,SOOX. Vol.923, September 1963 ing thymidine-H' is probably due to its subse quent effect on protein synthesis (6). In conclusion it can be said that the observa tions in these studies are consistent with the fol lowing hypothesis for the control mechanism of the DNA synthesis in the intact cell: RNA (type un specified) is involved in the control mechanism of DNA synthesis in the form of repressor at the template level, and the repressor activity is regu lated by amino acids (E. coli) or perhaps by some proteins by combining with the RNA to inactivate its repressor function. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is deeply grateful to Professor J. H. Taylor for his advice and guidance throughout the course of this investi gation. My sincere appreciation to Professor A. W. Pollister for his valuable suggestions and encouragement. To Dr. W. L. Hughes, Brookhaven National Laboratory, I am thankful for help in the preparation of the manuscript. REFERENCES 1. ALFERT, M.; DAs, N. K.; and EASTWOOD,J. M. Effects of RNase on Living Cells and on Cells Fixed by Different Methods. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 10:681, No. 51, 1962. 2. BARER, R. S.; JOHNSON, J. E.; and Fox, S. W. Incorpora tion of p-Fluorophenylalanine into Laciobacillus arabino ‘us.Fed. Proc. 13: 178, No. 590, 1954. S. BzNnlcn, A., and R0SENXRANZ, H. S. Some Thoughts on the Double Stranded Model of DNA. In: J. N. DAVIDSON and W. E. COHN(eds.), Progress in Nucleic Acid Research, 1:219—30. New York: Academic Press, 1963. 4. Bn@n, D. Alteration in DNA Synthesizing Capacity in Bacteria. An in Vivo-in Vitro study. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 55:960—68, 1962. 5. Bwcx, D. P., and GODMAN,G. C. A Microphotometric Study of the Synthesis of DNA and Nuclear Histone. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol., 1: 17-24, 1955. 6. BRACHur, J. Biochemical Academic Press, Cytology, p. 267. New York: 1957. 7. BURTON,K. The Relation between the Synthesis of DNA and the Synthesis of Protein in the Multiplication of Bac teriophage T,. Biochem. J.1 61:473—83, 1955. 8. COHEN, S. S., and B@uuiEa, H. D. Studies on Unbalanced Growth in E. coli. Proc. Natl. Aced. Sci., 40:885—93, 1954. 9. DAVISON,P. F. ; CONWAY,B. E. ; and BUTLER,J. A. V. The Nucleoprotein Complex of the Cell Nucleus and Its Reactions. 1954. Frog. Biophysics & Biophys. 10. Dr., D. N. Autoradiographic Metabolism 24, 1961. Chem., 4:148—94, Studies of Nucleoprotein during the Division Cycle. The Nucleus, 4:1— 11. DUBOSCQ-BRASSIL. In: J. GATENBY and J. BEAMS (eds.), B = Incorporation of lysine-H' after treatment of pure mycin, 100 pg/mI, for 8 hours. C = Control, incorporation of thymidine-H'. D = Incorporation of thymidine-H' after treatment puromycin,100 pg/mi for8 hours. A = Control, incorporation of lysine-H'. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. of @ 1,. ..,.@ ii a @.1 I p. • p @ .‘@ ‘S.., :.;.@. k @[email protected] @J. ..‘‘.. 1@ J@t; -1 ..f,ø .“ f; S.-.' @ .‘@ S Is4@@• A I a a. ‘a. .@ .1 ‘1 0 4é: C Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. SHAH—DNA Microtomist's Vademecum (Boiler Lees), Synthesis in Cultured 1959. 13. HAROLD,F., and ZIPORIN,Z. The Relationship between the Synthesis of DNA and Protein in E. coli Treated with Sulphur Mustard. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 28:492—505, 1958. 14. Hsu, T. C.; DEWEY, W. C.; and HUMPHREY,R. M. Radio sensitivity of Cells of Chinese Hamster in Vitro in Relation to the Cell Cycle. Exp. Cell. Res., 27:441—52, 1962. 15. Knm, H. M., and SMEILLE,R. M. S. Studies of the Biosyn thesis of DNA in Extracts from Mammalian Cells. II. The Formation of Deoxynucleotide Triphosphates. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 35:405—12, 1959. 16. KELLENBERGER, E.; LAiuc, K. G.; and BOLLE, A. Amino Acid Dependent ControlofDNA Synthesis in Bacteria and Vegetative Phage. Proc. NatI.Acad. Sci.,48: 1860—68,1962. 17. KORNBERG,A. Biological Synthesis of DNA. Science, 131: 1505—8,1960. 18. KoaxBuito, A.; ZIMMERMAN, S. B.; KORNBERG,S. R.; and Jossz, J. Enzymatic Synthesis of DNA. VI. Influence of Bacteriophage T, on the Synthetic Pathway in Host Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 45:772—85, 1959. 19. KURLAND, C., and MAALØE,0. Regulation of Ribosomal and Transfer RNA Synthesis. J. Mol. Biol., 4:193-210, 1962. 20. Luuc, K. G. Cellular Control of DNA Synthesis. TAYLOR (ed.), Academic Molecular Genetics, In: J. H. 1: 155—206. New 1147 Cells 25. NATHANS, D., and LIPMANN, F. Amino Acid Transfer p. 325. London: J. A. Churchill Ltd., 1950. 12. FRIEDKIN, M. In: F. STOHLMAN (ed.), The Kinetics of Cellular Proliferation, p. 97. New York: Grune & Stratton, Enzymatic Mammalian York: Press, 1963. 21. LEHMAN,S. H.; BmSMAN,M. J.; Saws, E. S.; and KoRN Amino-Acyl RNA to Protein on Ribosomes from of E. coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 47:497—504, 1961. 26. PAINTER, R. B., and DREW, R. M. Studies on DNA Metab olism in Human Cancer Cell Cultures (HeLa). J. Lab. Invest., 8:278—85, 1959. 27. POWELL, W. F. The Effects hibitors of Protein Synthesis of U. V. Irradiation on the Initiation and In of DNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells in Culture. I. The Overall Process of DNA Synthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acts, 55: 969—78,1962. 28. . The Effects of U. V. Irradiation and Inhibitors of Protein Synthesis on the Initiation of DNA Synthesis in MammalianCells inCulture. II. Effects on the Phosphoryl ation of Thymidine. Ibid., pp. 979—86. 29. Pucu, T. T. Genetics of Somatic Mammalian Cells. III. Long Term Cultivation of Euploid Cells from Human and Animal Subjects. J. Exp. Med., 108:945—55,1958. 30. R@tscH, E., and WOODARD,J. W. Basic Proteins of Plant Nuclei during Normal and Pathological Cell Growth. J. Biophys. Biochem. CytoL, 6:265—76,1959. 31. REICH, E. R.; FRANKLIN, R. M.; SHATKIN, A. J.; and TATUM, E. L. Effect of Actinomycin-D on Cellular Nucleic Acid Synthesis and Virus Production. Science, 134:556—57, 1961. 32. REICHARD, P.; CANELLAKIS, Z. N.; and CANELLAXIS, E. S. Studies on a Possible Regulatory Mechanism for the Biosynthesis of DNA. J. BioL Chem., 236:2514—19, 1961. 53. SHARON, N., and LIPMANN, F. Reactivity of Analogues with Pancreatic Tryptophan Activating Enzyme. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 69:219—27, 1957. 34. SOMERVILLE,R., and GREENBERG, G. A New Kinase in Phage Infected E. coli and Its Possible Relation to DNA of an Enzyme from E. coli. J. BioL Chem., 233:163—70, Synthesis. Fed. Proc., 18:327, No. 1296, 1959. 1958. 35. STENT, G., and BRENNER, S. A Genetic Locus for the Regu 22. MONOD, J.,and JACOB,F. GeneticRegulatoryMechanisms lation of RNA Synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sd., 47:2005in the Synthesis of Proteins. J. Mol. BioL, 3:318—24, 1961. 14, 1961. 23. MuEu.En, G. C.; KAJIWARA, K.; STUBBLEFIELD, E.; and BERG, A. Preparation of Substrates and Partial Purification of 36. TAYLOR,J. H. Asynchronous Duplication of Chromosomes Animal Cells. I. Effect of Puromycin on the Duplication of in Cultured Cellsof Chinese Hamster. .7.Biophys.Bio RUCKERT, H. Molecular Events in the Reproduction DNA. Cancer Res., 22:1084—90, 1962. 24. NA.x@A, D. Involvement of Newly Formed Protein in the Synthesisof DNA. Biochim. Biophys.Acta, 44:241-44, 1960. chem. Cytol., 7:455—64,1960. 37. YARMOLINSKY, M. B.,and DE LA HABA, G. Inhibition by Puromycin of Amino Acid Incorporationinto Protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 45:1721-29, 1959. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research. Autoradiographic Studies of the Effects of Antibiotics, Amino Acid Analogs, and Nucleases on the Synthesis of DNA in Cultured Mammalian Cells Vinod C. Shah Cancer Res 1963;23:1137-1147. Updated version E-mail alerts Reprints and Subscriptions Permissions Access the most recent version of this article at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/23/8_Part_1/1137 Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal. To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 15, 2017. © 1963 American Association for Cancer Research.