* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Commodity Systems Assessment Methodology (CSAM)
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Multi-level marketing wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Bayesian inference in marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing research wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
Target market wikipedia , lookup
Segmenting-targeting-positioning wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
Street marketing wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Commodity Systems Assessment Methodology (CSAM) CSAM A method for identifying common causes and sources of postharvest losses. CSAM A systematic method for identifying and measuring factors affecting postharvest losses and identifying bottlenecks leading to quality problems for a specific commodity in a specific location. CSAM was developed by LaGra (1991) The assessment method A team of 3 or 4 people work together to observe and gather information from local growers, handlers and marketers of the commodity. The team should be composed of technical specialists and extension workers. Where does CSAM information comes from? Written reports Government documents Extension publications Farm and field visits Interviews Observations Measurements CSAM Components The 26 components are grouped into 4 categories Pre-production Production Post-Harvest Marketing Participants Pre-production Sample questions: #2- Governmental policies. Are there any laws, regulations, incentives or disincentives related to producing or marketing the crop? (e.g., existing price supports or controls, banned pesticides or residue limits) Pre-production Sample questions: #4- Facilitating services. What services are available to producers and marketers (for example: credit, inputs, technical advice, subsidies)? Pre-production Sample questions: #5- Producer/shipper organizations. Are there any producer or marketer organizations involved with the crop? What benefits or services do they provide to participants? At what cost? Production Sample questions: #8- Farmers' general cultural practices. Do any farming practices in use have an effect on produce quality (irrigation, weed control, fertilization practices, field sanitation)? Production Sample questions: #10- Pre-harvest treatments. What kinds of pre-harvest treatments might affect postharvest quality (such as use of pesticides, pruning practices, thinning)? Post-Harvest Sample questions: #12- Harvest. When and how is produce harvested? by whom? at what time of day? Why? What sort of containers are used? Is the produce harvested at the proper maturity for the intended market? Post-Harvest Sample questions: #15- Packaging. How is produced packed for transport and storage? What kind of packages are used? Are packages appropriate for the product? Can they be reused or recycled? Post-Harvest Sample questions: #17- Storage. Where and for how long is produce stored? In what type of storage facility? Under what conditions (packaging, temperature, RH, physical setting, hygiene, inspections, etc.)? Marketing Sample questions: #22- Market intermediaries. Who are the handlers of the crop between producers and consumers? How long do they have control of produce and how do they handle it? Who is responsible for losses /who suffers financially? Is produce handled on consignment; marketed via direct sales; move through wholesalers? Marketing Sample questions: #25- Exports. Is this commodity produced for export? What are the specific requirements for export (regulations of importing country with respect to grades, packaging, pest control, etc.)? Findings Potential technical problems Potential solutions to problems Analysis of Findings The team works together to identify the key causes and sources of postharvest losses Problems are prioritized in terms of importance (by the volume of losses or value of losses) Factors that represent the larger issues affecting losses are identified (i.e. cultural, political or infrastructural) Expected outcomes of CSAM CSAM can assist a post-harvest technology training assessment team to determine: 1) the sources of post-harvest losses and bottlenecks (when, where and who within the marketing chain is responsible), 2) the causes of those losses and bottlenecks (what handling or marketing practices are responsible) and 3) the economic value of the losses compared to the costs of current and proposed post-harvest practices. Once this kind of information has been collected, we can target the responsible handlers with appropriate training and information on cost effective, improved postharvest technical practices. Expected outcomes of CSAM In the occasional situation where there is no existing appropriate technical solution for the handling or marketing problem uncovered using CSAM, the problem can be passed on to horticultural researchers in the universities or regional agricultural research centers. The more information provided regarding the commodity system, the better chance the researchers will have to identify solutions that are appropriate to the specific socio-economic and cultural setting where the post-harvest losses occur. Using the Results of CSAM We can describe the entire commodity system from farm to market in order to identify: Level of postharvest losses Sources of quality problems Issues affecting market value Potential solutions to problems Using the Results of CSAM Identification of: new research needs (when we have no ready answers) immediate needs suitable for practical postharvest extension training efforts and any advocacy issues that may arise (ex. when losses are related to regulatory or infrastructural issues).