Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Two-hybrid screening wikipedia , lookup
Endogenous retrovirus wikipedia , lookup
Evolution of metal ions in biological systems wikipedia , lookup
Biochemical cascade wikipedia , lookup
Paracrine signalling wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
dr SnapShot: Time Scales in Cell Biology af Maya Shamir,1 Yinon Bar-On,1 Rob Phillips,2 and Ron Milo1 Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel; 2 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA t 1 Please send comments to [email protected] Characteristic rates and durations in cell biology Model bacterium (E. coli) vs. Mammalian cell line (HeLa) diffusion limited on-rate 10 7-10 9 M-1 s-1 ligand induced conformational change 1 ms passage across membrane channel μs endocytosis 1 min diffusion over 10 μm 1-10 s transporter ms molecular motor 1 μm/s DNA replication 103 nt/s diffusion over 1 μm 10-100 ms DNA replication 10 3 nt/min cell movement - 1 μm/min cell movement - 10 μm/s transcription cell cycle 1 hr 10-100 nt/s 10-100 nt/s 1 min/gene [1 kbp] 10 min/gene [10 kbp] translation 10 aa/s 1 min/protein [300 aa] flagellar rotation 100 Hz cell cycle 1 day 10 aa/s 1 min/protein [300 aa] protein folding ms-s half-life metabolite mRNA protein 1s 10 min 1 hr 1 min 10 hr 1 day Orders of magnitude in time scales neurotransmitter [please send diffusion across synapse suggestion] 10-6 (µs) fastest enzyme turnover time ATP synthase rotation protein folding 10-3 (ms) allosteric average enzyme conformational turnover time change in proteins 10 0 gene splicing budding yeast generation time 10 3 (s) 10 6 (≈20 min) endocytosis minimal bacterial generation time taste bud cell lifetime (≈2 weeks) circadian clock red blood cell lifetime Characteristic time scales extracted from the literature for exponentially growing E. coli and HeLa cells at 37 °C. Numbers should only serve as “rule of thumb” values. For example, the half-lives of metabolites (turnover time of the metabolite pool) span over 3 orders of magnitude. Some processes are shown only in one of the cell types yet are relevant to both. 1 Cell no. , Text text text SnapShot: Time Scales in Cell Biology Maya Shamir,1 Yinon Bar-On,1 Rob Phillips,2 and Ron Milo1 Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel; 2 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA 1 Please send comments to [email protected] How to get a protein across a neuron on time? In order for a protein to get from the tip of the axon to the cell soma in a 1 cm long neuron, two main mechanisms are possible. Getting there by diffusion (D≈10 μm2 /s) would take over a week (scaling like R 2 /D). Alternatively, a molecular motor with a speed of 1 μm/s will transport the protein in just over an hour. In neurons over a meter long, say in a human or a giraffe, even molecular motors are predicted to take many days, and mechanisms such as local axonal translation may assist cells with overcoming this challenge. How long does it take to get a functional GFP molecule? Consider an inducible GFP system in E. coli - from the moment an inducer is added to the medium, it activates a cellular response by diffusing into the cell or binding to a receptor within a second. Transcription and translation take on the order of a minute, with protein folding occurring concurrently. However, a maturation process which involves cyclization and oxidation of the chromophore is essential for producing fluorescence, and takes tens of minutes in the originally developed fluorophores. Evolved versions of GFP reduce the maturation time to a few minutes, so the whole process from induction of expression to a fluorescent signal is achieved within minutes. Can metabolism wait for gene expression? Metabolic networks and gene regulatory networks are the epicenter of biological regulation. Interestingly, the time scales at which these networks exert their control are quite distinct. The characteristic pool size (concentration) of a metabolite in central metabolism is on the order of 1 mM, while the flux of reactions in the cellular metabolic highway of glycolysis is usually on the order of 1 mM/s in bacteria and 0.1-0.01 mM/s in mammalian cell lines as inferred from glucose uptake rates. Thus, the turnover time is on the order of a second for bacteria and a minute in mammalian cell lines, as befitting their relative growth rates. This means that if the production and consumption reactions are not in balance, the metabolite pool will be consumed (or compounded) before the central dogma can do anything about it. Regulating metabolic enzymes by means of gene expression is not feasible as the average time scale for such regulation takes minutes. This calls for a faster regulation mechanism, such as allosteric regulation and post-translational modifications, which can respond on the same time scale as turnover times in metabolism. A speed limit on crawling cells? Motility of many cells is powered by actin polymerization at the leading edge of the lamellipodium. The speed limit for a growing actin network is the growth rate of a single filament oriented perpendicular to the leading edge of the lamellipodium. The on-rate for the the addition of an actin monomer to the growing tip is 10 7-10 8 M-1 s-1. The reported cellular concentration of actin monomers ranges between 1-100 µM, and in such cases we choose to use the geometrical mean (10 µM). Each polymerized actin monomer adds 3 nm to the filament, and we thus get a velocity on the order of 1 μm/s (3x107 M-1s-1x 10 µM x 3 nm) which is observed for example for Listeria and similar cells. The observed crawling speed of keratocytes (in charge of wound healing) and fibroblasts are one and two orders of magnitude slower, respectively. The counteracting membrane tension and the fact that a lamellipodium is not a single actin filament, but an ensemble of filaments, are some of the mechanisms that can further reduce the speed of cells. dr af t Are mammalian cells a slow-motion version of bacterial cells? Mammalian cells and bacteria work under similar physical and chemical constraints. For example, the diffusion coefficients and the rates of the RNA polymerase and ribosomes are quite similar. Yet, with a larger cell size and gene length, the functional time scales in a mammalian cell are extended. For example, diffusion of a protein across a cell will take ~10 s in a 10 μm mammalian cell and ~0.1 s in a 1 μm bacterial cell. Similarly, even though transcription rates are comparable, an average bacterial gene is 1 kbp long, and thus will take about a minute to transcribe, while an average mammalian gene is 10 kbp long, and thus its transcription will take about 10 minutes. The same reasoning also holds true for additional cellular processes, such as the turnover times of metabolites. We find that what is true for a bacteria on a one second time scale is true for the mammalian cell (and probably also for an elephant) on a one minute time scale. We can thus half jokingly think of a mammalian cell as a slow motion version of a bacterium. How fast can Olympic athletes respond to the starter’s pistol in a 100-meter dash? Upon hearing the pistol shot, athletes must process and propagate an electric impulse from the brain all the way to their feet to activate the muscles (≈1 meter). Considering the speed of the action potential (10-100 m/s), this implies a latency of 10-100 ms regardless of other time-consuming processes, such as the speed of sound and signal processing in the brain. Indeed, the best athletes respond after ≈120 ms, and a reaction time below 100 ms is immediately disqualified as a false start, according to the Olympic rules from the International Association of Athletics Federations. What is the lifetime of different cells in our body? How do different cell types compare with the lab cell lines that divide once a day? The intestine epithelium turns over in less than a week, our skin epidermis in a week to a month, and tastebuds in about two weeks, enabling us to regain the joys of taste even after a tongue burn. Red blood cells are famous for having a characteristic lifetime of 4 months, a fact that allows us to donate 0.5 L from our 5 L of blood every 3 months without depleting our red blood cell pool. A striking difference exists between sperm cells and oocytes, with a lifetime of ≈50 days and ≈50 years, respectively. Our fat cells and skeleton replace themselves in about 10 years, while most of the neurons in the central nervous system, and our eye lens cells do not replace at all. In principle, could the body replace all of its tissues on a one day time-scale? Replacement requires, for example, polymerization of the proteins which is one of the most energy intensive processes in the cell. 4 ATP equivalents are required per amino acid (MW≈110 Da), with a glucose molecule (MW=180 Da) giving ≈30 ATPs. The adult body has about 10 kg protein which to be polymerized will require consuming more than 2 kg glucose (4 ATP/30 ATP x 180 Da/110 Da x 10 kg) - much higher than the daily body energy budget, thus demonstrating why the human body cannot compete with the proliferation of lab cell lines. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Uri Moran, Nigel Orme, Ulrich Schwarz, Alex Sigal, Avigdor Eldar, Sasha Bershadsky, Eran Bouchbinder, Ori Avinoam, Arren Bar-Even, Rotem Sorek, Danny Ben-Zvi, Eitan Bibi, Dan Tawfik, Ayelet Erez,... and the Weizmann students of “Cell Biology by the Numbers” course 2015-16 for help in preparing this SnapShot. REFERENCES Alon, U. (2006). An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits (New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC). Milo, R., and Phillips, R. (2016). Cell Biology by the Numbers (New York: Garland Science). Milo, R., Jorgensen, P., Moran, U., Weber, G., and Springer, M. (2010). BioNumbers – the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D750–D753. Neidhardt, F.C., Ingraham, J.L., and Schaechter, M. (1990). Physiology of the Bacterial Cell: A Molecular Approach (Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates). Phillips, R., Kondev, J., and Theriot, J. (2008). Physical Biology of the Cell (London: Garland Science). Weinstein, L. (2012). Guesstimation 2.0: Solving Today’s Problems on the Back of a Napkin (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). 1 Cell no. , Text text text