* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Cases of Crisis: Using International Case Studies to Teach Public
Global financial system wikipedia , lookup
Ease of doing business index wikipedia , lookup
United States and the United Nations wikipedia , lookup
World government wikipedia , lookup
Economic diplomacy wikipedia , lookup
International monetary systems wikipedia , lookup
Developmental state wikipedia , lookup
Development economics wikipedia , lookup
Cases of Crisis: Using International Case Studies to Teach Public Administration Marco Castillo, Ph.D New York City College of Technology - CUNY Introduction Despite internationalization of curriculum, PA students continue to have a national focus Understandable, as most will seek employment within national, state, or local boundaries But is there a value for traditional PA students in exploring international PA cases and topics? Exploring international topics helps us understand PA in greater depth Introduction In this paper, I explore how international case studies can be used to help students learn about PA and its essential tenets, elements, presuppositions By studying how nations cope with cases of crisis, instructors and students can find opportunities to learn more about PA Utilizing international cases allow us to see PA in new light, allowing for a fuller understanding of the field Allows us to reconsider the key facts, values, & premises, allowing for deeper understanding and more effective practice Origins Perhaps starts with a basic curiosity, desire for knowledge, about PA in other national contexts ATP notes that much of the literature on bureaucracy published in English refers to a limited number of countries Bureaucracy characterizes and internalizes the tensions and paradoxes inherent in the liberal democratic project. But there is a need for knowledge about how bureaucracy operates not just in the US, but in international contexts Origins So what about the international context? The less developed world? How is bureaucracy interpreted and understood by other world populations? What does a comparative approach reveal about PA as an art and science? These served as the initial impetus for this research project But this investigation and research project has also been a learning experience than can be translated into assignments and projects in the classroom The Case of Ecuador Coincided with a personal experience My own experience visiting Ecuador in 1999 and then in 2014. For all the controversies and political turbulence, a profound change in Ecuadorean society Piqued my own interest in just what happened and the role of public administration in accommodating and making such change. Metrics and Indicators Ecuador has undergone significant change since the turn of the 21st century, transforming from a politically and economically troubled nation A stronger economy, improved infrastructure, and a greater array of social programs and investments to fight poverty and protect the health and welfare. Ecuador’s GDP has grown substantially, growing from $18.3 billion in 2000 to over $90 billion in 2014 (World Bank, 2015a). Ecuador's poverty rate dropped from about 50% at the turn of the century to 25% in 2014 (World Bank, 2014). Its Gini coefficient, a measure of nation’s distribution of income, dropped from 56.4 in 2000 to 48.6, an indicator that economic growth is benefiting the poorest in Ecuadorean society (World Bank, 2014, 2015b). Metrics and Indicators Ecuador’s advancements go beyond these measures of economic progress Starting with the Bono de Desarrollo Humano in 2000, a direct cash benefit program for the poor, Ecuador has expanded its public welfare expenditures, access to public hospitals and clinics, reduced the price of medications, increased access to public education, and provided subsidies for housing (Ray & Kozameh, 2012). Metrics and Indicators As a result of these investments, Ecuador has considerably improved its HDI (Human Development Index) score, a composite measure of national well-being developed by the United Nations that takes into account factors such as life expectancy, education, and income. Ecuador now has an HDI score of 0.711, ranking 98th out 187 countries and territories and moving from the category of medium human development in 2006 to that of high human development in 2014 (United Nations Development Programme, 2014). Metrics and Indicators How did Ecuador get here, making such significant improvements in a relatively short time period? These improvements in the economic and social well-being of Ecuador were born of governmental response to an economic crisis that emerged in Ecuador at the end of the 20th century. Despite the difficulties of the economic crisis, it allowed Ecuador to radically reconfigure several key aspects of its politics and policy, allowing the country to make changes that brought real improvements to the living conditions of broad swaths of the Ecuadorean populace. The Ecuadorean Financial Crisis It was Ecuador’s national response to the financial crisis that emerged in the late 20th century that arguably created the conditions allowing for the policy and programmatic changes resulting in the aforementioned improvements. Most specifically, it was Ecuador’s policy of dollarization, adopted at the end of the 20th century, that helped provide the economic stability necessary for Ecuador’s subsequent economic growth in the 21st century, economic growth that provided the Ecuadorean government the fiscal capacity to make the programmatic changes resulting in improvements in the living conditions of the citizenry. The Ecuadorean Financial Crisis Dollarization, the policy of shedding a nation’s currency and adopting the United States dollar as the official medium of exchange, is considered a radical economic policy, taken only in extreme economic circumstances when all other efforts have failed to stem the rapid devaluation of a nation’s currency (Jameson, 2003). It is important to understand the broader context in which this decision was made and the economic events and conditions leading to this decision. The Context We should note that Ecuador’s economic vulnerabilities preceded the financial crisis of the late 1990s; indeed, they were built into the very structure of the nation’s economic functioning. - Exports and fluctuations - Exogenous factors (El Nino) - Oil exports and fluctuating prices - Liberal banking regulations The Context In efforts to alleviate economic pressures, Ecuador engaged in a policy of periodically resetting exchange rates… Misuse / abuse of this policy resulted in a precipitous downward spiral, a massive devaluation of the sucre, bringing Ecuador to the brink of hyperinflation In opposition to the policy preferences of Ecuador’s central bank, the Mahuad administration took the radical step of dollarizing the economy By the end of 2000, the sucre was abolished as a medium of exchange in the Ecuadorean economy. The Effects By forcing a conservative monetary policy, dollarization immediately halted Ecuador’s most pressing economic problem -- hyperinflation. Numerous other benefits But not without its costs Through dollarization, a nation effectively cedes control over its monetary policy to the United States Federal Reserve, making the country “in effect a monetary dependency, a client of the United States” (Cohen, 2002). Public Administrative Issues Opportunities for a comparative analysis Allows us to reflect generally on the administrative state, the capacity of government to take effective action Looking at an international case of financial crisis allows us to reflect How have we dealt with financial crisis? Have we taken similar actions? What does this case reveal about our own patterns of governance, our own administrative state? Lessons through Comparative Reflection The US experience with financial crisis Allows students to study in greater depth and focus What issues do reconsideration raise? What does this reveal about the American administrative state? Reflections on Administrative Effectiveness Prompts reflections on past American crises, especially early 20th century regulation of the economy, the Great Depression, and ensuing financial regulation The American administrative state was built in large part in response to economic crisis Early 20th century antitrust laws were passed to regulate economic imbalances The Great Depression prompted the federal government to increase action to regulate the national economy to protect the wellbeing of citizens Examples of Buildup of the Administrative State FLSA and the regulation of the employer-employee relationship Regulation of banks through the Banking Act of 1933 FDIC PWA National Recovery Administration Ecuadorean Economic Crisis Taking aggressive policy action Empowerment of some sectors of the Ecuadorean government; disempowerment of others But the policy ideas are not based on a new or clean intellectual slate, which is something to think about Ecuador and other nations must take action in accordance with an orthodox set of ideas developed by developed world nations Coercion or Consensus? The power of ideas While most agree of the benefits of dollarization, voices increasingly counter this course of action Dollarization disempowered the Ecuadorean Central Bank Illustrates the power of the US Fed Implications of responses to crisis for national administrative state Coercion or Consensus? Perspectives can differ and literature from foreign sources can reveal tensions In his book, President Correa reveals opposition Economic crises reveals different perspectives on “policy science” International cases such as this case reveal the limits of policy science Relativism? Dollarization puts Ecuador in the position of “boxing with one arm” Coercion or Consensus? In reality, since the crisis of 1999, Ecuador has been amongst the countries with the best fiscal results in Latin America…[this is] not necessarily good, as there is a great difference between being thin due to practicing sports and…[being thin] due to having one’s mouth sewn shut” (Correa, 2009). Coercion or Consensus Correa notes that the Ecuadorean state is restricted The interests of debt holders is prioritized, resulting in improvements in economic metrics while limiting the ability and autonomy of the state to act for the benefit of the citizenry Severe limits on protectionism Limits economic development “Competitive advantage” leaves less developed nations in present economic state Coercion or Consensus Limits and normative nature of policy science Correa questions this notion; claims that the acceptance of orthodoxy and science limits public debate about what is really a contestable field (present US debate) Ecuador becomes victim to the “arrogance of the international bureaucracy and of many academics” who seek to “present economics as a positivist science, with a supposedly general theory, that is equally valid for Argentina or Indonesia.” Coercion or Consensus International literature reveals other points Correa’s arguments are at times less generic, more specific Points toward the American Administrative State “America’s foreign policy… is now being run by the IMF, with some coaching from the Treasury Department” World Bank, IMF and other international institutions are not seen just as global forces, but as extensions of the American bureaucracy Public Administrative Lessons Less developed world context intensifies lessons Administrative states will have to contend with globalized contexts This case study of the Ecuadorean financial crisis illustrates the critical importance of a sound administrative state Forces of globalization will not wait and states will need systems to cope with economic turbulence and other crises This case illustrates the importance of effective public administration for sovereignty and national autonomy Administrative Theory So how do we cope? How do developing world nations cope? Century of public administrative thought is only partially relevant Luton notes that despite the availability of diverse theoretical streams of thought in the public administration, only some are relevant in foreign contexts due to the gap between the concerns of public administration theorists and the real political and economic conditions facing other nations (Luton, 2004) . Some theories relevant. Others, less so. This reveals the robustness of some administrative theory, what is art and what is science. Comparative Study International case studies remind us of the importance of comparative study for a fuller understanding of PA as a science Woodrow Wilson noted, “It is the more necessary to insist upon thus putting away all prejudices against looking anywhere in the world but at home for suggestions in this study, because nowhere else in the whole field of politics, it would seem, can we make use of the historical, comparative method more safely than in this province of administration. Perhaps the more novel the forms we study the better” (Wilson, 1887). Comparative Study Nevertheless, a relative dearth of comparative scholarship In his article reviewing the state of comparative public administration scholarship, Jamil Jreisat notes that that there are continuing issues facing comparative scholarship in public administration Includes issues such as resolving issues of the purpose of comparative studies, the methods used to engage in these studies, and the need to develop frameworks to reconcile systematic comparisons of different administrative systems (Jreisat, 2005, p. 237). Comparative Study Reveals the relevance of long standing themes Centralization vs. Decentralization The deep relevance of managing local governance with global forces forces us to consider our own governmental dynamics Federalism seen in a new light; can inform other world contexts Comparative Study Also, the relevance of administrative techniques Normative nature of managerialism NPM and neoliberalism Still, some administrative techniques that can help nations work Citizen participation practices can help developing nations work, manage the tensions between the local and the global and more effectively implement public policies The relevance of other theories? Comparative Study Perspectives on bureaucracy itself Americans may implicitly assume that our challenge with bureaucracy is universal US PA has always been highly concerned with legitimacy crisis But we have been less concerned with the connection between bureaucracy and sovereignty International case studies in crisis push us to consider an issue rarely discussed Comparative Study The case of Ecuador prompts us to consider this question Dollarization, a radical policy, was driven by exogenous shocks Beckerman and Solimano present the political side of this administrative problem, Due to coastal/inland tensions (the “Sierra” and the “Costa”) have “tended to limit central political and administrative power.” “Administrative institutions have been kept weak, both in mandates and capabilities.”; inability of Ecuador’s government to distribute resources in a way that furthered the collective national interest. Comparative Study Efforts to decentralize government also failed, as there was an equal fear that excessively empowered regional governments could break the country apart. These macro level public administrative failures were accompanied by other more specific public administrative problems, such as a poor tax administration system, an inability to keep the public sector payroll under control, an inability to manage the efficiency and quality of public services, and the existence of outmoded systems of budgetary planning and execution. Comparative Study Perhaps in some contexts, less developed nations should be less concerned about administrative legitimacy? Properly empowering the administrative state becomes a more pressing issue American concerns about bureaucracy may be uniquely American and a poor fit for nations where an empowered administrative state is more essential Developing world nations will need to develop the proper administrative tools and capacity to manage their economies and financial systems within a global economic system in a fashion that allows them to survive, and perhaps even thrive, without undermining the sovereignty of their nation Comparative Study International cases can bring to the fore the challenges of modern PA Remind us of the importance of building a national bureaucracy; checking populist rhetoric Cases of crisis in developing world nations may illustrate for us more powerfully the importance of an effective administrative state And perhaps help us start a conversation as to whether these challenges are really also America’s governmental challenges in the 21st century.